Decrees where party in defaultS
16.2.(1)In a cause to which this Chapter applies, where a party fails—
(a)to lodge, or intimate the lodging of, any production or part of process within the period required under a provision in these Rules or an order of the sheriff,
(b)to implement an order of the sheriff within a specified period, F1. . .
(c)to appear or be represented at any diet, [F2, or
(d)otherwise to comply with any requirement imposed upon that party by these Rules]
that party shall be in default.
[F3(2)Where a party is in default the sheriff may, as the case may be–
(a)grant decree as craved with expenses;
(b)grant decree of absolvitor with expenses;
(c)dismiss the cause with expenses; or
(d)make such other order as he thinks fit to secure the expeditious progress of the cause.]
(3)Where no party appears at a diet, the sheriff may dismiss the cause.
(4)In this rule, “diet” includes—
(a)a hearing under rule 9.12 (Options Hearing);
(b)a hearing under rule 10.6 (Procedural Hearing);
(c)a proof or proof before answer; and
(d)a debate.
Textual Amendments
F1Word in Sch. 1 rule 16.2(1)(b) omitted (18.8.2006) by virtue of Act of Sederunt (Ordinary Cause and Summary Application Rules) Amendment (Miscellaneous) 2006 (S.S.I. 2006/410), art. 2(5)(a)
F2Sch. 1 rule 16.2(1)(d) and word inserted (18.8.2006) by Act of Sederunt (Ordinary Cause and Summary Application Rules) Amendment (Miscellaneous) 2006 (S.S.I. 2006/410), art. 2(5)(b)
F3Sch. 1 rule 16.2(2) substituted (18.8.2006) by Act of Sederunt (Ordinary Cause and Summary Application Rules) Amendment (Miscellaneous) 2006 (S.S.I. 2006/410), art. 2(5)(c)