28.—(1) This section applies where the act mentioned in section 9(1) is—
(a)the imposition on P of a requirement to attend at a particular place at particular times or intervals for the purpose of being given treatment that would or might be treatment with serious consequences (an “attendance requirement”); or
(b)an act done for the purpose of ensuring that P complies with an attendance requirement.
(2) Section 9(2) (protection from liability) applies to the act only if—
(a)the requirement is authorised; and
(b)the receipt of treatment condition (as well as the conditions of section 9(1)(c) and (d), and any other conditions that apply under this Part) is met.
(3) Subsection (2)(a) does not apply where the situation is an emergency (see section 65).
(4) For the purposes of subsection (2)(a) the requirement is “authorised” if, at the time the act is done, there is in force an authorisation granted under Schedule 1 which permits that requirement to be imposed.
(5) The receipt of treatment condition is that at the time the act is done D reasonably believes that—
(a)failure to impose the requirement, or
(b)where the requirement is already imposed, failure to ensure that P complies with the requirement,
would be more likely than not to result in P’s not receiving the treatment.
29.—(1) If—
(a)an attendance requirement has been authorised under Schedule 1 and has been imposed on a person, and
(b)at any time after the imposition of the requirement, the medical practitioner in charge of the treatment considers that any of the conditions in subsection (2) is no longer met,
the requirement must be revoked.
(2) Those conditions are—
(a)that the person lacks capacity in relation to whether he or she should attend at the place and times or intervals concerned for the purpose of being given the treatment;
(b)that it is more likely than not that, without the attendance requirement, the person would not receive the treatment;
(c)that the attendance requirement is in the person’s best interests.
(3) Nothing in subsection (1) limits the effect of section 28 (under which acts to ensure compliance with an attendance requirement are unlawful if certain conditions are not met).
(4) Where an attendance requirement is revoked in the circumstances mentioned in subsection (1)(b), another attendance requirement may not be imposed on the person by virtue of the same authorisation.
(5) In this section “attendance requirement” has the same meaning as in section 28.