Commission Implementing Decision (EU) 2017/2410
of 20 December 2017
amending Decisions 2006/415/EC and 2007/25/EC and Implementing Decision 2013/657/EU concerning certain protection measures in relation to highly pathogenic avian influenza
(notified under document C(2017) 8969)
(Text with EEA relevance)
THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION,
Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union,
Whereas:
Decision 2006/415/EC lays down certain protection measures to be applied in the event of an outbreak of highly pathogenic avian influenza of the subtype H5N1 in poultry in a Member State, including the establishment of areas A and B following a suspected or confirmed outbreak of that disease.
Decision 2007/25/EC lays down certain protection measures in relation to highly pathogenic avian influenza and movements of pet birds accompanying their owners into the Union.
The measures laid down in Decisions 2006/415/EC and 2007/25/EC and Implementing Decision 2013/657/EU apply until 31 December 2017.
During recent years most outbreaks of highly pathogenic avian influenza in poultry and other captive birds, as well as cases in wild birds, within the Union have been caused by H5 subtypes other than H5N1 of Asian origin. However, that virus strain continues to circulate widely in poultry and other captive birds and in wild birds in several Asian and African countries and the risks for animal and human health in the Union persist.
It is therefore appropriate to continue mitigating the risks posed by that virus by certain protection measures in relation to outbreaks of highly pathogenic avian influenza in poultry and other captive birds in the Union and to maintain the measures directed at preventing the possible entry of highly pathogenic avian influenza viruses into the Union via imports of poultry commodities, including the introduction of pet birds.
The introduction of pet birds accompanying their owner poses a low risk for the introduction of the avian influenza virus into the Union, provided that the requirements of Decision 2007/25/EC are complied with, and the birds are destined for a household or another residence of the owner or responsible person. However, the requirements regarding the destination of pet birds following their entry in the Union are not sufficiently laid down in Decision 2007/25/EC which could result in such birds being entered into shows, fairs, exhibitions or other gatherings of birds with a higher risk for the possible spread of infection. Therefore, Decision 2007/25/EC should be amended in order to clearly lay down a requirement that such birds must not be entered into such events before the expiry of a period of 30 days following their entry into the Union.
In order to maintain the current protection measures and to allow for a thorough evaluation of the policy options for the envisaged review of Union rules based on the findings of the EFSA opinion, the period of application of Decisions 2006/415/EC and 2007/25/EC and Implementing Decision 2013/657/EU should be extended until 31 December 2018.
With regard to Decision 2007/25/EC, it is also appropriate to update the conditions for the introduction of pet birds into the Union by including the avian influenza H7 antigen for the use of diagnostic tests and vaccines.
In addition, in order to facilitate the application of Union rules including certification for the introduction of pet birds into the Union, certain cross-references in Decision 2007/25/EC should be updated to take account of changes in Union legislation.
Decisions 2006/415/EC and 2007/25/EC and Implementing Decision 2013/657/EU should therefore be amended accordingly.
In order to avoid any disturbance with regard to the introduction of pet birds into the Union, the use of the veterinary certificate issued in accordance with Decision 2007/25/EC, prior to the amendments made by this Decision, should be authorised during a transitional period subject to certain conditions.
The measures provided for in this Decision are in accordance with the opinion of the Standing Committee on Plants, Animals, Food and Feed,
HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION: