2006 No. 3212

LOCAL GOVERNMENT, ENGLAND
ROAD TRAFFIC, ENGLAND

The Bus Lane Contraventions (Approved Local Authorities) (England) (Amendment) (No. 6) Order 2006

Made

Laid before Parliament

Coming into force

The Secretary of State, in exercise of the powers conferred by section 144(3)(b) and (14) of the Transport Act 20001, makes the following Order:

Citation and commencement1

This Order may be cited as the Bus Lane Contraventions (Approved Local Authorities) (England) (Amendment) (No. 6) Order 2006 and shall come into force on 3rd January 2007.

Specification of approved local authorities2

Leicester City Council is specified as an approved local authority for the purposes of section 144 of the Transport Act 2000 (civil penalties for bus lane contraventions)2.

Amendment to the Bus Lane Contraventions (Approved Local Authorities) (England) Order 20053

1

The Schedule to the Bus Lane Contraventions (Approved Local Authorities) (England) Order 20053 shall be amended as set out in paragraph (2).

2

After the row in the table relating to Leeds City Council, insert the following row—

Leicester City Council

S.I. 2006/3211

Signed by authority of the Secretary of State

G. MerronParliamentary Under Secretary of StateDepartment for Transport
EXPLANATORY NOTE

(This note is not part of the Order)

The Bus Lane Contraventions (Penalty Charges, Adjudication and Enforcement) (England) Regulations 2005 (S.I. 2005/2757), made under section 144 of the Transport Act 2000, provide for the enforcement of bus lane restrictions through the imposition, by approved local authorities, of penalty charges in respect of contraventions of such restrictions. This Order specifies Leicester City Council (“Leicester”) as an approved local authority for these purposes.

The Order also makes a consequential amendment to the Bus Lane Contraventions (Approved Local Authorities) (England) Order 2005 (S.I. 2005/2755) to add Leicester to the list of approved local authorities set out in the Schedule to that Order.

No Regulatory Impact Assessment has been undertaken, since the Order is concerned with the enforcement of existing traffic restrictions and prohibitions and does not therefore constitute an additional burden on business. The costs incurred by local authorities undertaking enforcement are expected to be paid from the penalty charge income.