177.This section provides for the Keeper to compensate any person who has suffered a loss in consequence of a matter specified in subsection (1). Liability under subsection (1) is strict, in that the person does not have to show that the Keeper is at fault (as opposed to, say, arising from an unavoidable malfunction of the Keeper’s automated systems). However, subsection (2) limits the losses that can be recovered by excluding certain types of claim.
178.Subsection (3) provides more information about what is meant in subsection (1)(a) by “an inaccuracy which is attributable to the making up, maintenance or operation of the register”. It provides that an inaccuracy in information included in an entry in the assignations record when the entry is made up or corrected is not covered by subsection (1)(a) to the extent that the Keeper has been misled into making the inaccuracy and reasonably believed the information to be accurate. Subsection (4) provides that circumstances in which the Keeper is entitled to reasonably believe information to be accurate include if it is provided in connection with an application to which the entry relates, or by the court. As such, if the Keeper faithfully replicates the information provided in an application form and that information proves to be incorrect, that is not an inaccuracy for which the Keeper is liable, though the person who submitted the application may be liable under section 38. Subsection (4) is not exhaustive of the circumstances in which the Keeper is entitled to reasonably believe that information is accurate.
179.This section provides for certain persons to be liable, on fault being shown, for losses suffered by another person in consequence of a matter specified in subsection (1).
180.Subsection (1)(a) applies where a person suffers loss as a result of an inaccuracy in an entry in the assignations record. It applies where the person who made the application which led to the entry did not exercise reasonable care, or where the person notified the Keeper of an apparent inaccuracy without taking reasonable care.
Example
Bruce maliciously registers a forged assignation bearing to be granted by Claire in an effort to affect her credit rating. Claire has a claim against Bruce if she suffers loss.
181.Subsection (1)(b) applies where, as a result of a failure to take reasonable care, there is an inaccuracy in responding to an information request under section 36 of the Act.
Example
Information is supplied by Brian that a certain claim is not carried by an assignation from Andrew to Brian. But Brian does not take reasonable care, and the information is wrong. The person who receives the information then takes an assignation of the claim from Andrew, which will be invalid because it has already been transferred to Brian. That person will have a claim against Brian.
182.Subsection (1)(c) applies where a person has failed, without reasonable cause, to provide information under section 36 of the Act.
Example
Alan has granted an assignation document of certain claims to Bob. The Selkirk Bank is considering whether or not to lend money to Alan, and seeks information from Bob (with the consent of Alan) about which claims are assigned. Bob does not comply with the request, and the bank obtains a court order. Bob still does not comply, and the bank decides not to make the loan. Alan has a claim against Bob for loss suffered due to being unable to obtain a loan from the bank.
183.Subsection (2) imposes the same restrictions on liability as those set out in section 37(2) of the Act.