Search Legislation

Commission Decision of 26 October 2004 declaring a concentration to be compatible with the common market and the functioning of the EEA Agreement (Case No COMP/M.3216 — Oracle/PeopleSoft) (notified under document number C(2004) 4217) (Only the English text is authentic) (Text with EEA relevance) (2005/621/EC)

 Help about what version

What Version

 Help about opening options

Opening Options

 Help about UK-EU Regulation

Legislation originating from the EU

When the UK left the EU, legislation.gov.uk published EU legislation that had been published by the EU up to IP completion day (31 December 2020 11.00 p.m.). On legislation.gov.uk, these items of legislation are kept up-to-date with any amendments made by the UK since then.

Close

This item of legislation originated from the EU

Legislation.gov.uk publishes the UK version. EUR-Lex publishes the EU version. The EU Exit Web Archive holds a snapshot of EUR-Lex’s version from IP completion day (31 December 2020 11.00 p.m.).

Changes to legislation:

This version of this Decision was derived from EUR-Lex on IP completion day (31 December 2020 11:00 p.m.). It has not been amended by the UK since then. Find out more about legislation originating from the EU as published on legislation.gov.uk. Help about Changes to Legislation

Close

Changes to Legislation

Revised legislation carried on this site may not be fully up to date. At the current time any known changes or effects made by subsequent legislation have been applied to the text of the legislation you are viewing by the editorial team. Please see ‘Frequently Asked Questions’ for details regarding the timescales for which new effects are identified and recorded on this site.

  1. Introductory Text

  2. (1) On 14 October 2003 the Commission received a notification, pursuant...

    1. On 14 October 2003 the Commission received a notification, pursuant...

  3. (2) On 17 November 2003, the Commission initiated proceedings in accordance...

    1. On 17 November 2003, the Commission initiated proceedings in accordance...

  4. (3) On 7 April 2004, following the oral hearing, the Commission...

    1. On 7 April 2004, following the oral hearing, the Commission...

  5. (4) The operation was reviewed by the US authorities in parallel...

    1. The operation was reviewed by the US authorities in parallel...

  6. I. THE PARTIES

    1. (5) Oracle is a publicly listed company whose common stock is...

      1. Oracle is a publicly listed company whose common stock is...

    2. (6) PeopleSoft is a publicly listed company whose shares are traded...

      1. PeopleSoft is a publicly listed company whose shares are traded...

  7. II. THE TRANSACTION

    1. (7) The notified operation consists of a public bid for all...

      1. The notified operation consists of a public bid for all...

  8. III. THE RELEVANT MARKETS

    1. High-function HR and FMS solutions or software

      1. (8) Oracle and PeopleSoft are vendors of enterprise application software (EAS)....

        1. Oracle and PeopleSoft are vendors of enterprise application software (EAS)....

      2. (9) The industry generally groups EAS into categories having functionality with...

        1. The industry generally groups EAS into categories having functionality with...

      3. (10) The Commission found that the relevant product markets for the...

        1. The Commission found that the relevant product markets for the...

      4. (11) The market investigation showed that characteristics of high-function HR and...

        1. The market investigation showed that characteristics of high-function HR and...

      5. (12) High-function HR and FMS software has to offer compliance with...

        1. High-function HR and FMS software has to offer compliance with...

      6. (13) A very high level of product maintenance and support drives...

        1. A very high level of product maintenance and support drives...

      7. (14) The underlying architecture of high-function solutions is fundamentally different from...

        1. The underlying architecture of high-function solutions is fundamentally different from...

      8. (15) Mid-market solutions normally have simpler interfaces, or simpler APIs (application...

        1. Mid-market solutions normally have simpler interfaces, or simpler APIs (application...

      9. (16) The Commission’s investigation further showed that ‘best-of-breed’ or point solution...

        1. The Commission’s investigation further showed that ‘best-of-breed’ or point solution...

      10. Large and complex enterprises as customers

        1. (17) High-function HR and FMS solutions are software that is typically...

          1. High-function HR and FMS solutions are software that is typically...

        2. (18) The Commission has therefore come to the conclusion that there...

          1. The Commission has therefore come to the conclusion that there...

      11. Vendors of high-function HR and FMS software

        1. (19) The Commission further established who the vendors of FMS and...

          1. The Commission further established who the vendors of FMS and...

        2. (20) The Commission established the suppliers in the market by looking...

          1. The Commission established the suppliers in the market by looking...

        3. (21) As a first suitable proxy for the ‘complexity’ of the...

          1. As a first suitable proxy for the ‘complexity’ of the...

        4. (22) With the help of these proxies, the Commission analysed the...

          1. With the help of these proxies, the Commission analysed the...

        5. (23) On the basis of this evidence, the Commission concluded that...

          1. On the basis of this evidence, the Commission concluded that...

        6. (24) Using Oracle’s dataset containing bid data, as well as two...

          1. Using Oracle’s dataset containing bid data, as well as two...

        7. (25) The Commission further analysed the capabilities and reach of the...

          1. The Commission further analysed the capabilities and reach of the...

        8. (26) The relevant product markets are therefore, respectively, high-function FMS and...

          1. The relevant product markets are therefore, respectively, high-function FMS and...

    2. Mid-market HR and FMS solutions or software

      1. (27) The Commission found indications that the market for software applications...

        1. The Commission found indications that the market for software applications...

      2. (28) In any case, the exact delineation of the product markets...

        1. In any case, the exact delineation of the product markets...

    3. Geographic Scope of the relevant markets

      1. (29) The market investigation gave clear indications that the geographic scope...

        1. The market investigation gave clear indications that the geographic scope...

      2. (30) As regards the mid-market FMS and HR solutions, the geographic...

        1. As regards the mid-market FMS and HR solutions, the geographic...

  9. IV. ASSESSMENT

    1. A. Market Shares

      1. (31) The calculation of market shares has proven to be particularly...

      2. (32) Given their limited meaning for the markets at stake, the...

        1. Given their limited meaning for the markets at stake, the...

    2. B. Creation of a dominant position, as a result of which...

      1. High-function HR and FMS solutions or software

        1. 1. Non-coordinated effects

          1. (33) In the Statement of Objections the Commission had based its...

            1. In the Statement of Objections the Commission had based its...

          2. (34) In light of the conclusions regarding the market definition, it...

            1. In light of the conclusions regarding the market definition, it...

          3. (35) In order to assess whether or not the notified concentration...

            1. In order to assess whether or not the notified concentration...

          4. (36) The Commission generally found that there was a very strong...

            1. The Commission generally found that there was a very strong...

          5. (37) A finding, as in this case, that the number and...

            1. A finding, as in this case, that the number and...

        2. 2. Coordinated effects

          1. (38) In the Statement of Objections the Commission had based its...

            1. In the Statement of Objections the Commission had based its...

          2. (39) In light of the conclusions regarding the market definition, it...

            1. In light of the conclusions regarding the market definition, it...

          3. (40) In a market in which — in addition to Oracle,...

            1. In a market in which — in addition to Oracle,...

          4. (41) Also, the Commission cannot conclude that the merger will lead...

            1. Also, the Commission cannot conclude that the merger will lead...

      2. Mid-market HR and FMS solutions or software

        1. (42) As regards HR and FMS mid-market software markets, significantly more...

          1. As regards HR and FMS mid-market software markets, significantly more...

        2. (43) On a European level, the impact of the transaction may...

          1. On a European level, the impact of the transaction may...

        3. (44) Given the limited strength of a combined Oracle/PeopleSoft in the...

          1. Given the limited strength of a combined Oracle/PeopleSoft in the...

  10. V. CONCLUSION

    1. (45) The Commission concludes that the proposed concentration would not create...

      1. The Commission concludes that the proposed concentration would not create...

Back to top

Options/Help

Print Options

Close

Legislation is available in different versions:

Latest Available (revised):The latest available updated version of the legislation incorporating changes made by subsequent legislation and applied by our editorial team. Changes we have not yet applied to the text, can be found in the ‘Changes to Legislation’ area.

Original (As adopted by EU): The original version of the legislation as it stood when it was first adopted in the EU. No changes have been applied to the text.

Close

Opening Options

Different options to open legislation in order to view more content on screen at once

Close

More Resources

Access essential accompanying documents and information for this legislation item from this tab. Dependent on the legislation item being viewed this may include:

  • the original print PDF of the as adopted version that was used for the EU Official Journal
  • lists of changes made by and/or affecting this legislation item
  • all formats of all associated documents
  • correction slips
  • links to related legislation and further information resources
Close

Timeline of Changes

This timeline shows the different versions taken from EUR-Lex before exit day and during the implementation period as well as any subsequent versions created after the implementation period as a result of changes made by UK legislation.

The dates for the EU versions are taken from the document dates on EUR-Lex and may not always coincide with when the changes came into force for the document.

For any versions created after the implementation period as a result of changes made by UK legislation the date will coincide with the earliest date on which the change (e.g an insertion, a repeal or a substitution) that was applied came into force. For further information see our guide to revised legislation on Understanding Legislation.

Close

More Resources

Use this menu to access essential accompanying documents and information for this legislation item. Dependent on the legislation item being viewed this may include:

  • the original print PDF of the as adopted version that was used for the print copy
  • correction slips

Click 'View More' or select 'More Resources' tab for additional information including:

  • lists of changes made by and/or affecting this legislation item
  • confers power and blanket amendment details
  • all formats of all associated documents
  • links to related legislation and further information resources