CHAPTER IVDEPOSITARY
SECTION 4Loss of financial instruments, liability discharge and objective reasonsF1...
Article 100Loss of a financial instrument held in custody
1.
A loss of a financial instrument held in custody within the meaning of F2regulations 30(1) to (3) and 31(1) of the AIFM Regulations 2013 shall be deemed to have taken place when, in relation to a financial instrument held in custody by the depositary or by a third party to whom the custody of financial instruments held in custody has been delegated, any of the following conditions is met:
(a)
a stated right of ownership of the AIF is demonstrated not to be valid because it either ceased to exist or never existed;
(b)
the AIF has been definitively deprived of its right of ownership over the financial instrument;
(c)
the AIF is definitively unable to directly or indirectly dispose of the financial instrument.
2.
The ascertainment by the AIFM of the loss of a financial instrument shall follow a documented process readily available to the F3FCA. Once a loss is ascertained, it shall be notified immediately to investors in a durable medium.
3.
A financial instrument held in custody shall not be deemed to be lost within the meaning of F4regulations 30(1) to (3) and 31(1) of the AIFM Regulations 2013 where an AIF is definitively deprived of its right of ownership in respect of a particular instrument, but this instrument is substituted by or converted into another financial instrument or instruments.
4.
In the event of insolvency of the third party to whom the custody of financial instruments held in custody has been delegated, the loss of a financial instrument held in custody shall be ascertained by the AIFM as soon as one of the conditions listed in paragraph 1 is met with certainty.
There shall be certainty as to whether any of the conditions set out in paragraph 1 is fulfilled at the latest at the end of the insolvency proceedings. The AIFM and the depositary shall monitor closely the insolvency proceedings to determine whether all or some of the financial instruments entrusted to the third party to whom the custody of financial instruments has been delegated are effectively lost.
5.
A loss of a financial instrument held in custody shall be ascertained irrespective of whether the conditions listed in paragraph 1 are the result of fraud, negligence or other intentional or non-intentional behaviour.
Article 101Liability discharge F5...
1.
A depositary’s liability under the F6regulation 30(2) of the AIFM Regulations 2013 shall not be triggered provided the depositary can prove that all the following conditions are met:
(a)
the event which led to the loss is not the result of any act or omission of the depositary or of a third party to whom the custody of financial instruments held in custody in accordance with F7rule 3.11.21 of the Investment Funds sourcebook has been delegated;
(b)
the depositary could not have reasonably prevented the occurrence of the event which led to the loss despite adopting all precautions incumbent on a diligent depositary as reflected in common industry practice;
(c)
despite rigorous and comprehensive due diligence, the depositary could not have prevented the loss.
This condition may be deemed to be fulfilled when the depositary has ensured that the depositary and the third party to whom the custody of financial instruments held in custody in accordance with F8rule 3.11.21 of the Investment Funds sourcebook has been delegated have taken all of the following actions:
- (i)
establishing, implementing, applying and maintaining structures and procedures and insuring expertise that are adequate and proportionate to the nature and complexity of the assets of the AIF in order to identify in a timely manner and monitor on an ongoing basis external events which may result in loss of a financial instrument held in custody;
- (ii)
assessing on an ongoing basis whether any of the events identified under point (i) presents a significant risk of loss of a financial instrument held in custody;
- (iii)
informing the AIFM of the significant risks identified and taking appropriate actions, if any, to prevent or mitigate the loss of financial instruments held in custody, where actual or potential external events have been identified which are believed to present a significant risk of loss of a financial instrument held in custody.
2.
The requirements referred to in points (a) and (b) of paragraph 1 may be deemed to be fulfilled in the following circumstances:
(a)
natural events beyond human control or influence;
(b)
the adoption of any law, decree, regulation, decision or order by any government or governmental body, including any court or tribunal, which impacts the financial instruments held in custody;
(c)
war, riots or other major upheavals.
3.
The requirements referred to in points (a) and (b) of paragraph 1 shall not be deemed to be fulfilled in cases such as an accounting error, operational failure, fraud, failure to apply the segregation requirements at the level of the depositary or a third party to whom the custody of financial instruments held in custody in accordance with F9rule 3.11.21 of the Investment Funds sourcebook has been delegated.
4.
This Article shall apply mutatis mutandis to the delegate when the depositary has contractually transferred its liability in accordance with F10regulations 30(4) and 32 of the AIFM Regulations 2013.
Article 102Objective reasons for the depositary to contract a discharge of liability
1.
The objective reasons for contracting a discharge pursuant to F11regulation 30(4) of the AIFM Regulations 2013 shall be:
(a)
limited to precise and concrete circumstances characterising a given activity;
(b)
consistent with the depositary’s policies and decisions.
2.
The objective reasons shall be established each time the depositary intends to discharge itself of liability.
3.
The depositary shall be deemed to have objective reasons for contracting the discharge of its liability in accordance with F12regulation 30(4) of the AIFM Regulations 2013 when the depositary can demonstrate that it had no other option but to delegate its custody duties to a third party. In particular, this shall be the case where:
(a)
the law of a third country requires that certain financial instruments be held in custody by a local entity and local entities exist that satisfy the delegation criteria laid down in F13rules 3.11.28 to 3.11.30 of the Investment Funds sourcebook; or
(b)
the AIFM insists on maintaining an investment in a particular jurisdiction despite warnings by the depositary as to the increased risk this presents.