PART 7MISCELLANEOUS AND GENERAL
Defence to proceedings in respect of statutory nuisance29.
(1)
(a)
the defendant shows that the nuisance—
(i)
(ii)
is a consequence of the construction or maintenance of the authorised project and that it cannot reasonably be avoided; or
(b)
the defendant shows that the nuisance—
(i)
relates to premises used by Network Rail for the purposes of or in connection with the use of the authorised project and that the nuisance is attributable to the use of the authorised project which is being used in accordance with a scheme of mitigation of noise approved by the relevant planning authority as described in requirement 10 (noise mitigation Railway Cottages) in Part 2 (requirements) of Schedule 1 (authorised development and requirements); or
(ii)
is a consequence of the use of the authorised project and that it cannot reasonably be avoided.
(2)
Section 61(9) (consent for work on construction site to include statement that it does not of itself constitute a defence to proceedings under section 82 of the Environmental Protection Act 1990) of the Control of Pollution Act 1974 and section 65(8) of that Act (corresponding provision in relation to consent for registered noise level to be exceeded), does not apply where the consent relates to the use of premises by Network Rail for the purposes of or in connection with the construction or maintenance of the authorised project.