The structure of the Act
Part two – Periodical payments of damages
Section 3 – Award, continuity and index-linking
28.Section 3(1) of the Act amends section 2 of the 1996 Act. It inserts a new subsection (A2) which requires a court awarding damages for future pecuniary loss to consider whether to make an order under which the whole or part of those damages would take the form of periodical payments (a “periodical payment order”). In doing so courts must have special regard to the pursuer’s needs and preferences. The new subsection also gives courts the power to make such a periodical payment order without the consent of the parties. When awarding damages for losses other than future pecuniary loss (e.g. damages for pain and suffering and loss of expectation of life (known as solatium) or past pecuniary loss) the court will still have the power to make periodical payment orders under subsection (1) but only with the consent of the parties.
29.Section 2 of the 1996 Act is also amended by the insertion of new subsections (1A) and (1B). Subsection (1A) requires the court to be satisfied that the continuity of the payments is reasonably secure before it makes a periodical payments order. The court must also set out its reasons for being satisfied that the continuity of payment would be reasonably secure (subsection (1B)). These requirements apply whether the order is to be made under subsection (A2) or under subsection (1).
30.Section 3(2) of the Act inserts a new section 2C in the 1996 Act which makes further provision concerning the continuity of periodical payments. Paragraphs 31 to 37 below describe the effects of the particular provisions in the inserted section 2C. The new section 2C is stated to be inserted after section 2B, despite there being no existing sections 2A and 2B in the Scottish text of the 1996 Act. This acknowledges the existence of sections 2A and 2B as part of the law of England and Wales and Northern Ireland (see the Courts Act 2003, section 100).
31.Subsection (1) provides that continuity of payments is assumed to be reasonably secure if it is protected by either a ministerial guarantee or the Financial Services Compensation Scheme, or where the source of the payments is a recognised body or office-holder (on which see the notes on subsections (6) and (7) below). The court will not be bound to follow that assumption where, for example, it is presented with evidence which suggests the payments would not, in fact, be reasonably secure.
32.Subsection (2) enables the court to include in a periodical payment order provision about the method of payment and any steps which the person responsible for paying (the defender/compensator) must take to secure continuity of payment. The court will not be able to make provision about such steps where the circumstances covered by subsection (1) apply (i.e. where the payment is assumed to be reasonably secure for a reason given there).
33.Subsection (2)(c) allows the court to pave the way for the provisions on method of payment or required steps to be varied on a subsequent application to the court. If no such provision is included it will not be possible for the court to vary the order under subsection (4) (see paragraph 35 below).
34.Subsection (3) permits the use of a payment method other than that specified in the order, but only where the other method is backed by one of the protections or secure sources mentioned at paragraph 31 above.
35.Subsection (4) allows an application to be made to the court for a variation of the order’s provisions on how the payment is to be made. This power to vary the order is distinct from the power under section 2F (see below). Subsection (4) ensures that a court can only exercise this power of variation where the way for the application has been paved when the original order was made and where, after variation, the continuity of periodical payments will remain reasonably secure.
36.Subsection (5) ensures that the provisions of subsection (4)(a) do not prevent the method of payment being altered under section 2F(2)(a)(v) where a periodical payment order relating to damages for future pecuniary loss is varied.
37.Subsection (6) lists the bodies and office-holders that are recognised for the purposes of subsections (1)(b) and (3)(b). The list comprises the core central government departments, bodies and ministers (both UK Government and Scottish Government), but subsections (7) and (8) allow the Scottish Ministers to make regulations (subject to the negative procedure) changing the list. This will permit bodies within the National Health Service or outside government to be added where the Scottish Ministers consider it appropriate that the assumption in subsection (1) should apply to those bodies. Similarly, it will allow additions to the list to be removed where the Scottish Ministers no longer consider it appropriate for the assumption to apply.
38.Section 3(2) of the Act also inserts a new section 2D into the 1996 Act. Subsection (1), read with subsection (6) deems there to be included in any periodical payment order a requirement for the amount of payments to be altered at intervals. This allows the real value of periodical payments to be preserved over the whole period for which they are payable. In the absence of provision to the contrary the amount of payments is to be altered by reference to the retail prices index, with rules of court prescribing the timing, frequency and manner of alterations.
39.Subsections (3), (4) and (5) provide for courts to have the power to modify the deemed requirement, including the power to substitute an alternative basis of alteration or to order that there should be no alteration. Subsection (6)(b) also gives the Scottish Ministers the power to prescribe an alternative to the retail prices index as the default basis of alteration.
40.These provisions on index linking apply to orders made under section 2(A2) of the 1996 Act (inserted by section 3(1)(a)) and to those made under section 2(1). They will not apply to orders made before the commencement of section 3 of the Act (subsection (2)).
Section 4 – Variation or suspension of settlement
41.Section 4 of the Act inserts a series of sections (2E to 2I) into the 1996 Act concerning the variation and suspension of orders and agreements under which damages for future pecuniary loss are paid in the form of periodical payments. These provisions do not apply to orders which only include provision for payment of lump sums, or to orders which make provision for periodical payments in respect of other types of loss (i.e. those made under section 2(1) of the 1996 Act with the consent of the parties).
42.New section 2E describes the circumstances in which a court may make a periodical payment order that is capable of being varied or suspended by the court in the future. (For shorthand, such an order is referred to here as a “variable order”.) To do this the original order must include provision which paves the way for a subsequent application to be made to the court for variation of the order or suspension of the rights to payment under it (or both variation and suspension). Without such a paving provision it will not be possible for an application to be made to the court under the following provisions inserted into the 1996 Act. (This is distinct from the provisions of section 2C(4) concerning applications for variation of the method of payment.)
43.Subsection (2) of inserted section 2E provides that a court may only include such provision if it is satisfied that there is a significant deterioration or improvement in the pursuer’s medical condition which can be foreseen at the time of the original order and that as a consequence of that change the pursuer would end up being either significantly over- or under-compensated.
44.Subsection (3) of inserted section 2E sets out what must be specified in a variable order including details about the type of change in condition which would trigger any application to vary and the period within which an application must be made.
45.New section 2F describes the manner in which a court may vary a variable order which includes: altering the amount of payment, its indexation, the frequency of payment, the method of payment and period of payment as well as providing for a lump sum instead of or in addition to periodical payments. Whilst in general the court may not vary an order more than once in respect of any specified change, or outside the application period specified in the original order (subsection (5)), it may do so where there are exceptional circumstances. This is intended to provide the courts with the necessary flexibility to take account of a range of circumstances. The court will also be able to vary a variable order on an application made outside the application period if the party making the application shows cause for the lateness of the application linked to a delay in the party being made aware of relevant information (subsection (6)). (For example, this would cover a situation where the defender has been unable to make an application within the period specified in the original order because the pursuer failed to make the defender aware of a relevant change of circumstances, so long as the defender did not then delay in making the application.) The court will not be able to vary the order unless the continuity of payment remains reasonably secure (subsection (4)).
46.New section 2G enables the court to suspend the right to receive periodical payments under a variable order. This provision reflects the judgement in AA v CC [2013] EWHC 3679 (QB) that the 1996 Act and the Civil Procedure Rules in relation to England and Wales did not provide courts with the power to make an order for “periodical payments which are expected to stop at some uncertain time and to re-start again at some uncertain time later” and recognises that suspension goes further than variation. There is no limit to the number of occasions payments may be suspended under this section. The criteria which must be met before a court decides to suspend payments are otherwise the same as those for variation.
47.New section 2H extends the court’s power to vary and suspend to agreements made between parties which settle personal injury claims or actions and which make provision for periodical payment in respect of future pecuniary loss. The power can only be exercised when the agreement includes provision corresponding to that required in a variable order. Section 2H does not limit the number of occasions on which a right to a payment under an agreement can be suspended. Otherwise, and subject to the terms of the agreement restricting this, the court will have the same power to vary an agreement, or suspend the right to receive payments under one, as it would to vary an order, or suspend a right, under section 2F or 2G.
48.New section 2I sets out the circumstances in which a suspension under either section 2G or 2H may be lifted. The court must be satisfied that the injured person’s physical and/or mental condition has altered since the time of the suspension and that the person would be significantly under-compensated should the suspension continue.
Section 5 — Liability for bearing expenses in case
49.Section 5 of the Act inserts new section 2J into the 1996 Act and limits the circumstances in which courts may make awards of expenses against the injured person in proceedings for variation, suspension or lifting of suspension of a periodical payment under an order or an agreement. Section 8 of the Civil Litigation (Expenses and Group Proceedings) (Scotland) Act 2018 (“
Section 6 – Restriction on assignation by recipient
50.Section 6 of the Act inserts new section 4A into the 1996 Act which provides that an assignation of the right to receive certain periodical payments (whether outright or in security for some other obligation) is of no effect unless the assignation has been approved by a court. Whilst there is no express reference to arrestment, the effect of restricting assignation would be similarly to restrict arrestment (the legal mechanism through which creditors are able to attach a debtor’s property or rights which are in the hands of a third party as a means of recovering a debt). The provision does not restrict the ability of the pursuer to enter into an agreement to assign the right to those periodical payments, only the granting of an assignation itself. This does not affect the injured person’s ability to borrow money using the fact of their entitlement to periodical payments in future as evidence of their financial status and credit worthiness. However, it will prevent loans being secured on the future income stream under the periodical payments unless this is approved by the court.
51.Subsection (1) prevents the assignation of the right to receive certain periodical payments unless the court approves the assignation. The periodical payments in question may be paid pursuant to a periodical payment order or alternatively an agreement settling a claim or action out of court or an agreement entered into to give alternative effect to, or in substitution for, the obligations provided for in a periodical payment order (subsection (6)).
52.Subsection (2) identifies the portion of the periodical payments which is covered by the restriction in subsection (1). It is only the element of the periodical payments relating wholly to expenditure likely to be incurred by the injured person (or for the person’s benefit) in consequence of the injury which is covered by the restriction. This would include, for example, the element of the award or settlement directed at future care costs, but not future loss of earnings.
53.By virtue of subsection (3), the court must be satisfied that there are special circumstances that make it necessary. In reality this is a high standard of test and it is anticipated that courts, in considering whether or not to give approval, will want to be satisfied that the assignation represents value for money, that it is in the best interests of the individual, and how the individual will be financially supported following the assignation.
54.Subsection (4) makes the assignation of periodical payments to the scheme manager of the Financial Services Compensation Scheme an exception to the requirement for the court’s approval.
55.Subsection (5) prevents section 4A having an effect on rights which have vested in a person under an order or agreement made before section 6 of the Act comes into force.
Section 7 – Protection on occurrence of insolvency
56.Section 7 of the Act inserts section 4B into the 1996 Act which concerns the treatment of periodical payments in the event of the recipient’s insolvency. (The recipient may be the person in respect of whose injuries the payments are being made, but may alternatively be another person if the right to the payments has been assigned. On the latter situation, see paragraph 59 below). It applies to rights to periodical payments under both periodical payment orders and some agreements (subsection (8), which is in similar terms to section 4A(6), on which see above).
57.Section 4B(2) and (3)(b) protects any part of the periodical payment for future pecuniary loss which relates wholly to expenditure likely to be incurred for the person as a result of the personal injury to which it relates (subsection (5)). That is the same portion of the periodical payments as is covered by section 4A (see above). That portion of a periodical payment cannot be required to be paid to a trustee under a protected trust deed granted by the recipient as a contribution from income (subsection (2)) or to a trustee in sequestration under a debtor contribution order under section 90 of the Bankruptcy (Scotland) Act 2016 (subsection (3)(b)).
58.Section 4B(1) excludes the right to periodical payments for any future pecuniary loss (not just the portion referred to above) from the assets transferred under a trust deed if that trust deed is to get protected status under the Bankruptcy (Scotland) Act 2016. Similarly, subsection (3)(a) excludes the right to such periodical payments (or assets or arrangement backing them) from the estate that vests in a trustee in sequestration.
59.The protections do not apply where the right to receive the periodical payments has been assigned after the order was made and the person to whom the right has been assigned is not using the periodical payments for the benefit of the person who suffered the injury to which the periodical payments relate (subsection (6)).
60.Subsection (7) prevents section 4B having an effect on rights which have vested in a person under an order or agreement made before section 7 of the Act comes into force.
