http://www.legislation.gov.uk/eur/2015/1866/article/11Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2015/1866 of 13 October 2015 laying down detailed rules for the implementation of Regulation (EU) No 511/2014 of the European Parliament and of the Council as regards the register of collections, monitoring user compliance and best practicesCommission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2015/1866Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2015/1866 of 13 October 2015 laying down detailed rules for the implementation of Regulation (EU) No 511/2014 of the European Parliament and of the Council as regards the register of collections, monitoring user compliance and best practicesKing's Printer of Acts of Parliamenthttps://webarchive.nationalarchives.gov.uk/eu-exit/https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=CELEX:32015R1866texttext/xmlen2025-02-04Expert Participation2020-12-31 Deficiency in best practiceArticle 111Where the Secretary of State receives substantiated information regarding repeated or significant cases of non-compliance with Articles 4 and 7 of Regulation (EU) No 511/2014 by a user implementing a best practice, the Secretary of State shall request the association of users or the other interested parties to submit observations regarding the alleged non-compliance and whether those cases indicate possible deficiencies in the best practice.2Where the association of users or the other interested parties submit observations, they shall do so within three months.3. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .4. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .5Where the Secretary of State examines possible deficiencies in a best practice and cases of non-compliance with the obligations provided for in Articles 4 and 7 of Regulation (EU) No 511/2014, as referred to in Article 8(4) of that Regulation, the association of users or the other interested parties subject to examination shall co-operate with and assist the Secretary of State .... Where the association of users or the other interested parties subject to examination fails to do so, the Secretary of State may, without further consideration, withdraw recognition of the best practice.6The results of the examination carried out by the Secretary of State shall be conclusive and shall include any remedial actions to be taken by the association of users or the other interested parties. The examination may also result in a decision to withdraw recognition of the best practice.Words in Art. 11(5) inserted (31.12.2020) by The Nagoya Protocol (Compliance) (Amendment) (EU Exit) Regulations 2018 (S.I. 2018/1393), regs. 1, 4(10)(c)(i); 2020 c. 1, Sch. 5 para. 1(1)Words in Art. 11(5) omitted (31.12.2020) by virtue of The Nagoya Protocol (Compliance) (Amendment) (EU Exit) Regulations 2018 (S.I. 2018/1393), regs. 1, 4(10)(c)(ii); 2020 c. 1, Sch. 5 para. 1(1)Art. 11(3)(4) omitted (31.12.2020) by virtue of The Nagoya Protocol (Compliance) (Amendment) (EU Exit) Regulations 2018 (S.I. 2018/1393), regs. 1, 4(10)(b); 2020 c. 1, Sch. 5 para. 1(1)Words in Art. 11 substituted (31.12.2020) by The Nagoya Protocol (Compliance) (Amendment) (EU Exit) Regulations 2018 (S.I. 2018/1393), regs. 1, 4(10)(a); 2020 c. 1, Sch. 5 para. 1(1)