Armed Forces Act 2016

Commentary on provisions of Act

Section 1: Duration of AFA 2006

19. Since the Bill of Rights 1688, the legislation making the provision necessary for the army to exist as a disciplined force (and, more recently, the legislation for the Royal Navy and the Royal Air Force) has required regular renewal by Act of Parliament.
20. As originally drafted, section 382 of AFA 2006 provided that the Act would expire one year after it received Royal Assent (which it did on 8 November 2006), unless renewed by Order in Council approved by each House of Parliament. It provided that AFA 2006 could be continued by such an Order for up to a year at a time, but not beyond the end of 2011. Section 1 of the Armed Forces Act 2011 substituted a new section 382, which provides that AFA 2006 will expire a year after the 2011 Act was passed, unless renewed by Order in Council approved by each House of Parliament. It provides that AFA 2006 may be continued by Order in Council for up to a year at a time, but not beyond the end of 2016.
21. The 2011 Act was passed on 3 November 2011. The Armed Forces Act (Continuation) Order 2015 (S.I. 2015/1766) provided for the continuation of AFA 2006 for a period of 12 months so that, instead of expiring at the end of 2 November 2015, it would expire at the end of 2 November 2016.
22. Section 1 substitutes a new section 382, which provides for the continuation of AFA 2006. It also repeals section 1 of the Armed Forces Act 2011, which inserted the current section 382 into AFA 2006.

New section 382 Duration of this Act

23. This new section provides that AFA 2006 expires a year after the Armed Forces Act 2016 (this Act) is passed, unless renewed by Order in Council approved by each House of Parliament. AFA 2006 may be renewed by such an Order for up to a year at a time, but not beyond the end of 2021.

Section 2: Commanding officer’s power to require preliminary alcohol and drugs tests

24. Sections 93A to 93I of AFA 2006 make provision with respect to the testing for alcohol and drugs of members of the armed forces and civilians subject to service discipline suspected of committing, or of having committed, certain offences.
25. Under section 93A, a commanding officer may require a member of the armed forces or a civilian subject to service discipline to co-operate with ‘preliminary tests’ (a preliminary breath test, a preliminary impairment test or a preliminary drugs test). A member of the armed forces may be required to co-operate with such tests where a commanding officer has reasonable cause to believe that the person:
    1. is committing a specified type of offence, or
    2. has committed such an offence and still has alcohol or a drug in their body or is still under the influence of a drug.
26. The offences in question are an offence of exceeding the alcohol limit for a prescribed safety-critical duty contrary to section 20A of AFA 2006 and an offence of unfitness for duty due to the influence of alcohol or drugs contrary to section 20(1)(a) of AFA 2006 in respect of a safety-critical duty (as defined in section 93I) (see the definition of "safety-critical duty offence" in new section 93AA(1)).
27. Under section 93A, a commanding officer may require a civilian subject to service discipline to co-operate with such tests where that officer has reasonable cause to believe that the person is:
    1. committing an offence under section 42 of AFA 2006 as respects which the corresponding offence, under the law of England and Wales, is one of the offences sspecified in subsection (3)(a) of section 93A, or
    2. has committed such an offence and still has alcohol or a drug in their body or is still under the influence of a drug.
28. The offences specified in subsection (3)(a) are maritime and aviation offences under the Railways and Transport Safety Act 2003.
29. It is an offence under section 93A(6) to fail, without reasonable excuse, to comply with a requirement to co-operate with a preliminary test.
30. Subsection (2) of section 2 amends section 93A to allow commanding officers to require co-operation with preliminary tests in three additional situations. These are referred to as "the third situation", "the fourth situation" and "the fifth situation" in new subsections (3A), (3B) and (3C) of section 93A. The situations in which such tests may currently be required are referred to as "the first situation" and "the second situation" in subsections (1) and (3) of section 93A (as amended by subsection (2)(b) and (f) of section 2).
31. The changes made by section 2 provide for post-accident preliminary testing of a person for alcohol and drugs without the need for suspicion that the person may have committed an offence. New subsection (3A) of section 93A provides for the testing, after an accident involving an aircraft or a ship, of a person who was carrying out an aviation function in relation to the aircraft or a marine function in relation to the ship at the time of the accident. New subsection (3B) of section 93A provides for the testing after such an accident of a person who carried out such a function before the accident occurred, where the carrying out of the function by the person may have caused or contributed to the occurrence of the accident or its consequences. New subsection (3C) of section 93A provides for the testing, after other serious accidents, of people who carried out safety-critical functions (see new section 93AA(6)) before or at the time of the accident, where the carrying out of those functions may have caused or contributed to the occurrence of the accident or its consequences.
32. Subsection (3) of section 2 inserts new section 93AA into AFA 2006. This new section sets out the meaning of terms used in section 93A (as amended by subsection (2) of section 2).

New section 93AA Section 93A: interpretation

33. Under subsections (2) to (4) of this new section, the Defence Council may make regulations to specify roles or activities as "aviation functions" or "marine functions" for the purposes of new subsection (3A) ("the third situation") and (3B) ("the fourth situation") of section 93A. The regulations must be made by statutory instrument, subject to affirmative resolution procedure (see the amendments of section 373 of AFA 2006 in section 2(8)).

Section 3: Duty of service policeman following investigation

34. This section amends provisions in Part 5 of AFA 2006 which deal with the process of deciding whether a person is to be charged with an offence under that Act.  Part 5 sets out the roles of the service police, the commanding officers of those suspected or charged and the Director of Service Prosecutions ("the Director") in the investigation, charging and prosecution of offences. Commanding officers have limited powers enabling them to deal with minor examples of some offences in a form of summary hearing.
35. In all cases which cannot be dealt with by the commanding officer, the decision on the charge and prosecution are the responsibility of the Director, but currently some of those cases have to be referred by the investigating service police to the commanding officer, and then from the commanding officer to the Director. They are only referred by the service police straight to the Director if the offence for which there is enough evidence to bring a charge is one listed in Schedule 2 to AFA 2006 or if any circumstances set out under regulations in Part 5 apply to the case. Section 3(1) amends section 116 of AFA 2006 to provide instead for the service police to refer straight to the Director any case where there is sufficient evidence to charge an offence and the commanding officer cannot deal with the case.
36. The other main change made by section 3 is intended to deal with the issue that, under section 116, some cases may have to be sent to a commanding officer to deal with, although they are closely connected with a case which must be sent to the Director: for example, where separate offences occurred during the same incident. This can result in separate decisions on whether to prosecute, and separate trials. Section 117(3) of AFA 2006 was intended to deal with this issue of linked cases. It currently provides that, if the service police refer a case to the Director under section 116, any other case of a description prescribed by regulations under Part 5 is treated as also referred . But it has not proved possible to make general provision in regulations about when cases should be linked in this way. It depends too much on the facts of individual cases. Section 3(5) amends section 117(3) so that, instead of cases being deemed to be referred, the service police will be able to refer a case to the Director if, after consulting the Director, they consider it appropriate to do so because of a connection with another case which is referred to the Director under section 116. Section 3(6) amends section 118 of AFA 2006 to require the service police to inform the commanding officer where a case is referred to the Director under section 117(3).
37. Section 3(7) applies the Director's charging powers under section 121 of AFA 2006 to linked cases referred to the Director under section 117.

Section 4: Power of commanding officer to charge etc

38. One of the changes made by section 3 to section 117 is that linked cases will actually be referred to the Director rather than deemed to be referred, as provided for in the current section 117. Section 4(1) makes an equivalent change in relation to referrals of linked cases by commanding officers under section 120 of AFA 2006. Section 4(2) applies the Director's powers of charging to linked cases referred under section 120.

Section 5: Power of Director of Service Prosecutions to charge etc

39. Under the current section 121 of AFA 2006, where the Director decides that a charge should be brought in a case, he cannot bring the charge directly. Instead, he must direct the suspect's commanding officer to bring the charge. Under section 122, the commanding officer must then bring the charge as directed. Section 5 introduces a new section 121(1A) under which the Director may, as an alternative, bring the charge himself. Section 5 also provides for charges brought by the Director to be allocated to the appropriate service court on the same basis as where charges are brought at his direction.

Section 6: Period for which sentence of service detention may be suspended

40. Section 190 of AFA 2006 enables a court or commanding officer, when passing a sentence of service detention, to suspend that sentence for between three and twelve months. The period for which the sentence is suspended is known as the 'operational period’. The person sentenced is required to serve the period of service detention if they are convicted of another offence committed during the ‘operational period’.
41. Section 6 amends section 190 to increase, from twelve to twenty-four months, the maximum ‘operational period’ which the Court Martial may impose when suspending a sentence of service detention. The maximum ‘operational period’ remains twelve months for a commanding officer sentencing a person following summary hearing and for the Court Martial sentencing a person whose case would have been dealt with summarily had they not made an election to be dealt with by the Court Martial (section 129 of AFA 2006 makes provision to allow a person to elect to be tried by Court Martial rather than be dealt with by his or her commanding officer).
42. The effect of subsection (2) is that the new maximum may only be imposed when sentencing for offences committed on or after section 6 comes into force. Subsection (3) makes provision for the purposes of subsection (2) with respect to cases where the date on which the offence was committed is not clear.

Section 7: Immunity from prosecution

43. Sections 7 to 12 insert new sections 304A to 304H into AFA 2006. These create a statutory framework for immunity from prosecution, restrictions on the use of evidence and sentence reductions for offenders who co-operate in investigations and prosecutions. They make provision equivalent to the provision in sections 71 to 75 of the Serious Organised Crime and Police Act 2005 which applies to the civilian criminal justice system.
44. Section 7 inserts a new section 304A into AFA 2006.

New section 304A Immunity from prosecution

45. This new section allows the Director of Service Prosecutions ("the Director") to give a person immunity from prosecution for any service offence in return for assistance given by that person to the investigation or prosecution of a service offence. The effect of subsection (2) is that immunity may not be given for assistance in relation to a minor service offence. Service offences under section 42 of AFA 2006 are not minor offences if the corresponding civilian offence in England and Wales can be tried in the Crown Court. "The corresponding offence under the law of England and Wales" is defined in section 42(8) of AFA 2006. Other service offences are not minor offences if they are punishable with imprisonment for more than 2 years.
46. An offence for which immunity is given and any conditions to which it is subject must be specified in a written notice. The effect of subsection (4) is that the immunity is withdrawn in the event that the person to whom immunity is given fails to comply with those conditions.

Section 8: Undertakings as to use of evidence

47. Section 8 inserts a new section 304B into AFA 2006.

New section 304B Undertakings as to use of evidence

48. This new section allows the Director to give a person an undertaking that information will not be used against them in service proceedings. Such an undertaking may be given in return for assistance given by that person to the investigation or prosecution of a service offence. The effect of subsection (5) is that an undertaking may not be given for assistance in relation to a minor service offence. An undertaking may be given in respect of the use of information in service proceedings for any service offence.
49. The information in respect of which the undertaking is given, the proceedings that the undertaking applies to and any conditions to which it is subject must be specified in a written notice. The effect of subsection (4) is that the undertaking is withdrawn in the event of failure to comply with those conditions.

Section 9: Reduction in sentence

50. Section 9 inserts a new section 304C into AFA 2006. New section 304C makes provision equivalent to the provision in section 73 of the Serious Organised Crime and Police Act 2005.

New section 304C Reduction in sentence

51. This new section provides that a person who has been convicted of a service offence following a plea of guilty in the Court Martial may receive a reduction in their sentence in return for assistance that they have given, or offered to give, to an investigator or prosecutor pursuant to an agreement with the Director. Subsection (1)(b) refers to assistance in relation to any offence (not just service offences).
52. The effect of subsections (4) and (5) is that the power in subsection (2) to reduce a sentence overrides provisions in other legislation fixing minimum sentences or, in the case of a sentence fixed by law, affecting how a judge advocate determines the minimum period of imprisonment or detention that a person must serve, so the judge advocate could impose a sentence which is less than would otherwise be required.
53. The power in subsection (2) is also available to courts that substitute a sentence when dealing with appeals from the Court Martial. This is because sections 16A(2) and 41(3) of the Court Martial Appeals Act 1968 give the Court Martial Appeal Court and the Supreme Court the same powers as the Court Martial had when originally sentencing.

Section 10: Review of sentence following offer of assistance

54. Section 10 inserts new section 304D into AFA 2006. New section 304D makes provision equivalent to the provision in section 74 of the Serious Organised Crime and Police Act 2005 for sentences to be reduced on review (section 74(2)(b) and (c) and (6) cases).

New section 304D Review of sentence following offer of assistance

55. This new section provides that a person who has been sentenced by the Court Martial may have their sentence reviewed to take account of assistance that they have given, or offered to give, to an investigator or prosecutor pursuant to an agreement with the Director. The reviewing court may reduce the sentence in return for the assistance offered or given. Subsections (2)(b) and (3)(b) refer to assistance in relation to any offence (not just service offences).
56. The effect of subsection (1)(b) is that a person who received a sentence that was fixed by law may only have that sentence reviewed under new section 304D if they pleaded guilty to the offence for which they received that sentence.
57. A review under new section 304D may further reduce a sentence that has already been discounted under new sections 304C or 304D, if the person sentenced gives or offers to give further assistance.
58. Subsection (4) provides that a case may only be referred for review under new section 304D if the Director thinks that referral is in the interests of justice.
59. Subsection (8) allows a person whose sentence is reviewed under new section 304D to appeal against the Court Martial’s decision to reduce, or not to reduce, the sentence. The Director may also appeal against the decision (see subsection (9)).
60. Subsection (10) allows regulations to be made in relation to the conduct of proceedings on appeals against decisions under new section 304D (but this is subject to subsection (11)).
61. Subsection (13) applies, for the purposes of new section 304D, subsections (3) to (5) of new section 304C. The effect of this is that the power, in subsection (6) of new section 304D, to reduce a sentence overrides provisions in other legislation fixing minimum sentences or, in the case of a sentence fixed by law, affecting how a judge advocate determines the minimum period of imprisonment or detention that a person must serve, so the judge advocate could impose a sentence which is less than would otherwise be required.

Section 11: Review of sentence following failure to assist

62. Section 11 inserts new section 304E into AFA 2006. New section 304E makes provision equivalent to the provision in section 74 of the Serious Organised Crime and Police Act 2005 for sentences to be increased on review (section 74(2)(a) and (5) cases).

New section 304E Review of sentence following failure to assist

63. This new section allows a sentence to be reviewed to take account of a failure by the person sentenced to give assistance that they offered to an investigator or prosecutor and in return for which they received a sentence that was discounted under new section 304C or 304D. If the reviewing court is satisfied that the person knowingly failed to give the assistance, it may increase the sentence to take account of that failure.
64. Subsection (2) provides that a case may only be referred for review under new section 304E if the Director thinks that referral is in the interests of justice.
65. Subsection (7) allows a person whose sentence is reviewed under new section 304E to appeal against the decision of the reviewing court. The Director may also appeal against the decision (see subsection (8)).
66. Subsection (9) allows regulations to be made in relation to the conduct of proceedings on appeals against decisions under new section 304E (but this is subject to subsection (10)).

Section 12: Supplementary provision

67. Section 12 inserts new sections 304F to 304H into AFA 2006. New section 304F makes provision equivalent to the provision in section 73(3), (4) and (7) of the Serious Organised Crime and Police Act 2005, including those provisions as applied by section 74(15) of that Act. New section 304G makes provision equivalent to the provision in section 75 of the 2005 Act with respect to the exclusion of people from review proceedings.

New section 304F Sections 304C to 304E: statements in open court

68. Subsections (1) and (2) of new section 304F provide that a court which reduces a person’s sentence under new sections 304C or 304D is required to make a statement in open court confirming this and identifying the sentence it would have passed had that reduction not been given. However, this is subject to subsection (3), which provides that the requirement under subsection (2) and the requirement under section 252 of AFA 2006 (for a sentencing court to give reasons for deciding on the sentence passed), do not apply if the court thinks that it would not be in the public interest to disclose that the sentence has been discounted.
69. Where the court thinks that it would not be in the public interest to disclose that the sentence has been discounted, subsection (3) provides that it must instead make a statement in writing to the prosecutor and the defendant containing the same information as it would otherwise have been required to include in a statement in open court under subsection (2).
70. Subsections (4) and (5) provide that a court sentencing under new section 304E is not required by section 252 of AFA 2006 to disclose that the sentence imposed replaces a sentence that was discounted under new section 304C or 304D, if it thinks that disclosing this would not be in the public interest.

New section 304G Sections 304D and 304E: exclusion of public from review proceedings

71. This new section allows a court conducting review proceedings under new section 304D or 304E to make an order excluding members of the public from those proceedings and prohibiting publication of matters relating to the proceedings. Subsection (3) lists those who may not be so excluded. Such an order may only be made if the court is satisfied that making the order is necessary to protect the safety of a person and that it is in the interests of justice (see subsection (4)).

New section 304H Meaning of "sentence"

72. This new section defines "sentence" for the purposes of new sections 304A to 304G.
73. The reference to "sentence" includes all of the types of punishment listed in section 164(1) of AFA 2006, not just imprisonment or service detention. It includes the service-specific punishments, such as forfeiture of seniority.
74. The orders referred to in paragraph (a) include orders made, where a life sentence is imposed, to set the minimum period of imprisonment that must be served, or having the effect that there is no such minimum period.

Offences under the Service Discipline Acts

75. The intention is to use the power in section 380(8A) of AFA 2006 to provide that new sections 304A to 304H of AFA 2006 will apply in connection with offences under the Service Discipline Acts that preceded AFA 2006. It would be necessary to do this as AFA 2006 does not include provision about such offences (they are not "service offences" as defined in section 50 of AFA 2006). Instead, orders under section 380 make transitional provision about such offences. The main order made under section 380 is the Armed Forces Act 2006 (Transitional Provisions, etc) Order (S.I. 2009/1059). That order makes provision so that various references in AFA 2006 to "service offences" include offences under the Service Discipline Acts that preceded AFA 2006.

Section 13: AFA 2006: Isle of Man and British overseas territories

76. Subsections (1) and (2) of this section provide for AFA 2006, as it currently has effect in the United Kingdom, to come into force in the Isle of Man and the British overseas territories (except Gibraltar), having previously expired there.
77. Subsection (3) of this section amends section 384 of AFA 2006 to provide that AFA 2006 no longer extends to Gibraltar.
78. Unlike AFA 2006, the Armed Forces Act 2011 did not extend directly to the Isle of Man and the British overseas territories (but its provisions could be extended there by Order in Council). Section 1 of the 2011 Act inserted a new section 382 into AFA 2006, to provide for the continuation of that Act beyond 2011. Section 382 as originally enacted provided that AFA 2006 could not be continued in force beyond 2011. Section 382, as amended by the 2011 Act, provided that AFA 2006 could be continued beyond 2011 but not beyond the end of 2016. However, new section 382 did not extend to the Isle of Man or the British overseas territories, so in those jurisdictions section 382 remained as originally enacted. This meant that it continued to provide that AFA 2006 could not be continued in force beyond 2011. Accordingly, AFA 2006 expired in those jurisdictions in 2011 in accordance with section 382 as originally enacted.

Section 14: Repeals relating to discharge for homosexual acts

79. Section 1(1) of the Sexual Offences Act 1967 provided that, subject to section 2 of that Act, a homosexual act committed in private between consenting adults was not a criminal offence. Section 1(5) of the 1967 Act provided that subsection (1) did not prevent an act from being an offence under the Army Act 1955, the Air Force Act 1955 or the Naval Discipline Act 1957. Section 146(1), (2) and (3) of the Criminal Justice and Public Order Act 1994 repealed sections 1(5) and 2 of the 1967 Act and the equivalent provisions of Scottish legislation. Section 147(1) and (2) of the 1994 Act repealed the equivalent provisions of Northern Irish legislation. The only provisions in sections 146 and 147 which remain in force are sections 146(4) and 147(3).
80. Sections 146(4) and 147(3) contain wording which provides that those sections do not prevent a homosexual act from being a ground for discharging a member of the armed forces. Section 14 removes that wording. When sections 146 and 147 were enacted, it was government policy that homosexuality was incompatible with service in the armed forces and, accordingly, members of the armed forces who engaged in homosexual activity were administratively discharged from the armed forces. That policy was abandoned in January 2000, following a judgment of the European Court of Human Rights.

Section 15: War pensions committees and armed and reserve forces compensation schemes

81. War pensions committees are established by regulations made by the Secretary of State under section 25(1) of the Social Security Act 1989. The Secretary of State may, by regulations under section 25, give war pensions committees functions relating to war pensions and war pensioners. Those functions may include, for example, considering complaints made to them by persons receiving or claiming war pensions and, if they think fit, making representations about those complaints to the Secretary of State. "War pension" and "war pensioner" are defined in section 25(4) of the 1989 Act. The committees’ existing functions relate primarily to the war pensions scheme provided for in the Naval, Military and Air Forces Etc (Disablement and Death) Service Pensions Order 2006 (S.I. 2006/606). This scheme provides compensation for injury or death caused by service in the armed forces before 6 April 2005.
82. Subsections (2),(3) and (5) of section 15 amend section 25 so that war pensions committees may also be given functions relating to benefits payable under armed and reserve forces compensation schemes established under the Armed Forces (Pensions and Compensation) Act 2004. This allows provision to be made, by regulations under section 25, to extend the functions of war pensions committees to include, for example, considering complaints made to them by persons receiving or claiming benefits under the scheme provided for in the Armed Forces and Reserve Forces (Compensation Scheme) Order 2011 (S.I. 2011/517). This scheme provides compensation for injury or death caused by service in the armed forces on or after 6 April 2005. Section 15(4) amends section 25 by inserting a new subsection (3A) which allows the Secretary of State to provide, in regulations under that section, for the naming of war pensions committees.

Section 16: Powers of Ministry of Defence fire-fighters in an emergency

83. The purpose of this section is to give Ministry of Defence fire-fighters (as defined in subsection (3)) statutory powers to act in an emergency to protect life or property. The powers conferred are the same as those of employees of Fire and Rescue Authorities under section 44 of the Fire and Rescue Services Act 2004, section 25 of the Fire (Scotland) Act 2005 and Article 18 of the Fire and Rescue Services (Northern Ireland) Order 2006.
84. Ministry of Defence fire-fighters who are authorised in writing by the Secretary of State for the purposes of section 16 have the powers to act in an emergency that are set out in subsection (1). In particular, where the fire-fighter reasonably believes that a fire has broken out or is about to break out, he or she may do anything that he or she believes is reasonably necessary for the purpose of extinguishing or preventing the fire or protecting life or property (see subsection (1)(a)). Similar powers are conferred in connection with road traffic accidents (see subsection (1)(b)). Subsection (2) provides that the fire-fighters’ powers include powers to enter premises by force if necessary, to close roads and to regulate traffic.
85. Subsections (4) to (6) extend the offence in section 1 of the Emergency Workers (Obstruction) Act 2006 so that it is an offence under that section to obstruct or hinder a Ministry of Defence fire-fighter who is acting in an emergency (or a person who is assisting them) in England and Wales, Scotland or Northern Ireland.

Section 17: Minor amendments

86. This section makes minor amendments to enactments to give Ministry of Defence fire-fighters the same exemptions from provisions in those enactments as employees of Fire and Rescue Authorities. The enactments are:
    1. section 102(4) of the Transport Act 1968 (exemption for fire brigades, etc to rules on drivers’ hours)
    2. section 15(7)(a)(i) of the Greater London Council (General Powers) Act 1974 (exception for fire and rescue vehicles to offence of parking on footways, etc)
    3. section 62(2)(a) of the Control of Pollution Act 1974 (exception for fire brigades, etc to prohibition on use of loud-speakers in streets)
    4. section 135(1) of the Merchant Shipping Act 1995 (restrictions on transfer of oil at night).

Section 20: Extent in the United Kingdom

87. With the exception of section 14 (repeals relating to discharge for homosexual acts) and section 17 (minor amendments) this Act extends to the whole of the United Kingdom.
88. In section 14 (repeals relating to discharge for homosexual acts):
    1. section 146(4) of the Criminal Justice and Public Order Act 1994 is part of the law of England and Wales and Scotland;
    2. section 147(3) of the Criminal Justice and Public Order Act 1994 is part of the law of Northern Ireland only.
89. In section 17 (minor amendments):
    1. section 15 of the Greater London Council (General Powers) Act 1974 is part of the law of England and Wales only;
    2. section 102 of the Transport Act 1968 and section 62 of the Control of Pollution Act 1974 are part of the law of England and Wales and Scotland;
    3. section 135 of the Merchant Shipping Act 1995 is part of the law of the whole of the United Kingdom.
90. The provisions applicable to members of the armed forces will apply to them wherever they are in the world.

Section 21: Extent in the Channel Islands, Isle of Man and British overseas territories

91. The changes that this Act makes to AFA 2006 may be extended to the Channel Islands by Order in Council under section 384(1) of AFA 2006. If such an Order is made, it can modify those changes (so that the law of the Channel Islands is not the same as that of the United Kingdom).
92. The changes that this Act makes to AFA 2006 extend directly (ie without the need for an Order in Council) to the Isle of Man and the British overseas territories (except Gibraltar), but an Order in Council may be made under section 384(2) of AFA 2006 to modify the Act in its application to any of those territories.
93. The provisions applicable to members of the armed forces will apply to them wherever they are in the world.

Schedule to the Act: Isle of Man and British overseas territories: further provision

94. The Schedule makes further provision in connection with AFA 2006 and the Isle of Man and British overseas territories.
95. Paragraph 2 provides that amendments of AFA 2006, and of provisions applied by AFA 2006, made before section 13 comes into force extend to the Isle of Man and British overseas territories. When originally enacted, some of those amendments did not extend there. For example, the amendments made by the Armed Forces Act 2011 did not extend there (but could be extended there by Order in Council under section 33 of that Act).
96. Paragraph 3 provides that orders, regulations and rules made under AFA 2006 that are in force in England and Wales immediately before section 13 comes into force extend to the Isle of Man and British overseas territories.
97. Paragraphs 4 and 6 to 12 make provision in consequence of the fact that AFA 2006 is no longer to extend to Gibraltar. Paragraph 4 provides that powers in certain Acts to extend amendments of AFA 2006 to jurisdictions outside the United Kingdom cannot be used in respect of Gibraltar. Paragraphs 6 to 12 amend certain references to British overseas territories in AFA 2006 to exclude Gibraltar.