A.
<Strong>MEASURES IN FORCE</Strong>
(1)
On 2 December 2013, the Council imposed anti-dumping and countervailing measures on crystalline silicon photovoltaic modules and key components (i.e. cells) originating in or consigned from the People's Republic of China (‘the original measures’).
(2)
On 11 February 2016, the Commission extended those measures to imports of crystalline silicon photovoltaic modules and key components (i.e. cells) consigned from Malaysia and Taiwan, whether declared as originating in Malaysia and in Taiwan or not, with the exception of imports produced by certain companies specifically exempted from those measures (‘the extended measures’).
(3)
Following expiry review investigations of the original measures the Commission, on 1 March 2017, imposed anti-dumping and countervailing duties for a period of 18 months (‘the continued measures’). On the same day it also terminated two partial interim review investigations that had been limited to the Union interest.
(4)
On 3 March 2017, the Commission initiated a partial interim review limited to the form and level of the continued measures. Following this review, the Commission amended the continued measures following the publication of Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2017/1570, which entered into force on 1 October 2017.
(5)
On 8 November 2017, the Commission amended the extended measures by adding a new exporting producer to the list of exempted companies set out Article 1(1) of Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2016/184 and Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2016/185, respectively.
(6)
Accordingly, the countervailing and anti-dumping measures currently in force with regard to imports of crystalline silicon photovoltaic modules and key components (i.e. cells) consigned from Malaysia and Taiwan, whether declared as originating in Malaysia and in Taiwan or not, are those imposed by Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2017/366 and Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2017/367, with the exception of imports produced by the companies specifically exempted from those measures as set out in Implementing Regulation (EU) 2016/184 and Implementing Regulation (EU) 2016/185, as amended by Implementing Regulation (EU) 2017/1997.
C.
<Strong>FINDINGS</Strong>
(14)
Longi Kuching is a genuine Malaysian producer of crystalline silicon photovoltaic modules and cells that was incorporated in January 2016. It started commercial production of modules and cells in May 2016.
(15)
Longi Kuching had not exported the product under review to the Union during the investigation period used in the investigation that led to the extended measures, i.e. from 1 April 2014 to 31 March 2015. Longi Kuching had neither purchased the product under review from the PRC for further re-sales or transhipment to the Union up until the end of the reporting period, i.e. 31 December 2017. It had, however, entered into a contractual obligation to export the product under review to a customer in the Union.
(16)
During verification at the applicant's premises it was demonstrated that the contract had been fulfilled and the applicant had delivered the product under review to a customer in Poland in November 2017. No other Union sales had been made up to date.
(17)
The applicant is a wholly owned subsidiary of a Hong Kong based company, Longi H.K. Trading Limited, which in turn is wholly owned by the the Chinese company Longi Green Energy Technology Co., Ltd The latter company is the ultimate parent company of the Longi Group, which is active throughout the Solar PV value chain and produces, amongst others, wafers, ingots, solar cells and solar modules. The Longi Group is subject to the countervailing and anti-dumping measures currently in force on imports of crystalline silicon photovoltaic modules and cells originating in the People's Republic of China. As indicated in the Initiation Regulation, the Commission carefully examined this relationship and verified whether Longi Kuching was established or used to circumvent the existing measures.
(18)
The Commission found that Longi Kuching is a genuine producer of the product under review with complete and state of the art production facilities for both cells and modules, including R&D. It had not been engaged in circumvention activities, such as transhipment, assembly operations or re-sales of solar modules and cells originating in the People's Republic of China to the Union.
(19)
The Commission thus concluded that Longi Kuching was neither established nor used for circumventing the original measures and that the Chinese ownership, in itself, did not constitute a reason to reject the application.
(20)
Against this background, the Commission did not find it necessary to impose any particular monitoring conditions should the exemption be granted. In order to ensure the proper application of the exemption, the Commission considered it appropriate to apply the special measures applicable to all companies which had been granted exemptions. These special measures are the requirement of the presentation to the customs authorities of the Member States of a valid commercial invoice, which shall conform to the requirements set out in Article 1(2) of Implementing Regulation (EU) 2016/184 and Article 1(2) of Implementing Regulation (EU) 2016/185. Imports not accompanied by such an invoice shall be made subject to the extended dumping and countervailing duty respectively.
(21)
In the light of the findings described in recitals (13) to (19), the Commission concluded that Longi (Kuching) SDN.BHD fulfils the criteria laid down in Articles 11(4) and 13(4) of the basic anti-dumping Regulation and Article 23(6) of the basic anti-subsidy Regulation and should be exempted from the extended measures.
(22)
The findings above were disclosed to the applicant and other interested parties, which were given the opportunity to provide comments. No comments were received.
D.
<Strong>MODIFICATION TO THE LIST OF COMPANIES BENEFITTING FROM AN EXEMPTION TO THE EXTENDED MEASURES</Strong>
(23)
Given the findings referred to above, the Commission concluded that the company Longi (Kuching) SDN.BHD should be added to the list of companies that are exempted from the countervailing duty and anti-dumping duty imposed by Implementing Regulation (EU) 2016/184 and Implementing Regulation (EU) 2016/185, respectively.
(24)
Given that the list of the exempted exporting producers from Malaysia and Taiwan was also included in Implementing Regulation (EU) 2017/366 and Implementing Regulation (EU) 2017/367, Longi (Kuching) SDN.BHD should also be added to the list of exporting producers contained in those two regulations.
(25)
Accordingly, Longi (Kuching) SDN.BHD should be added to the list of individually identified companies in Article 1(1) of Implementing Regulation (EU) 2016/184, Article 1(1) of Implementing Regulation (EU) 2016/185, Article 4(1) of Implementing Regulation (EU) 2017/366 and Article 4(1) of Implementing Regulation (EU) 2017/367.
(26)
Furthermore, the application of the exemption is conditional upon compliance with the requirement set out in Article 1(2) of Implementing Regulation (EU) 2016/184 and in Article 1(2) of Implementing Regulation (EU) 2016/185. This requirement is also reflected in Article 4(2) of Implementing Regulation (EU) 2017/366 and in Article 4(2) of Implementing Regulation (EU) 2017/367.
(27)
The list of individually identified companies should be identical in all implementing regulations in force. Since, by means of Implementing Regulation (EU) 2017/1997, Jinko Solar Technology SDN.BHD had been included in the list of individually identified companies in Article 1(1) of Implementing Regulation (EU) 2016/184 and Article 1(1) of Implementing Regulation (EU) 2016/185, its name has to be also inserted in the list of individually identified companies in Article 4(1) of Implementing Regulation (EU) 2017/366 and Article 4(1) of Implementing Regulation (EU) 2017/367.
(28)
The measures provided for in this Regulation are in accordance with the opinion of the Committee established by Article 15(1) of Regulation (EU) 2016/1036,