(Corrected figures provided by the Czech Republic following the Opening Decision)  ,
    Even with the figures as corrected by the Czech authorities, the amounts indicated in the table do not entirely correspond to the given formula in some cases (provable loss in CZK/km multiplied by the number of kilometres does not entirely match the overall provable loss in CZK). However, the differences are only marginal and in all cases the amounts presented in Table 2 (compensation actually given) are lower than the results of the logical formulas.    ,
    Expected price of transport services is the sum of the economically admissible costs which should be incurred by an operator in performing transport public service obligations and a reasonable profit relating to such expenditure.    ,
    Foreseen revenue is receipts and revenues which should be achieved by the operator in performing the transport public service obligation including ticketing revenue.    ,

ČSAD,11 279 177,68,30,59,345 071 757,0,14,47,163 224 589,0,16,12,181 847 168,0,
DP Ústí,150 696,6,37,16,5 599 878,0,20,01,3 015 435,0,17,15,2 584 443,0,
DP Teplice,409 412,4,33,35,13 653 903,0,17,56,7 191 006,0,15,79,6 462 897,0,
DP Chomutov,1 155 060,0,30,40,35 113 824,0,11,55,13 340 905,0,18,85,21 772 919,0,
DP Děčín,636 830,0,29,24,18 619 839,3,13,71,8 729 066,0,15,53,9 890 772,0,
DP Most,229 878,9,34,51,7 933 109,0,14,25,3 275 769,0,20,26,4 657 340,0,
Podbořany,395 081,0,27,06,10 689 652,0,13,65,5 392 773,0,13,41,5 296 879,0,
Miroslav Ohem,68 936,0,29,00,1 999 144,0,11,54,795 642,0,17,46,1 203 502,0,
Petr Frommel,14 868,0,24,00,356 832,0,7,27,108 125,0,16,73,248 707,0,
Petr Stejskal,11 144,0,21,70,241 825,0,6,92,77 105,0,14,78,164 720,0,
Vilém Graupner,20 492,0,21,50,440 578,0,4,63,94 878,0,16,87,345 700,0,

ČSAD,181 106 734,73,
DP Ústí,2 584 442,98,
DP Teplice,5 972 688,46,
DP Chomutov,21 024 546,0,
DP Děčín,8 792 202,0,
DP Most,4 491 342,03,
Podbořany,5 189 441,0,
Miroslav Ohem,1 203 502,0,
Petr Frommel,248 707,0,
Petr Stejskal,95 823,0,
Vilém Graupner,338 807,5,
  (Corrected figures provided by the Czech Republic following the Opening Decision)  ,
    In some cases, the amounts indicated in the table do not entirely correspond to the mathematical formulas (expected overall price of transport services being calculated as number of km multiplied by expected overall price of transport services; foreseen overall revenue being calculated as number of km multiplied by foreseen revenue in CZK/km; provable loss CZK/km being calculated as expected price of transport services in CZK/km minus foreseen revenue in CZK/km, etc.) According to the Czech authorities, the provable loss was negotiated with certain transport providers to be lower than the difference between the expected price of transport services and foreseen revenue.    ,

DP Ústí,151 905,0,40,49,6 150 388,18,20,39,3 097 230,55,17,49,2 657 274,0,
DP Teplice,407 085,0,34,54,14 060 716,0,18,43,7 502 577,0,16,11,6 558 140,0,
DP Chomutov,1 114 320,0,31,34,34 922 789,0,12,09,13 467 600,0,19,25,21 455 189,0,
DP Děčín,648 974,0,32,90,21 351 245,0,14,77,9 582 505,0,16,40,10 640 675,0,
DP Most,233 195,0,37,89,8 835 760,0,15,60,3 637 843,0,20,67,4 819 011,0,
Podbořany,410 802,0,28,03,11 515 089,0,15,44,6 343 433,0,12,59,5 171 656,0,
Miroslav Ohem,68 322,0,29,00,1 981 338,0,11,50,785 703,0,17,50,1 195 635,0,
Petr Stejskal,11 032,0,30,30,334 270,0,12,69,139 996,0,17,34,191 295,0,
Vilém Graupner,35 556,0,21,50,764 454,0,4,63,164 624,0,16,87,599 830,0,

DP Ústí,2 657 274,0,
DP Teplice,6 558 140,0,
DP Chomutov,21 455 189,0,
DP Děčín,10 640 675,0,
DP Most,4 819 011,0,
Podbořany,5 035 557,0,
Miroslav Ohem,1 195 635,0,
Petr Stejskal,191 294,8,
Vilém Graupner,599 830,0,

DPÚK,3 828 910,45,39,63,151 744 748,24,15,56,59 572 239,0,24,07,92 172 509,24,
  (Corrected figures provided by the Czech Republic following the Opening Decision)  ,
    The reason why certain names appear more than once is that there are multiple contracts involving the same service provider. In some cases, the amounts indicated in the table do not entirely correspond to the given formula (provable loss in CZK/km multiplied by the number of kilometres does not entirely match the overall provable loss in CZK). However, the differences are only marginal and in all cases the amounts presented in the Table 7 below (compensation actually given) are lower than the results of the mathematical formulas.    ,

ZDAR, a.s.,391 462,0,31,50,12 331 053,0,16,10,6 300 903,59,15,40,6 030 149,41,
DP Most,453 962,0,29,80,13 528 067,6,9,40,4 269 395,1,20,40,9 258 672,5,
DP Most,646 065,0,29,80,19 252 737,0,11,13,7 192 416,86,18,67,12 060 320,14,
Autobusy Kavka, a.s.,569 514,0,27,85,15 860 964,9,13,62,7 755 780,81,14,23,8 105 184,09,
Autobusy Karlovy Vary, a.s.,334 582,0,32,30,10 806 998,6,14,68,4 911 462,09,17,62,5 895 536,51,
Autobusy Karlovy Vary, a.s.,199 218,5,32,70,6 514 444,95,12,44,2 479 272,62,20,26,4 035 172,33,
Autobusy Karlovy Vary, a.s.,740 074,0,31,50,23 312 331,0,13,94,10 319 904,5,17,56,12 992 426,5,
ČSAD Slaný a.s.,374 460,0,27,90,10 447 434,0,12,36,4 628 845,79,15,54,5 818 588,21,
ČSAD Slaný a.s.,798 764,5,28,40,22 684 911,8,13,77,11 002 327,62,14,63,11 682 584,18,
ZDAR, a.s.,536 733,0,31,50,16 907 089,5,13,70,7 352 493,4,17,80,9 554 596,1,

ZDAR, a.s.,3 485 619,0,
DP Most,4 300 909,19,
DP Most,5 802 759,25,
Autobusy Kavka, a.s.,4 893 192,5,
Autobusy Karlovy Vary, a.s.,2 857 950,0,
Autobusy Karlovy Vary, a.s.,2 042 809,0,
Autobusy Karlovy Vary, a.s.,6 653 077,0,
ČSAD Slaný a.s.,2 443 620,5,
ČSAD Slaný a.s.,5 059 228,25,
ZDAR, a.s.,2 613 935,34,
  (Corrected figures provided by the Czech Republic following the Opening Decision)  ,
    In some cases, the amounts indicated in the table do not entirely correspond to the given formula (provable loss in CZK/km multiplied by the number of kilometres does not entirely match the overall provable loss in CZK). However, the differences are only marginal and in all cases the amounts presented in the Table 9 below (compensation actually given) are lower than the results of the mathematical formulas.    ,

ČSAD Semily, a.s.,359 299,0,32,00,11 497 568,0,12,58,4 518 992,15,19,42,6 978 575,85,
DP Děčín,20 572,0,32,90,676 818,8,8,87,182 496,4,24,03,494 322,4,
ČSAD Střední Čechy, spol. sr.o.,82 189,0,32,00,2 630 048,0,7,18,590 203,09,24,82,2 039 844,91,
DP Teplice,70 240,6,34,54,2 426 110,32,16,11,1 131 576,06,18,43,1 294 534,26,
DP Ústí,22 654,0,38,17,864 703,18,16,72,378 774,88,21,45,485 928,3,
DP Chomutov,35 443,0,31,34,1 110 783,62,6,10,216 070,92,25,24,894 712,7,
Dopravní podnik Mladá Boleslav, s.r.o.,86 360,0,33,00,2 849 880,0,7,20,622 061,9,25,80,2 227 818,1,

ČSAD Semily, a.s.,5 253 038,0,
DP Děčín,484 084,0,
ČSAD Střední Čechy, spol. sr.o.,1 726 387,0,
DP Teplice,921 868,68,
DP Ústí,437 498,0,
DP Chomutov,823 855,1,
Dopravní podnik Mladá Boleslav, s.r.o.,2 227 818,0,