137.The review of the 1999 Act and consultation process found that, following the amendments, these provisions of the 1992 Act were generally working well. However, the judgment in the case of National Union of Rail, Maritime and Transport Workers v London Underground Limited [2001] IRLR 228 highlighted a difficulty with the way in which information required to be given in ballot and industrial action notices should be presented. Further, the case of National Union of Rail, Maritime and Transport Workers v Midland Mainline Ltd [2001] IRLR 813 revealed that there was a lack of clarity as to the union members to whom the union was required to give an entitlement to vote in an industrial action ballot. Sections 22, 23 and 25 address these matters.
The data on this page is available in the alternative data formats listed:
All content is available under the Open Government Licence v3.0 except where otherwise stated. This site additionally contains content derived from EUR-Lex, reused under the terms of the Commission Decision 2011/833/EU on the reuse of documents from the EU institutions. For more information see the EUR-Lex public statement on re-use.
