- Latest available (Revised)
- Original (As adopted by EU)
Regulation (EU) No 910/2014 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 23 July 2014 on electronic identification and trust services for electronic transactions in the internal market and repealing Directive 1999/93/EC
When the UK left the EU, legislation.gov.uk published EU legislation that had been published by the EU up to IP completion day (31 December 2020 11.00 p.m.). On legislation.gov.uk, these items of legislation are kept up-to-date with any amendments made by the UK since then.
Legislation.gov.uk publishes the UK version. EUR-Lex publishes the EU version. The EU Exit Web Archive holds a snapshot of EUR-Lex’s version from IP completion day (31 December 2020 11.00 p.m.).
There are currently no known outstanding effects for the Regulation (EU) No 910/2014 of the European Parliament and of the Council, SECTION 4 .
Revised legislation carried on this site may not be fully up to date. At the current time any known changes or effects made by subsequent legislation have been applied to the text of the legislation you are viewing by the editorial team. Please see ‘Frequently Asked Questions’ for details regarding the timescales for which new effects are identified and recorded on this site.
1.An electronic signature shall not be denied legal effect and admissibility as evidence in legal proceedings solely on the grounds that it is in an electronic form or that it does not meet the requirements for qualified electronic signatures.
2.A qualified electronic signature shall have the equivalent legal effect of a handwritten signature.
F13.. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Textual Amendments
An advanced electronic signature shall meet the following requirements:
it is uniquely linked to the signatory;
it is capable of identifying the signatory;
it is created using electronic signature creation data that the signatory can, with a high level of confidence, use under his sole control; and
it is linked to the data signed therewith in such a way that any subsequent change in the data is detectable.
[F21.If a public sector body requires an advanced electronic signature for the use of an online service offered by or on behalf of that body (but does not require it to be based on a qualified certificate for electronic signature), the body must recognise any advanced electronic signature (whether or not based on a qualified certificate for electronic signature) that complies with the Implementing Decision.
2.If a public sector body requires an advanced electronic signature based on a qualified certificate for electronic signature to use an online service offered by or on behalf of that body, the body must recognise any advanced electronic signature based on a qualified certificate for electronic signature, or any qualified electronic signature, that complies with the Implementing Decision.
3.If a public sector body requires an electronic signature to use an online service offered by or on behalf of that body, the body may not, for the use of that service from a place outside the United Kingdom, require the signature to be at a higher security level than that of a qualified electronic signature.]
F34.. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
[F45.In this Article “the Implementing Decision” means Commission Implementing Decision (EU) 2015/1506 laying down specifications relating to formats of advanced electronic signatures and advanced seals to be recognised by public sector bodies.]
Textual Amendments
F2Art. 27(1)-(3) substituted (31.12.2020) by The Electronic Identification and Trust Services for Electronic Transactions (Amendment etc.) (EU Exit) Regulations 2019 (S.I. 2019/89), reg. 1(2), Sch. para. 22(2); 2020 c. 1, Sch. 5 para. 1(1)
1.Qualified certificates for electronic signatures shall meet the requirements laid down in Annex I.
F52.. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
3.Qualified certificates for electronic signatures may include non-mandatory additional specific attributes. Those attributes shall not affect the interoperability and recognition of qualified electronic signatures.
4.If a qualified certificate for electronic signatures has been revoked after initial activation, it shall lose its validity from the moment of its revocation, and its status shall not in any circumstances be reverted.
F65.. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
F76.. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Textual Amendments
F5Art. 28(2) omitted (31.12.2020) by virtue of The Electronic Identification and Trust Services for Electronic Transactions (Amendment etc.) (EU Exit) Regulations 2019 (S.I. 2019/89), reg. 1(2), Sch. para. 23; 2020 c. 1, Sch. 5 para. 1(1)
1.Qualified electronic signature creation devices shall meet the requirements laid down in Annex II.
F82.. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Textual Amendments
1.Conformity of qualified electronic signature creation devices with the requirements laid down in Annex II shall be certified by appropriate public or private bodies designated by [F9a person appointed for that purpose by the Secretary of State (“the appointed person”)].
[F102.The appointed person must notify the supervisory body of the name and address of any body the person designates under paragraph 1.
2A.The supervisory body must maintain a list of the names and addresses of the designated bodies notified to it under paragraph 2.]
3.The certification referred to in paragraph 1 shall be based on one of the following:
(a)a security evaluation process [F11that complies with the Implementing Decision]; or
(b)a process other than the process referred to in point (a), provided that it uses comparable security levels and provided that the public or private body referred to in paragraph 1 notifies that process to the [F12supervisory body]. That process may be used only in the absence of standards referred to in point (a) or when a security evaluation process referred to in point (a) is ongoing.
[F13In this paragraph “the Implementing Decision” means Commission Implementing Decision (EU) 2016/650 laying down standards for the security assessment of qualified signature and seal creation devices.]
F144.. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Textual Amendments
F9Words in Art. 30(1) substituted (31.12.2020) by The Electronic Identification and Trust Services for Electronic Transactions (Amendment etc.) (EU Exit) Regulations 2019 (S.I. 2019/89), reg. 1(2), Sch. para. 25(2); 2020 c. 1, Sch. 5 para. 1(1)
F10Art. 30(2)(2A) substituted for Art. 30(2) (31.12.2020) by The Electronic Identification and Trust Services for Electronic Transactions (Amendment etc.) (EU Exit) Regulations 2019 (S.I. 2019/89), reg. 1(2), Sch. para. 25(3); 2020 c. 1, Sch. 5 para. 1(1)
F11Words in Art. 30(3)(a) substituted (31.12.2020) by The Electronic Identification and Trust Services for Electronic Transactions (Amendment etc.) (EU Exit) Regulations 2019 (S.I. 2019/89), reg. 1(2), Sch. para. 25(4)(a)(i); 2020 c. 1, Sch. 5 para. 1(1)
F12Words in Art. 30(3)(b) substituted (31.12.2020) by The Electronic Identification and Trust Services for Electronic Transactions (Amendment etc.) (EU Exit) Regulations 2019 (S.I. 2019/89), reg. 1(2), Sch. para. 25(4)(a)(ii); 2020 c. 1, Sch. 5 para. 1(1)
[F151.A body designated under Article 30(1) must notify the supervisory body as soon as reasonably practicable of any certification of conformity that it makes, or cancels, for the purposes of Article 30.
2.The supervisory body must maintain and publish a list of electronic signature creation devices the certification of which is notified to it under paragraph 1.]
F163.. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Textual Amendments
1.The process for the validation of a qualified electronic signature shall confirm the validity of a qualified electronic signature provided that:
(a)the certificate that supports the signature was, at the time of signing, a qualified certificate for electronic signature complying with Annex I;
(b)the qualified certificate was issued by a qualified trust service provider and was valid at the time of signing;
(c)the signature validation data corresponds to the data provided to the relying party;
(d)the unique set of data representing the signatory in the certificate is correctly provided to the relying party;
(e)the use of any pseudonym is clearly indicated to the relying party if a pseudonym was used at the time of signing;
(f)the electronic signature was created by a qualified electronic signature creation device;
(g)the integrity of the signed data has not been compromised;
(h)the requirements provided for in Article 26 were met at the time of signing.
2.The system used for validating the qualified electronic signature shall provide to the relying party the correct result of the validation process and shall allow the relying party to detect any security relevant issues.
F173.. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Textual Amendments
1.A qualified validation service for qualified electronic signatures may only be provided by a qualified trust service provider who:
(a)provides validation in compliance with Article 32(1); and
(b)allows relying parties to receive the result of the validation process in an automated manner, which is reliable, efficient and bears the advanced electronic signature or advanced electronic seal of the provider of the qualified validation service.
F182.. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Textual Amendments
1.A qualified preservation service for qualified electronic signatures may only be provided by a qualified trust service provider that uses procedures and technologies capable of extending the trustworthiness of the qualified electronic signature beyond the technological validity period.
F192.. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Textual Amendments
Latest Available (revised):The latest available updated version of the legislation incorporating changes made by subsequent legislation and applied by our editorial team. Changes we have not yet applied to the text, can be found in the ‘Changes to Legislation’ area.
Original (As adopted by EU): The original version of the legislation as it stood when it was first adopted in the EU. No changes have been applied to the text.
Geographical Extent: Indicates the geographical area that this provision applies to. For further information see ‘Frequently Asked Questions’.
Show Timeline of Changes: See how this legislation has or could change over time. Turning this feature on will show extra navigation options to go to these specific points in time. Return to the latest available version by using the controls above in the What Version box.
Access essential accompanying documents and information for this legislation item from this tab. Dependent on the legislation item being viewed this may include:
This timeline shows the different versions taken from EUR-Lex before exit day and during the implementation period as well as any subsequent versions created after the implementation period as a result of changes made by UK legislation.
The dates for the EU versions are taken from the document dates on EUR-Lex and may not always coincide with when the changes came into force for the document.
For any versions created after the implementation period as a result of changes made by UK legislation the date will coincide with the earliest date on which the change (e.g an insertion, a repeal or a substitution) that was applied came into force. For further information see our guide to revised legislation on Understanding Legislation.
Use this menu to access essential accompanying documents and information for this legislation item. Dependent on the legislation item being viewed this may include:
Click 'View More' or select 'More Resources' tab for additional information including: