The Asbestos (Prohibitions) (Amendment) Regulations 2003
Citation and Commencement
1.
These Regulations may be cited as the Asbestos (Prohibitions) (Amendment) Regulations 2003 and shall come into force on 15th August 2003.
Amendment of the Asbestos (Prohibitions) Regulations 1992
2.
“(4)
Where in these Regulations it is stated that amphibole asbestos or chrysotile has intentionally been added to a product, it will be presumed where—
(a)
amphibole asbestos or chrysotile is present in any product; and
(b)
amphibole asbestos or chrysotile, as the case may be, is not a naturally occurring impurity of that product, or of any component or constituent thereof,
that the amphibole asbestos or chrysotile, as the case may be, has intentionally been added, subject to evidence to the contrary being adduced in any proceedings.”.
3.
In regulation 3 of the Asbestos (Prohibitions) Regulations 1992:—
(a)
in paragraph (1), for the words “containing amphibole asbestos” substitute the words “to which amphibole asbestos has intentionally been added”; and
(b)
in paragraph (2), for the words “containing chrysotile” substitute the words “to which chrysotile has intentionally been added”.
Signed by authority of the Secretary of State for Work and Pensions.
These Regulations amend the Asbestos (Prohibitions) Regulations 1992, as amended, by the insertion of a definition of the words “intentionally been added” in regulation 2. The definition includes an evidential presumption, which is rebuttable if evidence to the contrary is adduced in any proceedings.
In regulation 3(a) and (b), the prohibitions on the importation of products containing chrysotile or amphibole asbestos respectively are amended, and now refer to products to which chrysotile or amphibole asbestos, as the case may be, has intentionally been added.
A copy of the Regulatory Impact Assessment prepared in respect of these Regulations can be obtained from the Health and Safety Executive, Economic Adviser’s Unit, Rose Court, 2 Southwark Bridge, London SE1 9HS.