Search Legislation

Regulation (EC) No 648/2004 of the European Parliament and of the CouncilShow full title

Regulation (EC) No 648/2004 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 31 March 2004 on detergents (Text with EEA relevance)

 Help about what version

What Version

 Help about advanced features

Advanced Features

Close

This is a legislation item that originated from the EU

After exit day there will be three versions of this legislation to consult for different purposes. The legislation.gov.uk version is the version that applies in the UK. The EU Version currently on EUR-lex is the version that currently applies in the EU i.e you may need this if you operate a business in the EU.

The web archive version is the official version of this legislation item as it stood on exit day before being published to legislation.gov.uk and any subsequent UK changes and effects applied. The web archive also captured associated case law and other language formats from EUR-Lex.

Changes to legislation:

There are outstanding changes not yet made to Regulation (EC) No 648/2004 of the European Parliament and of the Council. Any changes that have already been made to the legislation appear in the content and are referenced with annotations. Help about Changes to Legislation

Close

Changes to Legislation

Revised legislation carried on this site may not be fully up to date. Changes and effects are recorded by our editorial team in lists which can be found in the ‘Changes to Legislation’ area. Where those effects have yet to be applied to the text of the legislation by the editorial team they are also listed alongside the legislation in the affected provisions. Use the ‘more’ link to open the changes and effects relevant to the provision you are viewing.

View outstanding changes

Changes and effects yet to be applied to :

Changes and effects yet to be applied to the whole legislation item and associated provisions

ANNEX IU.K.Standards of accreditation, good laboratory practice and animal protection concerning the laboratories that are competent and authorised to provide the necessary service for checking compliance of detergents with the requirements of this Regulation and its Annexes

1.Standards applicable at the level of the laboratories:U.K.

EN ISO/IEC 17025, General requirements for the competence of testing and calibration laboratories;

Directive 2004/10/EC;

Council Directive 86/609/EEC.

2.Standards applicable at the level of the accreditation bodies and good laboratory practice monitoring authorities:U.K.

EN 45003, Calibration and testing laboratory accreditation system, general requirements for operation and recognition;

Directive 2004/9/EC.

ANNEX IIU.K.PRIMARY BIODEGRADABILITY TEST METHODS FOR SURFACTANTS IN DETERGENTS

Primary biodegradability is measured by the determination in biodegraded liquors of the remaining level of parent surfactants. This Annex begins with a list of the test-methods common to all classes of surfactants, and then lists under headings A to D the analytical test procedures specific to each class of surfactant.

The pass criterion for primary biodegradability shall be a level of at least 80 %, as measured according to the test methods below.

The reference method for the laboratory testing of surfactants in this Regulation is based on the Confirmatory test procedure in the OECD method, described in Annex VIII.1. Changes to the Confirmatory test procedure are permissible provided that they comply with EN ISO 11733.

Test methodsU.K.

(1)The OECD method published in the OECD's technical report of 11 June 1976 on the ‘Proposed Method for the Determination of the Biodegradability of Surfactants in Synthetic Detergents’.U.K.

(2)The method in use in France, approved by the ‘arrêté du 24 décembre 1987’ published in the Journal officiel de la République française of 30 December 1987, p. 15385, and by the standard NF 73-260 of June 1981, published by the Association française de normalisation (AFNOR).U.K.

(3)The method in use in Germany, established by the ‘Verordnung über die Abbaubarkeit anionischer und nichtionischer grenzflächenaktiver Stoffe in Wasch- und Reinigungsmitteln’ of 30 January 1977, published in the Bundesgesetzblatt of 1977, Part I, p. 244, as set out in the Regulation amending that Regulation of 4 June 1986, published in the Bundesgesetzblatt of 1986, Part I, p. 851.U.K.

(4)The method in use in the United Kingdom called the ‘Porous Pot Test’ and described in Technical Report No 70 (1978) of the Water Research Centre.U.K.

(5)The ‘Confirmatory test procedure’ in the OECD method, described in Annex VIII.1 (including possible changes in operating conditions as proposed in EN ISO 11733). This is also the reference method used for the settlement of litigation.U.K.

A.ANALYTICAL METHODS FOR ANIONIC SURFACTANTSU.K.

The determination of anionic surfactants in the tests shall be done by the Methylene Blue Active Substance (MBAS) analysis according to the criteria established in Annex VIII.2. For those anionic surfactants not reacting to the abovementioned MBAS method, or if it seems more appropriate for reasons of efficiency or precision, appropriate specific instrumental analyses such as high performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) or gas chromatography (GC) are to be applied. Samples of the pure surfactant of interest shall be provided by the manufacturer to the competent authorities of the Member States upon request.

B.ANALYTICAL METHODS FOR NON-IONIC SURFACTANTSU.K.

The determination of non-ionic surfactants in the tests shall be done by the Bismuth Active Substance (BiAS) method, according to the analytical procedure established in Annex VIII.3.

For those non-ionic surfactants not reacting to the abovementioned BiAS method, or if it seems more appropriate for reasons of efficiency or precision, appropriate specific instrumental analyses such as HPLC or GC are to be applied. Samples of the pure surfactant of interest shall be provided by the manufacturer to the competent authorities of the Member States upon request.

C.ANALYTICAL METHODS FOR CATIONIC SURFACTANTSU.K.

The determination of cationic surfactants in the tests shall be done by the Disulfine Blue Active Substance (DBAS) analysis according to the following DBAS procedures:

  • The method in use in the Federal Republic of Germany, (1989) DIN 38 409 — Ausgabe: 1989-07.

For those cationic surfactants not reacting to the abovementioned test method, or if it seems more appropriate for reasons of efficiency or precision (this must be justified), appropriate specific instrumental analyses such as HPLC or GC are to be applied. Samples of the pure surfactant of interest shall be provided by the manufacturer to the competent national authorities of the Member States upon request.

D.ANALYTICAL METHODS FOR AMPHOTERIC SURFACTANTSU.K.

The determination of amphoteric surfactants in the tests shall be done by analysis following the procedures listed below:

1.

If cationics absent:

  • The method in use in the Federal Republic of Germany, (1989) DIN 38 409-Teil 20.

2.

Otherwise:

  • Orange II method (Boiteux, 1984).

  • For those amphoteric surfactants not reacting to the abovementioned tests, or if it seems more appropriate for reasons of efficiency or precision (this must be justified), appropriate specific instrumental analyses such as HPLC or GC are to be applied. Samples of the pure surfactant of interest shall be provided by the manufacturer to the competent authorities of the Member States upon request.

[F1ANNEX III U.K. ULTIMATE BIODEGRADABILITY (MINERALISATION) TEST METHODS FOR SURFACTANTS IN DETERGENTS

A. The reference method for laboratory testing of surfactant ultimate biodegradability in this Regulation is based on the EN ISO standard 14593: 1999 (CO 2 headspace test). U.K.

Surfactants in detergents shall be considered as biodegradable if the level of biodegradability (mineralisation) measured according to one of the following tests (1) is at least 60 % within 28 days:

1.

EN ISO Standard 14593: 1999 — Water quality — Evaluation of ultimate aerobic biodegradability of organic compounds in aqueous medium — Method by analysis of inorganic carbon in sealed vessels (CO 2 headspace test). Pre-adaptation is not to be used. The 10-day window principle is not applied (reference method).

2.

Directive 67/548/EEC method, Annex V.C.4-C (carbon dioxide (CO 2 ) Eeolution modified Sturm test): pre-adaptation is not to be used. The 10-day window principle is not applied.

3.

Directive 67/548/EEC method, Annex V.C.4-E (closed Bottle): pre-adaptation is not to be used. The 10-day window principle is not applied.

4.

Directive 67/548/EEC method, Annex V.C.4-D (manometric respirometry): pre-adaptation is not to be used. The 10-day window principle is not applied.

5.

Directive 67/548/EEC method, Annex V.C.4-F (MITI: Ministry of International Trade and Industry, Japan): pre-adaptation is not to be used. The 10-day window principle is not applied.

6.

ISO 10708:1997 — Water quality — Evaluation in an aqueous medium of the ultimate aerobic biodegradability of organic compounds — Determination of biochemical oxygen demand in a two-phase closed bottle test. Pre-adaptation is not to be used. The 10-day window principle is not applied.

B. Depending on the physical characteristics of the surfactant, one of the methods listed below may be used if appropriately justified (2) . It should be noted that the pass criterion of at least 70 % of these methods is to be considered as equivalent to the pass criterion of at least 60 % referred to in methods listed in point A. The adequacy of the choice of the methods listed below shall be decided on a case-by-case confirmation, in accordance with Article 5 of this Regulation. U.K.

1.

Directive 67/548/EEC method, Annex V.C.4-A (dissolved organic carbon DOC die-away): pre-adaptation is not to be used. The 10-day window principle is not applied. The pass criteria for biodegradability measured according to the test shall be at least 70 % within 28 days.

2.

Directive 67/548/EEC method, Annex V.C.4-B (modified OECD screening-DOC die-away): pre-adaptation is not to be used. The 10-day window principle is not applied. The pass criteria for biodegradability measured according to the test shall be at least 70 % within 28 days.

NB : Those of the abovementioned methods that are taken from Council Directive 67/548/EEC can also be found in the publication Classification, Packaging and Labelling of Dangerous Substances in the European Union, Part 2: Testing Methods. European Commission 1997, ISBN 92-828-0076-8.] U.K.

ANNEX IVU.K.COMPLEMENTARY RISK ASSESSMENT FOR SURFACTANTS IN DETERGENTS

For those surfactants for which an environmental risk assessment is available in the context of Directive 93/67/EEC, or Regulation (EEC) No 793/93 and Regulation (EC) No 1488/94, and Technical Guidance Documents, this risk assessment shall be considered together with the complementary risk assessment run in the scope of this Regulation.

The complementary risk assessment run in the scope of this Regulation, in case it is likely that recalcitrant metabolites are produced, shall be considered in the context of assessments made on the basis of Directive 93/67/EEC or Regulation (EEC) No 793/93. This is to be assessed case by case and in particular on the basis of the results of the tests referred to in part 3.

The study shall cover the aquatic environmental compartment. Additional information relating to specific risk assessment concerns might be required by the Committee referred to in Article 12(2) on a case by case basis. Additional information might include other environmental compartments such as sewage sludge and soil. A tiered approach shall be adopted concerning the information required for the technical file referred to in Articles 5 and 9. The file shall contain at least the information described under points 1, 2 and 3 below.

However, to minimise testing, and especially to avoid unnecessary animal testing, the additional studies listed under point 4.2.2 should be requested only where such information is necessary and proportionate. In case of dispute concerning the extent of additional information required, a Decision may be taken in accordance with the procedure laid down in Article 12(2).

As noted in Article 13, the guidelines included in this Annex for the Decisions on derogation may be adapted as appropriate on the basis of the accumulated experience.

1.Identity of the surfactant (in accordance with the provisions laid down by Annex VII.A of Directive 67/548/EEC).U.K.

1.1.NameU.K.

1.1.1.Names in the IUPAC nomenclatureU.K.
1.1.2.Other namesU.K.
1.1.3.CAS number and CAS name (if available)U.K.
1.1.4.Einecs(3) or Elincs(4) numbers (if available)U.K.

1.2.Molecular and structural formulaU.K.

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

1.3.Composition of the surfactantU.K.

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

2.Information on the surfactantU.K.

2.1.Quantities of the surfactant used in detergentsU.K.

2.2.The information on use patterns given in this section shall be sufficient to allow an approximate but realistic estimate of function and environmental exposure to the surfactant as associated with its use in detergents. It shall include the following:U.K.

  • importance of the application (societal value),

  • use conditions (release scenario),

  • use volume,

  • availability and suitability of alternatives (performance and economic considerations),

  • assessment of relevant environmental information.

3.Information on the potential recalcitrant metabolitesU.K.

Toxicity information on test liquors shall be provided. If no data are available on residue identity, the information referred to in point 4.2.1 may be requested, depending on the potential risk, the importance and the quantity of the surfactant used in detergents. In conflicting cases concerning this information, a Decision may be taken in accordance with the procedure laid down in Article 12(2).

4.Additional studiesU.K.

4.1.Biodegradability testsU.K.

4.1.1.Pre-adapted inoculumU.K.

Any of the tests described in Annex III, may be run with pre adapted inoculum in order to provide evidence of the relevance of pre-adaptation for the surfactant.

4.1.2.Inherent Biodegradability TestsU.K.

At least one of the tests referred to below shall be included:

  • method of the Directive 67/548/EEC, Annex V.C.12 (Modified SCAS test),

  • method of the Directive 67/548/EEC, Annex V.C.9 (Zahn-Wellens).

Failure to pass the inherent biodegradability test would indicate potential for persistency which may be considered, in general terms, as sufficient to prohibit the placing on the market of such a surfactant except in cases where the criteria set out in Article 6 indicate that there is no justification for refusing a derogation.

4.1.3.Activated Sludge Simulation Biodegradability TestsU.K.

The following tests referred below shall be included:

  • method of the Directive 67/548/EEC, Annex V.C.10 (including possible changes in operating conditions as proposed in EN ISO 11733).

Failure to pass the activated sludge simulation biodegradability test would indicate potential for the release of the metabolites by sewage treatment, which may be considered, in general terms, as evidence of need for a more complete risk assessment.

4.2.Toxicity testing of biodegradation test liquorsU.K.

Toxicity information on test liquors is to be provided on:

4.2.1.Chemical and physical information, such as:U.K.
  • identity of the metabolite (and analytical means by which it was obtained);

  • key physical chemical properties (water solubility, Octanol: Water partition coefficient (Log Po/w, etc.).

4.2.2.Effects on organisms. Tests to be conducted in compliance with the principles of good laboratory practice.U.K.

Fish: the test recommended is that in Annex V.C.1 of Directive 67/548/EEC

Daphnia: the test recommended is that in Annex V.C.2 of Directive 67/548/EEC

Algae: the test recommended is that in Annex V.C.3 of Directive 67/548/EEC

Bacteria: the test recommended is that in Annex V.C.11 of Directive 67/548/EEC

4.2.3.DegradationU.K.

Biotic: the test recommended is that in Annex V.C.5 of Directive 67/548/EEC

Abiotic: the test recommended is that in Annex V.C.7 of Directive 67/548/EEC. The information to be provided will consider as well the potential of metabolites for bio-concentration and their partitioning to the sediment phase.

Moreover, if some metabolites are suspected for endocrine disrupting activity, it is recommended to determine if these have potential to result in adverse affects as soon as validated testing schemes to assess such adverse effects are available.

N.B.U.K.

All the abovementioned tests can also be consulted in the publication Classification, Packaging and Labelling of Dangerous Substances in the European Union; Part 2: ‘Testing Methods’. European Commission 1997. ISBN 92-828-0076-8.U.K.

[F2ANNEX V U.K. LIST OF SURFACTANTS THAT HAVE OBTAINED A DEROGATION

By way of derogation granted in accordance with Articles 4-6 and in accordance with the procedure laid down in Article 12(2), the following detergent surfactants, which pass the tests stipulated in Annex II, but which fail the tests stipulated in Annex III, may be placed on the market and used subject to the limitations mentioned below.

Name in the IUPAC nomenclature EC Number CAS number Limitations
Alcohols, Guerbet, C16-20, ethoxylated, n-butyl ether (7-8EO) None (polymer) 147993-59-7

May be used for the following industrial applications until 27 June 2019 :

  • bottle washing,

  • cleaning-in-place,

  • metal cleaning,

The EC number means the Einecs, ELINCS or NLP number and is the official number of the substance within the European Union.

Einecs means the European Inventory of Existing Commercial Chemical Substances. This inventory contains the definitive list of all substances deemed to be on the Community market on 18 September 1981 . The Einecs number can be obtained from the European Inventory of Existing Commercial Chemical Substance (5) .

ELINCS means the European List of Notified Chemical Substances. The ELINCS number can be obtained from the European List of Notified Substances, as amended (6) .

NLP means No-Longer Polymer. The term polymer is defined in Article 3(5) of Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (7) of the European Parliament and of the Council. The NLP number can be obtained from the list of No-Longer Polymers, as amended (8) .]

[F2ANNEX VI U.K. LIST OF BANNED OR RESTRICTED DETERGENT SURFACTANTS

The following detergent surfactants have been identified as not complying with the provisions of this Regulation:

Name in the IUPAC nomenclature EC Number CAS number Limitations

The EC number means the Einecs, ELINCS or NLP number and is the official number of the substance within the European Union.]

[F3ANNEX VIa U.K.

LIMITATIONS ON THE CONTENT OF PHOSPHATES AND OF OTHER PHOSPHORUS COMPOUNDS

Detergent Limitations Date as of which the limitation applies

1. Consumer laundry detergents

Shall not be placed on the market if the total content of phosphorus is equal to or greater than 0,5 grams in the recommended quantity of the detergent to be used in the main cycle of the washing process for a standard washing machine load as defined in section B of Annex VII for water of hard water hardness

  • for normally soiled fabrics in the case of heavy-duty detergents,

  • for lightly soiled fabrics in the case of detergents for delicate fabrics,

30 June 2013

2. Consumer automatic dishwasher detergents

Shall not be placed on the market if the total content of phosphorus is equal to or greater than 0,3 grams in the standard dosage as defined in section B of Annex VII 1 January 2017]

[F1ANNEX VII U.K. LABELLING AND INGREDIENT DATA SHEET

A. Labelling of contents U.K.

The following provisions on labelling shall apply to the packaging of detergents sold to the general public.

The following weight percentage ranges:

  • less than 5 %,

  • 5 % or over but less than 15 %,

  • 15 % or over but less than 30 %,

  • 30 % and more,

shall be used to indicate the content of the constituents listed below where they are added in a concentration above 0,2 % by weight:

  • phosphates,

  • phosphonates,

  • anionic surfactants,

  • cationic surfactants,

  • amphoteric surfactants,

  • non-ionic surfactants,

  • oxygen-based bleaching agents,

  • chlorine-based bleaching agents,

  • EDTA and salts thereof,

  • NTA (nitrilotriacetic acid) and salts thereof,

  • phenols and halogenated phenols,

  • paradichlorobenzene,

  • aromatic hydrocarbons,

  • aliphatic hydrocarbons,

  • halogenated hydrocarbons,

  • soap,

  • zeolites,

  • polycarboxylates.

The following classes of constituent, if added, shall be listed irrespective of their concentration:

  • enzymes,

  • disinfectants,

  • optical brighteners,

  • perfumes.

If added, preservation agents shall be listed, irrespective of their concentration, using where possible the common nomenclature established under Article 8 of Council Directive 76/768/EEC of 27 July 1976 on the approximation of laws of the Member States relating to cosmetic products (9) .

If added at concentrations exceeding 0,01 % by weight, the allergenic fragrances that appear on the list of substances in Annex III, Part 1 to Directive 76/768/EEC, as a result of its amendment by Directive 2003/15/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council (10) to include the allergenic perfume ingredients from the list first established by the Scientific Committee on Cosmetics and Non-food Products (SCCNFP) in its opinion SCCNFP/0017/98, shall be listed using the nomenclature of that Directive, as shall any other allergenic fragrances that are subsequently added to Annex III, Part 1 to Directive 76/768/EEC by adaptation of that Annex to technical progress.

[ F4. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .]

The website address, from which the list of ingredients mentioned in section D of Annex VII can be obtained, shall be given on the packaging.

For detergents intended to be used in the industrial and institutional sector, and not made available to members of the general public, the abovementioned requirements do not have to be fulfilled if the equivalent information is provided by means of technical data sheets, safety data sheets, or in a similar appropriate manner.

[F5B. Labelling of dosage information U.K.

As prescribed in Article 11(4), the following provisions on labelling shall apply to the packaging of detergents sold to the general public.

Consumer laundry detergents U.K.

The packaging of detergents sold to the general public intended to be used as laundry detergents shall bear the following information:

  • the recommended quantities and/or dosage instructions expressed in millilitres or grams appropriate to a standard washing machine load, for soft, medium and hard water hardness levels and making provision for one or two cycle washing processes,

  • for heavy-duty detergents, the number of standard washing machine loads of normally soiled fabrics, and, for detergents for delicate fabrics, the number of standard washing machine loads of lightly soiled fabrics, that can be washed with the contents of the package using water of medium hardness, corresponding to 2,5 millimoles CaCO 3 /l,

  • the capacity of any measuring cup, if provided, shall be indicated in millilitres or grams, and markings shall be provided to indicate the dose of detergent appropriate for a standard washing machine load for soft, medium and hard water hardness levels,

The standard washing machine loads are 4,5 kg dry fabric for heavy-duty detergents and 2,5 kg dry fabric for light-duty detergents, in line with the definitions of Commission Decision 1999/476/EC of 10 June 1999 establishing the Ecological Criteria for the award of the Community Eco-label to Laundry Detergents (11) . A detergent shall be considered to be a heavy-duty detergent unless the claims of the manufacturer predominantly promotes fabric care, i.e. low temperature wash, delicate fibres and colours.

Consumer automatic dishwasher detergents U.K.

The packaging of detergents sold to the general public intended to be used as automatic dishwasher detergents shall bear the following information:

  • the standard dosage expressed in grams or ml or number of tablets for the main washing cycle for normally soiled tableware in a fully loaded 12 place settings dishwasher, making provisions, where relevant, for soft, medium, and hard water hardness.]

C. Ingredient data sheet U.K.

The following provisions shall apply to the listing of ingredients on the data sheet referred to in Article 9(3).

The data sheet shall list the name of the detergent and that of the manufacturer.

All ingredients shall be listed; in order of decreasing abundance by weight, and the list shall be sub-divided into the following weight percentage ranges:

  • 10 % or more,

  • 1 % or over, but less than 10 %,

  • 0,1 % or over, but less than 1 %,

  • less than 0,1 %.

Impurities shall not be considered to be ingredients.

Ingredient means any chemical substance, of synthetic or natural origin, intentionally included in the composition of a detergent. For the purpose of this Annex, a perfume, an essential oil, or a colouring agent shall be considered to be a single ingredient and none of the substances that they contain shall be listed, with the exception of those allergenic fragrance substances that appear on the list of substances in Annex III, Part 1 to Directive 76/768/EEC if the total concentration of the allergenic fragrance substance in the detergent exceeds the limit mentioned in section A.

The common chemical name or IUPAC (12) name and, where available, the INCI (13) name, the CAS number, and the European Pharmacopoeia name, shall be given for each ingredient.

D. Publication of the list of ingredients U.K.

Manufacturers shall make available on a website the ingredient data sheet mentioned above except for the following:

  • information on weight percentage ranges is not required

  • CAS numbers are not required

  • the ingredient names shall be given in INCI nomenclature, or where this is not available, the European Pharmacopoeia name, shall be given. If neither name is available, the common chemical name or IUPAC name shall be used instead. For a perfume the word parfum shall be used and for a colouring agent, the word colorant . A perfume, an essential oil, or a colouring agent shall be considered to be a single ingredient and none of the substances that they contain shall be listed, with the exception of those allergenic fragrance substances that appear on the list of substances in Annex III, Part 1 to Directive 76/768/EEC if the total concentration of the allergenic fragrance substance in the detergent exceeds the limit mentioned in section A.

Access to the website shall not be subject to any restriction or condition and the content of the website shall be kept up to date. The website shall include a link to the Commission Pharmacos website or to any other suitable website that provides a table of correspondence between INCI names, European Pharmacopoeia names, and CAS numbers.

This obligation shall not apply to industrial or institutional detergents, or to surfactants for industrial or institutional detergents, for which a technical data sheet or safety data sheet is available.]

ANNEX VIIIU.K.TEST METHODS AND ANALYTICAL METHODS

The following test and analytical methods apply to control procedures for detergents on the market carried out by Member States:

1.Reference method (confirmatory test)U.K.

1.1.DefinitionU.K.

This method describes a laboratory model of the activated sludge + secondary settler which is designed to simulate municipal sewage treatment. The conditions described are those from the Directives that preceded this Regulation. Improved state-of-the-art operating conditions can be applied to this test method as described in EN ISO 11733.

1.2.Equipment needed for measurementU.K.

The method of measurement employs the small-activated sludge plant shown in Figure 1, and in greater detail in Figure 2. The equipment consists of a sewage vessel A for synthetic sewage, dosing pump B, aeration vessel C, settling vessel D, air-lift pump E to recycle the activated sludge, and vessel F for collecting the treated effluent.

Vessels A and F must be of glass or suitable plastic and hold at least twenty-four litres. Pump B must provide a constant flow of synthetic sewage to the aeration vessel; this vessel, during normal operation, contains three litres of mixed liquor. A sintered aeration cube G is suspended in the vessel C at the apex of the cone. The quantity of air blown through the aerator shall be monitored by means of a flow meter H.

1.3.Synthetic sewageU.K.

A synthetic sewage is employed for the test. Dissolve in each litre of tap water:

  • 160 mg peptone;

  • 110 mg meat extract;

  • 30 mg urea, CO(NH2)2;

  • 7 mg sodium chloride, NaCl;

  • 4 mg calcium chloride, CaCl2.2H2O;

  • 2 mg magnesium sulphate, MgSO4.7H2O;

  • 28 mg of di-potassium hydrogen phosphate, K2HPO4;

  • and 10 ± 1 mg of the surfactant.

The synthetic sewage is freshly prepared daily.

1.4.Preparation of samplesU.K.

Uncompounded surfactants are examined in the original state. Active content of surfactant samples must be determined in order to prepare the synthetic sewage (1.3).

1.5.Operation of equipmentU.K.

Initially, fill aeration vessel C and settling vessel D with synthetic sewage. The height of the vessel D should be so fixed that the volume contained in the aeration vessel C is three litres. Inoculation is made by introducing 3 ml of a secondary effluent of good quality, freshly collected from a treatment plant dealing with a predominantly domestic sewage. The effluent must be kept under aerobic conditions in the period between sampling and application. Then set the aerator G, air-lift E and dosing device B in operation. The synthetic sewage must pass through the aeration vessel C at a rate of one litre per hour; this gives a mean retention time of three hours.

The rate of aeration should be so regulated that the contents of vessel C are kept constantly in suspension and the dissolved oxygen content is at least 2 mg/l. Foaming must be prevented by appropriate means. Anti-foaming agents that inhibit the activated sludge or contain surfactants must not be used. The air-lift pump E must be set so that the activated sludge from the settling vessel is continually and regularly recycled to aeration vessel C. Sludge which has accumulated around the top of the aeration vessel C, in the base of the settling vessel D, or in the circulation circuit must be returned to the circulation at least once each day by brushing or some other appropriate means. When the sludge fails to settle, its settleability may be increased by the addition of 2 ml portions of a 5 % solution of ferric chloride, repeated as necessary.

The effluent from the settling vessel D is accumulated in vessel F for twenty-four hours, following which a sample is taken after thorough mixing. Vessel F must then be carefully cleaned.

1.6.Checking measuring equipmentU.K.

The surfactant content (in mg/l) of the synthetic sewage is determined immediately before use.

The surfactant content (in mg/l) of the effluent collected over twenty-four hours in vessel F should be determined analytically by the same method, immediately after collection: otherwise the samples must be preserved, preferably by freezing. The concentrations must be determined to the nearest 0,1 mg/l surfactant

As a check on the efficiency of the process, the chemical oxygen demand (COD) or the dissolved organic carbon (DOC) of the glass fibre filtered effluent accumulated in vessel F and of the filtered synthetic sewage in vessel A is measured at least twice per week.

The reduction in COD or DOC should level off when a roughly regular daily surfactant degradation is obtained at the end of the running-in period shown in Figure 3.

The content of dry matter in the activated sludge contained in the aeration vessel should be determined twice a week in g/l. If it is more than 2,5 g/l, the excess activated sludge must be discarded.

The degradation test is performed at room temperature; this should be steady and kept between 19-24 ° C.

1.7.Calculation of biodegradabilityU.K.

The percentage degradation of surfactant must be calculated every day on the basis of the surfactant content in mg/l of the synthetic sewage and of the corresponding effluent accumulated in vessel F.

The degradability values thus obtained should be presented graphically as in Figure 3.

The degradability of the surfactant should be calculated as the arithmetic mean of the values obtained over the twenty-one days that follow the running-in and acclimatisation period, during which degradation has been regular and the operation of the plant trouble-free. In any event the duration of the running-in period should not exceed six weeks.

The daily degradation values are calculated to the nearest 0,1 % but the final result is given to the nearest whole number.

In some cases it may be permissible to reduce the frequency of sampling but at least fourteen results collected over the twenty-one days which follow the running-in period should be used in calculating the average.

2.Determination of anionic surfactants in biodegradability testsU.K.

2.1.PrincipleU.K.

The method is based on the fact that the cationic dye methylene blue forms blue salts with anionic surfactants (MBAS), which can be extracted with chloroform. To eliminate interference, the extraction is first effected from alkaline solution and the extract is then shaken with acidic methylene blue solution. The absorbency of the separated organic phase is measured photometrically at the wavelength of maximum absorption of 650 nm.

2.2.Reagents and equipmentU.K.

2.2.1.Buffer solution pH 10U.K.

Dissolve 24 g sodium bicarbonate, NaHCO3 AR, and 27 g anhydrous sodium carbonate (Na2CO3) AR in deionised water and dilute to 1 000 ml.

2.2.2.Neutral methylene blue solutionU.K.

Dissolve 0,35 g methylene blue AR in deionised water and dilute to 1 000 ml. Prepare the solution at least twenty-four hours before use. The absorbency of the blank chloroform phase, measured against chloroform must not exceed 0,015 per 1 cm of layer thickness at 650 nm.

2.2.3.Acidic methylene blue solutionU.K.

Dissolve 0,35 g methylene blue AR in 500 ml deionised water and mix with 6,5 ml H2SO4 (d = 1,84 g/ml). Dilute to 1 000 ml with deionised water. Prepare the solution at least twenty-four hours before use. The absorbency of the blank chloroform phase, measured against chloroform must not exceed 0,015 per 1 cm of layer thickness at 650 nm.

2.2.4.Chloroform (trichloromethane) AR freshly distilledU.K.
2.2.5.Dodecyl benzene sulphonic acid methyl esterU.K.
2.2.6.Ethanolic potassium hydroxide solution, KOH 0,1 MU.K.
2.2.7.Ethanol pure, C2H5OHU.K.
2.2.8.sulphuric acid, H2SO4 0,5 MU.K.
2.2.9.Phenolphthalein solutionU.K.

Dissolve 1 g phenolphthalein in 50 ml ethanol and add 50 ml deionised water while stirring continuously. Filter off any precipitate obtained.

2.2.10.Methanolic hydrochloric acid: 250 ml hydrochloric acid AR and 750 ml methanolU.K.
2.2.11.Separating funnel, 250 mlU.K.
2.2.12.Graduated flask, 50 mlU.K.
2.2.13.Graduated flask, 500 mlU.K.
2.2.14.Graduated flask, 1 000 mlU.K.
2.2.15.Round-bottomed flask with ground glass stopper and reflux condenser, 250 ml; boiling granulesU.K.
2.2.16.pH meterU.K.
2.2.17.Photometer for measurements at 650 nm, with 1 to 5 cm cellsU.K.
2.2.18.Qualitative grade filter paperU.K.

2.3.ProcedureU.K.

The samples for analysis must not be taken through a layer of foam.

After thorough cleaning with water, the equipment used for the analysis must be thoroughly rinsed with methanolic hydrochloric acid (2.2.10) and then with deionised water before using.

Filter the activated sludge plant influent and effluent to be examined immediately on sampling. Discard the first 100 ml of the filtrates.

Place a measured volume of the sample, neutralised if necessary, into a 250 ml separating funnel (2.2.11). The volume of sample should contain between 20 and 150 g of MBAS. At the lower MBAS content, up to 100 ml of sample may be used. When using less than 100 ml, dilute to 100 ml with deionised water. Add to the sample 10 ml of buffer solution (2.2.1), 5 ml of neutral methylene blue solution (2.2.2) and 15 ml of chloroform (2.2.4). Shake the mixture uniformly and not too vigorously for one minute. After phase separation, run the chloroform layer into a second separating funnel, containing 110 ml of deionised water and 5 ml of acidic methylene blue solution (2.2.3). Shake the mixture for one minute. Pass the chloroform layer through a cotton-wool filter previously cleaned and wetted with chloroform into a graduated flask (2.2.12).

Extract the alkaline and acid solutions three times, using 10 ml of chloroform for the second and third extractions. Filter the combined chloroform extracts through the same cotton wool filter and dilute to the mark in the 50 ml flask (2.2.12) with chloroform used for rewashing the cotton wool. Measure the absorbency of the chloroform solution with a photometer at 650 nm in 1 to 5 cm cells against chloroform. Run a blank determination through the whole procedure.

2.4.Calibration curveU.K.

Prepare a calibration solution from the standard substance dodecylbenzene sulphonic acid methyl ester (tetrapropylene type mol. wt. 340) after saponification into the potassium salt. The MBAS is calculated as sodium dodecyl benzene sulphonate (mol. wt. 348).

From a weighing pipette, weigh 400 to 450 mg of dodecyl-benzene-sulphonic-acid-methyl-ester (2.2.5) to the nearest 0,1 mg in a round-bottomed flask and add 50 ml of ethanolic potassium hydroxide solution (2.2.6) and some boiling granules. After mounting the reflux condenser, boil for one hour. After cooling, wash the condenser and ground glass joint with about 30 ml of ethanol, and add these washings to the contents of the flask. Titrate the solution with sulphuric acid against phenolphthalein until it becomes colourless. Transfer this solution to a 1 000 ml graduated flask (2.2.14), dilute to the mark with deionised water and mix.

Part of this surfactant stock solution is then further diluted. Withdraw 25 ml, transfer to a 500 ml graduated flask (2.2.13), dilute to the mark with deionised water and mix.

This standard solution contains:

where E is the sample weight in mg.

To establish the calibration curve, withdraw 1, 2, 4, 6, 8 ml portions of the standard solution and dilute each to 100 ml with deionised water. Then proceed as stated under item 2.3 including a blank determination.

2.5.Calculation of resultsU.K.

The amount of anionic surfactant (MBAS) in the sample is read from the calibration curve (2.4). The MBAS content of the sample is given by:

where: V = ml volume of the sample used.

Express the results as sodium dodecylbenzene sulphonate (MW 348).

2.6.Expression of resultsU.K.

Express the results as MBAS mg/l to the nearest 0,1.

3.Determination of non-ionic surfactants in biodegradation test liquorsU.K.

3.1.PrincipleU.K.

Surface active agents are concentrated and isolated by gas stripping. In the sample used, the quantity of non-ionic surfactant should be in the range 250-800 g.

The stripped surfactant is dissolved in ethyl acetate.

After phase separation and evaporation of the solvent, the non-ionic surfactant is precipitated in aqueous solution with modified Dragendorff reagent (KBiI4 + BaCl2 + glacial acetic acid).

The precipitate is filtered, washed with glacial acetic acid and dissolved in ammonium tartrate solution. The bismuth in the solution is titrated potentiometrically with pyrrolidinedithiocarbamate solution at pH 4-5 using a bright platinum indicator electrode and a calomel or silver/silver chloride reference electrode. The method is applicable to non-ionic surfactants containing 6-30 alkylene oxide groups.

The titration result is multiplied by the empirical factor of 54 for conversion to the reference substance nonylphenol condensed with 10 mols ethylene oxide (NP 10).

3.2.Reagents and EquipmentU.K.

Reagents are to be made up in deionised water.

3.2.1.Pure ethyl acetate, freshly distilled.U.K.
3.2.2.Sodium bicarbonate, NaHCO3 AR.U.K.
3.2.3.Dilute hydrochloric acid [20 ml concentrated acid (HCl) diluted to 1 000 ml with water]U.K.
3.2.4.Methanol AR, freshly distilled, stored in a glass bottle.U.K.
3.2.5.Bromocresol purple, 0,1 g in 100 ml methanol.U.K.
3.2.6.Precipitating agent: the precipitating agent is a mixture of two volumes of solution A and one volume of solution B. The mixture is stored in a brown bottle and can be used for up to one week after mixing.U.K.
3.2.6.1.Solution AU.K.

Dissolve 1,7 g bismuth nitrate, BiONO3.H2O AR, in 20 ml glacial acetic acid, and make up to 100 ml with water. Then dissolve 65 g potassium iodide AR in 200 ml water. Mix these two solutions in a 1 000 ml measuring flask, add 200 ml glacial acetic acid (3.2.7) and make up to 1 000 ml with water.

3.2.6.2.Solution BU.K.

Dissolve 290 g barium chloride, BaCl2.2H2O AR, in 1 000 ml of water.

3.2.7.Glacial acetic acid 99-100 % (lower concentrations are unsuitable).U.K.
3.2.8.Ammonium tartrate solution: mix 12,4 g tartaric acid AR and 12,4 ml of ammonia solution AR (d = 0,910 g/ml) and make up to 1 000 ml with water (or use the equivalent amount of ammonium tartrate AR).U.K.
3.2.9.Dilute ammonia solution: 40 ml ammonia solution AR (d = 0,910 g/ml) diluted to 1 000 ml with water.U.K.
3.2.10.Standard acetate buffer: dissolve 40 g solid sodium hydroxide AR, in 500 ml water in a beaker and allow to cool. Add 120 ml glacial acetic acid (3.2.7). Mix thoroughly, cool and transfer to a 1 000 ml volumetric flask. Make up to the mark with water.U.K.
3.2.11.Pyrrolidinedithiocarbamate solution (known as ‘carbate solution’): dissolve 103 mg sodium pyrrolidinedithiocarbamate, C5H8NNaS2.2H2O, in about 500 ml water, add 10 ml of n-amyl alcohol AR and 0,5 g NaHCO3 AR, and make up to 1 000 ml with water.U.K.
3.2.12.Copper sulphate solution (for standardisation of 3.2.11).U.K.
STOCK SOLUTIONU.K.

Mix 1,249 g copper sulphate, CuSO4.5H2O AR, with 50 ml 0,5 M sulphuric acid and make up to 1 000 ml with water.

STANDARDSOLUTIONU.K.

Mix 50 ml stock solution with 10 ml 0,5 M H2SO4 and make up to 1 000 ml with water.

3.2.13.Sodium chloride AR.U.K.
3.2.14.Gas-stripping apparatus (see Figure 5).U.K.

The diameter of the sintered disc must be the same as the internal diameter of the cylinder.

3.2.15.Separating funnel, 250 ml.U.K.
3.2.16.Magnetic stirrer with magnet 25-30 mm.U.K.
3.2.17.Gooch crucible, diameter of the perforated base = 25 mm, Type G4.U.K.
3.2.18.Circular glass-fibre filter papers, 27 mm diameter with fibre diameter 0,3-1,5 m.U.K.
3.2.19.Two filter flasks with adapters and rubber collars, 500 and 250 ml respectively.U.K.
3.2.20.Recording potentiometer fitted with a bright platinum indicator electrode and a calomel or silver/silver chloride reference electrode with a 250 mV range, with automatic burette of 20-25 ml capacity, or alternative manual equipment.U.K.

3.3.MethodU.K.

3.3.1.Concentration and separation of the surfactantU.K.

Filter the aqueous sample through a qualitative filter paper. Discard the first 100 ml of the filtrate.

Into the stripping apparatus, previously rinsed with ethyl acetate, place a measured quantity of the sample, such that it contains between 250-800 g non-ionic surfactant.

To improve the separation add 100 g sodium chloride and 5 g sodium bicarbonate.

If the volume of the sample exceeds 500 ml, add these salts to the stripping apparatus in solid form, and dissolve by passing nitrogen or air through.

If a smaller-sized sample is used, dissolve the salts in 400 ml water and then add to the stripping apparatus.

Add water to bring the level to the upper stopcock.

Cautiously add 100 ml ethyl acetate on top of the water.

Fill the wash-bottle in the gas-line (nitrogen or air) two-thirds full with ethyl acetate.

Pass a gas stream of 30-60 l/h through the apparatus; the use of a flowmeter is recommended. The rate of aeration must be increased gradually at the beginning. The gas rate must be so adjusted that the phases remain noticeably separate to minimise the mixing of the phases and the solution of the ethyl acetate in the water. Stop the gas flow after five minutes.

If there is a reduction of more than 20 % in the volume of the organic phase through solution in water, the sublation must be repeated paying special attention to the rate of gas flow.

Run off the organic phase into a separating funnel. Return any water in the separating funnel from the aqueous phase — it should only be a few ml — to the stripping apparatus. Filter the ethyl acetate phase through a dry qualitative filter paper into a 250 ml beaker.

Put a further 100 ml ethyl acetate into the stripping apparatus and again pass nitrogen or air through for five minutes. Draw off the organic phase into the separating funnel used for the first separation, reject the aqueous phase and run the organic phase through the same filter as the first ethyl acetate portion. Rinse both the separating funnel and the filter with about 20 ml ethyl acetate.

Evaporate the ethyl acetate extract to dryness using a water-bath (fume cupboard). Direct a gentle stream of air over the surface of the solution to accelerate the evaporation.

3.3.2.Precipitation and filtrationU.K.

Dissolve the dry residue from 3.3.1 in 5 ml methanol, add 40 ml water and 0,5 ml dilute HCl (3.2.3) and stir the mixture with a magnetic stirrer.

To this solution add 30 ml of precipitating agent (3.2.6) from a measuring cylinder. The precipitate forms after repeated stirring. After stirring for ten minutes leave the mixture to stand for at least five minutes.

Filter the mixture through a Gooch crucible, the base of which is covered with a glass-fibre filter paper. First wash the filter under suction with about 2 ml glacial acetic acid. Then thoroughly wash the beaker, magnet, and crucible with glacial acetic acid, of which about 40-50 ml is necessary. It is not necessary to quantitatively transfer the precipitate adhering to the sides of the beaker, to the filter, because the solution of the precipitate for the titration is returned to the precipitating beaker, and the remaining precipitate will then be dissolved.

3.3.3.Dissolution of the precipitateU.K.

Dissolve the precipitate in the filter crucible by the addition of hot ammonium tartrate solution (about 80 ° C) (3.2.8) in three portions of 10 ml each. Allow each portion to stand in the crucible for some minutes before being sucked through the filter into the flask.

Put the contents of the filter flask into the beaker used for the precipitation. Rinse the sides of the beaker with a further 20 ml of tartrate solution to dissolve the rest of the precipitate.

Carefully wash the crucible, adapter and filter flask with 150-200 ml water, and return the rinsing water to the beaker used for the precipitation.

3.3.4.The titrationU.K.

Stir the solution using a magnetic stirrer (3.2.16), add a few drops of bromocresol purple (3.2.5) and add the dilute ammonia solution (3.2.9) until the colour turns violet (the solution is initially weakly acid from the residue of acetic acid used for rinsing).

Then add 10 ml standard acetate buffer (3.2.10), immerse the electrodes in the solution, and titrate potentiometrically with standard ‘carbate solution’ (3.2.11), the burette tip being immersed in the solution.

The titration rate should not exceed 2 ml/min.

The endpoint is the intersection of the tangents to the two branches of the potential curve.

It will be observed occasionally that the inflection in the potential curve becomes flattened; this can be eliminated by carefully cleaning the platinum electrode (by polishing with emery paper).

3.3.5.Blank determinationsU.K.

At the same time run a blank determination through the whole procedure with 5 ml methanol and 40 ml water, according to the instructions in 3.3.2. The blank titration should be below 1 ml, otherwise the purity of the reagents (3.2.3, 3.2.7, 3.2.8, 3.2.9, 3.2.10) is suspect, especially their content of heavy metals, and they must be replaced. The blank must be taken into account in the calculation of the results.

3.3.6.Control of the factor of the ‘carbate solution’U.K.

Determine the factor for the carbate solution on the day of use. To do this, titrate 10 ml of the copper sulphate solution (3.2.12) with ‘carbate solution’ after the addition of 100 ml water and 10 ml standard acetate buffer (3.2.10). If the amount used is a ml, the factor f is:

and all the results of the titration are multiplied by this factor.

3.4.Calculation of resultsU.K.

Every non-ionic surfactant has its own factor, depending on its composition, particularly on the length of the alkene oxide chain. The concentration of non-ionic surfactant is expressed in relation to a standard substance — a nonyl phenol with ten ethylene oxide units (NP 10) — for which the conversion factor is 0,054.

Using this factor the amount of surfactant present in the sample is found expressed as mg of NP 10 equivalent, as follows:

(b — c) xfx 0,054 = mg non-ionic surfactant as NP 10

where:

b

=

volume of ‘carbate solution’ used by the sample (ml),

c

=

volume of ‘carbate solution’ used by the blank (ml),

f

=

factor of the ‘carbate solution’.

3.5.Expression of resultsU.K.

Express the results in mg/l as NP 10 to the nearest 0,1.

4.Preliminary treatment of anionic surfactants to be testedU.K.

4.1.Preliminary notesU.K.

4.1.1.Treatment of samplesU.K.

The treatment of anionic surface-active agents and formulated detergents prior to the determination of primary biodegradability in the confirmatory test is:

ProductsTreatment
Anionic surfactantsNone
Formulated detergentsAlcoholic extraction followed by separation of the anionic surfactants by ion exchange

The purpose of the alcoholic extraction is to eliminate the insoluble and inorganic ingredients of the commercial product, which in some circumstances might upset the biodegradability test.

4.1.2.Ion-exchange procedureU.K.

Isolation and separation of anionic surface active agents from soap, non-ionic and cationic surfactants are required for correct biodegradability tests.

This is achieved by an ion-exchange technique using a macro-porous exchange resin and suitable eluants for fractional elution. Thus soap, anionic and non-ionic surfactants may be isolated in one procedure.

4.1.3.Analytical controlU.K.

After homogenising, the concentration of anionic surfactants in the synthetic detergent is determined according to the MBAS analytical procedure. The soap content is determined by a suitable analytical method.

This analysis of the products is necessary to calculate the quantities required for preparing fractions for the biodegradability test.

Quantitative extraction is not necessary; however, at least 80 % of the anionic surfactants should be extracted. Usually, 90 % or more is obtained.

4.2.PrincipleU.K.

From a homogeneous sample (powders, dried pastes and dried liquids) an ethanol extract is obtained which contains the surfactants, soap and other alcohol-soluble constituents of the synthetic detergent sample.

The ethanol extract is evaporated to dryness, dissolved in an isopropanol/water mixture and the solution obtained is passed through a strongly acidic cation exchange/macro-porous anion exchange combination heated to 50 ° C. This temperature is necessary to prevent the precipitation of any fatty acids which may be present in acidic media.

Any non-ionic surfactants remain in the effluent.

Soap fatty acids are separated by extraction with ethanol containing CO2. The anionic surfactants are then obtained as ammonium salts, by elution with an aqueous isopropanolic solution of ammonium bicarbonate. These ammonium salts are used for the degradation test.

Cationic surfactants that might upset the biodegradability test and the analytical procedure are eliminated by the cation exchanger placed above the anion exchanger.

4.3.Chemicals and equipmentU.K.

4.3.1.Deionised waterU.K.
4.3.2.Ethanol, 95 % (v/v) C2H5OH (permissible denaturant: methyl ethyl ketone or methanol)U.K.
4.3.3.Isopropanol/water mixture (50/50 v/v):U.K.
  • 50 parts by volume isopropanol, CH3CHOH.CH3, and

  • 50 parts by volume water (4.3.1)

4.3.4.Solution of carbon dioxide in ethanol (approximately 0,1 % CO2): using a delivery tube with a built-in sinter, pass carbon dioxide, CO2, through the ethanol (4.3.2) for ten minutes. Use fresh solutions onlyU.K.
4.3.5.Ammonium bicarbonate solution (60/40 v/v): 0,3 mol NH4HCO3 in 1 000 ml of an isopropanol/water mixture consisting of 60 parts by volume isopropanol and 40 parts by volume water (4.3.1)U.K.
4.3.6.Cation exchanger (KAT), strongly acidic, resistant to alcohol (50-100 mesh)U.K.
4.3.7.Anion exchanger (AAT), macro-porous, Merck Lewatit MP 7080 (70-150 mesh) or equivalentU.K.
4.3.8.Hydrochloric acid, 10 % HCl (w/w)U.K.
4.3.9.2 000 ml round-bottomed flask with ground glass stopper and reflux condenserU.K.
4.3.10.90 mm diameter suction filter (heatable) for filter papersU.K.
4.3.11.2 000 ml filter flaskU.K.
4.3.12.Exchange columns with heating jacket and tap: inner tube 60 mm in diameter and 450 mm in height (see Figure 4)U.K.
4.3.13.Water-bathU.K.
4.3.14.Vacuum drying ovenU.K.
4.3.15.ThermostatU.K.
4.3.16.Rotary evaporatorU.K.

4.4.Preparation of extract and separation of anionic active agentsU.K.

4.4.1.Preparation of extractU.K.

The quantity of surfactants necessary for the biodegradation test is about 50 g MBAS.

Normally, the quantity of product to be extracted will not exceed 1 000 g, but it may be necessary to extract further quantities of sample. For practical reasons, the quantity of product used should in most cases be limited to 5 000 g in preparing extracts for the biodegradation test.

Experience has shown that there are advantages in using a number of small extractions rather than one large extraction. The exchanger quantities specified are designed for a working capacity of 600-700 mmoles of surfactants and soap.

4.4.2.Isolation of alcohol-soluble constituentsU.K.

Add 250 g of the synthetic detergent to be analysed to 1 250 ml ethanol, heat the mixture to boiling point and reflux for one hour with stirring. Pass the hot alcoholic solution through a coarse-pored suction filter heated to 50 ° C and filter rapidly. Wash the flask and suction filter with approximately 200 ml hot ethanol. Collect the filtrate and filter washings in a filter flask.

In the case of pastes or liquid products to be analysed, make sure that not more than 55 g anionic surfactants and 35 g soap are contained in the sample. Evaporate this weighed sample to dryness. Dissolve the residue in 2 000 ml ethanol and proceed as described above. In the case of powders of low apparent density (< 300 g/l) it is recommended to increase the ethanol ratio in the relation 20:1. Evaporate the ethanolic filtrate to dryness, preferably by means of a rotary evaporator. Repeat the operation if a greater quantity of extract is required. Dissolve the residue in 5 000 ml isopropanol/water mixture.

Preparation of ion-exchange columns

4.4.3.CATION-EXCHANGE COLUMNU.K.

Place 600 ml cation-exchange resin (4.3.6) in a 3 000 ml beaker and cover by adding 2 000 ml hydrochloric acid (4.3.8). Allow to stand for at least two hours, with occasional stirring.

Decant the acid and transfer the resin into the column (4.3.12) by means of deionised water. The column should contain a glass-wool plug.

Wash the column with deionised water at a rate of 10-30 ml/min until the eluate is free of chloride.

Displace the water with 2 000 ml isopropanol/water mixture (4.3.3) at a rate of 10-30 ml/min. The exchange column is now ready for operation.

ANION-EXCHANGE COLUMNU.K.

Place 600 ml anion-exchange resin (4.3.7) in a 3 000 ml beaker and cover by adding 2 000 ml deionised water.

Allow the resin to swell for at least two hours.

Transfer the resin into the column by means of deionised water. The column should contain a glass-wool plug.

Wash the column with 0,3 M ammonium bicarbonate solution (4.3.5) until free of chloride. This requires about 5 000 ml solution. Wash again with 2 000 ml deionised water. Displace the water with 2 000 ml isopropanol/water mixture (4.3.3) at a rate of 10-30 ml/min. The exchange column is now in the OH-form and ready for operation.

Ion-exchange procedure

4.4.4.Connect the exchange columns so that the cation-exchange column is placed on top of the anion-exchange column.U.K.

Heat the exchange columns to 50 ° C using thermostatic control.

Heat 5 000 ml of the solution obtained in item 4.4.2 to 60 ° C and pass the solution through the exchanger combination at a rate of 20 ml/min. Wash the columns with 1 000 ml hot isopropanol/water mixture (4.3.3).

To obtain the anionic surface active agents (MBAS), disconnect the KAT column. Using 5 000 ml ethanol/CO2 solution at 50 ° C (4.3.4), elute the soap fatty acids out of the KAT column. Reject the eluate.

Then elute the MBAS out of the AAT column with 5 000 ml ammonium bicarbonate solution (4.3.5). Evaporate the eluate to dryness using a steam bath or in a rotary evaporator.

The residue contains the MBAS (as ammonium salt) and possible non-surfactant anionics that have no detrimental effect on the biodegradation test. Add deionised water to the residue until a definite volume is obtained and determine the MBAS content in an aliquot. The solution is used as a standard solution of the anionic synthetic detergents for the biodegradation test. The solution should be kept at a temperature below 5 ° C.

Regeneration of ion exchange resins

4.4.5.The cation exchanger is rejected after use.U.K.

Passing an additional quantity of ammonium bicarbonate solution (4.3.5) down the column at a flow rate of approximately 10 ml/min until the eluate is free from anionic surfactants (methylene blue test) regenerates the anion-exchange resin.

Then pass 2 000 ml isopropanol/water mixture (4.3.3) down the anion exchanger to wash. The anion exchanger is again ready for operation.

Preliminary treatment of non-ionic surfactants to be tested

5.Preliminary notesU.K.

5.1.Treatment of samplesU.K.

5.1.1.The treatment of non-ionic surface-active agents and formulated detergents prior to the determination of primary biodegradability in the confirmatory test is:U.K.

The purpose of the alcoholic extraction is to eliminate the insoluble and inorganic ingredients of the commercial product, which in some circumstances might upset the biodegradability test.

ProductsTreatment
Non-ionic surfactantsNone
Formulated detergentsAlcoholic extraction followed by separation of the non-ionic surfactants by ion exchange

Ion-exchange procedure

5.1.2.Isolation and separation of non-ionic surface active agents from soap, anionic and cationic surfactants are required for correct biodegradability tests.U.K.

This is achieved by an ion exchange technique using a macro-porous exchange resin and suitable eluants for fractional elution. Thus soap, anionic and non-ionic surfactants may be isolated in one procedure.

Analytical control

5.1.3.After homogenising, the concentration of anionic and non-ionic surfactants in the detergent is determined according to the MBAS and BiAS analytical procedure. The soap content is determined by a suitable analytical method.U.K.

This analysis of the product is necessary to calculate the quantities required preparing fractions for the biodegradability tests.

Quantitative extraction is not necessary; however, at least 80 % of the non-ionic surfactants should be extracted. Usually, 90 % or more is obtained.

Principle

5.2. From a homogeneous sample (powders, dried paste and dried liquids) an ethanol extract is obtained which contains the surfactants, soap and other alcohol-soluble constituents of the detergent sample. U.K.

The ethanol extract is evaporated to dryness, dissolved in an isopropanol/water mixture and the solution obtained is passed through a strongly acidic cation exchange/macro-porous anion exchange combination heated to 50 ° C. This temperature is necessary to prevent the precipitation of any fatty acids which may be present in acidic media. The non-ionic surfactants are obtained from the effluent by evaporation.

Cationic surfactants, which might upset the degradation test and the analytical procedure, are eliminated by the cation exchanger placed above the anion exchanger.

Chemicals and equipment

5.3.Deionised waterU.K.

5.3.1.Ethanol, C2H5OH 95 % (v/v) (permissible denaturant: methyl-ethyl ketone or methanol)U.K.
5.3.2.Isopropanol/water mixture (50/50 v/v):U.K.
5.3.3.50 parts by volume isopropanol, CH3CHOH.CH3, andU.K.
  • 50 parts by volume water (5.3.1)

  • Ammonium bicarbonate solution (60/40 v/v):

5.3.4.0,3 mol NH4HCO3 in 1 000 ml of an isopropanol/water mixture consisting of 60 parts by volume isopropanol and 40 parts by volume water (5.3.1)U.K.
  • Cation exchanger (KAT), strongly acidic, resistant to alcohol (50-100 mesh)

5.3.5.Anion exchanger (AAT), macro-porous, Merck Lewatit MP 7080 (70-150 mesh) or equivalentU.K.
5.3.6.Hydrochloric acid, 10 % HCl w/wU.K.
5.3.7.2 000 ml round-bottomed flask with ground glass stopper and reflux condenserU.K.
5.3.8.90 mm diameter suction Filter (heatable) for filter papersU.K.
5.3.9.2 000 ml filter flaskU.K.
5.3.10.Exchange columns with heating jacket and tap: inner tube 60 mm in diameter and 450 mm in height (see Figure 4)U.K.
5.3.11.Water-bathU.K.
5.3.12.Vacuum drying ovenU.K.
5.3.13.ThermostatU.K.
5.3.14.Rotary evaporatorU.K.
5.3.15.Preparation of extract and separation of non-ionic active agentsU.K.

5.4.Preparation of extractU.K.

5.4.1.The quantity of surfactant necessary for the degradation test is about 25 g BiAS.U.K.

In preparing extracts for the degradation tests, the quantity of product to be used should be limited to a maximum of 2 000 g. Therefore it may be necessary to carry out the operation two or more times in order to obtain sufficient quantity for the degradation tests.

Experience has shown that there are advantages in using a number of small extractions rather than one large extraction.

Isolation of alcohol-soluble constituents

5.4.2.Add 250 g of the synthetic detergent to be analysed to 1 250 ml ethanol and heat the mixture to boiling point and reflux for one hour with stirring. Pass the hot alcoholic solution through a coarse-pored suction filter heated to 50 ° C and filter rapidly. Wash the flask and suction filter with approximately 200 ml hot ethanol. Collect the filtrate and filter washings in a filter flask.U.K.

In the case of pastes or liquid products to be analysed, make sure that not more than 25 g anionic surfactants and 35 g soap are contained in the sample. Evaporate this weighed sample to dryness. Dissolve the residue in 500 ml ethanol and proceed as described above.

In the case of powders of low apparent density (< 300 g/l) it is recommended to increase the ethanol ratio in the relation 20:1.

Evaporate the ethanolic filtrate to complete dryness, preferably by means of rotary evaporator. Repeat the operation if a greater quantity of extract is required. Dissolve the residue in 5 000 ml isopropanol/water mixture.

5.4.3.Preparation of ion-exchange columnsU.K.
CATION-EXCHANGE COLUMNU.K.

Place 600 ml cation-exchange resin (5.3.5) in a 3 000 ml beaker and cover by adding 2 000 ml hydrochloric acid (5.3.7). Allow to stand for at least two hours, with occasional stirring.

Decant the acid and transfer the resin into the column (5.3.11) by means of deionised water. The column should contain a glass-wool plug. Wash the column with deionised water at a rate of 10-30 ml/min until the eluate is free of chloride.

Displace the water with 2 000 ml isopropanol/water mixture (5.3.3) at a rate of 10-30 ml/min. The exchange column is now ready for operation.

ANION-EXCHANGE COLUMNU.K.

Place 600 ml anion-exchange resin (5.3.6) in a beaker and cover by adding 2 000 ml deionised water. Allow the resin to swell for at least two hours. Transfer the resin into the column by means of deionised water. The column should contain a glass-wool plug.

Wash the column with 0,3 M ammonium bicarbonate solution (5.3.4) until free of chloride. This requires about 5 000 ml solution. Wash again with 2 000 ml deionised water.

Displace the water with 2 000 ml isopropanol/water mixture (5.3.3) at a rate of 10-30 ml/min. The exchange column is now in the OH form and ready for operation.

5.4.4.Ion-exchange procedureU.K.

Connect the exchange columns so that the cation-exchange column is placed on top of the anion-exchange column. Heat the exchange columns to 50 ° C using thermostatic control. Heat 5 000 ml of the solution obtained in item 5.4.2 to 60 ° C and pass the solution through the exchanger combination at a rate of 20 ml/min. Wash the columns with 1 000 ml hot isopropanol/water mixture (5.3.3).

To obtain the non-ionic surfactants collect the filtrate and filter washings and evaporate to dryness, preferably by means of a rotary evaporator. The residue contains the BiAS. Add deionised water until a defined volume is obtained and determine the BiAS content in an aliquot. The solution is used as a standard solution of non-ionic surfactants for the degradation test. The solution should be kept at a temperature below 5 ° C.

5.4.5.Regeneration of ion exchange resinsU.K.

The cation exchanger is rejected after use.

Passing about 5 000-6 000 ml of ammonium bicarbonate solution (5.3.4) down the column at a flow rate of approximately 10 ml/min until the eluate is free from anionic surfactants (methylene blue test) regenerates the anion-exchange resin. Then pass 2 000 ml isopropanol/water mixture (5.3.3) down the anion exchanger to wash. The anion exchanger is again ready for operation.

A

Storage vessel

B

Dosing device

C

Aeration chamber (three litres capacity)

D

Settling vessel

E

Air-lift pump

F

Collector

G

Sintered aerator

H

Air-flow meter

I

Air

A

Liquid level

B

Hard PVC

C

Glass or waterproof plastic (hard PVC)

A

Running-in period

B

Period used for calculation (twenty-one days)

C

Readily biodegradable surfactant

D

Surfactant not readily biodegradable

E

Biodegradation ( %)

F

Time (days)

(1)

[F1These tests are identified as the most suitable for surfactants.]

(2)

[F1The DOC methods could give results on the removal and not on the ultimate biodegradation. The manometric respirometry and the MITI and two-phase BOD methods would not be appropriate in some cases because the high initial test concentration could be inhibitory.]

(3)

European Inventory of Existing Commercial Substances.

(4)

European List of Notified Chemical Substances.

(6)

[F2Office for Official Publications of the European Communities, 2006, ISSN 1018-5593 EUR 22543 EN.]

(8)

[F2Office for Official Publications of the European Communities, 2007, ISSN 1018-5593 EUR 20853 EN/3.]

(9)

[F1 OJ L 262, 27.9.1976, p. 169 . Directive as last amended by Commission Directive 2005/80/EC ( OJ L 303, 22.11.2005, p. 32 ).]

(11)

[F1 [F5 OJ L 187, 20.7.1999, p. 52 . Decision as amended by Decision 2011/264/EU ( OJ L 111, 30.4.2011, p. 34 ).] ]

(12)

[F1International Union of Pure and Applied Chemistry.]

(13)

[F1International Nomenclature Cosmetic Ingredient.]

Back to top

Options/Help

Print Options

You have chosen to open the Whole Regulation

The Whole Regulation you have selected contains over 200 provisions and might take some time to download. You may also experience some issues with your browser, such as an alert box that a script is taking a long time to run.

Would you like to continue?

You have chosen to open Schedules only

The Schedules you have selected contains over 200 provisions and might take some time to download. You may also experience some issues with your browser, such as an alert box that a script is taking a long time to run.

Would you like to continue?

Close

Legislation is available in different versions:

Latest Available (revised):The latest available updated version of the legislation incorporating changes made by subsequent legislation and applied by our editorial team. Changes we have not yet applied to the text, can be found in the ‘Changes to Legislation’ area.

Original (As adopted by EU): The original version of the legislation as it stood when it was first adopted in the EU. No changes have been applied to the text.

Close

See additional information alongside the content

Geographical Extent: Indicates the geographical area that this provision applies to. For further information see ‘Frequently Asked Questions’.

Show Timeline of Changes: See how this legislation has or could change over time. Turning this feature on will show extra navigation options to go to these specific points in time. Return to the latest available version by using the controls above in the What Version box.

Close

Opening Options

Different options to open legislation in order to view more content on screen at once

Close

More Resources

Access essential accompanying documents and information for this legislation item from this tab. Dependent on the legislation item being viewed this may include:

  • the original print PDF of the as adopted version that was used for the EU Official Journal
  • lists of changes made by and/or affecting this legislation item
  • all formats of all associated documents
  • correction slips
  • links to related legislation and further information resources
Close

Timeline of Changes

This timeline shows the different versions taken from EUR-Lex before exit day and during the implementation period as well as any subsequent versions created after the implementation period as a result of changes made by UK legislation.

The dates for the EU versions are taken from the document dates on EUR-Lex and may not always coincide with when the changes came into force for the document.

For any versions created after the implementation period as a result of changes made by UK legislation the date will coincide with the earliest date on which the change (e.g an insertion, a repeal or a substitution) that was applied came into force. For further information see our guide to revised legislation on Understanding Legislation.

Close

More Resources

Use this menu to access essential accompanying documents and information for this legislation item. Dependent on the legislation item being viewed this may include:

  • the original print PDF of the as adopted version that was used for the print copy
  • correction slips

Click 'View More' or select 'More Resources' tab for additional information including:

  • lists of changes made by and/or affecting this legislation item
  • confers power and blanket amendment details
  • all formats of all associated documents
  • links to related legislation and further information resources