Commission Decision
of 18 September 2008
on a temporary derogation from the rules of origin laid down in Annex II to Council Regulation (EC) No 1528/2007 to take account of the special situation of Madagascar with regard to preserved tuna and tuna loins
(notified under document number C(2008) 5097)
(2008/751/EC)
THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,
Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community,
Whereas:
On 26 May 2008 Madagascar requested, in accordance with Article 36 of Annex II to Regulation (EC) No 1528/2007, a derogation from the rules of origin set out in that Annex for a period of six months. The request covers a total quantity of 2 000 tonnes of canned tuna and 500 tonnes of tuna loins of HS heading 1604. The request is made because catches and supply of originating raw tuna have decreased in the Indian Ocean.
According to the information provided by Madagascar catches of raw originating tuna were unusually low in the first four months of 2008 even compared to the normal seasonal variations and have led to a decrease in production of preserved tuna. This abnormal situation makes it impossible for Madagascar to comply with the rules of origin laid down in Annex II to Regulation (EC) No 1528/2007 during a certain period.
To ensure smooth transition from the ACP-EC Partnership Agreement to the ESA (Eastern and Southern Africa States)-EU Interim Economic Partnership Agreement a new derogation should be granted with retroactive effect from 1 January 2008.
A temporary derogation from the rules of origin laid down in Annex II to Regulation (EC) No 1528/2007 would not cause serious injury to an established Community industry taking into account the imports concerned, provided that certain conditions relating to quantities, surveillance and duration are respected.
It is therefore justified to grant a temporary derogation under Article 36(1)(a) of Annex II to Regulation (EC) No 1528/2007.
Madagascar will benefit from an automatic derogation from the rules of origin for canned tuna and tuna loins of HS heading 1604 pursuant to Article 42(8) of the Origin Protocol attached to the Interim Agreement establishing a framework for an Economic Partnership Agreement between the Eastern and Southern Africa States on the one part and the European Community and its Member States on the other part (ESA-EU Interim Partnership Agreement), when that Agreement enters into force or is provisionally applied.
In accordance with Article 4(2) of Regulation (EC) No 1528/2007 the rules of origin set out in Annex II to that Regulation and the derogations from them are to be superseded by the rules of the ESA-EU Interim Partnership Agreement, the entry into force or provisional application of which is expected to take place in 2008. The derogation should therefore apply until 31 December 2008, as requested by Madagascar, unless the ESA-EU Interim Partnership Agreement enters into force or is applied provisionally before that date.
In accordance with Article 42(8) of the Origin Protocol attached to the ESA-EU Interim Partnership Agreement, the automatic derogation from the rules of origin is limited to an annual quota of 8 000 tonnes of canned tuna and 2 000 tonnes of tuna loins for the countries having initialled the ESA-EU Interim Economic Partnership Agreement (Comoros, Mauritius, Madagascar, Seychelles and Zimbabwe). Mauritius and Seychelles have already lodged a request for a temporary derogation in accordance with Article 36 of Annex II to Regulation (EC) No 1528/2007. It would be inappropriate to grant derogations in accordance with Article 36 of Annex II to Regulation (EC) No 1528/2007 which exceed the annual quota granted to the ESA region under the ESA-EU Interim Partnership Agreement.
Accordingly a derogation should be granted to Madagascar in respect of 2 000 tonnes of canned tuna and 500 tonnes of tuna loins for a period of one year.
In order to allow efficient monitoring of the operation of the derogation, the authorities of Madagascar should communicate regularly to the Commission details of the EUR.1 movement certificates issued.
The measures provided for in this Decision are in accordance with the opinion of the Customs Code Committee,
HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION: