- Latest available (Revised)
- Original (As adopted by EU)
Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2015/1866 of 13 October 2015 laying down detailed rules for the implementation of Regulation (EU) No 511/2014 of the European Parliament and of the Council as regards the register of collections, monitoring user compliance and best practices
When the UK left the EU, legislation.gov.uk published EU legislation that had been published by the EU up to IP completion day (31 December 2020 11.00 p.m.). On legislation.gov.uk, these items of legislation are kept up-to-date with any amendments made by the UK since then.
Legislation.gov.uk publishes the UK version. EUR-Lex publishes the EU version. The EU Exit Web Archive holds a snapshot of EUR-Lex’s version from IP completion day (31 December 2020 11.00 p.m.).
There are currently no known outstanding effects by UK legislation for Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2015/1866.![]()
Revised legislation carried on this site may not be fully up to date. At the current time any known changes or effects made by subsequent legislation have been applied to the text of the legislation you are viewing by the editorial team. Please see ‘Frequently Asked Questions’ for details regarding the timescales for which new effects are identified and recorded on this site.
THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION,
Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union,
Having regard to Regulation (EU) No 511/2014 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 16 April 2014 on compliance measures for users from the Nagoya Protocol on Access to Genetic Resources and the Fair and Equitable Sharing of Benefits Arising from their Utilization in the Union(1), and in particular Article 5(5), Article 7(6) and Article 8(7) thereof,
Whereas:
(1) Regulation (EU) No 511/2014 establishes rules governing compliance with access and benefit-sharing for genetic resources and traditional knowledge associated with genetic resources in accordance with the provisions of the Nagoya Protocol on Access to Genetic Resources and the Fair and Equitable Sharing of Benefits Arising from their Utilization to the Convention on Biological Diversity (the ‘Nagoya Protocol’). The effective implementation of that Regulation will also contribute to the conservation of biological diversity and the sustainable use of its components, in accordance with the provisions of the Convention on Biological Diversity.
(2) Articles 5 and 8 of Regulation (EU) No 511/2014 provide for voluntary tools, namely registered collections and best practices, to assist users in complying with their due diligence obligation. Identifying and registering collections which effectively apply measures that result in supplying genetic resources and related information only with documentation providing evidence of legal access and ensuring the establishment of mutually agreed terms, where required, is expected to assist users in complying with that obligation. Users which obtain genetic resources from a collection included in the register should be considered to have exercised due diligence as regards the seeking of information. Identifying and recognising as best practices measures that are particularly suitable for achieving compliance with the system of implementation of the Nagoya Protocol, at an affordable cost and with legal certainty, is also expected to assist users in fulfilling the due diligence obligation. The effective implementation of a recognized best practice by users should be considered by the competent authorities in their checks on user compliance. In order to ensure uniform conditions for the implementation of those provisions, detailed rules are required regarding the procedures to be followed in the case of a request for registration of a collection or part thereof and regarding recognition of best practices.
(3) Where an applicant wishing to be included in the register is a member of a network of collections, it is useful that such applicant provides information on any other collections or parts thereof from the same network that were or are the subject of an application in other Member States. In order to facilitate the fair and consistent treatment of applicants in different Member States, when verifying the collections or parts thereof, the competent authorities of the Member States that have been made aware of such applications in relation to different collections or parts thereof within a network should consider exchanging information with the authorities of those Member States in which applications have been made by other members of the network.
(4) Regulation (EU) No 511/2014 applies to genetic resources and to traditional knowledge associated with genetic resources. The material for the utilisation of which a due diligence declaration is required includes: genetic resources, traditional knowledge associated with genetic resources and a combination of both.
(5) In order to ensure uniform conditions for the implementation of provisions on monitoring user compliance, detailed rules are required regarding the declarations to be made by recipients of funding for research involving the utilisation of genetic resources and traditional knowledge associated with genetic resources, as well as regarding the declarations to be made by users at the stage of final development of a product developed via the utilisation of genetic resources and traditional knowledge associated with genetic resources.
(6) When monitoring user compliance at the stage of research funding, it is important to ensure that recipients of funding understand their obligations under Regulation (EU) No 511/2014 and that they exercise due diligence. It is equally important to provide information to the Access and Benefit-Sharing Clearing House (‘ABS Clearing House’), and to ensure that such information is useful for the functioning and implementation of the Nagoya Protocol. Where an internationally recognised certificate of compliance is not available, other relevant information should be submitted. In order to balance the objectives of submitting useful information to the ABS Clearing House and of not overburdening the recipients of funding for research, only information which is essential for the identification of genetic resources should be exchanged at this check-point.
(7) The monitoring of user compliance is effective when carried out in the Member State where the utilisation takes place. It is therefore appropriate that the declaration of due diligence is submitted to the competent authority of the Member State where the recipient of funding is established, as this is where the research involving utilisation of genetic resources and traditional knowledge associated with genetic resources typically takes place.
(8) The unnecessary multiplication of due diligence declarations should be avoided. Therefore, a declaration made by recipients of research funding may cover more than one genetic resource or any traditional knowledge associated with genetic resources. A single declaration may also be made by several users jointly conducting research involving the utilisation of genetic resources and traditional knowledge associated with genetic resources funded by one grant. In this context, a special role should be given to the project co-ordinator, who should be responsible for submitting the declarations on behalf of the users concerned. In the light of Article 12 of Regulation (EU) No 511/2014, the competent authority receiving the declarations submitted by the project co-ordinator should exchange the information with its counterparts in the other Member States concerned.
(9) In order to monitor user compliance under Article 7(2) of Regulation (EU) No 511/2014, the final stage of utilisation, meaning the stage of final development of a product should be determined. The stage of final development of a product can be identified with legal certainty as having been completed at the time when either market approval or authorisation is sought or a notification required prior to placing for the first time on the Union market is made or, where neither market approval or authorisation nor a notification is required, at the time of placing for the first time on the Union market a product developed via the utilisation of genetic resources and traditional knowledge associated with genetic resources. In some cases, it may not be the user that is requesting market approval or authorisation, making a notification or placing a product for the first time on the Union market. In order to effectively address all activities that utilise genetic resources and traditional knowledge associated with genetic resources within the Union, the due diligence declaration should, in those cases, be made by the user selling or transferring in any other way the result of the utilisation. Effective monitoring of user compliance within the Union should also address cases where the utilisation has ended in the Union and its outcome is sold or transferred in any other way outside the Union without placing a product on the Union market.
(10) Those different events that give rise to the due diligence declaration by the user at the stage of final development of a product are exclusive of each other, and therefore the declaration should only be made once. As the stage of final development of a product is reached before any of those events occur, the due diligence declaration should be made prior to the first event occurring.
(11) The information provided in the due diligence declarations is to be submitted by the competent authorities to the ABS Clearing House pursuant to Article 7(3) of Regulation (EU) No 511/2014. Where an internationally recognised certificate of compliance is not available, other relevant information provided in accordance with Article 17(4) of the Nagoya Protocol, as specified in Article 4(3)(b) of Regulation (EU) No 511/2014, should be submitted. In order to ensure efficient operation of the Nagoya Protocol and the ABS Clearing House in particular, only information which will facilitate the monitoring by the competent national authorities referred to in Article 13(2) of the Nagoya Protocol should be exchanged.
(12) A due diligence declaration is required only for genetic resources or traditional knowledge associated with genetic resources obtained from a Party to the Nagoya Protocol that has established relevant access and benefit-sharing legislation or regulatory requirements pursuant to Article 6(1) and Article 7 of the Nagoya Protocol.
(13) In the light of the novelty of measures introduced, it is appropriate to review this Regulation. In this context, the reports referred to in Article 16(1) of Regulation (EU) No 511/2014 may prove useful and therefore should be taken into account, where available.
(14) The measures provided for in this Regulation are in accordance with the opinion of the ABS Committee,
HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:
This Regulation lays down detailed rules concerning the implementation of Articles 5, 7 and 8 of Regulation (EU) No 511/2014 which refer to the register of collections, the monitoring of user compliance, and to best practices.
The register established by the [F1Secretary of State] in accordance with Article 5 of Regulation (EU) No 511/2014 shall include the following information for each collection or part thereof:
F2...
name given to the collection or part thereof and its contact details;
name and contact details of the holder;
category of the collection or part thereof;
short description of the collection or part thereof;
link to database, where available;
[F3details of the competent authority] that verified the capacity of the collection to comply with Article 5(3) of Regulation (EU) No 511/2014;
date of inclusion in the register;
other existing identifier, where available;
where applicable, date of removal from the register.
Textual Amendments
F1Words in Art. 2 substituted (31.12.2020) by The Nagoya Protocol (Compliance) (Amendment) (EU Exit) Regulations 2018 (S.I. 2018/1393), regs. 1, 4(2)(a); 2020 c. 1, Sch. 5 para. 1(1)
F2Art. 2(a) omitted (31.12.2020) by virtue of The Nagoya Protocol (Compliance) (Amendment) (EU Exit) Regulations 2018 (S.I. 2018/1393), regs. 1, 4(2)(b); 2020 c. 1, Sch. 5 para. 1(1)
F3Words in Art. 2(g) substituted (31.12.2020) by The Nagoya Protocol (Compliance) (Amendment) (EU Exit) Regulations 2018 (S.I. 2018/1393), regs. 1, 4(2)(c); 2020 c. 1, Sch. 5 para. 1(1)
1.A request for inclusion of a collection or a part thereof in the register, referred to in Article 5(2) of Regulation (EU) No 511/2014, shall contain the information specified in Annex I to this Regulation.
Following the inclusion in the register of a collection or a part thereof, the collection holder shall notify the competent authority of any significant changes that influence the collection's capacity to comply with the criteria set out in Article 5(3) of Regulation (EU) No 511/2014 and of any changes to the information previously submitted on the basis of Part A of Annex I to this Regulation.
F52.. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
3.The verification referred to in Article 5(2) of Regulation (EU) No 511/2014 may include the following:
(a)on-the-spot checks;
(b)examination of selected documentation and records of a collection or part thereof, which are relevant for demonstrating compliance with Article 5(3) of Regulation (EU) No 511/2014;
(c)examination of whether selected samples of genetic resources and related information of the collection concerned have been documented in accordance with Article 5(3) of Regulation (EU) 511/2014;
(d)examination of whether the collection holder has the capacity to consistently supply genetic resources to third persons for their utilisation in accordance with Article 5(3) of Regulation (EU) No 511/2014;
(e)interviews with relevant persons, such as the collection holder, staff, external verifiers, and users obtaining samples from that collection.
F54.. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Textual Amendments
F4Words in Art. 3 heading omitted (31.12.2020) by virtue of The Nagoya Protocol (Compliance) (Amendment) (EU Exit) Regulations 2018 (S.I. 2018/1393), regs. 1, 4(3)(a); 2020 c. 1, Sch. 5 para. 1(1)
F5Art. 3(2)(4) omitted (31.12.2020) by virtue of The Nagoya Protocol (Compliance) (Amendment) (EU Exit) Regulations 2018 (S.I. 2018/1393), regs. 1, 4(3)(b); 2020 c. 1, Sch. 5 para. 1(1)
1.The verification referred to Article 5(4) of Regulation (EU) No 511/2014 by the competent authorities shall be effective, proportionate and capable of detecting cases of non-compliance with Article 5(3) of that Regulation. It shall be conducted on the basis of a periodically reviewed plan developed using a risk-based approach. The plan should provide for a minimum level of checks and allow for differentiation in the frequency of checks.
2.Where there are substantiated concerns that a collection or part thereof included in the register no longer meets the criteria set out in Article 5(3) of Regulation (EU) No 511/2014, the competent authority shall carry out additional verification.
3.The verification referred to in paragraph 1 and 2 may include the following:
(a)on-the-spot checks;
(b)examination of selected documentation and records of a collection or part thereof, which are relevant for demonstrating compliance with Article 5(3) of Regulation (EU) No 511/2014;
(c)examination of whether selected samples of genetic resources and related information have been documented and supplied to third persons for their utilisation in accordance with Article 5(3) of Regulation (EU) No 511/2014;
(d)interviews with relevant persons, such as the collection holder, staff, external verifiers, and users obtaining samples from that collection.
4.The collection holder and its staff shall provide all assistance necessary to facilitate the verification referred to in paragraphs 1, 2 and 3.
5.Remedial actions or measures referred to in Article 5(4) of Regulation (EU) No 511/2014 shall be effective and proportionate and address shortcomings which, if left unaddressed, would permanently compromise the capacity of a registered collection to comply with Article 5(3) of that Regulation. They may require the collection holder concerned to put in place additional tools or to improve its capacity to apply existing tools. The collection holder shall report to the competent authority on the implementation of the identified remedial actions or measures.
1.A recipient of funding for research involving the utilisation of genetic resources and traditional knowledge associated with genetic resources shall make the due diligence declaration requested pursuant to Article 7(1) of Regulation (EU) No 511/2014 to the competent authority F6...
2.The due diligence declaration shall be made by submitting the completed template set out in Annex II. It shall be made after the first instalment of funding has been received and all the genetic resources and traditional knowledge associated with genetic resources that are utilised in the funded research have been obtained, but no later than at the time of the final report, or in absence of such report, at the project end. The time of submission of such declaration may be further specified by the [F7Secretary of State].
3.Where the same research project is funded from more than one source or involves more than one recipient, the recipient(s) may decide to make only one declaration. F8...
F94.. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
5.For the purposes of this Article and Annex II, ‘funding for research’ means any financial contribution by means of a grant to carry out research, whether from commercial or non-commercial sources. It does not cover internal budgetary resources of private or public entities
Textual Amendments
F6Words in Art. 5(1) omitted (31.12.2020) by virtue of The Nagoya Protocol (Compliance) (Amendment) (EU Exit) Regulations 2018 (S.I. 2018/1393), regs. 1, 4(4)(a); 2020 c. 1, Sch. 5 para. 1(1)
F7Words in Art. 5(2) substituted (31.12.2020) by The Nagoya Protocol (Compliance) (Amendment) (EU Exit) Regulations 2018 (S.I. 2018/1393), regs. 1, 4(4)(b); 2020 c. 1, Sch. 5 para. 1(1)
F8Words in Art. 5(3) omitted (31.12.2020) by virtue of The Nagoya Protocol (Compliance) (Amendment) (EU Exit) Regulations 2018 (S.I. 2018/1393), regs. 1, 4(4)(c); 2020 c. 1, Sch. 5 para. 1(1)
F9Art. 5(4) omitted (31.12.2020) by virtue of The Nagoya Protocol (Compliance) (Amendment) (EU Exit) Regulations 2018 (S.I. 2018/1393), regs. 1, 4(4)(d); 2020 c. 1, Sch. 5 para. 1(1)
1.For the utilisation of genetic resources and traditional knowledge associated with genetic resources users shall make the due diligence declaration pursuant to Article 7(2) of Regulation (EU) No 511/2014 to the [F10relevant competent authority]. That declaration shall be made by submitting the completed template set out in Annex III to this Regulation.
2.The due diligence declaration referred to in paragraph 1 shall only be made once, prior to the first of the following events occurring:
(a)market approval or authorisation is sought for a product developed via the utilisation of genetic resources and traditional knowledge associated with genetic resources;
(b)a notification required prior to placing for the first time on the [F11United Kingdom] market is made for a product developed via the utilisation of genetic resources and traditional knowledge associated with genetic resources;
(c)placing on the [F11United Kingdom] market for the first time a product developed via the utilisation of genetic resources and traditional knowledge associated with genetic resources for which no market approval, authorisation or notification is required;
(d)the result of the utilisation is sold or transferred in any other way to a natural or legal person within the [F11United Kingdom] in order for that person to carry out one of the activities referred to in points (a), (b) and (c);
(e)the utilisation in the [F11United Kingdom] has ended and its outcome is sold or transferred in any other way to a natural or legal person outside the [F11United Kingdom].
3.For the purposes of this Article and Annex III, ‘result of the utilisation’ means products, precursors or predecessors to a product, as well as parts of products to be incorporated into a final product, blueprints or designs, based on which manufacturing and production could be carried out without further utilisation of the genetic resource and traditional knowledge associated with genetic resources.
4.For the purposes of this Article and Annex III, ‘placing on the [F12United Kingdom] market’ means the first making available of a product developed via utilisation of genetic resources and traditional knowledge associated with genetic resources on the [F12United Kingdom] market, where making available means the supply by any means, for distribution, consumption or use on the [F12United Kingdom] market in the course of a commercial activity, whether in return for payment or free of charge. Placing on the market does not include pre-commercial trials, including clinical, field or pest resistance trials, nor the making available of unauthorised medicinal products in order to provide treatment options for individual patients or groups of patients.
Textual Amendments
F10Words in Art. 6(1) substituted (31.12.2020) by The Nagoya Protocol (Compliance) (Amendment) (EU Exit) Regulations 2018 (S.I. 2018/1393), regs. 1, 4(5)(a); 2020 c. 1, Sch. 5 para. 1(1)
F11Words in Art. 6(2) substituted (31.12.2020) by The Nagoya Protocol (Compliance) (Amendment) (EU Exit) Regulations 2018 (S.I. 2018/1393), regs. 1, 4(5)(b); 2020 c. 1, Sch. 5 para. 1(1)
F12Words in Art. 6(4) substituted (31.12.2020) by The Nagoya Protocol (Compliance) (Amendment) (EU Exit) Regulations 2018 (S.I. 2018/1393), regs. 1, 4(5)(b); 2020 c. 1, Sch. 5 para. 1(1)
1.In accordance with Article 7(3) of Regulation (EU) No 511/2014, and unless the information is confidential within the meaning of Article 7(5) of Regulation (EU) No 511/2014, the competent authorities shall transmit to the ABS Clearing House the information received on the basis of Part A of Annexes II and III to this Regulation without undue delay and at the latest one month after the information has been received.
2.Where essential information, such as on the user and utilisation, on the place of access, or on the genetic resource, without which the record could not be published on the ABS Clearing House, is considered confidential, the competent authorities shall consider instead transmitting that essential information directly to the competent national authorities referred to in Article 13(2) of the Nagoya Protocol.
F133.. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
F134.. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Textual Amendments
F13Art. 7(3)(4) omitted (31.12.2020) by virtue of The Nagoya Protocol (Compliance) (Amendment) (EU Exit) Regulations 2018 (S.I. 2018/1393), regs. 1, 4(6); 2020 c. 1, Sch. 5 para. 1(1)
1.An application submitted in accordance with Article 8(1) of Regulation (EU) No 511/2014 must be made to the Secretary of State by providing the information and supporting documentation specified in Annex 4 to this Regulation.
2.An interested party that does not represent users but is involved in the access, collection, transfer or commercialisation of genetic resources or in developing measures and policy related to genetic resources must provide with its application information, as specified in Annex 4 to this Regulation, on its legitimate interest in developing and overseeing a combination of procedures, tools or mechanisms, which, when effectively implemented by a user, enables that user to comply with the obligations provided for in Articles 4 and 7 of Regulation (EU) No 511/2014.
3.The Secretary of State must acknowledge receipt of an application within 20 working days from the date of receipt of the application. The Secretary of State must provide the applicant with an indicative time limit within which a decision on the application will be taken. The Secretary of State must inform the applicant if additional information or documentation is required in order to carry out the assessment of the application.
4.The applicant must submit to the Secretary of State any additional information and documentation requested without undue delay.
5.The Secretary of State must inform the applicant each time of any revision to the indicative time limit within which a decision on the application will be taken due to the necessity to obtain additional information or documents for the assessment of the application. The Secretary of State must inform the applicant in writing of the status of the assessment of the application at least every six months.]
Textual Amendments
F14Art. 8 substituted (31.12.2020) by The Nagoya Protocol (Compliance) (Amendment) (EU Exit) Regulations 2018 (S.I. 2018/1393), regs. 1, 4(7); 2020 c. 1, Sch. 5 para. 1(1)
1.Where the Secretary of State decides to grant recognition as best practice under Article 8(2) of Regulation (EU) No 511/2014 or to withdraw the recognition of best practice under Article 8(5) of that Regulation, the Secretary of State must inform the association of users or the other interested parties of that decision without undue delay.
2.The Secretary of State must state reasons for the decision to grant recognition as best practice or to withdraw the recognition of best practice, and must publish that decision in the register established under Article 8(6) of Regulation (EU) No 511/2014.]
Textual Amendments
F15Art. 9 substituted (31.12.2020) by The Nagoya Protocol (Compliance) (Amendment) (EU Exit) Regulations 2018 (S.I. 2018/1393), regs. 1, 4(8); 2020 c. 1, Sch. 5 para. 1(1)
Where the Secretary of State is informed, pursuant to Article 8(3) of Regulation (EU) No 511/2014, of any changes or updates made to a recognised best practice, the Secretary of State must assess whether the changed or updated combination of procedures, tools or mechanisms still enables users to comply with their obligations provided for in Articles 4 and 7 of Regulation (EU) No 511/2014.]
Textual Amendments
F16Art. 10 substituted (31.12.2020) by The Nagoya Protocol (Compliance) (Amendment) (EU Exit) Regulations 2018 (S.I. 2018/1393), regs. 1, 4(9); 2020 c. 1, Sch. 5 para. 1(1)
1.Where the [F17Secretary of State] receives substantiated information regarding repeated or significant cases of non-compliance with Articles 4 and 7 of Regulation (EU) No 511/2014 by a user implementing a best practice, the [F17Secretary of State] shall request the association of users or the other interested parties to submit observations regarding the alleged non-compliance and whether those cases indicate possible deficiencies in the best practice.
2.Where the association of users or the other interested parties submit observations, they shall do so within three months.
F183.. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
F184.. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
5.Where the [F17Secretary of State] examines possible deficiencies in a best practice and cases of non-compliance with the obligations provided for in Articles 4 and 7 of Regulation (EU) No 511/2014, as referred to in Article 8(4) of that Regulation, the association of users or the other interested parties subject to examination shall co-operate with [F19and assist] the [F17Secretary of State] F20.... Where the association of users or the other interested parties subject to examination fails to do so, the [F17Secretary of State] may, without further consideration, withdraw recognition of the best practice.
6.The results of the examination carried out by the [F17Secretary of State] shall be conclusive and shall include any remedial actions to be taken by the association of users or the other interested parties. The examination may also result in a decision to withdraw recognition of the best practice.
Textual Amendments
F17Words in Art. 11 substituted (31.12.2020) by The Nagoya Protocol (Compliance) (Amendment) (EU Exit) Regulations 2018 (S.I. 2018/1393), regs. 1, 4(10)(a); 2020 c. 1, Sch. 5 para. 1(1)
F18Art. 11(3)(4) omitted (31.12.2020) by virtue of The Nagoya Protocol (Compliance) (Amendment) (EU Exit) Regulations 2018 (S.I. 2018/1393), regs. 1, 4(10)(b); 2020 c. 1, Sch. 5 para. 1(1)
F19Words in Art. 11(5) inserted (31.12.2020) by The Nagoya Protocol (Compliance) (Amendment) (EU Exit) Regulations 2018 (S.I. 2018/1393), regs. 1, 4(10)(c)(i); 2020 c. 1, Sch. 5 para. 1(1)
F20Words in Art. 11(5) omitted (31.12.2020) by virtue of The Nagoya Protocol (Compliance) (Amendment) (EU Exit) Regulations 2018 (S.I. 2018/1393), regs. 1, 4(10)(c)(ii); 2020 c. 1, Sch. 5 para. 1(1)
The [F21Secretary of State] shall review the functioning and effectiveness of this Regulation, taking into account the experience gathered in its implementation and with a view to its potential revision. Such review should consider the impact of this Regulation on micro, small and medium-sized enterprises, public research institutions and specific sectors, as well as relevant developments at the international level, in particular those related to the ABS Clearing House.
Textual Amendments
F21Words in Art. 12 substituted (31.12.2020) by The Nagoya Protocol (Compliance) (Amendment) (EU Exit) Regulations 2018 (S.I. 2018/1393), regs. 1, 4(11); 2020 c. 1, Sch. 5 para. 1(1)
This Regulation shall enter into force on the twentieth day following that of its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union.
F22...
Done at Brussels, 13 October 2015.
For the Commission
The President
Jean-Claude Juncker
Textual Amendments
F22Words in Signature omitted (31.12.2020) by virtue of The Nagoya Protocol (Compliance) (Amendment) (EU Exit) Regulations 2018 (S.I. 2018/1393), regs. 1, 4(12); 2020 c. 1, Sch. 5 para. 1(1)
Pursuant to Article 3(1) the information to be provided with a request for inclusion in the register of collections is as follows:
Information on the holder of the collection (name, type of entity, address, e-mail, telephone number).
Information on whether the application concerns a collection or part of a collection.
Information on the collection or the relevant part thereof (name; identifier (code/ number), where available; address(es), website, where available; link to the collection's online database of genetic resources, where available).
A brief description of the collection or the relevant part thereof.
Where only part of a collection is to be included in the register, details on the relevant part(s) and its(their) distinctive features should be provided.
Collection category
The application should provide information on the category to which the collection or part thereof belongs.
| a When no particular parts of a specimen are concerned, refer to the appropriate cell of ‘entire specimens’. | ||||||||
| b ‘Other parts’ include asexual reproductive parts, vegetative reproduction structures, such as stem, cutting, tuber, rhizomes. | ||||||||
| c ‘Other groupings’ include slime molds, etc. | ||||||||
| Specificities | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Entire specimensa | Parts | |||||||
| Seeds, sexual spores, or embryos | Gametes♀ ♂ | Somatic cells | Nucleic acids | Other partsb | ||||
| Animal | Vertebrate | |||||||
| Invertebrate | ||||||||
| Plants | ||||||||
| Algae | ||||||||
| Protista | ||||||||
| Fungi | ||||||||
| Bacteria | ||||||||
| Archaea | ||||||||
| Viruses | ||||||||
| Other groupingsc | ||||||||
Any of the following documentation may be attached (or linked) to the application as evidence of the capacity of the collection or the relevant part thereof to comply with Article 5(3) of Regulation (EU) No 511/2014:
codes of conduct, guidelines or standards, whether national or international, developed by associations or organisations, and adhered to by the collection, and information relating to the collection's instruments for the application of those codes of conduct, guidelines or standards;
relevant principles, guidelines, codes of conduct or manuals of procedures, developed and applied within the collection, and any additional instruments for their application;
certification of the collection under relevant schemes, whether national or international;
information about participation of the collection in any international collection networks F23...
any other relevant documentation.
Textual Amendments
F23Words in Annex 1 Pt. B point (d) omitted (31.12.2020) by virtue of The Nagoya Protocol (Compliance) (Amendment) (EU Exit) Regulations 2018 (S.I. 2018/1393), regs. 1, 4(13); 2020 c. 1, Sch. 5 para. 1(1)
If the information provided is confidential within the meaning of Article 7(5) of Regulation (EU) No 511/2014, please provide it nonetheless, tick the respective box and provide the justification for confidentiality at the end of this Annex.
If you marked as confidential essential information (such as about the genetic resources or traditional knowledge associated with genetic resources, access place, form of utilisation), without which the record would not be published on the website of the ABS Clearing House, this information will not be shared with the ABS Clearing House, but it may be passed on directly to the competent authorities of the provider country.
At least one declaration is required per grant received, i.e. different recipients under one grant may choose to submit either individual declarations or a joint declaration, through the project coordinator.
I am making this declaration for the utilisation of:
Please tick the appropriate box or boxes:
☐ Genetic resources
☐ Traditional knowledge associated with genetic resources
Subject matter of the research or identification code of the grant:
☐ Confidential
Recipient or recipients of funding, including contact details:
Name:
Address:
E-mail:
Telephone:
Website, where available:
Information on exercise of due diligence:
☐ An internationally recognised certificate of compliance (i) was issued for my (entity's) access or (ii) covers the terms of this access to the genetic resource(s) and traditional knowledge associated with genetic resources.
Where this box is ticked, please indicate the unique identifier of the internationally recognised certificate of compliance:
Please go to point 1 of Part B.
Where the box in point (a) has not been ticked, please fill in the following information:
Place of access:
☐ Confidential
Description of the genetic resources or traditional knowledge associated with genetic resources utilised; or unique identifier(s), where available:
☐ Confidential
Please go to point 2 of Part B.
Please go to point 3.
date of access;
person or entity having granted prior informed consent, where applicable;
person or entity to whom prior informed consent was granted (where applicable), if not granted directly to me or my entity;
mutually agreed terms, where applicable;
the source from which I or my entity obtained the genetic resource and traditional knowledge associated with genetic resources;
presence or absence of rights and obligations relating to access and benefit-sharing, including rights and obligations regarding subsequent applications and commercialisation.
| Private ☐ | Public ☐ |
Textual Amendments
F24Annex 2 para. 5 omitted (31.12.2020) by virtue of The Nagoya Protocol (Compliance) (Amendment) (EU Exit) Regulations 2018 (S.I. 2018/1393), regs. 1, 4(14); 2020 c. 1, Sch. 5 para. 1(1)
If the information provided is confidential within the meaning of Article 7(5) of Regulation (EU) No 511/2014, please provide it nonetheless, tick the respective box and provide the justification for confidentiality at the end of this Annex.
If you marked as confidential essential information (such as about the genetic resources or traditional knowledge associated with genetic resources, access place, form of utilisation) without which the record would not be published on the website of the ABS Clearing House, this information will not be shared with the Clearing House but it may be passed on directly to the competent authorities of the provider country.
If the utilisation has involved more than one genetic resource or any traditional knowledge associated with genetic resources, please provide relevant information for each genetic resource or any traditional knowledge utilised.
I declare that I have fulfilled the obligations under Article 4 of Regulation (EU) No 511/2014. I am making this declaration for the utilisation of:
Please tick the appropriate box or boxes:
☐ Genetic resources
☐ Traditional knowledge associated with genetic resources
Name of the product or description of the result of the utilisation(3) or description of the outcome of the utilisationM1:
☐ Confidential
Contact details of the user:
Name:
Address:
E-mail:
Telephone:
Website, where available:
The declaration is made on the occasion of the following event:
Please tick the appropriate box:
market approval or authorisation is sought for a product developed via the utilisation of genetic resources and traditional knowledge associated with genetic resources;
a notification required prior to placing for the first time on the [F25United Kingdom] market is made for a product developed via the utilisation of genetic resources and traditional knowledge associated with genetic resources;
placing for the first time on the [F25United Kingdom] market a product developed via the utilisation of genetic resources and traditional knowledge associated with genetic resources, for which no market approval, authorisation or notification is required;
the result of the utilisation is sold or transferred in any other way to a natural or legal person within the [F25United Kingdom] in order for that person to carry out one of the activities referred to in points (a), (b) and (c);
Information on exercise of due diligence:
☐ An internationally recognised certificate of compliance (i) was issued for my (entity's) access or (ii) covers the terms of this access to the genetic resource(s) and traditional knowledge associated with genetic resources.
Where this box is ticked, please indicate the unique identifier of the internationally recognised certificate of compliance:
Please go to point 2 of Part B.
Where the box in point (a) has not been ticked, please fill in the following information:
Place of access:
☐ Confidential
Description of the genetic resource or traditional knowledge associated with genetic resources utilised, or unique identifier(s), where available:
☐ Confidential
Date of access:
☐ Confidential
Person or entity who granted prior informed consent:
☐ Confidential
Person or entity to whom the prior informed consent was granted:
☐ Confidential
Is the utilisation of genetic resources and traditional knowledge associated with genetic resources subject to mutually agreed terms?
| Yes ☐ | No ☐ |
☐ Confidential
Please go to point 1 of Part B.
Textual Amendments
F25Words in Annex 3 substituted (31.12.2020) by The Nagoya Protocol (Compliance) (Amendment) (EU Exit) Regulations 2018 (S.I. 2018/1393), regs. 1, 4(15)(a); 2020 c. 1, Sch. 5 para. 1(1)
Marginal Citations
M1Where the utilisation in the [United Kingdom] has ended and its outcome is sold or transferred in any other way to a natural or legal person outside the [United Kingdom]. [Editorial Note: words in Annex 3 footnote substituted (31.12.2020) by The Nagoya Protocol (Compliance) (Amendment) (EU Exit) Regulations 2018 (S.I. 2018/1393), regs. 1, 4(15)(a); 2020 c. 1, Sch. 5 para. 1(1)]
Direct source of the genetic resource and the traditional knowledge associated with genetic resources:
Are there any restrictions in the mutually agreed terms limiting the possible utilisation of the genetic resource(s) or the traditional knowledge associated with genetic resources, e.g. allowing for non-commercial utilisation only?
| Yes ☐ | No ☐ | Not applicable ☐ |
Have there been rights and obligations agreed regarding subsequent applications and commercialisation in the mutually agreed terms?
| Yes ☐ | No ☐ | Not applicable ☐ |
Textual Amendments
F26Words in Annex 3 para. 2 substituted (31.12.2020) by The Nagoya Protocol (Compliance) (Amendment) (EU Exit) Regulations 2018 (S.I. 2018/1393), regs. 1, 4(15)(b)(i); 2020 c. 1, Sch. 5 para. 1(1)
Textual Amendments
F27Words in Annex 3 para. 3 inserted (31.12.2020) by The Nagoya Protocol (Compliance) (Amendment) (EU Exit) Regulations 2018 (S.I. 2018/1393), regs. 1, 4(15)(b)(ii)(aa); 2020 c. 1, Sch. 5 para. 1(1)
F28Words in Annex 3 para. 3 substituted (31.12.2020) by The Nagoya Protocol (Compliance) (Amendment) (EU Exit) Regulations 2018 (S.I. 2018/1393), regs. 1, 4(15)(b)(ii)(bb); 2020 c. 1, Sch. 5 para. 1(1)
cosmetics
medicinal products
food and beverage
biological control
plant breeding
animal breeding
other, please specify:
Textual Amendments
F29Annex 3 para. 5 substituted for Annex 3 paras. 5, 6 (31.12.2020) by The Nagoya Protocol (Compliance) (Amendment) (EU Exit) Regulations 2018 (S.I. 2018/1393), regs. 1, 4(15)(b)(iii); 2020 c. 1, Sch. 5 para. 1(1)
Pursuant to Article 8(1) the information to be provided with the application for recognition of best practice is as follows:
Information whether the application is made on behalf of an association of users or other interested parties.
Contact details of the association of users or other interested parties (name, address, e-mail, telephone, and website, where available).
If the application is made by an association of users, the following should be provided:
evidence of being established in accordance with the requirements of the [F30competent authority];
description of the organisation and structure of the association.
If the application is made by other interested parties, the reasons for having legitimate interest in the subject matter of Regulation (EU) No 511/2014 should be explained.
The information provided should describe how the applicant is involved in developing measures and policies related to genetic resources, or how the applicant accesses, collects, transfers or commercialises genetic resources and traditional knowledge associated with genetic resources.
Description of the combination of procedures, tools or mechanisms, developed by the applicant, which, when effectively implemented, enable users to comply with the obligations provided for in Articles 4 and 7 of Regulation (EU) No 511/2014.
Description of how the overseeing of the procedures, tools or mechanisms referred to in point 6 will be carried out.
F31. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
F32. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Textual Amendments
F30Words in Annex 4 para. 3(a) substituted (31.12.2020) by The Nagoya Protocol (Compliance) (Amendment) (EU Exit) Regulations 2018 (S.I. 2018/1393), regs. 1, 4(16)(a); 2020 c. 1, Sch. 5 para. 1(1)
F31Annex 4 para. 8 omitted (31.12.2020) by virtue of The Nagoya Protocol (Compliance) (Amendment) (EU Exit) Regulations 2018 (S.I. 2018/1393), regs. 1, 4(16)(b); 2020 c. 1, Sch. 5 para. 1(1)
F32Annex 4 para. 9 omitted (31.12.2020) by virtue of The Nagoya Protocol (Compliance) (Amendment) (EU Exit) Regulations 2018 (S.I. 2018/1393), regs. 1, 4(16)(b); 2020 c. 1, Sch. 5 para. 1(1)
List of supporting documents related to points 5 and 6:
list of relevant personnel working for organization applying or any sub-contractors, with description of their duties related to the development and overseeing of best practices;
declaration of absence of conflict of interest, on the part of applicant and any sub-contractors, in developing and overseeing the combination of procedures, tools or mechanisms(5);
where tasks related to development of best practices or overseeing such practices or both are sub-contracted, description of those tasks.
Evidence of the decision to grant prior informed consent or approval for access to genetic resources and traditional knowledge associated with genetic resources.
‘Result of the utilisation of genetic resources and traditional knowledge associated with genetic resources’ means products, precursors or predecessors to a product, as well as parts of products to be incorporated into a final product, blueprints or designs, based on which manufacturing and production could be carried out without further utilisation of the genetic resource and traditional knowledge associated with genetic resources.
Evidence of the decision to grant prior informed consent or approval for access to genetic resources and traditional knowledge associated with genetic resources.
Payment of fees or voluntary contributions by users to an association should not be considered as creating a conflict of interest.
Latest Available (revised):The latest available updated version of the legislation incorporating changes made by subsequent legislation and applied by our editorial team. Changes we have not yet applied to the text, can be found in the ‘Changes to Legislation’ area.
Original (As adopted by EU): The original version of the legislation as it stood when it was first adopted in the EU. No changes have been applied to the text.
Geographical Extent: Indicates the geographical area that this provision applies to. For further information see ‘Frequently Asked Questions’.
Show Timeline of Changes: See how this legislation has or could change over time. Turning this feature on will show extra navigation options to go to these specific points in time. Return to the latest available version by using the controls above in the What Version box.
Access essential accompanying documents and information for this legislation item from this tab. Dependent on the legislation item being viewed this may include:
This timeline shows the different versions taken from EUR-Lex before exit day and during the implementation period as well as any subsequent versions created after the implementation period as a result of changes made by UK legislation.
The dates for the EU versions are taken from the document dates on EUR-Lex and may not always coincide with when the changes came into force for the document.
For any versions created after the implementation period as a result of changes made by UK legislation the date will coincide with the earliest date on which the change (e.g an insertion, a repeal or a substitution) that was applied came into force. For further information see our guide to revised legislation on Understanding Legislation.
Use this menu to access essential accompanying documents and information for this legislation item. Dependent on the legislation item being viewed this may include:
Click 'View More' or select 'More Resources' tab for additional information including: