Commission Directive 2010/39/EUShow full title

Commission Directive 2010/39/EU

of 22 June 2010

amending Annex I to Council Directive 91/414/EEC as regards the specific provisions relating to the active substances clofentezine, diflubenzuron, lenacil, oxadiazon, picloram and pyriproxyfen

(Text with EEA relevance)

THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION,

Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union,

Having regard to Council Directive 91/414/EEC of 15 July 1991 concerning the placing of plant protection products on the market(1), and in particular Article 6(1) thereof,

Whereas:

(1) The active substances clofentezine, diflubenzuron, lenacil, oxadiazon, picloram and pyriproxyfen were included in Annex I to Directive 91/414/EEC by Commission Directive 2008/69/EC(2) in accordance with the procedure provided for in Article 11b of Commission Regulation (EC) No 1490/2002(3).

(2) In accordance with Article 12a of Regulation (EC) No 1490/2002 EFSA presented to the Commission the conclusions on the peer review for clofentezine(4) on 4 June 2009, for diflubenzuron(5) on 16 July 2009, for lenacil(6) on 25 September 2009, for oxadiazon(7) and picloram(8) on 26 November 2009 and for pyriproxyfen(9) on 21 July 2009. These conclusions were reviewed by the Member States and the Commission within the Standing Committee on the Food Chain and Animal Health and finalised on 11 May 2010 in the format of the Commission review reports for clofentezine, diflubenzuron, lenacil, oxadiazon, picloram and pyriproxyfen.

(3) Taking into account the EFSA conclusions, it is confirmed that plant protection products containing clofentezine, diflubenzuron, lenacil, oxadiazon, picloram or pyriproxyfen may be expected to satisfy, in general, the requirements laid down in Article 5(1)(a) and (b) of Directive 91/414/EEC, in particular with regard to the uses which were examined and detailed in the Commission review report.

(4) For certain substances it is necessary to include specific provisions requiring Member States, when authorising those substances, to pay particular attention to certain points or to ensure that appropriate risk mitigation measures are taken.

(5) Without prejudice to the conclusions referred to in recital 3, it is appropriate to obtain further information on certain specific points. Article 6(1) of Directive 91/414/EEC provides that inclusion of a substance in Annex I to that Directive may be subject to conditions. It is appropriate as regards clofentezine, to require that the notifier carry out a monitoring programme to assess the potential of that substance for long-range atmospheric transport and related environmental risks. Moreover, the notifier shall also submit confirmatory studies in respect of toxicological and environmental risks of clofentezine metabolites.

(6) It is appropriate as regards diflubenzuron, to require that the notifier submit confirmatory data in respect of the potential toxicological relevance of the impurity and metabolite 4-chloroaniline (PCA).

(7) It is appropriate as regards lenacil, to require that the notifier submit further information on certain soil metabolites which occurred in lysimeter studies and confirmatory data on rotational crops, including possible phytotoxic effects. If a decision on the classification of lenacil under Council Directive 67/548/EEC(10) identifies the need for further information on the relevance of certain metabolites, the Member States concerned should request the submission of such information.

(8) It is appropriate as regards oxadiazon, to require that the notifier submit further information on the potential toxicological relevance of an impurity in the proposed technical specification and on the occurrence of a metabolite in primary crops and rotational crops. In addition, the notifier should be required to submit a metabolism study on ruminants and information on further trials on rotational crops and information on the risk to earthworm-eating birds and mammals and on the long-term risk to fish.

(9) It is appropriate as regards picloram, to require that the notifier submit confirmatory information in respect of the monitoring analytical method applied in residue trials and a soil photolysis study to confirm the evaluation of picloram degradation.

(10) It is appropriate as regards pyriproxifen, to require that the notifier submit information confirming the risk assessment in respect of two points, namely the risk posed to aquatic insects by pyriproxfen and the metabolite DPH-pyr and the risk posed by pyriproxfen to pollinators.

(11) Directive 91/414/EEC should therefore be amended accordingly.

(12) The measures provided for in this Directive are in accordance with the opinion of the Standing Committee on the Food Chain and Animal Health,

HAS ADOPTED THIS DIRECTIVE:

(1)

OJ L 230, 19.8.1991, p. 1.

(2)

OJ L 172, 2.7.2008, p. 9.

(3)

OJ L 224, 21.8.2002, p. 23.

(4)

EFSA Scientific Report (2009) 269, Conclusion on pesticide peer review regarding the risk assessment of the active substance clofentezine (finalised: 4 June 2009).

(5)

EFSA Scientific Report (2009) 332, Conclusion on pesticide peer review regarding the risk assessment of the active substance diflubenzuron (finalised: 16 July 2009).

(6)

European Food Safety Authority; Conclusion on the peer review of the pesticide risk assessment of the active substance lenacil on request from the European Commission. EFSA Journal 2009; 7(9):1326. [83 pp.]. doi:10.2903/j.efsa.2009.1326. Available online: www.efsa.europa.eu (finalised: 25 September 2009).

(7)

European Food Safety Authority; Conclusion on the peer review of the pesticide risk assessment of the active substance oxadiazon on request of EFSA. EFSA Journal 2009; 7(12): [92 pp.]. doi:10.2903/j.efsa.2009.1389. Available online: www.efsa.europa.eu (finalised: 25 November 2009).

(8)

European Food Safety Authority; Conclusion on the peer review of the pesticide risk assessment of the active substance picloram. EFSA Journal 2009; 7(12):1390. [78 pp.]. doi:10.2903/j.efsa.2009.1390. Available online: www.efsa.europa.eu (finalised: 25 November 2009).

(9)

EFSA Scientific Report (2009) 336, Conclusion on pesticide peer review regarding the risk assessment of the active substance pyriproxyfen (finalised: 21 July 2009).

(10)

OJ 196, 16.8.1967, p. 1.