In section 30 of the 1985 Act (election, resignation and removal of commissioners)—
(a)in subsection (4), after paragraph (b) insert—
“(c)by order of the sheriff if the sheriff is satisfied that the commissioner is no longer acting in the interests of the efficient conduct of the sequestration.”, and
(b)after subsection (4), insert—
“(5)An order under subsection (4)(c) may be made on the application of—
(a)the Accountant in Bankruptcy,
(b)a person representing not less than one quarter in value of the creditors, or
(c)the trustee.
(6)The sheriff must—
(a)order an application by a person mentioned in subsection (5) to be served on the commissioner,
(b)order that the application is intimated to every creditor who has given a mandate to the commissioner, and
(c)before deciding whether or not to make an order under subsection (4)(c), give the commissioner the opportunity to make representations.
(7)On an application under subsection (4)(c), the sheriff may, in ordering the removal of the commissioner from office, make such further order as the sheriff thinks fit or may, instead of removing the commissioner from office, make such other order as the sheriff thinks fit.
(8)The trustee, the Accountant in Bankruptcy, any commissioner or any creditor may appeal against the decision of the sheriff on an application under subsection (4)(c) within 14 days after the date of that decision.”.