Modifications etc. (not altering text)
C1Pt. 5 applied (with modifications) by 1992 c. 7 (N.I.), s. 11A(1)(3) (as inserted (with effect in accordance with Sch. 1 para. 35 of the amending Act) by National Insurance Contributions Act 2015 (c. 5), Sch. 1 para. 12)
C2Pt. 5 applied (with modifications) by 1992 c. 4, s. 11A(1)(3) (as inserted (with effect in accordance with Sch. 1 para. 35 of the amending Act) by National Insurance Contributions Act 2015 (c. 5), Sch. 1 para. 3)
C3Pt. 5 modified (12.2.2015 for specified purposes, 12.4.2015 in so far as not already in force) by National Insurance Contributions Act 2015 (c. 5), Sch. 2 Pt. 2, Sch. 2 para. 33(2)
C4Pt. 5 applied (with modifications) by Social Security Contributions and Benefits Act 1992 (c. 4), s. 16(1)(d) (as inserted (12.4.2015) by National Insurance Contributions Act 2015 (c. 5), Sch. 2 para. 32)
(1)A person who, without reasonable excuse, fails to comply with a duty imposed under section 236B(1) is guilty of an offence.
(2)The recipient of a stop notice (“R”) is guilty of an offence if—
(a)R fails, without reasonable excuse, to comply with a duty imposed under section 236B(3)(a), (4)(a) or (5)(a) to give a copy of the notice to another person (“P”),
(b)P subsequently fails to comply with a duty imposed under section 236B(1) in relation to the notice, and
(c)at the time of P’s failure the stop notice continues to have effect in relation to R.
(3)For the purposes of this section—
(a)an insufficiency of funds is not a reasonable excuse unless attributable to events outside the person's control,
(b)if the person relies on any other person to do anything, that is not a reasonable excuse unless the first person took reasonable care to avoid the failure,
(c)if the person had a reasonable excuse for the failure but the excuse has ceased, the person is to be treated as having continued to have the excuse if the failure is remedied without unreasonable delay after the excuse ceased, and
(d)reliance on legal advice is to be taken automatically not to constitute a reasonable excuse where the person is a monitored promoter if either—
(i)the advice was not based on a full and accurate description of the facts, or
(ii)the conclusions in the advice that the person relied on were unreasonable.]