Textual Amendments
F1Sch. 1 paras. 6A-6C and headings inserted (5.4.2004) by Criminal Justice Act 2003 (c. 44), ss. 19(4)(a), 336(3)(4) (with s. 141); S.I. 2004/829, art. 2(1)(2)(b)
6B(1)A defendant falls within this paragraph if—E+W
(a)he is aged 18 or over;
(b)a sample taken—
(i)under section 63B of the Police and Criminal Evidence Act 1984 (testing for presence of Class A drugs) in connection with the offence; or
(ii)under section 161 of the Criminal Justice Act 2003 (drug testing after conviction of an offence but before sentence),
has revealed the presence in his body of a specified Class A drug;
(c)either the offence is one under section 5(2) or (3) of the Misuse of Drugs Act 1971 and relates to a specified Class A drug, or the court is satisfied that there are substantial grounds for believing—
(i)that misuse by him of any specified Class A drug caused or contributed to the offence; or
(ii)(even if it did not) that the offence was motivated wholly or partly by his intended misuse of such a drug; and
(d)the condition set out in sub-paragraph (2) below is satisfied or (if the court is considering on a second or subsequent occasion whether or not to grant bail) has been, and continues to be, satisfied.
(2)The condition referred to is that after the taking and analysis of the sample—
(a)a relevant assessment has been offered to the defendant but he does not agree to undergo it; or
(b)he has undergone a relevant assessment, and relevant follow-up has been proposed to him, but he does not agree to participate in it.
(3)In this paragraph and paragraph 6C below—
(a)“Class A drug” and “misuse” have the same meaning as in the Misuse of Drugs Act 1971;
(b)“relevant assessment” and “relevant follow-up” have the meaning given by section 3(6E) of this Act;
(c)“specified” (in relation to a Class A drug) has the same meaning as in Part 3 of the Criminal Justice and Court Services Act 2000.]