Regulation (EC) No 883/2004 of the European Parliament and of the CouncilShow full title

ANNEX VII U.K. CONCORDANCE BETWEEN THE LEGISLATIONS OF MEMBER STATES ON CONDITIONS RELATING TO THE DEGREE OF INVALIDITY(Article 46(3) of the Regulation)

BELGIUM U.K.

a Entries concerning concordance between Luxembourg and France or Belgium will be the subject of technical re-examination taking account of the changes which have been made to national legislation in Luxembourg.
Member State	Schemes administered by institutions of Member States which have taken a decision recognising the degree of invalidity	Schemes administered by Belgian institutions on which the decision is binding in cases of concordance
		General scheme	Miners' scheme		Mariners' scheme	Ossom
			General invalidity	Occupational invalidity
FRANCE	1. General scheme:
	– Group III (constant attendance)	Concordance	Concordance	Concordance	Concordance	No concordance
	– Group II	Concordance	Concordance	Concordance	Concordance	No concordance
	– Group I	Concordance	Concordance	Concordance	Concordance	No concordance
	2. Agricultural scheme
	– Total, general invalidity	Concordance	Concordance	Concordance	Concordance	No concordance
	– Two-thirds general invalidity	Concordance	Concordance	Concordance	Concordance	No concordance
	– Constant attendance	Concordance	Concordance	Concordance	Concordance	No concordance
	3. Miners' scheme:
	– Partial, general invalidity	Concordance	Concordance	Concordance	Concordance	No concordance
	– Constant attendance	Concordance	Concordance	Concordance	Concordance	No concordance
	– Occupational invalidity	No concordance	No concordance	Concordance	No concordance	No concordance
	4. Mariners' scheme:
	– General invalidity	Concordance	Concordance	Concordance	Concordance	No concordance
	– Constant attendance	Concordance	Concordance	Concordance	Concordance	No concordance
	– Occupational invalidity	No concordance	No concordance	No concordance	No concordance	No concordance
ITALY	1. General scheme:
	– Invalidity – manual workers	No concordance	Concordance	Concordance	Concordance	No concordance
	– Invalidity – clerical staff	No concordance	Concordance	Concordance	Concordance	No concordance
	2. Mariners' scheme:
	– Unfitness for seafaring	No concordance	No concordance	No concordance	No concordance	No concordance
LUXEMBOURGa	Workers' invalidity – manual workers	Concordance	Concordance	Concordance	Concordance	No concordance
	Invalidity – clerical staff	Concordance	Concordance	– Concordance	Concordance	No concordance

FRANCE U.K.

a In so far as the invalidity recognised by the Belgian institutions is general invalidity.
b Only if the Belgian institution has recognised that the worker is unfit for work underground or at ground level.
c Entries concerning concordance between Luxembourg and France or Belgium will be the subject of technical re-examination taking account of the changes which have been made to national legislation in Luxembourg.
Member State	Schemes administered by institutions of Member States which have taken a decision recognising the degree of invalidity	Schemes administered by French institutions on which the decision is binding in cases of concordances
		General scheme			Agricultural scheme			Miners' scheme			Mariners' scheme
		Group I	Group II	Group III Constant attendance	2/3 Invalidity	Total invalidity	Constant attendance	2/3 General invalidity	Constant attendance	Occupational invalidity	2/3 General invalidity	Total occupational invalidity	Constant attendance
BELGIUM	1. General scheme	Concordance	No concordance	No concordance	Concordance	No concordance	No concordance	Concordance	No concordance	No concordance	No concordance	No concordance	No concordance
	2. Miners' scheme
	– partial general invalidity	Concordance	No concordance	No concordance	Concordance	No concordance	No concordance	Concordance	No concordance	No concordance	No concordance	No concordance	No concordance
	– occupational invalidity	No concordance	No concordance	No concordance	No concordance	No concordance	No concordance	No concordance	No concordance	Concordanceb
	3. Mariners' scheme	Concordancea	No concordance	No concordance	Concordancea	No concordance	No concordance	Concordancea	No concordance	No concordance	No concordance	No concordance	No concordance
ITALY	1. General scheme
	– invalidity – manual workers	Concordance	No concordance	No concordance	Concordance	No concordance	No concordance	Concordance	No concordance	No concordance	No concordance	No concordance	No concordance
	– invalidity – clerical staff	Concordance	No concordance	No concordance	Concordance	No concordance	No concordance	Concordance	No concordance	No concordance	No concordance	No concordance	No concordance
	2. Mariners' scheme
	– unfitness for seafaring	No concordance	No concordance	No concordance	No concordance	No concordance	No concordance	No concordance	No concordance	No concordance	No concordance	No concordance	No concordance
LUXEMBOURGc	Invalidity – manual workers	Concordance	No concordance	No concordance	Concordance	No concordance	No concordance	Concordance	No concordance	No concordance	No concordance	No concordance	No concordance
	Invalidity – clerical staff	No concordance	No concordance	No concordance	No concordance	No concordance	No concordance	No concordance	No concordance	No concordance	No concordance	No concordance	No concordance

ITALY U.K.

Member State	Schemes administered by institutions of Member States which have taken a decision recognising the degree of invalidity	Schemes administered by Italian institutions on which the decision is binding in cases of concordance
		General scheme		Mariners Unfit for navigation
		Manual workers	Clerical staff
BELGIUM	1. General scheme	No concordance	No concordance	No concordance
	2. Miners' scheme
	– partial general invalidity	Concordance	Concordance	No concordance
	– occupational invalidity	No concordance	No concordance	No concordance
	3. Mariners' scheme	No concordance	No concordance	No concordance
FRANCE	1. General scheme
	– Group III (constant attendance)	Concordance	Concordance	No concordance
	– Group II	Concordance	Concordance	No concordance
	– Group I	Concordance	Concordance	No concordance
	2. Agricultural scheme
	– total general invalidity	Concordance	Concordance	No concordance
	– partial general invalidity	Concordance	Concordance	No concordance
	– constant attendance	Concordance	Concordance	No concordance
	3. Miners' scheme
	– partial general invalidity	Concordance	Concordance	No concordance
	– constant attendance	Concordance	Concordance	No concordance
	– occupational invalidity	No concordance	No concordance	No concordance
	4. Mariners' scheme
	– partial general invalidity	No concordance	No concordance	No concordance
	– constant attendance	No concordance	No concordance	No concordance
	– occupational invalidity

LUXEMBOURG(1) U.K.

a In so far as the invalidity recognised by the Belgian institution is general invalidity.
Member State	Schemes administered by institutions of Member States which have taken a decision recognising the degree of invalidity	Schemes administered by Luxembourg institutions on which the decision is binding in cases of concordance
		Invalidity – manual workers	Invalidity – clerical staff
BELGIUM	1. General scheme	Concordance	Concordance
	2. Miners' scheme:
	- partial general invalidity	No concordance	No concordance
	- occupational invalidity	No concordance	No concordance
	3. Mariners' scheme	Concordancea	No concordancea
FRANCE	1. General scheme:
	- Group III (constant attendance)	Concordance	Concordance
	- Group II	Concordance	Concordance
	- Group I	Concordance	Concordance
	2. Agricultural scheme:
	- total general invalidity	Concordance	Concordance
	- two-thirds general invalidity	Concordance	Concordance
	- constant attendance	Concordance	Concordance
	3. Miners' scheme:
	- two-thirds general invalidity	Concordance	Concordance
	- constant attendance	Concordance	Concordance
	- total general invalidity	No concordance	No concordance
	4. Mariners' scheme:
	- partial general invalidity	Concordance	Concordance
	- constant attendance	Concordance	concordance
	- occupational invalidity	No concordance	No concordan

(1)

Entries concerning concordance between Luxembourg and France or Belgium will be the subject of technical re-examination taking account of the changes which have been made to national legislation in Luxembourg.