The Family Procedure (Amendment) Rules 2018

“Standard and fast-track procedures for financial remedy proceedings9.9B.

(1)

In this rule “order for periodical payments” means an order under—

(a)

section 23(1)(a), (b), (d) or (e) of the 1973 Act;

(b)

section 27(5) or (6)(a), (b), (d) or (e) of the 1973 Act;

(c)

paragraph 1(2)(a) or (b), 2(2)(a) or 9 of Schedule 1 to the 1989 Act;

(d)

paragraph 2(1)(a), (b), (d) or (e) of Schedule 5 to the 2004 Act;

(e)

paragraph 40 or 41(1)(a), (b), (d) or (e) of Schedule 5 to the 2004 Act.

(2)

Subject to paragraph (3), an application for a financial remedy must be dealt with under the standard procedure.

(3)

The fast-track procedure applies to—

(a)

any application where the financial remedy sought is only for an order for periodical payments;

(b)

any application made under—

(i)

the 1978 Act;

(ii)

Schedule 6 to the 2004 Act;

(iii)

Article 56 of the Maintenance Regulation; or

(iv)

Article 10 of the 2007 Hague Convention;

(c)

any application for the variation of an order for periodical payments, except where the applicant seeks the dismissal (immediate or otherwise) of the periodical payments order and its substitution with one or more of a lump sum order, a property adjustment order, a pension sharing order or a pension compensation sharing order.

(4)

At any stage in the proceedings the court may order that an application proceeding under the fast-track procedure must proceed under the standard procedure.

(Rule 9.18A provides for specific occasions when the court may direct that a case should proceed under the standard procedure.)”.

“STANDARD PROCEDURE”.

“FAST-TRACK PROCEDURE”.

“9.18A.

(1)

Paragraph (2) applies where the applicant wishes to seek a direction from the court that the standard procedure should apply to an application to which the fast-track procedure would otherwise apply.

(2)

Where this paragraph applies, a request for a direction—

(a)

must be made with the application for a financial remedy; and

(b)

must state—

(i)

that the applicant seeks a direction that the standard procedure should apply; and

(ii)

the applicant’s reasons for seeking such a direction.

(3)

Paragraph (4) applies where—

(a)

a respondent wishes to seek a direction from the court that the standard procedure should apply to an application to which the fast-track procedure would otherwise apply; or

(b)

a respondent wishes to make representations on an application made by the applicant to which paragraph (1) applies.

(4)

Where this paragraph applies, the respondent’s request or representations—

(a)

must be filed with the court within 7 days of service of the application for a financial remedy; and

(b)

must state—

(i)

which procedure (standard or fast-track) the respondent wishes the court to direct should apply to the application for a financial remedy; and

(ii)

the respondent’s reasons for seeking such a direction.

(5)

Where a request or representations referred to in this rule have been made, the court must—

(a)

determine without notice to the parties and before the first hearing whether the standard procedure or the fast-track procedure should apply to the application for a financial remedy; and

(b)

notify the parties of its determination and any directions made in consequence of that determination.”.

“Consideration of the application at the first hearing9.20.

(1)

If the court is able to determine the application at the first hearing, it must do so unless it considers that there are good reasons not to do so.

(2)

Paragraphs (3) to (7) apply where the court does not determine the application at the first hearing.

(3)

The court may give directions relating to—

(a)

the filing of further evidence;

(b)

the production of further documents;

(c)

any other matter required for the fair determination of the matter.

(4)

The court may use the first hearing or part of it as a FDR appointment.

(5)

Where the court uses the first hearing or part of it as a FDR appointment, rule 9.17 applies with these modifications—

(a)

for paragraph (3) substitute—

“(3)

At the first hearing, the applicant must produce to the court all offers and proposals and responses to them.”; and

(b)

paragraphs (7) and (9) do not apply.

(6)

The court may direct that the application be referred to a FDR appointment.

(7)

If the court decides that a referral to a FDR appointment is not appropriate it must direct one or more of the following—

(a)

that a further directions appointment be fixed;

(b)

that an appointment be fixed for the making of an interim order;

(c)

that the case be fixed for a final hearing and, where that direction is given, the court must determine the judicial level at which the case should be heard.

(Under Part 3 the court may also direct that the case be adjourned if it considers that non-court dispute resolution is appropriate.)”.