Article 1. . . . . . . . . ....
Article 2. . . . . . . . . ....
Article 3. . . . . . . . . ....
Article 4. . . . . . . . . ....
Article 5. . . . . . . . . ....
Article 6. . . . . . . . . ....
Article 7. . . . . . . . . ....
Article 8. . . . . . . . . ....
ANNEXTechnical specification for interoperability relating to the subsystem control-command and signalling of the trans-European conventional rail system
1.INTRODUCTION
1.1.Technical scope
1.2.Geographical scope
1.3.Content of this TSI
2.SUBSYSTEM DEFINITION AND SCOPE
2.1.General
2.2.Overview
2.2.1.Interoperability
2.2.2.Classes of control-command systems
2.2.3.Levels of application
2.2.4.Infrastructure network borders
3.THE ESSENTIAL REQUIREMENTS OF THE CONTROL-COMMANDCONTROL-COMMAND SUBSYSTEM
3.1.General
3.2.Specific Aspects for the control-command subsystem
3.2.1.Safety
3.2.2.Reliability and Availability
3.2.3.Health
3.2.4.Environmental protection
3.2.5.Technical compatibility
3.2.5.1.Engineering compatibility
3.2.5.1.1.Physical environmental conditions
3.2.5.1.2.Railway internal electromagnetic compatibility
3.2.5.2.Control-command compatibility.
4.CHARACTERISATION OF THE SUBSYSTEM
4.1.Introduction
4.2.Functional and technical specifications of the subsystem
4.2.1Control-command safety characteristics relevant to interoperability
4.2.2.On-board ETCS functionality
4.2.3.Track-side ETCS functionality
4.2.4.EIRENE functions
4.2.5.ETCS and EIRENE air gap interfaces
4.2.6.On-board interfaces internal to control-command
4.2.6.1.Interface between ETCS and STM
4.2.6.1.GSM-R/ETCS
4.2.6.2.Odometry
4.2.7.Trackside interfaces internal to control-command
4.2.7.1.Functional interface between RBCs
4.2.7.2.Technical interface between RBCs
4.2.7.3.GSM-R/RBC
4.2.7.4.Eurobalise/LEU
4.2.7.5.Euroloop/LEU
4.2.7.6.Requirements on pre-fitting of ERTMS track side equipment
4.2.8.Key management
4.2.9.ETCS-ID management
4.2.10.HABD (Hot axle box detector)
4.2.11.Compatibility with track-side train detection systems
4.2.12.Electromagnetic compatibility
4.2.12.1.Internal control-command electromagnetic compatibility
4.2.12.2.Electromagnetic compatibility between rolling stock and control-command track-side equipment
4.2.13.ETCS DMI (driver machine interface)
4.2.14.EIRENE DMI (driver machine interface)
4.2.15.Interface to data recording for regulatory purposes
4.2.16.Visibility of track-side Control-command objects
4.3.Functional and technical specifications of the interfaces to other subsystems...
4.3.1.Interface to the subsystem traffic operation and management
4.3.1.1.Operating rules
4.3.1.2.ETCS driver machine interface
4.3.1.3.EIRENE driver machine interface
4.3.1.4.Interface to data recording for regulatory purposes
4.3.1.5.Guaranteed train braking performance and characteristics
4.3.1.6.Isolation of on-board ETCS functionality
4.3.1.7.Key management
4.3.1.8.Hot Axle Box Detectors
4.3.1.9.Driver Vigilance
4.3.1.10.Use of sanding
4.3.1.11.Driver’s external field of view
4.3.2.Interface to the subsystem rolling stock
4.3.2.1.Compatibility with track-side train detection systems
4.3.2.2.Electromagnetic compatibility between rolling stock and control-command track-side equipment.
4.3.2.3.Guaranteed train braking performance and characteristics
4.3.2.4.Position of control-command on-board antennae
4.3.2.5.Physical environmental conditions
4.3.2.6.Electromagnetic compatibility
4.3.2.7.Isolation of on-board ETCS functionality
4.3.2.8.Data interfaces
4.3.2.9.Hot axle box detectors
4.3.2.10.Vehicle headlights
4.3.2.11.Driver vigilance
4.3.2.12.Odometry
4.3.2.13.Interface to data recording for regulatory purposes
4.3.2.14.Onboard pre-fitting
4.3.3.Interfaces to subsystem infrastructure
4.3.3.1.Train detection systems
4.3.3.2.Track-side antennae
4.3.3.3.Physical environmental conditions
4.3.3.4.Electromagnetic compatibility
4.3.4.Interfaces to subsystem energy
4.3.4.1.Electromagnetic compatibility
4.4.Operating rules
4.5.Maintenance rules
4.5.1.Responsibility of manufacturer of equipment
4.5.2.Responsibility of contracting entities
4.5.3.Responsibility of infrastructure manager or railway undertaking
4.5.4.Maintenance plan
4.6.Professional qualifications
4.7.Health and safety conditions
4.8.Infrastructure and Rolling stock registers
5.INTEROPERABILITY CONSTITUENTS
5.1.Definitions
5.2.List of interoperability constituents
5.2.1.Basic interoperability constituents
5.2.2.Grouping of interoperability constituents
5.3.Constituents performances and specifications
6.ASSESSMENT OF CONFORMITY AND/OR SUITABILITY FOR USE OF THE CONSTITUENTS...
6.0.Introduction
6.1.Interoperability constituents
6.1.1.Assessment procedures
6.1.1.1.The specific transmission module (STM)
6.1.1.2.EC declaration of suitability for use
6.1.2.Modules
6.2.Control-command subsystem
6.2.1.Assessment procedures
6.2.1.1.Functional integration verification of on-board assembly
6.2.1.2.Functional integration verification of track-side assembly
6.2.1.3.Assessment in migration phases
6.2.2.Modules
6.2.2.1.On-board assembly
6.2.2.2.Track-side assembly
6.2.2.3.Conditions for use of modules for on-board and track-side assemblies...
6.2.2.4.Assessment of maintenance
7.IMPLEMENTATION OF THE TSI CONTROL-COMMAND
7.1.ERTMS-Trackside implementation
7.1.1.Corridors
7.1.2.Connection to the main European ports, marshalling yards, freight terminals...
7.1.3.EU-funded projects
7.1.4.Conditions under which optional functions are required
7.1.5.Legacy systems
7.1.6.Notification
7.1.7.Delays
7.2.ETCS On-board implementation
7.3.GSM-R specific implementation rules
7.3.1.Trackside installations
7.3.2.On-board installations
7.3.3.Legacy systems
7.4.Specific cases
7.4.1.Introduction
7.4.2.List of specific cases
7.4.2.1.Category of each specific case is given in Annex A,...
7.4.2.2.Specific case for Greece
7.4.2.3.Specific case for the Baltic States (for Latvia, Lithuania, Estonia...
7.5.Transitional provisions
APPENDIX 1
specific lines constituting the corridors
Corridor A – to be equipped by 2015
Corridor B
Corridor C
Corridor D
Corridor E
Corridor F
APPENDIX 2 main European ports, marshalling yards, freight terminals and freight transport areas
ANNEX A
APPENDIX 1TRAIN DETECTION SYSTEMS CHARACTERISTICS NECESSARY TO BE COMPATIBLE WITH ROLLING STOCK
4.GENERAL
4.1.. . . . . . . . . ....
4.2.The longitudinal vehicle dimensions are defined as:
Fig. 1.
4.3.. . . . . . . . . ....
4.4.For definition of wheel dimensions the Figure 2 applies, where:...
4.5.. . . . . . . . . ....
4.6.. . . . . . . . . ....
Fig. 2
5.VEHICLE GEOMETRY
5.1.Axle distances
5.1.1.. . . . . . . . . ....
5.1.2.About distance bx
5.1.3.The distance ai (Fig.1) shall not be less than:
5.1.4.. . . . . . . . . ....
5.1.5.Specific case Germany:
5.1.6.Specific case Poland and Belgium (conventional lines only):
5.1.7.Specific case Germany:
5.1.8.Specific case France high Speed TEN and Belgium high speed...
5.1.9.Specific case Belgium:
5.2.Wheel geometry
5.2.1.. . . . . . . . . ....
5.2.2.The dimension D (Fig. 2) shall not be less than:...
5.2.3.The dimension Sd (Fig. 2) shall not be less than...
6.VEHICLE DESIGN
6.1.Vehicle Mass
6.1.1.. . . . . . . . . ....
6.1.2.. . . . . . . . . ....
6.1.3.Specific case Austria, Germany and Belgium
6.1.4.Specific case France high speed TEN and Belgium high speed...
6.1.5.Specific case Belgium high speed TEN (except ‘L1’):
6.2.Metal-free space around wheels
6.2.1.The space where only wheels and their parts (gearboxes, brake...
6.3.Metal-mass of vehicle
6.3.1.Specific Case Germany, Poland:
6.4.Wheel material
6.4.1.. . . . . . . . . ....
6.5.Impedance between wheels
6.5.1.Electrical resistance between the running surfaces of the opposite wheels...
6.5.2.. . . . . . . . . ....
6.5.3.Specific case Poland:
6.5.4.Specific case France:
6.5.5.Specific case Netherlands:
6.6.Vehicle impedance
6.6.1.The minimum impedance between pantograph and wheels of the rolling...
7.ISOLATING EMISSIONS
7.1.Use of Sanding Equipment
7.1.1.For improving braking and traction performances, it is permissible to...
7.1.2.The number of active sanding devices shall not exceed the...
7.1.3.Specific case United Kingdom
7.2.Use of composite brake blocks
7.2.1.Conditions for use of composite brake blocks will have to...
8.ELECTROMAGNETIC INTERFERENCES
8.1.Traction current
8.1.1.Limits and accompanying explanation in a separate document that is...
8.2.Use of electric/magnetic brakes
8.2.1.. . . . . . . . . ....
8.2.2.. . . . . . . . . ....
8.2.3.Specific case Germany
8.3.Electric, magnetic, electromagnetic fields
8.3.1.– Open point –.
9.SPECIFIC CHARACTERISTICS ON THE LINES WITH A GAUGE 1520/1524 MM...
Appendix 2Requirements on trackside hot wheelset bearing detection (‘Hot Axle Box Detection’) Systems
1.GENERAL
2.SCANNING RANGE (HABD) AND TARGET AREA (ROLLING STOCK) IN TRANSVERSE...
3.SCANNING RANGE (HABD) AND TARGET AREA (ROLLING STOCK) IN LONGITUDINAL...
4.MOUNTING DIMENSIONS IN THE TRACK
5.ALARM-TYPES AND -LIMITS
6.SPECIFICATION
ANNEX BCLASS B
USE OF ANNEX B
Part 1: Signalling
ALSN
Automatic locomotive signalling of continuous operation
Description:
Main characteristics:
ASFA
Description:
Main Characteristics:
ATB
Description of ATB first generation:
Main characteristics:
Description of ATB new generation:
Main characteristics:
ATP-VR/RHK
Automatic train protection (ATP), Junakulunvalvonta (JKV)
Description:
Main characteristics:
BACC
Description:
Main characteristics:
CAWS AND ATP
(installed on Iarnród Éireann)
Main characteristics: (Dublin suburban electrified area)
Main characteristics: (outside Dublin suburban electrified area)
Automatic train protection
Continuous automatic warning system
Crocodile
Description:
Main characteristics:
Ebicab
Description of Ebicab 700:
Main characteristics:
Description of Ebicab 900:
Main characteristics:
EVM
Description:
Main characteristics:
GW ATP SCHEME
Description:
Main characteristics
INDUSI/PZB
(Induktive Zugsicherung/Punktförmige Zugbeeinflussung)
Description:
Main Characteristics:
KVB
Description:
Characteristics:
LS
Description:
Main characteristics:
LZB
(Linienförmige Zugbeeinflussung)
Description:
Main characteristics:
MEMOR II+
Description:
Main characteristics:
Outlook:
RETB
Description:
Train-borne equipment
Radio equipment
Cab display unit (CDU)
RSDD/SCMT
(Ripetizione segnali discontinua digitale/sistema controllo marcia del treno)
Description:
SELCAB
Description:
Main characteristics:
SHP
Samoczynne Hamowanie Pociągu
Description:
Main characteristics:
Reaction:
TBL 1/2/3
Description:
Main characteristics:
TPWS
Description:
Other characteristics:
TVM
Description:
Main characteristics:
ZUB 123
Description:
Main characteristics:
ZUB 121
(For information only)
Description:
Characteristics:
Part 2: Radio
UIC Radio Chapter 1-4
Description:
Main characteristics:
UIC Radio Chapter 1- 4 + 6
Description:
Main characteristics:
UIC Radio Chapter 1- 4 + 6 (Irish system)
Description:
Main characteristics:
UIC Radio Chapter 1- 4 + 6 + 7
Description:
Main characteristics:
Introduction to UK Systems
BR 1845 Issues G and H (lineside)BR 1661 Issue A (train-borne) Commonly called cab secure Radio Description: . . . ....
Description:
Main characteristics:
BR 1609 Issue 2Commonly called National Radio Network (NRN)
Description:
Main characteristics:
FS ETACS and GSM
Description:
UIC Radio Chapter 1-4 (TTT radio system installed at Cascais...
Description:
Main characteristics:
TTT radio system CP_N
Description:
Main characteristics:
The PKP radio system
Description:
Main characteristics:
VR Train Radio
Description:
Main characteristics:
TRS — The Czech Railways radio system
Description:
Main characteristics:
The LDZ radio system
Description:
Main Characteristics:
CH — Greek Railways radio system
Description:
Main Characteristics:
UIC Radio Chapter Bulgaria
(for information only)
Description:
Main characteristics:
Estonian Railways train communication network
Lithuanian Railways train radio system
Description:
Main characteristics:
Shunting radio communication system
Description:
Main characteristics:
Part 3: Transition matrix between Class A and B systems (signalling)
PURPOSE OF THE MATRIX
INTRODUCTION
TRANSITION MATRIX
How to read the matrix
System transitions
System transitions (Class A and B)
Member States responsible for transition
Part 4: Electromagnetic characteristic of train detection systems used in Member States
ANNEX CLINE SPECIFIC CHARACTERISTICS AND TRAIN SPECIFIC CHARACTERISTICS TO BE PUT IN THE REGISTERS ACCORDING TO ARTICLE 24 OF DIRECTIVE 2001/16/EC
General requirements
Register of Infrastructure
Register of Rolling Stock
Lists of specific characteristics and requirements
ANNEX DTSI control-command (conventional rail system)
. . . . . . . . . ....
Figure 8
ANNEX E
MODULES FOR INTEROPERABILITY CONSTITUENTS
Module B: Type examination
1.. . . . . . . . . ....
2.The application for the EC type-examination must be lodged by...
3.The technical documentation must enable the conformity of the interoperability...
4.. . . . . . . . . ....
4.1.. . . . . . . . . ....
4.2.. . . . . . . . . ....
4.3.. . . . . . . . . ....
4.4.. . . . . . . . . ....
4.5.. . . . . . . . . ....
4.6.. . . . . . . . . ....
4.7.. . . . . . . . . ....
4.8.. . . . . . . . . ....
5.Where the type meets the provisions of the TSI, the...
6.. . . . . . . . . ....
7.. . . . . . . . . ....
8.. . . . . . . . . ....
9.. . . . . . . . . ....
10.. . . . . . . . . ....
Module D: Production quality management system
1.. . . . . . . . . ....
2.. . . . . . . . . ....
3.. . . . . . . . . ....
3.1.The manufacturer must lodge an application for assessment of his...
3.2.The quality management system must ensure compliance of the interoperability...
3.3.The notified body assesses the quality management system to determine...
3.4.The manufacturer must undertake to fulfil the obligations arising out...
4.. . . . . . . . . ....
4.1.. . . . . . . . . ....
4.2.The manufacturer must allow the notified body entrance for inspection...
4.3.The notified body must periodically carry out audits to make...
4.4.. . . . . . . . . ....
5.Each notified body must communicate to the other notified bodies...
6.The manufacturer must, for a period of 10 years after...
7.The manufacturer or his authorised representative established within the Community...
8.The manufacturer or his authorised representative established within the Community...
9.. . . . . . . . . ....
Module F: Product verification
1.. . . . . . . . . ....
2.. . . . . . . . . ....
3.. . . . . . . . . ....
4.. . . . . . . . . ....
4.1.. . . . . . . . . ....
4.2.. . . . . . . . . ....
4.3.. . . . . . . . . ....
5.. . . . . . . . . ....
5.1.. . . . . . . . . ....
5.2.. . . . . . . . . ....
5.3.. . . . . . . . . ....
5.4.In the case of accepted lots, the notified body shall...
5.5.. . . . . . . . . ....
6.The manufacturer or his authorised representative established within the Community...
7.The manufacturer or his authorised representative established within the Community...
8.. . . . . . . . . ....
Module H2: Full quality management system with design examination
1.. . . . . . . . . ....
2.. . . . . . . . . ....
3.. . . . . . . . . ....
3.1.The manufacturer must lodge an application for assessment of his...
3.2.The quality management system must ensure compliance of the interoperability...
3.3.The notified body must assess the quality management system to...
3.4.The manufacturer must undertake to fulfil the obligations arising out...
4.. . . . . . . . . ....
4.1.. . . . . . . . . ....
4.2.The manufacturer must allow the notified body entrance for inspection...
4.3.The notified body must periodically carry out audits to make...
4.4.. . . . . . . . . ....
5.The manufacturer must, for a period of 10 years after...
6.. . . . . . . . . ....
6.1.. . . . . . . . . ....
6.2.The application must enable the design, manufacture, maintenance and operation...
6.3.. . . . . . . . . ....
6.4.The notified body must examine the application and assess the...
6.5.. . . . . . . . . ....
6.6.. . . . . . . . . ....
7.Each notified body must communicate to the other notified bodies...
8.The manufacturer or his authorised representative established within the Community...
9.The manufacturer or his authorised representative established within the Community...
10.. . . . . . . . . ....
MODULES FOR THE EC VERIFICATION OF SUBSYSTEMS
Module SB: Type examination
1.This module describes the EC verification procedure whereby a notified...
2.The contracting entity must lodge an application for EC verification...
3.The applicant must place at the disposal of the notified...
4.. . . . . . . . . ....
4.1.. . . . . . . . . ....
4.2.. . . . . . . . . ....
4.3.. . . . . . . . . ....
4.4.. . . . . . . . . ....
4.5.. . . . . . . . . ....
4.6.. . . . . . . . . ....
4.7.. . . . . . . . . ....
5.Where the type meets the provisions of the TSI, the...
6.. . . . . . . . . ....
7.. . . . . . . . . ....
8.. . . . . . . . . ....
9.. . . . . . . . . ....
Module SD: Production quality management system
1.This module describes the EC verification procedure whereby a notified...
2.The notified body carries out the procedure, under the condition,...
3.For the subsystem that is subject of the EC verification...
4.. . . . . . . . . ....
4.1.. . . . . . . . . ....
4.2.The application must enable the design, manufacture, assembly, installation, maintenance...
4.3.The notified body shall fist examine the application concerning the...
5.. . . . . . . . . ....
5.1.The contracting entity, if involved, and the main contractors, when...
5.2.For the contracting entity or the main contractor responsible for...
5.3.The notified body chosen by the contracting entity must examine,...
5.4.The notified body referenced to in point 5.1. must assess...
5.5.The contracting entity, if involved, and the main contractors shall...
6.. . . . . . . . . ....
6.1.. . . . . . . . . ....
6.2.The contracting entity, if involved, and the main contractors must...
6.3.The notified body must periodically carry out audits to make...
6.4.. . . . . . . . . ....
6.5.The notified body chosen by the contracting entity and responsible...
7.. . . . . . . . . ....
8.The contracting entity, if involved, and the main contractors must,...
9.Where the subsystem meets the requirements of the TSI, the...
10.The notified body chosen by the contracting entity shall be...
11.Each notified body must communicate to the other notified bodies...
12.The records accompanying the certificate of conformity must be lodged...
Module SF: Product verification
1.This module describes the EC verification procedure whereby a notified...
2.The contracting entity must lodge an application for EC verification...
3.Within that part of the procedure the contracting entity checks...
4.. . . . . . . . . ....
5.The application must enable the design, manufacture, installation, maintenance and...
6.The notified body shall first examine the application concerning the...
7.. . . . . . . . . ....
7.1.. . . . . . . . . ....
7.2.. . . . . . . . . ....
8.The notified body may agree with the contracting entity (and...
9.Where the subsystem meets the requirements of the TSI, the...
10.The notified body shall be responsible for compiling the technical...
11.The records accompanying the certificate of conformity must be lodged...
Module SH2: Full quality management system with design examination
1.This module describes the EC verification procedure whereby a notified...
2.The notified body shall carry out the procedure, including a...
3.For the subsystem that is subject of the EC verification...
4.. . . . . . . . . ....
4.1.. . . . . . . . . ....
4.2.The application must enable the design, manufacture, assembly, installation, maintenance...
4.3.. . . . . . . . . ....
4.4.The notified body must examine the application concerning the design...
5.. . . . . . . . . ....
5.1.The contracting entity, if involved, and the main contractors, when...
5.2.For the contracting entity or the main contractor responsible for...
5.3The notified body chosen by the contracting entity must examine,...
5.4.The notified body referenced in point 5.1 must assess the...
5.5.The contracting entity, if involved, and the main contractors shall...
6.. . . . . . . . . ....
6.1.. . . . . . . . . ....
6.2.The contracting entity, if involved, and the main contractors must...
6.3.The notified body must periodically carry out audits to make...
6.4.. . . . . . . . . ....
6.5.The notified body chosen by the contracting entity and responsible...
7.. . . . . . . . . ....
8.The contracting entity, if involved, and the main contractors must,...
9.Where the subsystem meets the requirements of the TSI, the...
10.The notified body chosen by the contracting entity shall be...
11.Each notified body must communicate to the other notified bodies...
12.The records accompanying the certificate of conformity must be lodged...
Module SG: Unit Verification
1.This module describes the EC verification procedure whereby a notified...
2.The contracting entity must lodge an application for EC verification...
3.The technical documentation must enable the design, manufacture, installation and...
4.The notified body must examine the application and the technical...
5.. . . . . . . . . ....
6.. . . . . . . . . ....
7.Where the subsystem meets the requirements of the TSI, the...
8.The notified body shall be responsible for compiling the technical...
9.. . . . . . . . . ....
ANNEX FCONFORMITY ASSESSMENT PROCEDURE
1.. . . . . . . . . ....
2.The application for assessment of the maintenance arrangements must be...
3.The maintenance arrangements documentation shall contain at least the following...
4.The technical documentation must enable assessment of conformity of the...
5.The body authorised by the MS must :
6.Where the maintenance arrangements meet the provisions of the TSI,...
ANNEX GOPEN POINTS
PRIORITY OF AN OPEN POINT
Interfaces
Annex A
GSM-R:
Annex A — Appendix 1: (P1)
Annex A — Appendix 2: (P1)
Annex B, part 4
Additional interfaces
ANNEX HSYNTHESIS OF ETCS-NET CORRIDORS
ETCS-Net conventional rail sections in Annex II of Decision No...
Railway axis Berlin-Verona/Milan-Bologna-Naples-Messina-Palermo
Betuwe line
Railway axis Lyon-Trieste-Divaèa/Koper-Divaèa-Ljubljana-Budapest-Ukrainian border
Multimodal axis Portugal/Spain-rest of Europe
Nordic triangle railway/road axis
Freight railway axis Sines-Madrid-Paris
Railway axis Paris-Strasbourg-Stuttgart-Vienna-Bratislava
Fehmarn Belt railway axis
Railway axis Athens-Sofia-Budapest-Vienna-Prague-Nuremberg/Dresden
Railway axis Gdansk-Warszaw-Brno/Bratislava-Vienna
Railway axis Lyon/Genoa-Basel-Duisburg-Rotterdam/Antwerp
Railway/road axis Ireland/United Kingdom/continental Europe
‘Rail Baltica’ axis Warsaw-Kaunas-Riga-Tallinn-Helsinki
‘Eurocaprail’ on the Brussels-Luxembourg-Strasbourg railway axis
ETCS-Net conventional rail sections not covered by Annex II of...
TEN Corridor II — E20 in the Berlin-Warsaw axis, Poland...
TEN Corridor III — E30 between western border (Zgorzelec) and...
TINA/AGTC double track line CE-59 — north south traffic from...
Budapest–Bucharest–Constanta (part of Pan-European Corridor IV).
Ljubljana–Zagreb/Belgrade/Bar/Skopje–Thessaloniki (part of Pan-European Corridor X).
ETCS-Net conventional rail sections not covered by Annex II of...
Antwerp-Athus/Bettembourg-Basel-Milan
Hallsberg/Mjölby, Sweden
ETCS on Oresund connection through Denmark over Storebelt link
Aachen — Horka/Frankfurt (O), Germany
Germany
France
Stockholm-Nyland-Umea
ETCS-Net high-speed rail sections
High-speed railway axis Paris-Brussels/Brussels-Cologne-Amsterdam-London
High-speed railway axis of south-west Europe
High-speed railway axis east
West Coast Main Line
High-speed rail interoperability on the Iberian peninsula

Commission Decision

of 28 March 2006

concerning the technical specification for interoperability relating to the control-command and signalling subsystem of the trans-European conventional rail system

(notified under document number C(2006) 964)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2006/679/EC) (repealed)

F1. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .