28.Section 5 inserts amendments to section 18 of ETA 1996, which provides for the circumstances in which Acas is obliged, or has the power, to offer conciliation.
29.Section 18(3) of ETA 1996 applies to conciliation in situations where a person claims he could bring tribunal proceedings, but has not yet done so. It provides that where either the person who might bring proceedings, or the employer against whom proceedings might be brought, has requested conciliation, the Acas conciliation officer has a duty to attempt to conciliate a solution to the dispute (where both parties have made the request), or (if only one party has made the request) to do so where he considers there is a reasonable prospect of success. Subsection (2) amends section 18(3) to replace this obligation with a discretionary power to conciliate in a pre-tribunal dispute without requiring the Acas officer to justify the reasons for his decision whether or not to offer conciliation. The intention of the amendment is to enable Acas to prioritise cases where demand for conciliation exceeds resources available for conciliation and to relieve Acas of the obligation to offer conciliation in pre-tribunal disputes where there is no prospect of success.
30.Section 18(5) of ETA 1996 provides that, where a person claims that an unfair dismissal complaint under section 111 of ERA 1996 could be, but has not yet been, made, the Acas officer must act as if that claim had been made and, as provided for in section 18(4) of ERA 1996, as part of the conciliation exercise, attempt to secure reinstatement or reengagement (or additional compensation in lieu of such) for the dismissed employee. Subsection (3) repeals that duty and substitutes a discretionary power to seek such reinstatement or reengagement in pre-tribunal disputes.
