Inserted section 271BZC (Child witnesses in certain solemn cases: modifications of section 271D)
18.In cases in which the new rule in section 271BZA applies, the court may still review the arrangements for taking the child witness’s evidence in accordance with section 271D. However, the court’s power under section 271D to revoke or vary an earlier order must be exercised in a way which is consistent with the requirements of section 271BZA. For that reason, section 271BZC sets out modifications of section 271D in cases where section 271BZA applies.
19.Subsection (2)(a) provides that section 271D has effect as if subsections (3A) to (3C) were omitted. Those subsections are inserted by section 4 of the Act but those subsections are not to apply in cases in which the new rule in section 271BZA applies. Subsection (2)(aa) provides that section 271D has effect as if subsection (4A) were omitted. That subsection is inserted by section 6 of the Act but it is not to apply in cases in which the new rule in section 271BZA applies.
20.The effect of subsection (2)(b) is to make section 271D(2) to (4) subject to additional provisions that are to be treated as being inserted in section 271D. Subsection (4C) (which is to be treated as being inserted in section 271D) provides that the court must not make an order which revokes an earlier order or varies an earlier order in such a way that it no longer satisfies the requirements of the new rule (the requirements being to authorise the taking of evidence by commissioner or use of a prior statement for the purpose of taking all of a witness’s evidence and to refrain from authorising the taking of any of their evidence without a special measure or with an incompatible special measure). The court must not make an order having that effect unless satisfied that an exception is justified under section 271BZA(7) or (8) or unless the hearing has already commenced when the court commences its review. There is a possibility of there being cases where, for example, a commissioner is appointed to take evidence from a child witness and the commission takes place but later, during the course of the trial, it becomes clear that there is a need to recall the child witness. In that case, the court should be able to review the arrangements for taking the child witness’s evidence in accordance with section 271D. At that point, the hearing has already commenced so it is no longer possible for the child witness to give all of their evidence in advance of the trial if they are to be recalled. Therefore, the court may revoke or vary the earlier order if the hearing has already commenced.
21.Subsections (4CA) and (4CB) (which are to be treated as being inserted in section 271D) are relevant in review cases where the earlier order has authorised only the special measure of giving evidence in chief by prior statement. If any party to the proceedings requests that the child witness’s evidence be taken by commissioner, the court must make an order having that effect unless the hearing has already commenced when the court commences its review or there is an exception under section 271BZA(7) or (8). This situation could arise where, for example, a child witness has given their evidence in the form of a prior statement but then further evidence becomes available and, as a result of that, the other party to proceedings wishes to cross-examine the child witness. That party could seek a review and could request that the court authorise the taking of evidence by commissioner to enable cross-examination. The court would (in most cases) be required to authorise that.
22.Subsections (4D) to (4F) (which are to be treated as being inserted in section 271D) introduce an additional restriction in cases where section 271BZA applies. They are relevant where section 271BZA applies but the hearing has already commenced when the court commences its review or an exception to the new rule is justified under section 271BZA(7) or (8). In those circumstances, the court is not required to make an order enabling all of the child witness’s evidence to be given in advance of the hearing. However, even if the court makes an order which has the effect of requiring the child witness to give evidence at the hearing, it must not have the effect of requiring the child witness to be present in the courtroom unless an exception applies. There is an exception under subsection (4E) if the giving of evidence in a way other than by being present in the courtroom would give rise to a significant risk of prejudice to the fairness of the hearing or interests of justice and that significantly outweighs any risk of prejudice to the child witness’s interests. There is an exception under subsection (4F) if the child witness is aged 12 or over and expresses a wish to be present in the courtroom to give evidence and that would be in the child witness’s best interests.