Commission Regulation (EU) 2017/706
of 19 April 2017
amending Annex VII to Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 of the European Parliament and of the Council on the Registration, Evaluation, Authorisation and Restriction of Chemicals (REACH) as regards skin sensitisation and repealing Commission Regulation (EU) 2016/1688
(Text with EEA relevance)
THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION,
Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union,
Whereas:
Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 establishes requirements for the registration of substances manufactured or imported in the Union on their own, in mixtures or articles. The registrants have to provide the information required by Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006, as appropriate, in order to fulfil the registration requirements.
Pursuant to Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006, in vivo studies are required for the generation of information on skin sensitisation in point 8.3 of Annex VII to Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006.
In recent years, significant scientific progress has been made in the development of alternative test methods for skin sensitisation. Several in chemico/in vitro test methods have been validated by the European Union Reference Laboratory for Alternatives to Animal Testing (EURL ECVAM) and/or internationally agreed by the Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD). These test methods may allow the generation of adequate information to assess whether a substance causes skin sensitisation without the need to resort to in vivo testing, when applied in an appropriate combination in the framework of an integrated approach to testing and assessment (IATA).
To reduce animal testing, point 8.3 of Annex VII to Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 should be amended to allow the use of these alternative methods, where adequate information can be obtained through this approach and where the available test methods are applicable for the substance to be tested.
The currently available alternative test methods agreed by OECD are based on an adverse outcome pathway (AOP) describing the mechanistic knowledge about the development of skin sensitisation. These methods are not intended to be used on their own, but to be applied in combination. For the comprehensive assessment of skin sensitisation, typically methods addressing the first three key events of the AOP should be used.
However, under certain conditions, it may be possible to derive sufficient information without explicitly addressing all three key events by separate test methods. Therefore, the possibility should be given to registrants to scientifically justify the omission of tests addressing certain key events.
The test method indicated as the first choice for in vivo testing, the local lymph node assay (LLNA), provides information on the strength of the sensitisation potential of a substance. The identification of strong skin sensitisers is important to allow appropriate classification and risk assessment of such substances. It therefore should be clarified that the requirement for information allowing an assessment whether a substance should be presumed to be a strong sensitiser applies to all data, irrespective whether they are generated in vivo or in vitro.
ECHA, in cooperation with Member States and stakeholders, should further develop guidance documents for the application of the test methods and waiving possibilities for the standard information requirements provided by this Regulation for the purposes of Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006. In doing so, ECHA should take full account of the work carried out in OECD, as well as in other relevant scientific and expert groups.
Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 should therefore be amended accordingly.
The measures provided for in this Regulation are in accordance with the opinion of the Committee established under Article 133 of Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006
HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:
Article 1
Annex VII to Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 is amended in accordance with the Annex to this Regulation.
Article 2
This Regulation shall enter into force on the twentieth day following that of its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union.
It shall apply from 11 October 2016.
Regulation (EU) 2016/1688 is repealed with effect from the entry into force of this Regulation.
This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.
Done at Brussels, 19 April 2017.
For the Commission
The President
Jean-Claude Juncker
ANNEX
Point 8.3 of Annex VII to Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 shall be replaced by the following:
‘8.3.Skin sensitisation
Information allowing:
a conclusion whether the substance is a skin sensitiser and whether it can be presumed to have the potential to produce significant sensitisation in humans (Cat. 1A), and
risk assessment, where required.
The study(ies) under point 8.3.1 and 8.3.2 do not need to be conducted if:
the substance is classified as skin corrosion (Category 1), or
the substance is a strong acid (pH ≤ 2,0) or base (pH ≥ 11,5), or
the substance is spontaneously flammable in air or in contact with water or moisture at room temperature.
8.3.1.Skin sensitisation, in vitro/in chemico
Information from in vitro/in chemico test method(s) recognised according to Article 13(3), addressing each of the following key events of skin sensitisation:
- (a)
molecular interaction with skin proteins;
- (b)
inflammatory response in keratinocytes;
- (c)
activation of dendritic cells.
The(se) test(s) do not need to be conducted if:
an in vivo study according to point 8.3.2 is available, or
the available in vitro/in chemico test methods are not applicable for the substance or are not adequate for classification and risk assessment according to point 8.3.
If information from test method(s) addressing one or two of the key events in column 1 already allows classification and risk assessment according to point 8.3, studies addressing the other key event(s) need not be conducted.
8.3.2.Skin sensitisation, in vivo
An in vivo study shall be conducted only if in vitro/in chemico test methods described under point 8.3.1 are not applicable, or the results obtained from those studies are not adequate for classification and risk assessment according to point 8.3.
The murine local lymph node assay (LLNA) is the first-choice method for in vivo testing. Only in exceptional circumstances should another test be used. Justification for the use of another in vivo test shall be provided.
In vivo skin sensitisation studies that were carried out or initiated before 10 May 2017, and that meet the requirements set out in Article 13(3), first subparagraph, and Article 13(4) shall be considered appropriate to address this standard information requirement.’