Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 76/2014
of 28 January 2014
amending Regulation (EC) No 684/2009 as regards the data to be submitted under the computerised procedure for the movement of excise goods under suspension of excise duty
THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION,
Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union,
Whereas:
In order to improve the correlation between information concerning the movement of excise goods held by excise authorities and the information on excise goods that have been imported held by the authorities responsible for importation formalities, where excise goods are moved under a duty suspension arrangement from the place of importation, the consignor is to indicate the code of the customs office responsible for the completion of importation formalities relating to the excise goods to be moved under duty suspension.
In order for the competent authorities of the Member State of dispatch to be able to carry out their responsibilities under Article 21(5) of Directive 2008/118/EC where excise goods are moved under a duty suspension arrangement with the intention to leave the territory of the Union the consignor should indicate the code of the office of export in the draft electronic administrative document.
In accordance with Article 22 of Directive 2008/118/EC the competent authorities of the Member State of dispatch may authorise the consignor to omit the data concerning the consignee if the destination is unknown at the time of the submission of the draft electronic administrative document. Therefore the requirement laid down in Annex I to Regulation (EC) No 684/2009 to identify the new consignee of the movement should not apply where the destination is not known at the time of splitting operation.
Article 18(4)(b) of Directive 2008/118/EC allows the Member State of dispatch to waive the obligation to provide a movement guarantee for energy products moving under a duty suspension arrangement by sea or by fixed pipeline where the other Member States concerned so agree. A guarantor type code indicating that no guarantee is provided should therefore be included.
The structure of the Excise Product Code in the ‘e-AD Body’ data group in Table 1 of Annex I to Regulation (EC) No 684/2009 and the structure of the same data item in Table 6 of that Annex differ. The structure laid down in Table 6 is correct and the structure of the former data item should therefore be adapted to match the structure of the data item in Table 6.
The structure of the Sequence Number in the ‘Excise Movement e-AD’ data group in Table 6 of Annex I to Regulation (EC) No 684/2009 no longer corresponds to the agreed structure in the common system specifications. The data item should therefore be adapted to match the structure in the common system specifications.
Regulation (EC) No 684/2009 should therefore be amended accordingly.
The measures provided for in this Regulation are in accordance with the opinion of the Committee on Excise Duty,
HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION: