
Print Options
PrintThe Whole
Act
PrintThe Whole
Cross Heading
PrintThis
Section
only
Changes over time for: Section 10B


Timeline of Changes
This timeline shows the different points in time where a change occurred. The dates will coincide with the earliest date on which the change (e.g an insertion, a repeal or a substitution) that was applied came into force. The first date in the timeline will usually be the earliest date when the provision came into force. In some cases the first date is 01/02/1991 (or for Northern Ireland legislation 01/01/2006). This date is our basedate. No versions before this date are available. For further information see the Editorial Practice Guide and Glossary under Help.
Status:
Point in time view as at 02/04/2012.
Changes to legislation:
There are currently no known outstanding effects for the Standards in Scotland’s Schools etc. Act 2000, Section 10B.

Changes to Legislation
Revised legislation carried on this site may not be fully up to date. At the current time any known changes or effects made by subsequent legislation have been applied to the text of the legislation you are viewing by the editorial team. Please see ‘Frequently Asked Questions’ for details regarding the timescales for which new effects are identified and recorded on this site.
[10BPreliminary noticeS
This section has no associated Explanatory Notes
(1)Where, on a reference under section 10A(2) of this Act, it appears to the Scottish Ministers that—
(a)the education authority are failing or have failed to take satisfactory action to secure improvement in the way they exercise the function mentioned in section 10A(2)(a) of this Act; and
(b)an enforcement direction is justified,
they may serve a preliminary notice on the authority.
(2)A preliminary notice is a notice which—
(a)informs the education authority of the apparent failure mentioned in subsection (1)(a) above; and
(b)requires the authority to submit to the Scottish Ministers, within such time as is specified in the notice, a written response which—
(i)states that the authority have not so failed and gives reasons supporting that statement; or
(ii)states that the authority have so failed but gives reasons why an enforcement direction should not be given to them.]
Back to top