xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"

SCHEDULES

[F1SCHEDULE 3AU.K.The electronic communications code

Textual Amendments

F1Sch. 3A inserted (31.7.2017 for the purpose of making regulations under Sch. 3A para. 95, 22.11.2017 but only in relation to Sch. 3A para. 106, 28.12.2017 in so far as not already in force) by Digital Economy Act 2017 (c. 30), s. 118(6), Sch. 1 (with Sch. 2); S.I. 2017/765, reg. 2(ii)(jj); S.I. 2017/1136, reg. 2; S.I. 2017/1286, reg. 2(b)

Modifications etc. (not altering text)

PART 6U.K.Rights to require removal of electronic communications apparatus

Modifications etc. (not altering text)

C3Sch. 3A Pt. 6 applied by 1985 c. 68, s. 298(2) (as amended (28.12.2017) by Digital Economy Act 2017 (c. 30), s. 118(6), Sch. 3 para. 19; S.I. 2017/1286, reg. 2(d))

C4Sch. 3A Pt. 6 excluded by 1996 c. 61, Sch. 15 Pt. 4 para. 2(1) (as amended (28.12.2017) by Digital Economy Act 2017 (c. 30), s. 118(6), Sch. 3 para. 38(3); S.I. 2017/1286, reg. 2(d))

When does a landowner or occupier of neighbouring land have the right to require removal of electronic communications apparatus?U.K.

38(1)A landowner or occupier of any land (“neighbouring land”) has the right to require the removal of electronic communications apparatus kept on, under or over other land in exercise of a right mentioned in paragraph 13(1), if both of the following conditions are met.U.K.

(2)The first condition is that the apparatus interferes with or obstructs a means of access to or from the neighbouring land.

(3)The second condition is that the landowner or occupier of the neighbouring land is not bound by a code right within [F2paragraph 3(1)(h)] entitling an operator to cause the interference or obstruction.

(4)A landowner of neighbouring land who is not the occupier of the land does not meet the second condition if—

(a)the land is occupied by a person who—

(i)conferred a code right (which is in force) entitling an operator to cause the interference or obstruction, or

(ii)is otherwise bound by such a right, and

(b)that code right was not conferred in breach of a covenant enforceable by the landowner.

(5)In the application of sub-paragraph (4)(b) to Scotland the reference to a covenant enforceable by the landowner is to be read as a reference to a contractual term which is so enforceable.]