5.—(1) The reviewer must, subject to compliance with the provisions of regulation 6, consider—
(a)any representations made under regulation 2, and in a case falling within regulation 4, any responses to them; and
(b)any representations made under paragraph (2).
(2) If the reviewer considers there is a deficiency or irregularity in the original decision, or in the manner in which is was made, but is minded nonetheless to make a decision which is against the interests of the applicant on one or more issues, the reviewer must notify the applicant—
(a)that the reviewer is so minded and the reasons why; and
(b)that the applicant, or someone acting on the applicant’s behalf, may make representations to the reviewer orally or in writing or both orally and in writing.