xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"

Part 10U.K.Court Martial Decisions: Appeals and Review

Chapter 1U.K.Appeals from Court Martial

272Appeals to the Court Martial Appeal CourtU.K.

(1)The Courts-Martial Appeal Court is renamed the Court Martial Appeal Court.

(2)Schedule 8 (amendment of the Courts-Martial (Appeals) Act 1968) has effect.

Commencement Information

I1S. 272 in force at 28.3.2009 for specified purposes by S.I. 2009/812, art. 3(a)(b) (with transitional provisions in S.I. 2009/1059)

I2S. 272 in force at 31.10.2009 in so far as not already in force by S.I. 2009/1167, art. 4

Chapter 2U.K.Review of Court Martial Sentence

273Review of unduly lenient sentence by Court Martial Appeal CourtU.K.

(1)If the Attorney General considers—

(a)that a sentence passed by the Court Martial in respect of an offence under section 42 (criminal conduct) is unduly lenient, and

(b)that condition A or B is satisfied,

he may refer the case to the Court Martial Appeal Court for it to review the sentencing of the offender.

(2)Condition A is that the corresponding offence under the law of England and Wales is under that law an offence which, if committed by an adult, is triable only on indictment.

(3)Condition B is that the case is of a description specified for the purposes of this subsection in an order made by the Secretary of State.

(4)A reference under subsection (1) may not be made without the leave of the Court Martial Appeal Court.

(5)On a reference under subsection (1), the Court Martial Appeal Court may—

(a)quash the sentence passed by the Court Martial; and

(b)pass in substitution for it any sentence which the Court Martial Appeal Court thinks appropriate and which is a sentence that the Court Martial had power to pass in respect of the offence.

(6)For the purposes of subsection (1)(a), the Attorney General may consider that a sentence passed by the Court Martial is unduly lenient if he considers—

(a)that the Court Martial erred in law as to its powers of sentencing; or

(b)that the sentence is not that required by [F1section 225(2) or 226(2) of the 2003 Act (as applied by section 219(2) or 221(2) of this Act) or by section 225, 226 or 227 of this Act];

but nothing in this subsection limits subsection (1)(a).

[F2(7)Where a reference under subsection (1) relates to a case in which the Court Martial made an order specified in subsection (7A), the Court Martial Appeal Court may not, in deciding what sentence is appropriate for the case, make any allowance for the fact that the offender is being sentenced for a second time.

(7A)The orders specified in this subsection are—

(a)an order under section 269(2) of the 2003 Act (determination of minimum term in relation to mandatory life sentence);

(b)an order under section 82A(2) of the Sentencing Act (determination of minimum term in relation to discretionary life sentences and certain other sentences).]

(8)The reference in subsection (1)(a) to a sentence passed by the Court Martial does not include one passed on an appeal under section 285 (appeal from Service Civilian Court).

(9)In this section and section 274 “sentence” includes any order made by a court when dealing with an offender.

Textual Amendments

Modifications etc. (not altering text)

Commencement Information

I3S. 273 in force at 28.3.2009 for specified purposes by S.I. 2009/812, art. 3(a)(b) (with transitional provisions in S.I. 2009/1059)

I4S. 273 in force at 31.10.2009 in so far as not already in force by S.I. 2009/1167, art. 4

274Reference of point of law to Supreme CourtU.K.

(1)Where the Court Martial Appeal Court has concluded its review of a case referred to it under section 273(1), the Attorney General or the offender may refer to the Supreme Court a point of law involved in any sentence passed on the offender in the proceedings.

(2)A reference under subsection (1) may not be made without the leave of the Court Martial Appeal Court or the Supreme Court.

(3)Such leave may not be given unless—

(a)the Court Martial Appeal Court has certified that the point of law is of general public importance; and

(b)it appears to the Court Martial Appeal Court or the Supreme Court (as the case may be) that the point is one which should be considered by the Supreme Court.

(4)The Supreme Court must give its opinion on any point of law referred to it under subsection (1) and must—

(a)remit the case to the Court Martial Appeal Court to be dealt with; or

(b)deal with the case itself.

(5)For the purposes of dealing with a case itself the Supreme Court may exercise any powers of the Court Martial Appeal Court.

Commencement Information

I5S. 274 in force at 28.3.2009 for specified purposes by S.I. 2009/812, art. 3(a)(b) (with transitional provisions in S.I. 2009/1059)

I6S. 274 in force at 31.10.2009 in so far as not already in force by S.I. 2009/1167, art. 4

275Power to make supplementary provision about review of sentenceU.K.

(1)The Secretary of State may by regulations make supplementary provision with respect to references under section 273(1) or 274(1) (including provision with respect to applications, proceedings and other matters in connection with such references).

(2)The regulations may in particular include provision which is equivalent to that made by, or capable of being made under, any provision of—

(a)this Act,

(b)the Court Martial Appeals Act 1968 (c. 20), or

(c)Schedule 3 to the Criminal Justice Act 1988 (c. 33) (reviews of sentencing; supplementary),

subject to such modifications as the Secretary of State considers appropriate.

Commencement Information

I7S. 275 in force at 28.3.2009 for specified purposes by S.I. 2009/812, art. 3(a)(b) (with transitional provisions in S.I. 2009/1059)

I8S. 275 in force at 31.10.2009 in so far as not already in force by S.I. 2009/1167, art. 4

Chapter 3U.K.Compensation for Miscarriages of Justice

276Compensation for miscarriages of justiceU.K.

(1)Where—

(a)a person has been convicted by the Court Martial, and

(b)subsequently his conviction has been reversed, or he has been pardoned, on the ground that a new or newly discovered fact shows beyond reasonable doubt that there has been a miscarriage of justice,

the Secretary of State shall pay compensation for the miscarriage of justice to him or, if he is dead, to his personal representatives; but this is subject to [F3subsections (2) to (3A)].

(2)Compensation under this section is not payable if the non-disclosure of the unknown fact was wholly or partly attributable to the person convicted.

(3)Compensation under this section is not payable unless an application for such compensation has been made to the Secretary of State [F4before the end of the period of 2 years beginning with the date on which the conviction of the person concerned is reversed or he is pardoned.

(3A)But the Secretary of State may direct that an application for compensation made after the end of that period is to be treated as if it had been made within that period if the Secretary of State considers that there are exceptional circumstances which justify doing so.]

(4)The question whether there is a right to compensation under this section is to be determined by the Secretary of State.

(5)If the Secretary of State determines that there is a right to such compensation, the amount of the compensation is to be assessed by an assessor appointed by the Secretary of State.

[F5(6)Section 276A applies in relation to the assessment of the amount of the compensation.]

(7)The reference in subsection (1) to a conviction having been reversed is to be read as a reference to a conviction having been quashed—

(a)on an appeal out of time;

(b)on a reference under section 34 of the Court Martial Appeals Act 1968 (c. 20); or

(c)on a reference under section 12A of the Criminal Appeal Act 1995.

[F6(7A)But in a case where—

(a)a person's conviction for an offence is quashed on an appeal out of time, and

(b)the person is to be subject to a retrial,

the conviction is not to be treated for the purposes of subsection (1) as “reversed” unless and until the person is acquitted of all offences at the retrial or the prosecution indicates that it has decided not to proceed with the retrial.]

(8)Schedule 9 (provision with regard to assessors) has effect.

Textual Amendments

F4S. 273(3A) and preceding words at the end of subsection (3) inserted (31.10.2009) by Criminal Justice and Immigration Act 2008 (c. 4), s. 153(7), Sch. 25 para. 29(3) (with Sch. 25 para. 34(1)); S.I. 2009/1028, art. 2(b)

Commencement Information

I9S. 276 in force at 28.3.2009 for specified purposes by S.I. 2009/812, art. 3(a)(b) (with transitional provisions in S.I. 2009/1059)

I10S. 276 in force at 31.10.2009 in so far as not already in force by S.I. 2009/1167, art. 4

[F7276AMiscarriages of justice: amount of compensationU.K.

(1)This section applies where an assessor is required to assess the amount of compensation payable to or in respect of a person under section 276 for a miscarriage of justice.

(2)In assessing so much of any compensation payable under section 276 as is attributable to suffering, harm to reputation or similar damage, the assessor must have regard in particular to—

(a)the seriousness of the offence of which the person was convicted and the severity of the punishment resulting from the conviction, and

(b)the conduct of the investigation and prosecution of the offence.

(3)The assessor may make from the total amount of compensation that the assessor would otherwise have assessed as payable under section 276 any deduction or deductions that the assessor considers appropriate by reason of either or both of the following—

(a)any conduct of the person appearing to the assessor to have directly or indirectly caused, or contributed to, the conviction concerned; and

(b)any other convictions of the person and any punishment resulting from them.

(4)If, having had regard to any matters falling within subsection (3)(a) or (b), the assessor considers that there are exceptional circumstances which justify doing so, the assessor may determine that the amount of compensation payable under section 276 is to be a nominal amount only.

(5)The total amount of compensation payable to or in respect of a person under section 276 for a particular miscarriage of justice must not exceed the overall compensation limit. That limit is—

(a)£1 million in a case to which section 276B applies, and

(b)£500,000 in any other case.

(6)The total amount of compensation payable under section 276 for a person's loss of earnings or earnings capacity in respect of any one year must not exceed the earnings compensation limit.

That limit is an amount equal to 1.5 times the median annual gross earnings according to the latest figures published by the Office of National Statistics at the time of the assessment.

(7)The Secretary of State may by order amend subsection (5) or (6) so as to alter any amount for the time being specified as the overall compensation limit or the earnings compensation limit.

276BCases where person has been detained for at least 10 yearsU.K.

(1)For the purposes of section 276A(5) this section applies to any case where the person concerned (“P”) has been in qualifying detention for a period (or total period) of at least 10 years by the time when—

(a)the conviction is reversed, or

(b)the pardon is given,

as mentioned in section 276(1).

(2)P was “in qualifying detention” at any time when P was detained in a prison, a hospital or at any other place, if P was so detained—

(a)by virtue of a sentence passed in respect of the relevant offence,

(b)under mental health legislation by reason of P's conviction of that offence (disregarding any conditions other than the fact of the conviction that had to be fulfilled in order for P to be so detained), or

(c)as a result of P's having been ordered to be kept in service custody, or remanded for mental health purposes, in connection with the relevant offence or with any other offence the charge for which was founded on the same facts or evidence as that for the relevant offence.

(3)In calculating the period (or total period) during which P has been in qualifying detention as mentioned in subsection (1), no account is to be taken of any period of time during which P was both—

(a)in qualifying detention, and

(b)in excluded concurrent detention.

(4)P was “in excluded concurrent detention” at any time when P was detained in a prison, a hospital or at any other place, if P was so detained—

(a)during the term of a sentence passed in respect of an offence other than the relevant offence,

(b)under mental health legislation by reason of P's conviction of any such other offence (disregarding any conditions other than the fact of the conviction that had to be fulfilled in order for P to be so detained), or

(c)as a result of P's having been ordered to be kept in service custody, or remanded for mental health purposes, in connection with an offence for which P was subsequently convicted other than—

(i)the relevant offence, or

(ii)any other offence the charge for which was founded on the same facts or evidence as that for the relevant offence.

(5)But P was not “in excluded concurrent detention” at any time by virtue of subsection (4)(a), (b) or (c) if P's conviction of the other offence mentioned in that provision was quashed on appeal, or a pardon was given in respect of it.

(6)In this section—

(7)If, as a result of the miscarriage of justice—

(a)two or more convictions are reversed, or

(b)a pardon is given in respect of two or more offences,

the relevant offence” means any of the offences concerned.]