Search Legislation

Employment Act 2008

Dispute resolution

Section 3: Non-compliance with statutory Codes of Practice

19.As noted in paragraph 14, section 31 of EA 2002 requires a tribunal to increase or decrease any award where an employer or employee fails to follow the Statutory procedures. Section 31 of EA 2002 is repealed by section 1 of this Act and section 3 provides for an alternative mechanism to encourage compliance with a relevant Code of Practice which relates exclusively or primarily to procedure for the resolution of disputes issued under the power described below.

20.Under Part IV, chapter 3 of TULRCA 1992, the Secretary of State and Acas may issue Codes of Practice subject to Parliamentary approval (“statutory codes”). Section 207 of TULRCA 1992 provides that a statutory code, although not legally binding, is admissible in evidence and can be taken into account by the employment tribunal.

21.In order to provide an incentive to follow recommended practice, section 3 contains provisions giving employment tribunals the discretion to vary awards for unreasonable failure to comply with any relevant Code of Practice relating to workplace dispute resolution, by introducing a new section 207A and Schedule A2 to TULRCA 1992. The relevant Code of Practice is one which relates exclusively or primarily to procedure for the resolution of disputes. Of the existing six codes issued under TULRCA, such a definition only applies to the Acas Code of Practice on disciplinary and grievance procedures, which Acas is substantially revising for reissue at the time the Act comes into force.

22.Subsection (2) of new section 207A provides that the employment tribunal may, if it considers it just and equitable, increase any award to an employee by up to 25% if it appears to the tribunal that the employer has unreasonably failed to comply with the relevant Code of Practice.

23.Subsection (3) of new section 207A provides that the employment tribunal may, if it considers it just and equitable, decrease any award to an employee by no more than 25% if it appears to the tribunal that the employee has unreasonably failed to comply with the relevant Code of Practice.

24.Subsection (5) of new section 207A provides that, where an award is adjusted under new section 207A and also under section 38 of EA 2002 (which provides that awards for claims under specified jurisdictions must be adjusted where it transpires during those proceedings that the employer has failed to give the statutory statement of employment particulars) the adjustment under new section 207A is to be made first.

25.New Schedule A2 lists the jurisdictions covered by this section. Together, the listed jurisdictions cover the overwhelming majority of tribunal claims. Subsection (6) of new section 207A confers power on the Secretary of State to add or remove jurisdictions from the list.

Back to top

Options/Help

Print Options

Close

Explanatory Notes

Text created by the government department responsible for the subject matter of the Act to explain what the Act sets out to achieve and to make the Act accessible to readers who are not legally qualified. Explanatory Notes were introduced in 1999 and accompany all Public Acts except Appropriation, Consolidated Fund, Finance and Consolidation Acts.

Close

More Resources

Access essential accompanying documents and information for this legislation item from this tab. Dependent on the legislation item being viewed this may include:

  • the original print PDF of the as enacted version that was used for the print copy
  • lists of changes made by and/or affecting this legislation item
  • confers power and blanket amendment details
  • all formats of all associated documents
  • correction slips
  • links to related legislation and further information resources
Close

Impact Assessments

Impact Assessments generally accompany all UK Government interventions of a regulatory nature that affect the private sector, civil society organisations and public services. They apply regardless of whether the regulation originates from a domestic or international source and can accompany primary (Acts etc) and secondary legislation (SIs). An Impact Assessment allows those with an interest in the policy area to understand:

  • Why the government is proposing to intervene;
  • The main options the government is considering, and which one is preferred;
  • How and to what extent new policies may impact on them; and,
  • The estimated costs and benefits of proposed measures.