The Combined Authorities (Mayoral Elections) (Amendment) Order 2026
The Secretary of State has consulted the Electoral Commission about this Order in accordance with paragraph 12(4) of Schedule 5B to the 2009 Act and paragraph 12(4) of Schedule 2 to the 2023 Act.
Citation, extent and commencement1.
(1)
This Order—
(a)
may be cited as the Combined Authorities (Mayoral Elections) (Amendment) Order 2026;
(b)
extends to England and Wales; and
(c)
comes into force the day after the day on which it is made.
(2)
This Order does not apply for the purposes of—
(a)
an election for the return of a combined authority mayor in accordance with Schedule 5B to the Local Democracy, Economic Development and Construction Act 2009, or
(b)
an election for the return of a combined county authority mayor in accordance with Schedule 2 to the Levelling-up and Regeneration Act 2023,
in respect of which the notice of election is published before the date on which this Order comes into force.
Amendment of the Combined Authorities (Mayoral Elections) Order 20172.
Amendment of Schedule 13.
(1)
Schedule 1 (the mayoral elections rules) is amended as follows.
(2)
In rule 16 (method of election)—
(a)
in paragraph (a)—
(i)
for “two”
substitute
;“three”
(ii)
for “Part 4”
substitute
;“Parts 4 and 5”
(b)
“(b)
only two candidates remain validly nominated, a poll shall be taken in accordance with Part 4,”.
(3)
In rule 28 (equipment of polling stations)—
(a)
in paragraph (6)—
(i)
“(b)
where the election is a combined authority mayoral election, the following notice which must be exhibited in every compartment of every polling station—
*[Specify name of combined authority] COMBINED AUTHORITY MAYORAL ELECTION
*[Vote for ONLY ONE CANDIDATE by putting a cross [X] in the box next to your choice.]
*[Vote by putting a cross [X] in the box—
In column A next to your FIRST CHOICE candidate
In column B next to your SECOND CHOICE candidate
Your first and second choices should be different.]
PUT NO OTHER MARK ON THE BALLOT PAPER OR YOUR VOTE MAY NOT COUNT.
*Complete or omit as necessary.”;
(ii)
“(ba)
where the election is a combined county authority mayoral election, the following notice which must be exhibited in every compartment of every polling station—
*[Specify name of combined county authority] COMBINED COUNTY AUTHORITY MAYORAL ELECTION
*[Vote for ONLY ONE CANDIDATE by putting a cross [X] in the box next to your choice.]
*[Vote by putting a cross [X] in the box—
In column A next to your FIRST CHOICE candidate
In column B next to your SECOND CHOICE candidate
Your first and second choices should be different.]
PUT NO OTHER MARK ON THE BALLOT PAPER OR YOUR VOTE MAY NOT COUNT.
*Complete or omit as necessary.”;
(b)
“(8)
Where the Electoral Commission publishes information about the supplementary vote system to be used at CA/CCA mayoral elections, the CA/CCA returning officer may provide each returning officer with a copy of that information for exhibition at a polling station.”.
(4)
“and
(b)
at which the returning officer will begin any count of the second preference votes.”.
(5)
In rule 50 (the count)—
(a)
in the heading, before “count”
insert
;“first”
(b)
“(3)
The returning officer must then—
(a)
where the election is contested by three or more candidates, count the first preference votes given on them,
(b)
where the election is contested by only two candidates, count the votes given on them.”.
(6)
In rule 51 (rejected ballot papers)—
(a)
in paragraph (1)—
(i)
in sub-paragraph (b) after “more than one”
insert
;“first preference”
(ii)
in sub-paragraph (d) after “uncertainty”
insert
;“as to the first preference vote”
(b)
in paragraph (2)—
(i)
“(i)
at an election at which three or more candidates remain validly nominated, an intention that a vote shall be given, by way of a first preference vote, for not more than one of the candidates clearly appears, or”;
(ii)
in sub-paragraph (ii) at the beginning insert
;“at any other election”
(iii)
in the words after sub-paragraph (ii) before “the way”
insert
;“(in either case)”
(c)
“(3)
A ballot paper which is not otherwise void and on which not more than one first preference vote is marked (whether or not a second preference vote is marked) is valid with respect to that vote, and must be counted accordingly.”.
(d)
in paragraph (5)—
(i)
in sub-paragraph (b) after “candidate”
insert
;“as to the first preference vote”
(ii)
in sub-paragraph (d) after “uncertainty”
insert
;“as to the first preference vote”
(e)
“(7)
In the case of an election where only two candidates remain validly nominated, this rule is to apply as if—
(a)
in paragraph (1)(b), for “first preference vote” there were substituted
“vote”,(b)
in paragraphs (1)(d) and (5)(b) and (d), the words “as to the first preference vote” were omitted,
(c)
paragraph (3) were omitted.”.
(7)
In rule 53 (re-count)—
(a)
in paragraph (1) after “any re-count of the votes”
insert
;“or, as the case may be, the first preference votes,”
(b)
in paragraph (2) after “any re-count of votes”
insert
.“or, as the case may be, the first preference votes,”
(8)
In rule 54 (procedure at conclusion of count)—
(a)
in the heading before “count”
insert
;“first”
(b)
“(1)
As soon as practicable after the conclusion of the first count (including any re-count), the returning officer must draw up a provisional statement showing—
(a)
the total number of ballot papers used,
(b)
the total number of rejected ballot papers,
(c)
at an election contested by three or more candidates—
(i)
the number of first preference votes given for each candidate, and
(ii)
the total number of first preference votes given, and
(d)
at an election contested by only two candidates, the number of votes given for each candidate.”.
(9)
“Part 5Further provision: three or more candidates
The count of second preference votes55.
(1)
If directed by the CA/CCA returning officer in accordance with rule 58, the returning officer must, at the time and place notified to the counting agents, count the number of second preference votes for each of the candidates remaining in the contest given by voters who did not give their first preference vote to any of those candidates.
(2)
A ballot paper which is not otherwise void and on which not more than one second preference vote is marked is valid with respect to that vote and must be counted accordingly if, but only if, a valid first preference vote has also been marked.
(3)
Rules 49(2) to (5), 50(4) to (7), 51 (except paragraph (3)) and 53 (except the words “the votes, or as the case may be,” in both paragraphs where they appear) apply in relation to the count of second preference votes as they apply in relation to the count of first preference votes as if references to first preference votes were references to second preference votes.
(4)
The returning officer is not required to re-examine any decision taken under rule 52.
The calculation of total votes56.
(1)
The returning officer must add the number of second preference votes given for a candidate to the number of first preference votes given for that candidate, to give that candidate’s total number of votes.
(2)
The returning officer must then draw up a provisional statement showing—
(a)
the total number of first preference votes given for each candidate,
(b)
the total number of second preference votes given for each of the candidates remaining in the contest after the count of the first preference votes,
(c)
the total number of votes given for each of those candidates, and
(d)
the number of ballot papers that were—
(i)
valid with respect to a first preference vote given for a candidate who did not remain in the contest after the count of the first preference votes, and
(ii)
rejected for the purposes of the count of second preference votes on the ground that they were unmarked or void for uncertainty as to the second preference vote.
(3)
As soon as practicable after completion of the statement, the returning officer must—
(a)
provide such of the election agents for those candidates who remain in the contest as are then present with a copy of the statement, and must give them a reasonable opportunity to satisfy themselves as to the accuracy of the calculation,
(b)
inform the CA/CCA returning officer of its contents.”.
(10)
In rule 57(1) (CA/CCA returning officer’s re-count) for “or 54(1)”
substitute
.“, 54(1) or 56(2),”
(11)
“CA/CCA returning officer’s direction to count second preference votes58.
(1)
This rule applies if there are more than two candidates to be the mayor of a combined authority or a combined county authority.
(2)
If none of the candidates receive more than half of all first preference votes given in the election, the CA/CCA returning officer must direct each returning officer to count the number of second preference votes for each of the candidates remaining in the contest.”.
(12)
In rule 59 (returning officer’s final statement, central calculation and declaration of result)—
(a)
in paragraph (1) for “and 54(1)”
substitute
;“, 54(1) and, where applicable, 56(2)”
(b)
“(7)
As soon as the CA/CCA returning officer has received the information required by paragraph (3) from every returning officer, the CA/CCA returning officer must—
(a)
in relation to an election contested by three or more candidates, ascertain the total of the first preference votes given to each candidate and, where relevant, the total of the second preference votes given to each candidate;
(b)
in relation to an election contested by only two candidates, ascertain the total number of votes given to each candidate.”;
(c)
“(10)
In paragraphs (8) and (9),
“the relevant figures”means—(a)
in the case of an election contested by three or more candidates—
(i)
the number of first preference votes given for each candidate;
(ii)
the calculation undertaken by the CA/CCA returning officer for the purpose of ascertaining whether a candidate is to be returned in accordance with—
(aa)
in the case of a combined authority, paragraph 5(3) of Schedule 5B to the 2009 Act (candidate with overall majority of first preference votes);
(bb)
in the case of a combined county authority, paragraph 4A(3) of Schedule 2 to the 2023 Act (candidate with overall majority of first preference votes);
(iii)
where relevant—
(aa)
the number of second preference votes given for each of the candidates remaining in the contest, and
(bb)
the calculation undertaken by the CA/CCA returning officer for the purpose of ascertaining the total number of first and second preference votes given to each of those candidates;
(b)
in the case of an election contested by only two candidates, the total number of votes given for each candidate.”;
(d)
in paragraph (11)—
(i)
in sub-paragraph (a) after “contested”
insert
;“by only two candidates”
(ii)
in paragraph (11)(b) for “each candidate”
substitute
;“each of them”
(e)
“(12)
Where—
(a)
an election is contested by only two candidates, and
(b)
after the counting of the votes (including any re-count) is completed, an equality of votes is found to exist between any candidates and the addition of a vote would entitle any of those candidates to be returned as mayor,
the CA/CCA returning officer must forthwith decide between those candidates by lot, and proceed as if the candidate on whom the lot falls had received an additional vote.”;
(f)
“(13)
Where an election is contested by three or more candidates, the CA/CCA returning officer must—
(a)
if one of candidates receives more than half of all the first preference votes given in the election, declare that candidate as the person to be returned as mayor, or
(b)
if none of the candidates receive more than half of all the first preference votes given in the election, declare the candidate with the most total preference votes as the person to be returned as mayor.
(14)
If, after the counting of second preference votes (including any re-count) is completed, an equality of votes is found to exist between any two or more candidates remaining in the contest and the addition of a vote would entitle any of those candidates to be returned as mayor, the CA/CCA returning officer must forthwith decide between those candidates by lot and proceed as if the candidate on whom the lot falls had received an additional vote.”;
(g)
in paragraph (15)—
(i)
in sub-paragraph (b)—
(aa)
after “number of”
insert
;“first preference”
(bb)
omit “and”
;
(ii)
“and
“(d)
if second preference votes were counted—
(i)
the total number of second preference votes given for each of the candidates remaining in the contest after the count of the first preference votes, and
(ii)
the number of ballot papers rejected for the purposes of the count of second preference votes on the ground that they were unmarked or void for uncertainty as to the second preference vote.”.
(13)
In rule 60 (return or forfeiture of candidate’s deposit)—
(a)
in paragraph (4) before “count”
insert
;“first”
(b)
in paragraph (5)—
(i)
before “count”
insert
;“first”
(ii)
before “votes”
insert
.“first preference”
(14)
In Part 9 (appendix of forms)—
(a)
in the list of forms—
(i)
in the entry for Form 3 after “ballot paper”
insert
;“(two candidates)”
(ii)
“Form 4: Ballot paper (three or more candidates) including directions as to printing”.
(b)
for Form 3 substitute Form 3 set out in Part 1 of Schedule 1 to this Order;
(c)
after Form 3 insert Form 4 set out in Part 2 of Schedule 1 to this Order;
(d)
for Form 7 substitute Form 7 set out in Part 3 of Schedule 1 to this Order.
Amendment of Schedule 24.
(1)
Schedule 2 (modifications of Acts and statutory instrument) is amended as follows.
(2)
In paragraph 1—
(a)
“(9)
Section 46 (further provision as to local election voting) has effect as if subsection (1) were omitted.”;
(b)
in sub-paragraph (30) after ““Vote (x) for one candidate only””
in each place where it occurs insert
.“if there are only two candidates, or the words “Vote once (x) in column A for your first choice, and Vote once (x) in column B for your second choice” if there are three or more candidates”
Amendment of Schedule 35.
(1)
Schedule 3 (the mayoral election (combination of polls) rules) is amended as follows.
(2)
In rule 16 (method of election)—
(a)
in paragraph (a)—
(i)
for “two”
substitute
;“three”
(ii)
for “Part 4”
substitute
;“Parts 4 and 5”
(b)
“(b)
only two candidates remain validly nominated, a poll shall be taken in accordance with Part 4,”.
(3)
In rule 28 (equipment of polling stations)—
(a)
“(b)
the following notice which must be exhibited in every compartment of every polling station—
*PARLIAMENTARY ELECTION ([specify colour] ballot paper)
Vote for ONLY ONE CANDIDATE by putting a cross [X] in the box next to your choice.
*[Specify name of council] COUNCIL ELECTION ([specify colour] ballot paper)
[*Vote for NO MORE THAN ... CANDIDATES by putting a cross [X] in the box next to EACH of your choices.]
[*Vote ONLY ONCE by putting a cross [X] in the box next to your choice.]
*[Specify name of combined authority] COMBINED AUTHORITY MAYORAL ELECTION ([specify colour] ballot paper)
*[Vote for ONLY ONE CANDIDATE by putting a cross [X] in the box]
*[Vote by putting a cross [X] in the box—
In column A next to your FIRST CHOICE candidate
In column B next to your SECOND CHOICE candidate
Your first and second choices should be different.]
*[Specify name of combined authority] COMBINED COUNTY AUTHORITY MAYORAL ELECTION ([specify colour] ballot paper)
*[Vote for ONLY ONE CANDIDATE by putting a cross [X] in the box]
*[Vote by putting a cross [X] in the box—
In column A next to your FIRST CHOICE candidate
In column B next to your SECOND CHOICE candidate
Your first and second choices should be different.]
*LOCAL MAYORAL ELECTION FOR [specify name of authority] ([specify colour] ballot paper)
Vote for ONLY ONE CANDIDATE by putting a cross [X] in the box next to your choice.
*POLICE AND CRIME COMMISIONER ELECTION FOR (specify police area) ([specify colour] ballot paper)
Vote for ONLY ONE CANDIDATE by putting a cross [X] in the box next to your choice.
*[Specify other] ELECTION / REFERENDUM ([specify colour] ballot paper) [specify voting instructions in accordance with the legislation governing the election or referendum]
PUT NO OTHER MARK ON THE BALLOT PAPER OR YOUR VOTE MAY NOT COUNT.
*[PLEASE DO NOT FOLD THE BALLOT PAPERS FOR [specify the elections and/or referendum(s) at which the votes are to be counted electronically]. Post them, face downwards, in the [*appropriate] ballot box
*Complete or omit as necessary.
#Alternatively, insert such information as the CA/CCA returning officer may decide.”;
(b)
“(10)
Where the Electoral Commission publishes information about the supplementary vote system to be used at CA/CCA mayoral elections, the CA/CCA returning officer may provide each returning officer with a copy of that information for exhibition at a polling station.”.
(4)
In rule 50 (the count)—
(a)
in the heading, before “count”
insert
;“first”
(b)
“(4)
The returning officer must then—
(a)
where the election is contested by three or more candidates, count the first preference votes given on them,
(b)
where the election is contested by only two candidates, count the votes given on them.”.
(5)
In rule 51 (rejected ballot papers)—
(a)
in paragraph (1)—
(i)
in sub-paragraph (b) after “more than one”
insert
;“first preference”
(ii)
in sub-paragraph (d) after “uncertainty”
insert
;“as to the first preference vote”
(b)
in paragraph (2)—
(i)
“(i)
at an election at which three or more candidates remain validly nominated, an intention that a vote shall be given, by way of a first preference vote, for not more than one of the candidates clearly appears, or”;
(ii)
in sub-paragraph (ii) at the beginning insert
;“at any other election”
(iii)
in the words after sub-paragraph (ii) before “the way”
insert
;“(in either case)”
(c)
“(3)
A ballot paper which is not otherwise void and on which not more than one first preference vote is marked (whether or not a second preference vote is marked) is valid with respect to that vote, and must be counted accordingly.”.
(d)
in paragraph (5)—
(i)
in sub-paragraph (b) after “candidate”
insert
;“as to the first preference vote”
(ii)
in sub-paragraph (d) after “uncertainty”
insert
;“as to the first preference vote”
(e)
“(7)
In the case of an election where only two candidates remain validly nominated, this rule is to apply as if—
(a)
in paragraph (1)(b), for “first preference vote” there were substituted
“vote”,(b)
in paragraphs (1)(d) and (5)(b) and (d), the words “as to the first preference vote” were omitted,
(c)
paragraph (3) were omitted.”.
(6)
In rule 53 (re-count)—
(a)
in paragraph (1) after “any re-count of the votes”
insert
;“or, as the case may be, the first preference votes,”
(b)
in paragraph (2) after “any re-count of votes”
insert
.“or, as the case may be, the first preference votes,”
(7)
In rule 54 (procedure at conclusion of count)—
(a)
in the heading before “count”
insert
;“first”
(b)
“(1)
As soon as practicable after the conclusion of the first count (including any re-count), the returning officer must draw up a provisional statement showing—
(a)
the total number of ballot papers used,
(b)
the total number of rejected ballot papers,
(c)
at an election contested by three or more candidates—
(i)
the number of first preference votes given for each candidate, and
(ii)
the total number of first preference votes given, and
(d)
at an election contested by only two candidates, the number of votes given for each candidate.”.
(8)
“Part 5Further provision: three or more candidates
The count of second preference votes55.
(1)
If directed by the CA/CCA returning officer in accordance with rule 58, the returning officer must, at the time and place notified to the counting agents, count the number of second preference votes for each of the candidates remaining in the contest given by voters who did not give their first preference vote to any of those candidates.
(2)
A ballot paper which is not otherwise void and on which not more than one second preference vote is marked is valid with respect to that vote and must be counted accordingly if, but only if, a valid first preference vote has also been marked.
(3)
Rules 49(2) to (5), 50(4) to (7), 51 (except paragraph (3)) and 53 (except the words “the votes, or as the case may be,” in both paragraphs where they appear) shall apply in relation to the count of second preference votes as they apply in relation to the count of first preference votes as if references to first preference votes were references to second preference votes.
(4)
The returning officer is not required to re-examine any decision taken under rule 52.
The calculation of total votes56.
(1)
The returning officer must add the number of second preference votes given for a candidate to the number of first preference votes given for that candidate, to give that candidate’s total number of votes.
(2)
The returning officer must then draw up a provisional statement showing—
(a)
the total number of first preference votes given for each candidate,
(b)
the total number of second preference votes given for each of the candidates remaining in the contest after the count of the first preference votes,
(c)
the total number of votes given for each of those candidates, and
(d)
the number of ballot papers that were—
(i)
valid with respect to a first preference vote given for a candidate who did not remain in the contest after the count of the first preference votes, and
(ii)
rejected for the purposes of the count of second preference votes on the ground that they were unmarked or void for uncertainty as to the second preference vote.
(3)
As soon as practicable after completion of the statement, the returning officer must—
(a)
provide such of the election agents for those candidates who remain in the contest as are then present with a copy of the statement, and must give them a reasonable opportunity to satisfy themselves as to the accuracy of the calculation,
(b)
inform the CA/CCA returning officer of its contents.”.
(9)
In rule 57(1) (CA/CCA returning officer’s re-count) for “or 54(1)”
substitute
.“, 54(1) or 56(2),”
(10)
“CA/CCA returning officer’s direction to count second preference votes58.
(1)
This rule applies if there are more than two candidates to be the mayor of a combined authority or combined county authority.
(2)
If none of the candidates receive more than half of all first preference votes given in the election, the CA/CCA returning officer must direct each returning officer to count the number of second preference votes for each of the candidates remaining in the contest.”.
(11)
In rule 59 (returning officer’s final statement, central calculation and declaration of result)—
(a)
in paragraph (1) for “and 54(1)”
substitute
;“, 54(1) and, where applicable, 56(2)”
(b)
“(7)
As soon as the CA/CCA returning officer has received the information required by paragraph (3) from every returning officer, the CA/CCA returning officer must—
(a)
in relation to an election contested by three or more candidates, ascertain the total of the first preference votes given to each candidate and, where relevant, the total of the second preference votes given to each candidate;
(b)
in relation to an election contested by only two candidates, ascertain the total number of votes given to each candidate.”;
(c)
“(10)
In paragraphs (8) and (9),
“the relevant figures”means—(a)
in the case of an election contested by three or more candidates—
(i)
the number of first preference votes given for each candidate;
(ii)
the calculation undertaken by the CA/CCA returning officer for the purpose of ascertaining whether a candidate is to be returned in accordance with—
(aa)
in the case of a combined authority, paragraph 5(3) of Schedule 5B to the 2009 Act (candidate with overall majority of first preference votes);
(bb)
in the case of a combined county authority, paragraph 4A(3) of Schedule 2 to the 2023 Act (candidate with overall majority of first preference votes);
(iii)
where relevant—
(aa)
the number of second preference votes given for each of the candidates remaining in the contest, and
(bb)
the calculation undertaken by the CA/CCA returning officer for the purpose of ascertaining the total number of first and second preference votes given to each of those candidates;
(b)
in the case of an election contested by only two candidates, the total number of votes given for each candidate.”;
(d)
in paragraph (12)—
(i)
in sub-paragraph (a) after “contested”
insert
;“by only two candidates”
(ii)
in sub-paragraph (b) for “each candidate”
substitute
;“each of them”
(e)
“(13)
Where—
(a)
an election is contested by only two candidates, and
(b)
after the counting of the votes (including any re-count) is completed, an equality of votes is found to exist between any candidates and the addition of a vote would entitle any of those candidates to be returned as mayor,
the CA/CCA returning officer must forthwith decide between those candidates by lot, and proceed as if the candidate on whom the lot falls had received an additional vote.”;
(f)
“(14)
Where an election is contested by three or more candidates, the CA/CCA returning officer must—
(a)
if one of candidates receives more than half of all the first preference votes given in the election, declare that candidate as the person to be returned as mayor, or
(b)
if none of the candidates receive more than half of all the first preference votes given in the election, declare the candidate with the most total preference votes as the person to be returned as mayor.
(15)
If, after the counting of second preference votes (including any re-count) is completed, an equality of votes is found to exist between any two or more candidates remaining in the contest and the addition of a vote would entitle any of those candidates to be returned as mayor, the CA/CCA returning officer must forthwith decide between those candidates by lot and proceed as if the candidate on whom the lot falls had received an additional vote.”;
(g)
in paragraph (16)—
(i)
in sub-paragraph (b)—
(aa)
after “number of”
insert
;“first preference”
(bb)
omit “and”
;
(ii)
“and
(d)
if second preference votes were counted—
(i)
the total number of second preference votes given for each of the candidates remaining in the contest after the count of the first preference votes, and
(ii)
the number of ballot papers rejected for the purposes of the count of second preference votes on the ground that they were unmarked or void for uncertainty as to the second preference vote.”.
(12)
In rule 60 (return or forfeiture of candidate’s deposit)—
(a)
in paragraph (4) before “count”
insert
;“first”
(b)
in paragraph (5)—
(i)
before “count”
insert
;“first”
(ii)
before “votes”
insert
.“first preference”
(13)
In Part 9 (appendix of forms)—
(a)
in the list of forms—
(i)
in the entry for Form 3 after “ballot paper”
insert
;“(two candidates)”
(ii)
“Form 4: Ballot paper (three or more candidates) including directions as to printing”.
(b)
for Form 3 substitute Form 3 set out in Part 1 of Schedule 2 to this Order;
(c)
after Form 3 insert Form 4 set out in Part 2 of Schedule 2 to this Order;
(d)
for Forms 7(1) and 7(2) substitute Forms 7(1) and 7(2) set out in Part 3 and Part 4 of Schedule 2 to this Order respectively.
Signed by authority of the Secretary of State for Housing, Communities and Local Government
Schedule 1Forms to be substituted in Schedule 1 to the Combined Authorities (Mayoral Elections) Order 2017
Part 1Form 3: Ballot paper (two candidates) including directions as to printing
Part 2Form 4: Ballot paper (three or more candidates) including directions as to printing
Part 3Form 7: Postal Voting Statement
Schedule 2Forms to be substituted in Schedule 3 to the Combined Authorities (Mayoral Elections) Order 2017
Part 1Form 3: Ballot paper (two candidates) including directions as to printing
Part 2Form 4: Ballot paper (three or more candidates) including directions as to printing
Part 3Form 7(1): Postal Voting Statement
Part 4Form 7(2): Postal Voting Statement
The Combined Authorities (Mayoral Elections) Order 2017 (S.I. 2017/67, “the 2017 Order”) makes provision for the conduct of elections of combined authority mayors and combined county authority mayors.
Section 63 of, and Schedule 30 to the English Devolution and Community Empowerment Act 2026 (c. 26) changes the voting system at elections for combined authority mayors and combined county authority mayors in England from the simple majority vote system, also known as “first past the post”, to the supplementary vote system. As a consequence of the amendments made by that section to the Local Democracy, Economic Development and Construction Act 2009 (c. 20) and the Levelling-up and Regeneration Act 2023 (c. 55) this Order amends the 2017 Order Rules to replace provisions relating to the simple majority vote system for the election of combined authority mayors and combined county authority mayors with provisions which will provide for the supplementary vote system for those elections, largely reversing changes made by the Combined Authorities (Mayoral Elections) (Amendment) Order 2022 (S.I. 2022/1353).
An impact assessment has been produced for the English Devolution and Community Empowerment Act 2026 including an Addendum on the “supplementary vote” provision. No, or no significant, impact on business, charities or the public or voluntary sector is foreseen. Copies can be obtained at https://bills.parliament.uk/bills/4002/publications or from the Ministry of Housing, Communities and Local Government, 2 Marsham Street, London SW1P 4DF.