- Latest available (Revised)
- Original (As made)
This is the original version (as it was originally made). This item of legislation is currently only available in its original format.
1.—(1) This Order may be cited as the Scotland Act 2012 (Transitional and Consequential Provisions) Order 2013 and comes into force on 22nd April 2013.
(2) In this Order—
“the 1995 Act” means the Criminal Procedure (Scotland) Act 1995(1);
“the 1998 Act” means the Scotland Act 1998(2);
“the 2012 Act” means the Scotland Act 2012;
“compatibility issue” has the meaning given by section 288ZA(2) of the 1995 Act(3);
“convertible devolution issue” has the meaning given by article 2;
“devolution issue” has the meaning given by paragraph 1 of Schedule 6 to the 1998 Act(4) as if the amendments made by section 36(4) of the 2012 Act were not in force;
“relevant date” means 22nd April 2013.
2.—(1) A convertible devolution issue is a question arising in criminal proceedings before the relevant date which—
(a)is a devolution issue;
(b)would have been a compatibility issue had it arisen on or after that date; and
(c)has not been finally determined before the relevant date.
(2) But a devolution issue arising in criminal proceedings before the relevant date is not a convertible devolution issue if—
(a)the issue has been referred, or a determination of the issue has been appealed, to the Supreme Court under Schedule 6 to the 1998 Act; and
(b)the hearing of the reference or appeal commences before the relevant date.
3.—(1) Subject to paragraphs (2) to (4), a convertible devolution issue becomes a compatibility issue for all purposes on the relevant date.
(2) Where a hearing to determine a convertible devolution issue (whether at first instance or on a reference from a lower court) commences before the relevant date but the court has not determined the issue by that date, the issue becomes a compatibility issue immediately after the court determines it.
(3) Where the hearing of an appeal against a determination of a convertible devolution issue commences before the relevant date but the court has not determined the appeal by that date, the issue becomes a compatibility issue immediately after the court disposes of the appeal.
(4) Where a convertible devolution issue arises in a trial commencing before the relevant date but the trial verdict has not been returned by that date, the issue becomes a compatibility issue immediately after the verdict is returned.
(5) In this article, a trial is taken to commence—
(a)in solemn proceedings, when the oath is administered to the jury;
(b)in summary proceedings, when the first witness is sworn.
(6) Except as otherwise provided for in this Order, a devolution issue arising in criminal proceedings before the relevant date remains a devolution issue notwithstanding the commencement of sections 34 to 36 of the 2012 Act.
4.—(1) Article 5 has effect in relation to a convertible devolution issue from the time at which it becomes a compatibility issue under article 3.
(2) Articles 6, 7 and 8 have effect in relation to a convertible devolution issue from the relevant date.
5. A determination of a convertible devolution issue is to be treated as a determination of a compatibility issue.
6.—(1) A reference of a convertible devolution issue under paragraph 9 of Schedule 6 to the 1998 Act is to be treated as a reference of a compatibility issue under section 288ZB(1) of the 1995 Act(5).
(2) A reference of a convertible devolution issue under paragraph 11 of that Schedule is to be treated as a reference of a compatibility issue under section 288ZB(4) of the 1995 Act.
(3) A reference of a convertible devolution issue under paragraph 33 of that Schedule is to be treated as a reference of a compatibility issue under section 288ZB(5) of the 1995 Act.
(4) Where a reference to which paragraph (3) applies is from a court other than a court consisting of two or more judges of the High Court of Justiciary, section 288ZB(7) of the 1995 Act is to be read as requiring the Supreme Court to remit the proceedings to the court which made the reference.
7.—(1) An application to a court of two or more judges of the High Court of Justiciary or to the Supreme Court for permission to appeal under paragraph 13(a) of Schedule 6 to the 1998 Act against a determination of a convertible devolution issue is to be treated as an application to that court for permission to appeal against a determination of a compatibility issue under section 288AA(5) of the 1995 Act(6).
(2) An appeal under paragraph 13(a) of that Schedule against a determination of a convertible devolution issue is to be treated as an appeal under section 288AA(1) of the 1995 Act if, before the relevant date, the High Court of Justiciary or the Supreme Court has granted permission to appeal.
(3) In such a case the permission to appeal is to be treated as granted under section 288AA(5) of the 1995 Act.
(4) A refusal by the High Court of Justiciary or the Supreme Court, before the relevant date, of permission to appeal under paragraph 13(a) of that Schedule is to be treated as made by that Court under section 288AA(5) of the 1995 Act.
8. Where, before the relevant date, the Advocate General was a party to criminal proceedings so far as they related to a convertible devolution issue by virtue of paragraph 6 of Schedule 6 to the 1998 Act, the Advocate General is to be treated as being a party to criminal proceedings in pursuance of section 288ZA(1) of the 1995 Act so far as they relate to a compatibility issue.
9.—(1) This article applies where—
(a)a convertible devolution issue has, before the relevant date, been determined by a court of two or more judges of the High Court of Justiciary (whether in the ordinary course of proceedings or on a reference under paragraph 9 of Schedule 6 to the 1998 Act); and
(b)no application has by that date been made to that Court for permission to appeal under paragraph 13(a) of that Schedule.
(2) In relation to such a case, section 288AA(7) of the 1995 Act has effect as if the reference to the date of determination against which the appeal lies were a reference to 22nd April 2013.
10.—(1) This article applies where—
(a)a convertible devolution issue has, before the relevant date, been determined by a court of two or more judges of the High Court of Justiciary (whether in the ordinary course of proceedings or on a reference under paragraph 9 of Schedule 6 to the 1998 Act);
(b)an application to the High Court of Justiciary for permission to appeal under paragraph 13(a) of Schedule 6 to the 1998 Act has, before the relevant date, been refused; and
(c)no application has by that date been made to the Supreme Court for permission to appeal under paragraph 13(a) of that Schedule.
(2) In relation to such a case, section 288AA(8) .of the 1995 Act has effect as if the reference to the date on which the High Court refused permission under that paragraph were a reference to 22nd April 2013.
11.—(1) This article applies where—
(a)a devolution issue other than a convertible devolution issue has, before the relevant date, been determined by a court of two or more judges of the High Court of Justiciary (whether in the ordinary course of proceedings or on a reference under paragraph 9 of Schedule 6 to the Scotland Act 1998); and
(b)no application has by that date been made to that Court for permission to appeal under paragraph 13(a) of that Schedule.
(2) In relation to such a case, paragraph 13A of that Schedule has effect as if the reference to the date of determination against which the appeal lies were a reference to 22nd April 2013.
12.—(1) This article applies where—
(a)a devolution issue other than a convertible devolution issue has, before the relevant date, been determined by a court of two or more judges of the High Court of Justiciary (whether in the ordinary course of proceedings or on a reference under paragraph 9 of Schedule 6 to the Scotland Act 1998);
(b)an application to the High Court of Justiciary for permission to appeal under paragraph 13(a) of Schedule 6 to the 1998 Act has, before the relevant date, been refused; and
(c)no application has by that date been made to the Supreme Court for permission to appeal under paragraph 13(a) of that Schedule.
(2) In relation to such a case, paragraph 13B of that Schedule has effect as if the reference to the date on which the High Court refused permission under that paragraph were a reference to 22nd April 2013.
13. A person admitted to bail under section 112(6) of the 1995 Act(7) pending the determination of an appeal under paragraph 13(a) of Schedule 6 of the 1998 Act against a determination of a convertible devolution issue is, from the time at which the issue becomes a compatibility issue under article 3, to be treated as having been admitted to bail pending determination of an appeal under section 288AA of the 1995 Act.
14. For the purposes of section 121(5)(a) of the 1995 Act(8), an appeal under paragraph 13(a) of Schedule 6 to the 1998 Act against a determination of a convertible devolution issue is, from the time at which the issue becomes a compatibility issue under article 3, to be treated as an appeal under section 288AA of the 1995 Act.
15.—(1) The Criminal Legal Aid (Scotland) (Fees) Regulations 1989(9) are amended as follows.
(2) In—
(a)Schedule 1, Part 2, paragraph 6(a);
(b)Schedule 2, Part 1, Chapter 1, paragraphs 1A(b) and 4(e);
(c)Schedule 2, Part 1, Chapter 2, paragraphs 1A(b) and 4(e);
(d)Schedule 2, Part 2, Chapter 1, paragraph 7(a);
(e)Schedule 2, Part 2, Chapter 2, paragraph 7(a);
(f)Schedule 2, Part 3, Chapter 1, paragraphs 1A(b) and 3(e);
(g)Schedule 2, Part 3, Chapter 2, paragraphs 1A(b) and 3(e); and
(h)Schedule 2, notes on operation, paragraph 3(eb),
after “devolution” insert “or compatibility”.
16. For regulation 4(1)(k) of the Criminal Legal Aid (Scotland) Regulations 1996(10) substitute—
“(k)proceedings in the Supreme Court on appeal from the High Court of Justiciary under—
(i)paragraph 13 of Schedule 6 to the Scotland Act 1998; or
(ii)section 288AA of the 1995 Act,
including any application for permission to appeal.”.
17.—(1) In regulation 2(1) of the Criminal Legal Aid (Fixed Payments) (Scotland) Regulations 1999(11), in sub-paragraph (1) of the definition of “excluded proceedings”—
(a)in sub-paragraph (l), for “.” substitute “;”;
(b)after sub-paragraph (l), insert—
“(m)any reference on a compatibility issue under section 288ZB(1) or (2) of the 1995 Act;”.
Michael Moore
Secretary of State
Scotland Office
Dover House,
London
8th January 2013
Latest Available (revised):The latest available updated version of the legislation incorporating changes made by subsequent legislation and applied by our editorial team. Changes we have not yet applied to the text, can be found in the ‘Changes to Legislation’ area.
Original (As Enacted or Made): The original version of the legislation as it stood when it was enacted or made. No changes have been applied to the text.
Explanatory Memorandum sets out a brief statement of the purpose of a Statutory Instrument and provides information about its policy objective and policy implications. They aim to make the Statutory Instrument accessible to readers who are not legally qualified and accompany any Statutory Instrument or Draft Statutory Instrument laid before Parliament from June 2004 onwards.
Access essential accompanying documents and information for this legislation item from this tab. Dependent on the legislation item being viewed this may include:
Use this menu to access essential accompanying documents and information for this legislation item. Dependent on the legislation item being viewed this may include:
Click 'View More' or select 'More Resources' tab for additional information including: