THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION,
Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union,
Having regard to Regulation (EC) No 1924/2006 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 20 December 2006 on nutrition and health claims made on foods, and in particular Article 17(3) thereof,
Whereas:
(1)
Pursuant to Regulation (EC) No 1924/2006 health claims made on foods are prohibited unless they are authorised by the Commission in accordance with that Regulation and included in a list of permitted claims.
(2)
Regulation (EC) No 1924/2006 also provides that applications for authorisations of health claims may be submitted by food business operators to the national competent authority of a Member State. The national competent authority is to forward valid applications to the European Food Safety Authority (EFSA), hereinafter referred to as ‘the Authority’.
(3)
Following receipt of an application the Authority is to inform without delay the other Member States and the Commission thereof, and to deliver an opinion on the health claim concerned.
(4)
The Commission is to decide on the authorisation of health claims taking into account the opinion delivered by the Authority.
(5)
Following an application from Specialised Nutrition Europe (formerly European Dietetic Food Industry Association), submitted pursuant to Article 14(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 1924/2006, the Authority was required to deliver an opinion on a health claim related to beta-palmitate and contribution to softening stools (Question No EFSA-Q-2008-174). The claim proposed by the applicant was worded, inter alia, as follows: ‘Beta-palmitate enrichment contributes to soften stool consistency which helps to increase their frequency’.
(6)
On the basis of the data presented, the Authority concluded in its opinion, received by the Commission and the Member States on 21 February 2014, that a cause and effect relationship has not been established between the consumption of beta-palmitate and softening of stools. Accordingly, as the claim does not comply with the requirements of Regulation (EC) No 1924/2006, it should not be authorised.
(7)
Following an application from Specialised Nutrition Europe, submitted pursuant to Article 14(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 1924/2006, the Authority was required to deliver an opinion on a health claim related to the effects of choline and ‘development of brain’ (Question No EFSA-Q-2008-134). The claim proposed by the applicant was worded, inter alia, as follows: ‘Choline is needed for the development of brain of infants and young children from birth to three years’.
(8)
On the basis of the data presented, the Authority concluded in its opinion, received by the Commission and the Member States on 5 May 2014, that the claimed effect, ‘development of brain’ for infants and young children from birth to three years in relation to dietary choline, was not sufficiently defined for a scientific evaluation. In particular, the Authority considered that from the references provided by the applicant it is not possible to establish the physiological function of the nervous system that is the subject of the health claim and therefore the claimed effect is general and non-specific. Accordingly, as the claim does not comply with the requirements of Regulation (EC) No 1924/2006, it should not be authorised.
(9)
Following an application from Specialised Nutrition Europe, submitted pursuant to Article 14(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 1924/2006, the Authority was required to deliver an opinion on a health claim related to ‘complex carbohydrates’ and ‘contribute to satiety’ (Question No EFSA-Q-2008-131). The claim proposed by the applicant was worded, inter alia, as follows: ‘Complex carbohydrates contribute to satiety’.
(10)
On the basis of the data presented, the Authority concluded in its opinion, received by the Commission and the Member States on 5 May 2014, that a cause and effect relationship has not been established between the consumption of ‘complex carbohydrates’ and a beneficial physiological effect for infants and young children (from birth to three years of age). According to the Authority, the applicant did not provide evidence to establish that an increase in satiety is a beneficial physiological effect for infants and young children. Accordingly, as the claim does not comply with the requirements of Regulation (EC) No 1924/2006, it should not be authorised.
(11)
In accordance with Article 28(6) of Regulation (EC) No 1924/2006, health claims referred to in its Article 14(1)(b) and not authorised by a decision pursuant to Article 17(3) of Regulation (EC) No 1924/2006 may continue to be used for six months after such decision is taken, provided the application for authorisation was made before 19 January 2008. Accordingly, as the health claims listed in the Annex to this Regulation fulfil the above conditions, the transitional period laid down in that Article should apply.
(12)
The measures provided for in this Regulation are in accordance with the opinion of the Standing Committee on Plants, Animals, Food and Feed,
HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION: