xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"

PART VN.I.FINANCIAL PROVISIONS

Modifications etc. (not altering text)

C1Pt. V (ss. 53 - 89A) applied (with modifications) by S.R 2004/49, art. 3 (as substituted (28.1.2008) by Local Government (Constituting a Joint Committee a Body Corporate) (Amendment) Order (Northern Ireland) 2007 (S.R. 2007/505), art. 2(3))

N.I.Surcharge, etc.

[F181Declaration that item of account is unlawful.N.I.

(1)Where it appears to a local government auditor at any audit held by him that any item of account is contrary to law he may apply to the court for a declaration that the item is contrary to law except where it is sanctioned by the Department.

(2)On an application under this section the court may make or refuse to make the declaration asked for, and where the court makes that declaration, then, subject to subsection (3), it may also—

(a)order that any person responsible for incurring or authorising any expenditure declared unlawful shall repay it in whole or in part to the council concerned and, where two or more persons are found to be responsible, that they shall be jointly and severally liable to repay it as aforesaid;

(b)if any such expenditure exceeds £2,000 and the person responsible for incurring or authorising it is, or was at the time of his conduct in question, a member of the council concerned, order him to be disqualified for being elected or being a member of a council for a specified period; and

(c)order rectification of the accounts.

(3)The court shall not make an order under subsection (2)(a) or (b) if the court is satisfied that the person responsible for incurring or authorising any such expenditure acted reasonably or in the belief that the expenditure was authorised by law, and in any other case shall have regard to all the circumstances, including that person's means and ability to repay that expenditure or any part of it.

(4)Any person who has made an objection under section 79 and is aggrieved by a decision of an auditor not to apply for a declaration under this section may—

(a)not later than six weeks after he has been notified of the decision, require the auditor to state in writing the reasons for his decision; and

(b)appeal against the decision to the court,

and on any such appeal the court shall have the like powers in relation to the item of account to which the objection relates as if the auditor had applied for the declaration.

(5)On an application or appeal under this section relating to the accounts of a council, the court may make such order as the court thinks fit for the payment by that council of expenses incurred in connection with the application or appeal by the auditor or the person to whom the application or appeal relates or by whom the appeal is brought, as the case may be.

(6)The court having jurisdiction for the purposes of this section shall be the High Court except that, if the amount of the item of account alleged to be contrary to law does not exceed the amount over which county courts have jurisdiction in actions founded on contract, the county court shall have concurrent jurisdiction with the High Court.]

[F282Recovery of amount not accounted for, etc.N.I.

(1)Where it appears to a local government auditor at any audit held by him—

(a)that any person has failed to bring into account any sum which should have been so included and that the failure has not been sanctioned by the Department; or

(b)that a loss has been incurred or deficiency caused by the wilful misconduct of any person,

he shall certify that the sum or, as the case may be, the amount of the loss or the deficiency is due from that person and, subject to subsections (3) and (5), both he and the council concerned may recover that sum or amount for the benefit of that council; and if the auditor certifies under this section that any sum or amount is due from two or more persons, they shall be jointly and severally liable for that sum or amount.

(2)Any person who—

(a)has made an objection under section 79 and is aggrieved by a decision of an auditor not to certify under this section that a sum or amount is due from another person; or

(b)is aggrieved by a decision of an auditor to certify under this section that a sum or amount is due from him,

may not later than 6 weeks after he has been notified of the decision require the auditor to state in writing the reasons for his decision.

(3)Any such person who is aggrieved by such a decision may appeal against the decision to the court and—

(a)in the case of a decision to certify that any sum or amount is due from any person, the court may confirm, vary or quash the decision and give any certificate which the auditor could have given;

(b)in the case of a decision not to certify that any sum or amount is due from any person, the court may confirm the decision or quash it and give any certificate which the auditor could have given;

and any certificate given under this subsection shall be treated for the purposes of subsection (1) and the following provisions of this section as if it had been given by the auditor under subsection (1).

(4)If a certificate under this section relates to a loss or deficiency caused by the wilful misconduct of a person who is, or was at the time of such misconduct, a member of the council concerned and the amount certified to be due from him exceeds £2,000, that person shall be disqualified for being elected or being a member of a council for the period of five years beginning on the ordinary date on which the period allowed for bringing an appeal against a decision to give the certificate expires or, if such an appeal is brought, the date on which the appeal is finally disposed of or abandoned or fails for non-prosecution.

(5)A sum or other amount certified under this section to be due from any person shall be payable within fourteen days after the date of the issue of the certificate or, if an appeal is brought, within fourteen days after the appeal is finally disposed of or abandoned or fails for non-prosecution.

(6)In any proceedings for the recovery of any sum or amount due from any person under this section a certificate signed by a local government auditor stating that that sum or amount is due from a person specified in the certificate to a council so specified shall be conclusive evidence of that fact; and any certificate purporting to be so signed shall be taken to have been so signed unless the contrary is proved.

(7)On an appeal under this section relating to the accounts of a council the court may make such order as the court thinks fit for the payment by that council of expenses incurred in connection with the appeal by the auditor or the person to whom the appeal relates or by whom the appeal is brought, as the case may be.

(8)Any expenses incurred by an auditor in recovering a sum or other amount certified under this section to be due in connection with the accounts of a council shall, so far as not recovered from any other source, be recoverable from that council unless the court otherwise directs.

(9)The court having jurisdiction for the purposes of this section shall be the High Court except that, if the sum or amount alleged to be due does not exceed the amount over which county courts have jurisdiction in actions founded on contract, the county court shall have concurrent jurisdiction with the High Court.]

F382APower of auditor to issue prohibition order.N.I.

(1)The local government auditor may issue an order under this section (a “prohibition order”) if he has reason to believe that the council or any officer of the council—

(a)is about to make or has made a decision which involves or would involve the council incurring expenditure which is unlawful; or

(b)is about to take or has taken a course of action which, if pursued to its conclusion, would be unlawful and likely to cause a loss or deficiency; or

(c)is about to enter an item of account, the entry of which is unlawful;

and for the purposes of this section and section 82B, the actions of a committee or sub-committee of the council or of any other person (not being an officer) authorised to act on behalf of the council shall be treated as the actions of the council itself.

(2)A prohibition order is one—

(a)which is addressed to the council or officer concerned;

(b)which specifies the paragraph of subsection (1) which is relevant and the decision, course of action or item of account to which the order relates;

(c)which specifies the date on which (subject to subsection (5)) the order is to take effect, being a date not earlier than the date of service of a copy of the order in accordance with paragraph (a) or, as the case may be, paragraphs (a) and (b) of subsection (4); and

(d)which requires the council or officer concerned to desist from making or implementing the decision, taking or continuing to take the course of action or, as the case may be, entering the item of account in question.

(3)Where 2 or more local government auditors are appointed in relation to the accounts of any council, a prohibition order may be issued by the auditors acting jointly or by such one of them as they may determine; and, in relation to such an order, any reference in subsections (4) and (5) to the auditor is a reference to the auditor or auditors by whom the order is issued.

(4)A copy of a prohibition order—

(a)shall be served on the council to which, or to an officer of which, it is addressed; and

(b)in the case of an order addressed to an officer, shall also be served on him; and

(c)may be served on such other person or persons as appears to the local government auditor to be appropriate.

(5)A prohibition order shall not have effect unless, not later than the expiration of 7 days from the date of service referred to in subsection (2)(c), the local government auditor serves on the council concerned and on any officer on whom a copy of the order was served under subsection (4)(b), a statement of the auditor's reasons for the belief referred to in subsection (1).

(6)A prohibition order may at any time be revoked (but not varied) by the local government auditor.

F3prosp. rep. by 2005 NI 18

F482BEffect of and appeals against prohibition orders.N.I.

(1)So long as a prohibition order has effect, the council concerned or any officer of that council shall not make or implement the decision, take or continue to take the course of action or, as the case may be, enter the item of account to which the order relates.

(2)A prohibition order—

(a)takes effect, subject to section 82A(5), on the date specified in the order in accordance with subsection (2)(c) of that section; and

(b)continues to have effect, subject to any order or decision of the High Court on an appeal under subsection (3), until revoked under section 82A(6).

(3)Not later than 28 days from the service under section 82A(5) of a statement of reasons relating to a prohibition order, the council concerned (but not any officer of that council) may appeal against the order to the High Court in accordance with rules of court.

(4)On an appeal against a prohibition order under subsection (3), the High Court may make such order as it thinks fit for the payment by the council concerned of expenses incurred by a local government auditor in connection with the appeal.

(5)Any expenses reasonably incurred by a local government auditor in or in connection with the issue of a prohibition order shall be recoverable by him from the council concerned.

(6)In this section “the council concerned”, in relation to a prohibition order, means the council to which, or to an officer of which, the order is addressed.

F4prosp. rep. by 2005 NI 18

F582CSupplementary provisions as to prohibition orders.N.I.

(1)In any case where—

(a)before a prohibition order is issued, a council enters into a contract to dispose of or acquire an estate in land, and

(b)before the disposal or acquisition is completed, a prohibition order takes effect as a result of which it is unlawful for the council to complete the disposal or acquisition,

the existence of the prohibition order shall not prejudice any remedy in damages which may be available to any person by reason of the council's failure to complete the contract.

(2)No action shall lie against a local government auditor in respect of any loss or damage alleged to have been caused by reason of the issue of a prohibition order which was issued in good faith; but nothing in this subsection affects the right of a court to award costs against a local government auditor on an appeal under section 82B(3).

F5prosp. rep. by 2005 NI 18

F682DPower of auditor to apply for judicial review.N.I.

(1)Subject to section 18(2)(a) of the Judicature (Northern Ireland) Act 1978 (no application for judicial review without leave) the local government auditor may make an application for judicial review with respect to—

(a)any decision of a council, or

(b)any failure by a council to act,

which (in either case) it is reasonable to believe would have an effect on the accounts of that council.

(2)The existence of the powers conferred on a local government auditor under sections 82A to 82C and this section shall not be regarded as a ground for refusing an application falling within subsection (1) (or an application for leave to make such an application).

(3)On an application for judicial review made as mentioned in subsection (1), the High Court may make such order as it thinks fit for the payment by the council to whose decision the application relates of expenses incurred by the local government auditor in connection with the application.

F6prosp. rep. by 2005 NI 18