1a (allegation about priest or deacon),The misconduct complained of,
1b (allegation about bishop or archbishop),The misconduct complained of,
1c (application to make allegation out of time),The reasons for not making the allegation in time,
1d (allegation about cathedral clerk),The misconduct complained of,
1e (allegation about chaplain in institution),The misconduct complained of,
1f (allegation about armed forces chaplain),The misconduct complained of,
1g (allegation about minister with licence to preach in province or with licence from Oxford or Cambridge University),The misconduct complained of,
2 (respondent’s answer to allegation),The summary of the respondent’s version of events,
3 (statement in support of allegation or answer),The statement,
4 (request to review dismissal of allegation),The reasons why the dismissal of the allegation is believed to be wrong,
5 (referral to consider determination for no further action),The reasons why the determination that there be no further action is believed to be wrong,
8 (notice of application to Registrar),The order applied for and the reasons for applying for it (taken together),
9 (response to allegation to Registrar),The reasons for the response given,
10a (application for disclosure by non-party),The order applied for and the reasons,

Rule 14A (allegations of sexual misconduct towards vulnerable child),Making written representations under paragraph (3),
Rule 66 (appeal by priest or deacon against notice of suspension),Setting out grounds of appeal under paragraph (2),
Rule 75 (inclusion of name in list under section 38(1)(a) to (dd) of the Measure),Making a written request for a review under paragraph (2),
Section 37 of the Measure (suspension of archbishop or bishop),Making an appeal by virtue of section 37(6) of the Measure,