It seems, however, that fee-paying access to the commercial service's high precision service could slow the development of the applications required to use this service and hinder the promising growth of economic activities based on satellite navigation systems, particularly within the Union. It could, moreover, make it more difficult for the system established under the Galileo programme to penetrate global markets given that rival systems propose to offer high precision services free of charge.

Furthermore, enterprises in the expanding sectors most likely to use the high precision commercial service, such as those developing autonomous vehicles, robotics or drones, do not need such high precision positioning as initially envisaged for the commercial service. Positioning error of less than two decimetres is sufficient for those enterprises, and is more attractive if, in return, the time needed to achieve such precision can be reduced. There is therefore a positive correlation between positioning accuracy and the time needed to achieve it. Changing the minimum precision requirement from one decimetre to two will thus reduce the time needed to achieve that precision, which may vary depending on the technology used and the user's environment and location.

Furthermore, users requiring a service offering a smaller positioning error than the ‘CS high precision’ service will still be able to obtain it from the enterprises that already offer commercial services to that level of precision locally.

It should also be noted that the fact that the commercial service's high precision service is free does not rule out other services provided by the system established under the Galileo programme perhaps being subject to a fee.

Accordingly, provision should be made for free access to the ‘CS high precision’ service offered by the commercial service, on the one hand, and for the general specifications of the ‘CS high precision’ service to provide for a positioning error of less than two decimetres.

Lastly, in deploying the ‘CS high precision’ service, the two planned phases should be renamed in order to better reflect what each really involves.

Implementing Decision (EU) 2017/224 should be amended accordingly.

The measures provided for in this Decision are in line with the opinion of the committee established pursuant to Article 36(1) of Regulation (EU) No 1285/2013,