Commission Implementing Decision
of 29 March 2012
amending Decision 1999/94/EC on the procedure for attesting the conformity of construction products pursuant to Article 20(2) of Council Directive 89/106/EEC as regards precast normal/lightweight/autoclaved aerated concrete products
(notified under document C(2012) 1977)
(Text with EEA relevance)
(2012/202/EU)
THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION,
Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union,
After consulting the Standing Committee on Construction,
Whereas:
Annex III to Decision 1999/94/EC should be amended in order to adapt the systems of attestation of conformity for beam/block floor units and elements incorporating organic material to technical progress in order to take into account uses subject to regulations on reaction to fire, as a different level of third party intervention should be ensured depending on the processes and materials used in production.
Decision 1999/94/EC should therefore be amended accordingly,
HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:
Article 1
Annex III to Decision 1999/94/EC is amended in accordance with the Annex to this Decision.
Article 2
This Decision is addressed to the Member States.
Done at Brussels, 29 March 2012.
For the Commission
Antonio Tajani
Vice-President
ANNEX
In Annex III to Decision 1999/94/EC, the following text is added:
‘PRODUCT FAMILY
BEAM/BLOCK FLOOR UNITS AND ELEMENTS INCORPORATING ORGANIC MATERIALS
Systems of attestation of conformity
For the product(s) and intended use(s) listed below, the European Committee for Standardisation (CEN) is requested to specify the following system of attestation of conformity in the relevant harmonised European standards:
Product(s)
Intended use(s)
Level(s) or class(es)(Reaction to fire)
Attestation of conformity system(s)
Beam/block floor units and elements incorporating organic materials
For uses subject to regulations on reaction to fire
(A1, A2, B, C)6
1
(A1, A2, B, C)7, D, E3
(A1 to E)8, F4
System 1: See Annex III(2)(i) to Directive 89/106/EEC, without audit-testing of samples.
System 3: See Annex III(2)(ii) to Directive 89/106/EEC, second possibility.
System 4: See Annex III(2)(ii) to Directive 89/106/EEC, third possibility.
The specification for the system must be such that it may be implemented even where it is not necessary to determine the performance for a certain characteristic, because at least one Member State has no legal requirement for that characteristic (see Article 2(1) of Directive 89/106/EEC and, where applicable, point 1.2.3 of the Interpretative Documents). In those cases, the verification of such a characteristic must not be imposed on the manufacturer if it does not wish to declare the performance of the product in that respect.’