CHAPTER I
GENERAL PROVISIONS
Article 1
Subject matter
Article 2
Definitions
Article 3
Competent authorities and liaison offices
Article 4
Identification of a genuine posting and prevention of abuse and circumvention
CHAPTER II
ACCESS TO INFORMATION
Article 5
Improved access to information
CHAPTER III
ADMINISTRATIVE COOPERATION
Article 6
Mutual assistance — general principles
Article 7
Role of the Member States in the framework of administrative cooperation
Article 8
Accompanying measures
CHAPTER IV
MONITORING COMPLIANCE
Article 9
Administrative requirements and control measures
Article 10
Inspections
CHAPTER V
ENFORCEMENT
Article 11
Defence of rights — facilitation of complaints — back-payments
Article 12
Subcontracting liability
CHAPTER VI
CROSS-BORDER ENFORCEMENT OF FINANCIAL ADMINISTRATIVE PENALTIES AND/OR FINES
Article 13
Scope
Article 14
Designation of the competent authorities
Article 15
General principles — mutual assistance and recognition
Article 16
Request for recovery or notification
Article 17
Grounds for refusal
Article 18
Suspension of the procedure
Article 19
Costs
CHAPTER VII
FINAL PROVISIONS
Article 20
Penalties
Article 21
Internal Market Information System
Article 22
Amendment to Regulation (EU) No 1024/2012
Article 23
Transposition
Article 24
Review
Article 25
Entry into force
Article 26
Addressees
ATTACHMENTS
Joint statement by the European Parliament, the Council and the Commission on Article 4(3)(g)
Directive 2014/67/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council
of 15 May 2014
on the enforcement of Directive 96/71/EC concerning the posting of workers in the framework of the provision of services and amending Regulation (EU) No 1024/2012 on administrative cooperation through the Internal Market Information System (‘the IMI Regulation’)
(Text with EEA relevance)
THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION,
Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, and in particular Article 53(1) and Article 62 thereof,
Having regard to the proposal from the European Commission,
After transmission of the draft legislative act to the national parliaments,
Having regard to the opinion of the European Economic and Social Committee ,
Having regard to the opinion of the Committee of the Regions ,
Acting in accordance with the ordinary legislative procedure ,
Whereas:
(1)
The free movement of workers, freedom of establishment and freedom to provide services are fundamental principles of the internal market in the Union enshrined in the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (TFEU). The implementation of those principles is further developed by the Union aimed at guaranteeing a level playing field for businesses and respect for the rights of workers.
(2)
The freedom to provide services includes the right of undertakings to provide services in another Member State, to which they may post their own workers temporarily in order to provide those services there. It is necessary for the purpose of the posting of workers to distinguish this freedom from the free movement of workers, which gives every citizen the right to move freely to another Member State to work and reside there for that purpose and protects them against discrimination as regards employment, remuneration and other conditions of work and employment in comparison to nationals of that Member State.
(3)
With respect to workers temporarily posted to carry out work in order to provide services in another Member State than the one in which they habitually carry out their work, Directive 96/71/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council establishes a core set of clearly defined terms and conditions of employment which are required to be complied with by the service provider in the Member State to which the posting takes place to ensure the minimum protection of the posted workers concerned.
(4)
All measures introduced by this Directive should be justified and proportionate so as not to create administrative burdens or to limit the potential that undertakings, in particular small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs), have to create new jobs, while protecting posted workers.
(5)
In order to ensure compliance with Directive 96/71/EC, whilst not putting an unnecessary administrative burden on the service providers, it is essential that the factual elements referred to in the provisions on the identification of a genuine posting and preventing abuse and circumvention in this Directive are considered to be indicative and non-exhaustive. In particular, there should be no requirement that each element is to be satisfied in every posting case.
(6)
Notwithstanding the fact that the assessment of the indicative factual elements should be adapted to each specific case and take account of the specificities of the situation, situations representing the same factual elements should not lead to a different legal appreciation or assessment by competent authorities in different Member States.
(7)
In order to prevent, avoid and combat abuse and circumvention of the applicable rules by undertakings taking improper or fraudulent advantage of the freedom to provide services enshrined in the TFEU and/or of the application of Directive 96/71/EC, the implementation and monitoring of the notion of posting should be improved and more uniform elements, facilitating a common interpretation, should be introduced at Union level.
(8)
Therefore, the constituent factual elements characterising the temporary nature inherent to the notion of posting, and the condition that the employer is genuinely established in the Member State from which the posting takes place, need to be examined by the competent authority of the host Member State and, where necessary, in close cooperation with the Member State of establishment.
(9)
When considering the size of the turnover realised by an undertaking in the Member State of establishment for the purpose of determining whether that undertaking genuinely performs substantial activities, other than purely internal management and/or administrative activities, competent authorities should take into account differences in the purchasing power of currencies.
(10)
The elements set out in this Directive relating to the implementation and monitoring of posting may also assist the competent authorities in identifying workers falsely declared as self-employed. According to Directive 96/71/EC, the relevant definition of a worker is that which applies in the law of the Member State to whose territory a worker is posted. Further clarification and improved monitoring of posting by relevant competent authorities would enhance legal certainty and provide a useful tool contributing to combating bogus self-employment effectively and ensuring that posted workers are not falsely declared as self-employed, thus helping prevent, avoid and combat circumvention of the applicable rules.
(11)
Where there is no genuine posting situation and a conflict of law arises, due regard should be given to the provisions of Regulation (EC) No 593/2008 of the European Parliament and of the Council (‘Rome I’) or the Rome Convention that are aimed at ensuring that employees should not be deprived of the protection afforded to them by provisions which cannot be derogated from by an agreement or which can only be derogated from to their benefit. Member States should ensure that provisions are in place to adequately protect workers who are not genuinely posted.
(12)
The lack of the certificate concerning the applicable social security legislation referred to in Regulation (EC) No 883/2004 of the European Parliament and of the Council may be an indication that the situation should not be characterised as one of temporarily posting to a Member State other than the one in which the worker concerned habitually works in the framework of the provision of services.
(13)
As is the case with Directive 96/71/EC, this Directive should not prejudice the application of Regulation (EC) No 883/2004 and Regulation (EC) No 987/2009 of the European Parliament and of the Council .
(14)
Respect for the diversity of national industrial relations systems as well as the autonomy of social partners is explicitly recognised by the TFEU.
(15)
In many Member States, the social partners play an important role in the context of the posting of workers for the provision of services since they may, in accordance with national law and/or practice, determine the different levels, alternatively or simultaneously, of the applicable minimum rates of pay. The social partners should communicate and inform about those rates.
(16)
Adequate and effective implementation and enforcement are key elements in protecting the rights of posted workers and in ensuring a level-playing field for the service providers, whereas poor enforcement undermines the effectiveness of the Union rules applicable in this area. Close cooperation between the Commission and the Member States, and where relevant, regional and local authorities, is therefore essential, without neglecting the important role of labour inspectorates and the social partners in this respect. Mutual trust, a spirit of cooperation, continuous dialogue and mutual understanding are essential in this respect.
(17)
Effective monitoring procedures in Member States are essential for the enforcement of Directive 96/71/EC and of this Directive and therefore they should be established throughout the Union.
(18)
Difficulties in accessing information on terms and conditions of employment are very often the reason why existing rules are not applied by service providers. Member States should therefore ensure that such information is made generally available, free of charge and that effective access to it is provided, not only to service providers from other Member States, but also to the posted workers concerned.
(19)
Where terms and conditions of employment are laid down in collective agreements which have been declared to be universally applicable, Member States should ensure, while respecting the autonomy of social partners, that those collective agreements are made generally available in an accessible and transparent way.
(20)
In order to improve accessibility of information, a single source of information should be established in Member States. Each Member State should provide for a single official national website, in accordance with web accessibility standards, and other suitable means of communication. The single official national website should, as a minimum, be in the form of a website portal and should serve as a gateway or main entry point and should provide in clear and precise way links to the relevant sources of the information as well as brief information on the content of the website and the links referred to. Such websites should include in particular any website put in place pursuant to Union legislation with a view to promoting entrepreneurship and/or the development of cross-border provision of services. Host Member States should provide information on the periods laid down in their national law for which the service providers have to retain documents after the period of posting.
(21)
Posted workers should have the right to receive from the host Member State general information on national law and/or practice that is applicable to them.
(22)
Administrative cooperation and mutual assistance between the Member States should comply with the rules on the protection of personal data laid down in Directive 95/46/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council , and in accordance with national data protection rules implementing Union legislation. With regard to administrative cooperation through the Internal Market Information System (IMI), it should also comply with Regulation (EC) No 45/2001 of the European Parliament and of the Council and Regulation (EU) No 1024/2012 of the European Parliament and of the Council .
(23)
In order to ensure the correct application of, and to monitor compliance with, the substantive rules on the terms and conditions of employment to be respected with regard to posted workers, Member States should apply only certain administrative requirements and control measures to undertakings that post workers in the framework of the provision of services. According to the case law of the Court of Justice of the European Union, such requirements and measures may be justified by overriding reasons of general interest, which include the effective protection of workers' rights, provided they are appropriate for securing the attainment of the objective pursued and do not go beyond what is necessary to attain it. Such requirements and measures may only be imposed provided that the competent authorities cannot carry out their supervisory task effectively without the requested information and/or less restrictive measures would not ensure that the objectives of the national control measures deemed necessary are attained.
(24)
A service provider should ensure that the identity of the posted workers included in the declaration made by the service provider in order to allow factual controls at the workplace is verifiable for the duration of the posting by the competent authorities.
(25)
A service provider established in another Member State should inform the competent authorities in the host Member State without undue delay of any important changes to the information contained in the declaration made by the service provider in order to allow factual controls at the workplace.
(26)
The obligation to communicate administrative requirements and control measures to the Commission should not constitute an ex-ante authorisation process.
(27)
In order to ensure better and more uniform application of Directive 96/71/EC as well as its enforcement in practice and to reduce, as far as possible, differences in the level of application and enforcement across the Union, Member States should ensure that effective and adequate inspections are carried out on their territory, thus contributing, inter alia, to the fight against undeclared work in the context of posting, also taking into account other legal initiatives to address this issue better.
(28)
Member States should provide, where applicable, in accordance with their national law and/or practice, the inspected undertaking with a post- inspection or control document which includes any relevant information.
(29)
Member States should ensure that sufficient staff are available with the skills and qualifications needed to carry out inspections effectively and to enable requests for information as provided for in this Directive, from the host Member State or the Member State of establishment to be responded to without undue delay.
(30)
Labour inspectorates, social partners and other monitoring bodies are of paramount importance in this respect and should continue to play a crucial role.
(31)
In order to cope in a flexible way with the diversity of labour markets and industrial relations systems, by way of exception, the management and labour and/or other actors and/or bodies may monitor certain terms and conditions of employment of posted workers, provided they offer the persons concerned an equivalent degree of protection and exercise their monitoring in a non-discriminatory and objective manner.
(32)
Member States' inspection authorities and other relevant monitoring and enforcement bodies should avail themselves of the cooperation and exchange of information provided for in the relevant law in order to verify whether the rules applicable to posted workers have been respected.
(33)
Member States are particularly encouraged to introduce a more integrated approach to labour inspections. The need to develop common standards in order to establish comparable methods, practices and minimum standards at Union level should equally be examined. However, the development of common standards should not result in Member States being hampered in their efforts to combat undeclared work effectively.
(34)
To facilitate the enforcement of Directive 96/71/EC and ensure its more effective application, effective complaint mechanisms should exist through which posted workers may lodge complaints or engage in proceedings either directly or, with their approval, through relevant designated third parties, such as trade unions or other associations as well as common institutions of social partners. This should be without prejudice to national rules of procedure concerning representation and defence before the courts and to the competences and other rights of trade unions and other employee representatives under national law and/or practice.
(35)
For the purpose of ensuring that a posted worker receives the correct pay and provided that allowances specific to posting can be considered part of minimum rates of pay, such allowances should only be deducted from wages if national law, collective agreements and/or practice of the host Member State provide for this.
(36)
Compliance with the applicable rules in the field of posting in practice and the effective protection of workers' rights in this respect is a matter of particular concern in subcontracting chains and should be ensured through appropriate measures in accordance with national law and/or practice and in compliance with Union law. Such measures may include the introduction on a voluntary basis, after consulting the relevant social partners, of a mechanism of direct subcontracting liability, in addition to or in place of the liability of the employer, in respect of any outstanding net remuneration corresponding to the minimum rates of pay and/or contributions due to common funds or institutions of social partners regulated by law or collective agreement in so far as these are covered by Article 3(1) of Directive 96/71/EC. However, Member States remain free to provide for more stringent liability rules under national law or to go further under national law on a non-discriminatory and proportionate basis.
(37)
Member States that have introduced measures to ensure compliance with the applicable rules in subcontracting chains should have the possibility to provide that a (sub)contractor should not be liable in specific circumstances or that the liability may be limited in cases where due diligence obligations have been undertaken by that (sub)contractor. Those measures should be defined by national law, taking into account the specific circumstances of the Member State concerned, and they may include, inter alia, measures taken by the contractor concerning documentation of compliance with administrative requirements and control measures in order to ensure effective monitoring of compliance with the applicable rules on the posting of workers.
(38)
It is a matter of concern that there are still many difficulties for Member States to recover cross-border administrative penalties and/or fines and therefore the mutual recognition of administrative penalties and/or fines needs to be addressed.
(39)
The disparities between the systems of the Member States for enforcing imposed administrative penalties and/or fines in cross-border situations are prejudicial to the proper functioning of the internal market and risk making it very difficult, if not impossible, to ensure that posted workers enjoy an equivalent level of protection throughout the Union.
(40)
Effective enforcement of the substantive rules governing the posting of workers for the provision of services should be ensured by specific action focusing on the cross-border enforcement of imposed financial administrative penalties and/or fines. Approximation of the legislation of the Member States in this field is therefore an essential prerequisite in order to ensure a higher, more equivalent and comparable level of protection necessary for the proper functioning of the internal market.
(41)
The adoption of common rules which provide mutual assistance and support for enforcement measures and the associated costs, as well as the adoption of uniform requirements for the notification of decisions relating to administrative penalties and/or fines imposed for the non-respect of Directive 96/71/EC, as well as of this Directive, should resolve a number of practical cross-border enforcement problems and guarantee better communication and better enforcement of such decisions emanating from another Member State.
(42)
If it emerges that the service provider is indeed not established in the Member State of establishment or that the address or the company data are false, the competent authorities should not terminate the procedure on formal grounds but should investigate the matter further in order to establish the identity of the natural or legal person responsible for the posting.
(43)
The recognition of decisions imposing an administrative penalty and/or fine and requests to recover such a penalty and/or fine should be based on the principle of mutual trust. To that end, the grounds for non-recognition or a refusal to recover an administrative penalty and/or fine should be limited to the minimum necessary.
(44)
Notwithstanding the establishment of more uniform rules with respect to the cross-border enforcement of administrative penalties and/or fines and the need for more common criteria to make follow-up procedures more effective in the event of the non-payment, they should not affect the Member States' competences to determine their system of penalties, sanctions and fines or the recovery measures available under their national law. Therefore, the instrument permitting enforcement or execution of such penalties and/or fines may, if appropriate, and taking into account national law and/or practice in the requested Member State, be completed, or be accompanied or replaced by a title permitting its enforcement or execution in the requested Member State.
(45)
The more uniform rules should not have the effect of amending or modifying the obligation to respect fundamental rights and freedoms of defendants as well as fundamental legal principles that apply to them as enshrined in Article 6 of the Treaty on European Union (TEU), such as the right to be heard and the right to an effective remedy and to a fair trial or the principle ‘ne bis in idem’.
(46)
This Directive does not aim to establish harmonised rules for judicial cooperation, jurisdiction, or the recognition and enforcement of decisions in civil and commercial matters, or to deal with applicable law.
(47)
Member States should take appropriate measures in the event of failure to comply with the obligations laid down in this Directive, including administrative and judicial procedures, and should provide for effective, dissuasive and proportionate penalties for any breaches of the obligations under this Directive.
(48)
This Directive respects the fundamental rights and observes the principles recognised in the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union, notably protection of personal data (Article 8), the freedom to choose an occupation and right to engage in work (Article 15), the freedom to conduct a business (Article 16), the right to collective bargaining and action (Article 28), fair and just working conditions (Article 31), the right to an effective remedy and to a fair trial (Article 47), the presumption of innocence and right of defence (Article 48) and the right not to be tried twice for the same offence (ne bis in idem) (Article 50), and has to be implemented in accordance with those rights and principles.
(49)
In order to facilitate better and more uniform application of Directive 96/71/EC, it is appropriate to provide for an electronic information exchange system to facilitate administrative cooperation and competent authorities should use the IMI as much as possible. However, that should not prevent the application of existing and future bilateral agreements or arrangements concerning administrative cooperation and mutual assistance.
(50)
Since the objective of this Directive, namely to establish a common framework of a set of appropriate provisions, measures and control mechanisms necessary for better and more uniform implementation, application and enforcement in practice of Directive 96/71/EC, cannot be sufficiently achieved by the Member States, and can rather, by reason of the scale and effects of the action, be better achieved at Union level, the Union may adopt measures, in accordance with the principle of subsidiarity as set out in Article 5 of the TEU. In accordance with the principle of proportionality, as set out in that Article, this Directive does not go beyond what is necessary in order to achieve that objective.
(51)
The European Data Protection Supervisor has been consulted in accordance with Article 28(2) of Regulation (EC) No 45/2001 and delivered an opinion on 19 July 2012 ,
HAVE ADOPTED THIS DIRECTIVE:
OJ C 351, 15.11.2012, p. 61.
OJ C 17, 19.1.2013, p. 67.
Position of the European Parliament of 16 April 2014 (not yet published in the Official Journal) and decision of the Council of 13 May 2014.
Directive 96/71/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 16 December 1996 concerning the posting of workers in the framework of the provision of services (OJ L 18, 21.1.1997, p. 1).
Regulation (EC) No 593/2008 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 17 June 2008 on the law applicable to contractual obligations (Rome I) (OJ L 177, 4.7.2008, p. 6).
Rome Convention of 19 June 1980 on the law applicable to contractual obligations (80/934/EEC) (OJ L 266, 9.10.1980, p. 1).
Regulation (EC) No 883/2004 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 29 April 2004 on the coordination of social security systems (OJ L 166, 30.4.2004, p. 1).
Regulation (EC) No 987/2009 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 16 September 2009 laying down the procedure for implementing Regulation (EC) No 883/2004 on the coordination of social security systems (OJ L 284, 30.10.2009, p. 1).
Directive 95/46/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 24 October 1995 on the protection of individuals with regard to the processing of personal data and on the free movement of such data (OJ L 281, 23.11.1995, p. 31).
Regulation (EC) No 45/2001 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 18 December 2000 on the protection of individuals with regard to the processing of personal data by the Community institutions and bodies and on the free movement of such data (OJ L 8, 12.1.2001, p. 1).
Regulation (EU) No 1024/2012 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 25 October 2012 on administrative cooperation through the Internal Market Information System and repealing Commission Decision 2008/49/EC (‘the IMI Regulation’) (OJ L 316, 14.11.2012, p. 1).
OJ C 27, 29.1.2013, p. 4.