Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 990/2013

of 15 October 2013

amending Regulation (EC) No 1187/2009 as regards exports of milk and milk products to the United States of America and the Dominican Republic

THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION,

Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 1234/2007 of 22 October 2007 establishing a common organisation of agricultural markets and on specific provisions for certain agricultural products (Single CMO Regulation)1, and in particular Articles 161(3), 170 and 171(1), in conjunction with Article 4 thereof,

Whereas:

(1)
Section 2 of Chapter III of Commission Regulation (EC) No 1187/20092 lays down provisions as regards export licences for cheese to be exported to the United States under certain GATT quotas. Experience with certain of those quotas has shown that, because of the continuously evolving market circumstances, in particular high price volatility, increased competition and changes in currency conversion rates, which occur in the long time lapse between the period for submission of applications for export licences (‘licence applications’) and the moment in which exports take place, exporters may not be able to use their licences and as a result lose the related securities. In order that exporters are not discouraged from applying for those quotas for which the time lapse is set in agreement with the authorities of the Unites States, it is necessary to reduce the applicable rate of the security, starting from the quota year 2015.
(2)

Article 22(3) of Regulation (EC) No 1187/2009 provides that for the quotas opened by the Unites States licence applications are subject to the lodging of a security in accordance with Article 9 thereof. Being part of the Chapter on general rules in Regulation (EC) No 1187/2009, Article 9 sets the mechanism for calculating the security for exports not benefiting from trade preferences granted by third countries. Therefore, in view of the experience with the preferential quotas opened by the United States and to render them more attractive to exporters, it is necessary, in addition to reducing the rate of the security, to specify that Article 9 in its entirety should not apply to those quotas.

(3)

Section 3 of Chapter III of Regulation (EC) No 1187/2009 provides for the conditions and the procedure to which the exporters are submitted for participating in the milk powder quota opened by the Dominican Republic. Whilst the quota has been fully used since its introduction until the quota year 2010/2011, it appears that as from the quota year 2011/2012 the total quantities applied for are lower than the available quota quantity.

(4)

With a view to maximising the use of the quota in the following years, it is necessary to adjust the rules as regards eligibility, applicable quantities, periods for submission of licence applications and security.

(5)

In addition, to make the quota more easily accessible to the exporters, the requirements concerning the minimum historical trade performance when applying for the quota part referred to in Article 28(1)(a) of Regulation (EC) No 1187/2009 should be alleviated.

(6)

In order to maximize the use of the quota and for the sake of simplification, the maximum quantities for which licence applications can be lodged, as laid down in Article 28(2) of Regulation (EC) No 1187/2009, should be increased to the quota quantity levels. The minimum quantity for which licence applications can be lodged should be fixed at 20 tonnes.

(7)

The long time lapse between the period for submission of licence applications, as laid down in Article 29 of Regulation (EC) No 1187/2009, and the quota year during which exports take place, as well as the high price volatility in the dairy sector and an increased competition for milk powders in the Dominican Republic have enhanced the risk for exporters to remain with licences that are not or only partially used, resulting in a loss of the related security. It is therefore appropriate to defer the submission of licence applications from April to May and to provide for a second allocation period.

(8)

Moreover, a reduction of the security referred to in Article 28(3) would encourage operators not to refrain from applying for licences and should therefore be provided for. It is also necessary to specify that Article 9 should not apply to the preferential quota opened by the Dominican Republic in order to render that quota more attractive to exporters.

(9)

Regulation (EC) No 1187/2009 should therefore be amended accordingly.

(10)

The measures provided for in this Regulation are in accordance with the opinion of the Management Committee for the Common Organisation of Agricultural Markets,

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION: