- Latest available (Revised)
- Point in Time (15/02/2007)
- Original (As made)
Version Superseded: 11/06/2010
Point in time view as at 15/02/2007.
There are currently no known outstanding effects for the The Air Quality Standards Regulations 2007 (revoked), SCHEDULE 8.
Revised legislation carried on this site may not be fully up to date. At the current time any known changes or effects made by subsequent legislation have been applied to the text of the legislation you are viewing by the editorial team. Please see ‘Frequently Asked Questions’ for details regarding the timescales for which new effects are identified and recorded on this site.
Regulation 16(2)Regulation 17(2)(d)
1. The data-quality objectives set out in the following table, for the required accuracy of assessment methods, of minimum time coverage and of data capture of measurement are laid down to guide quality assurance programmes—
Sulphur dioxide, nitrogen dioxide and oxides of nitrogen | Lead, PM2.5 and PM10 | |
---|---|---|
Continuous measurement | ||
Accuracy | 15% | 25% |
Minimum data capture | 90% | 90% |
Indicative measurement | ||
Accuracy | 25% | 50% |
Minimum data capture | 90% | 90% |
Minimum time coverage | 14% (One measurement a week at random, evenly distributed over the year, or eight weeks evenly distributed over the year) | 14% (One measurement a week at random, evenly distributed over the year, or eight weeks evenly distributed over the year) |
Modelling | ||
Accuracy: | ||
Hourly averages | 50%–60% | |
Daily averages | 50% | |
Annual averages | 30% | 50% |
Objective estimation | ||
Accuracy | 75% | 100% |
2. The accuracy of the measurement is defined as that set out in the “Guide to the Expression of Uncertainty of Measurements” (ISO 1993) M1 or in ISO 5725-1 “Accuracy (trueness and precision) of measurement methods and results” (ISO 1994). The percentages in the table are given for individual measurements averaged, over the period considered, by the limit value, for a 95% confidence interval (bias + two times the standard deviation). The accuracy for continuous measurements shall be interpreted as being applicable in the region of the appropriate limit value.U.K.
Marginal Citations
M1Copies of International Standards Organisation publications may be purchased from the British Standards Institution (“BSI”) Sales Department either by telephone (0208 996 9001) or by post from the BSI, Standards House, 389 Chiswick High Road, London W4 4AL, http://www.bsi-global.com.
3. The accuracy for modelling and objective estimation is defined as the maximum deviation of the measured and calculated concentration levels, over the period considered by the limit value, without taking account the timing of the eventsU.K.
4. The requirements for minimum data capture and time coverage do not include losses of data due to the regular calibration or the normal maintenance of the instrumentation.U.K.
5. The Secretary of State may allow for random measurements to be made instead of continuous measurements for lead, PM2.5 and PM10 by methods for which accuracy within the 95% confidence interval with respect to continuous monitoring has been demonstrated to be within 10%. Random sampling shall be spread evenly over the year.U.K.
6. The data quality objectives set out in the following table, for allowed uncertainty of assessment methods, of minimum time coverage and of data capture of measurement are provided to guide quality assurance programmes—
Benzene | Carbon monoxide | |
---|---|---|
Fixed measurements | ||
Uncertainty | 25% | 15% |
Minimum data capture | 90% | 90% |
Minimum time coverage | 35% urban background and traffic sites (distributed over the year to be representative of various conditions for climate and traffic); 90% industrial sites | |
Indicative measurements | ||
Uncertainty | 30% | 25% |
Minimum data capture | 90% | 90% |
Minimum time coverage | 14% (one day's measurement a week at random, evenly distributed over the year, or eight weeks evenly distributed over the year) | 14% (one measurement a week at random, evenly distributed over the year, or eight weeks evenly distributed over the year) |
Modelling | ||
Uncertainty: | ||
Eight-hour averages | 50% | |
Annual averages | 50% | |
Objective estimation | ||
Uncertainty | 100% | 75% |
7. The uncertainty (on a 95% confidence interval) of the assessment methods shall be evaluated in accordance with the “Guide to the Expression of Uncertainty of Measurements” (ISO 1993) or the methodology of ISO 5725:1994. The percentages for uncertainty in the table in paragraph 6 are given for individual measurements averaged over the period considered by the limit value, for a 95% confidence interval. The uncertainty for the fixed measurements shall be interpreted as being applicable in the region of the appropriate limit value.U.K.
8. The uncertainty for modelling and objective estimation is defined as the maximum deviation of the measured and calculated concentration levels, over the period considered by the limit value, without taking into account the timing of the events.U.K.
9. The requirements for minimum data capture and time coverage do not include losses of data due to the regular calibration or the normal maintenance of the instrumentation.U.K.
10. The Secretary of State may allow for random measurements to be made instead of continuous measurements for benzene if the uncertainty, including the uncertainty due to random sampling, meets the quality objective of 25%. Random sampling shall be spread evenly over the year.U.K.
11. The data quality objectives set out in the following table are provided to guide quality assurance—U.K.
1 Indicative measurement being measurements which are performed at reduced regularity but fulfil the other data quality objectives. | ||||
Benzo(a)pyrene | Arsenic, cadmium and nickel | Polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons and total gaseous mercury | Total deposition | |
---|---|---|---|---|
Uncertainty | ||||
Fixed and indicative measurements | 50% | 40% | 50% | 70% |
Modelling | 60% | 60% | 60% | 60% |
Minimum data capture | 90% | 90% | 90% | 90% |
Minimum time coverage | ||||
Fixed measurements | 33% | 50% | ||
Indicative measurements1 | 14% | 14% | 14% | 33% |
12. The uncertainty (expressed at a 95 % confidence level) of the methods used for the assessment of ambient air concentrations shall be evaluated in accordance with the CEN Guide to the Expression of Uncertainty in Measurement (ENV 13005-1999) M2, the methodology of ISO 5725:1994, and the guidance provided in the CEN Report, “Air quality — Approach to uncertainty estimation for ambient air reference measurement methods” (CR 14377:2002E). The percentages for uncertainty in the table in paragraph 11 are given for individual measurements, which are averaged over typical sampling times, for a 95 % confidence interval. The uncertainty of the measurements shall be interpreted as being applicable in the region of the appropriate target value. Fixed and indicative measurements shall be evenly distributed over the year in order to avoid skewing of results.U.K.
Marginal Citations
M2European Committee for Standardisation (CEN) publication (copies may be obtained from CEN at 36, Rue de Stassart, B-1050, Brussels, Belgium http://www.cenorm.be).
13. The requirements for minimum data capture and time coverage do not include losses of data due to regular calibration or normal maintenance of the instrumentation. Twenty-four-hour sampling is required for the measurement of benzo(a)pyrene and polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons. With care, individual samples taken over a period of up to one month may be combined and analysed as a composite sample, provided the method ensures that the samples are stable for that period. The three congeners benzo(b)fluoranthene, benzo(j)fluoranthene, benzo(k)fluoranthene may be difficult to resolve analytically in which case they may be reported as sum. The Secretary of State shall endeavour, in so far as practicable, to undertake twenty-four hour sampling for the measurement of arsenic, cadmium and nickel concentrations. Sampling shall be spread evenly over the weekdays and the year. For the measurement of deposition rates, the Secretary of State shall endeavour, in so far as practicable, to obtain monthly or weekly samples throughout the year.U.K.
14. The Secretary of State may allow for use of wet only instead of bulk sampling if it can be demonstrated that the difference between them is within 10 %. Deposition rates shall generally be given as µg/m² per day.U.K.
15. The Secretary of State may apply a minimum time coverage lower than indicated in the table, but not lower than 14 % for fixed measurements and 6 % for indicative measurements provided that he is satisfied that it can be demonstrated that the 95 % expanded uncertainty for the annual mean, calculated from the data quality objectives in the table according to ISO 11222:2002 — “Determination of the uncertainty of the time average of air quality measurements” will be met.U.K.
16. The data quality objectives set out in the following table, for allowed uncertainty of assessment methods, of minimum time coverage and of data capture of measurement, are provided to guide quality-assurance programmes—U.K.
For ozone, NO and NO2 assessed at ozone sampling points | |
---|---|
Continuous fixed measurement | |
Uncertainty of individual measurements | 15% |
Minimum data capture | 90% during summer; 75% during winter |
Indicative measurement | |
Uncertainty of individual measurements | 30% |
Minimum data capture | 90% |
Minimum time coverage | >10% during summer |
Modelling | |
Uncertainty: | |
1 hour averages (daytime) | 50% |
8 hours daily maximum | 50% |
Objective estimation | |
Uncertainty | 75% |
17. The uncertainty (on a 95% confidence interval) of the measurement methods shall be evaluated in accordance with the principles laid down in the “Guide to the Expression of Uncertainty of Measurements” (ISO 1993), or the methodology in ISO 5725-1 “Accuracy (trueness and precision) of measurement methods and results” (ISO 1994) or equivalent. The percentages for uncertainty in the table are given for individual measurements, averaged over the period for calculating target values and long-term objectives, for a 95% confidence interval. The uncertainty for continuous fixed measurements shall be interpreted as being applicable in the region of the concentration used for the appropriate threshold.U.K.
18. The uncertainty for modelling and objective estimation means the maximum deviation of the measured and calculated concentration levels, over the period for calculating the appropriate threshold, without taking into account the timing of events.U.K.
19. “Time coverage” means the percentage of time considered for settling the threshold value during which the pollutant is measured.U.K.
20. “Data capture” means the ratio of the time for which the instrument produces valid data, to the time for which the statistical parameter or aggregated value is to be calculated.U.K.
21. The requirements for minimum data capture and time coverage do not include losses of data due to the regular calibration or normal maintenance of the instrumentation.U.K.
Latest Available (revised):The latest available updated version of the legislation incorporating changes made by subsequent legislation and applied by our editorial team. Changes we have not yet applied to the text, can be found in the ‘Changes to Legislation’ area.
Original (As Enacted or Made): The original version of the legislation as it stood when it was enacted or made. No changes have been applied to the text.
Point in Time: This becomes available after navigating to view revised legislation as it stood at a certain point in time via Advanced Features > Show Timeline of Changes or via a point in time advanced search.
Geographical Extent: Indicates the geographical area that this provision applies to. For further information see ‘Frequently Asked Questions’.
Show Timeline of Changes: See how this legislation has or could change over time. Turning this feature on will show extra navigation options to go to these specific points in time. Return to the latest available version by using the controls above in the What Version box.
Explanatory Memorandum sets out a brief statement of the purpose of a Statutory Instrument and provides information about its policy objective and policy implications. They aim to make the Statutory Instrument accessible to readers who are not legally qualified and accompany any Statutory Instrument or Draft Statutory Instrument laid before Parliament from June 2004 onwards.
Access essential accompanying documents and information for this legislation item from this tab. Dependent on the legislation item being viewed this may include:
This timeline shows the different points in time where a change occurred. The dates will coincide with the earliest date on which the change (e.g an insertion, a repeal or a substitution) that was applied came into force. The first date in the timeline will usually be the earliest date when the provision came into force. In some cases the first date is 01/02/1991 (or for Northern Ireland legislation 01/01/2006). This date is our basedate. No versions before this date are available. For further information see the Editorial Practice Guide and Glossary under Help.
Use this menu to access essential accompanying documents and information for this legislation item. Dependent on the legislation item being viewed this may include:
Click 'View More' or select 'More Resources' tab for additional information including: