PART 3REMEDIES
CHAPTER 5FACILITATION OF REMEDIES
Scope of Chapter 5
85. This Chapter applies to contracts and framework agreements falling within the scope of Part 2.
Notices of decisions to award a contract or conclude a framework agreement
86.—(1) Subject to paragraphs (5) and (6), a contracting authority shall send to each candidate and tenderer a notice communicating its decision to award the contract or conclude the framework agreement.
Content of notices
(2) Where it is to be sent to a tenderer, the notice referred to in paragraph (1) shall include—
(a)the criteria for the award of the contract;
(b)the reasons for the decision, including the characteristics and relative advantages of the successful tender, the score (if any) obtained by—
(i)the tenderer which is to receive the notice; and
(ii)the tenderer—
(aa)to be awarded the contract, or
(bb)to become a party to the framework agreement,
and anything required by paragraph (3);
(c)the name of the tenderer—
(i)to be awarded the contract, or
(ii)to become a party to the framework agreement; and
(d)a precise statement of either—
(i)when, in accordance with regulation 87, the standstill period is expected to end and, if relevant, how the timing of its ending might be affected by any and, if so what, contingencies, or
(ii)the date before which the contracting authority will not, in conformity with regulation 87 enter into the contract or conclude the framework agreement.
(3) The reasons referred to in paragraph (2)(b) shall include the reason for any decision by the contracting authority that the economic operator did not meet the technical specifications—
(a)in an equivalent manner as mentioned in regulation 42(14); or
(b)because compliance with a standard, approval, specification or system mentioned in regulation 42(15) does not address the performance or functional requirements laid down by the contracting authority.
(4) Where it is to be sent to a candidate, the notice referred to in paragraph (1) shall include—
(a)the reasons why the candidate was unsuccessful; and
(b)the information mentioned in paragraph (2), but as if the words “and relative advantages” were omitted from sub-paragraph (b).
Exemptions
(5) A contracting authority need not comply with paragraph (1) in any of the following cases:—
(a)where the contract or framework agreement is permitted by Part 2 to be awarded or concluded without prior publication of a contract notice;
(b)where the only tenderer is the one who is to be awarded the contract or who is to become a party to the framework agreement, and there are no candidates;
(c)where the contracting authority awards a contract under a framework agreement or a dynamic purchasing system.
(6) A contracting authority may withhold any information to be provided in accordance with the preceding requirements of this regulation where the release of such information—
(a)would impede law enforcement or would otherwise be contrary to the public interest;
(b)would prejudice the legitimate commercial interests of a particular economic operator, whether public or private; or
(c)might prejudice fair competition between economic operators.
Meaning of “candidate” and “tenderer”
(7) In this regulation,—
(a)“candidate” means a candidate, as defined in regulation 2(1), which—
(i)is not a tenderer, and
(ii)has not been informed of the rejection of its application and the reasons for it;
(b)“tenderer” means a tenderer, as defined in regulation 2(1), which has not been definitively excluded.
(8) For the purposes of paragraph (7)(b), an exclusion is definitive if, and only if, the tenderer has been notified of the exclusion and either—
(a)the exclusion has been held to be lawful in proceedings under Chapter 6; or
(b)the time limit for starting such proceedings has expired even on the assumption that the Court would have granted the maximum extension permitted by regulation 92(4) and (5).
Standstill period
87.—(1) Where regulation 86(1) applies, the contracting authority must not enter into the contract or conclude the framework agreement before the end of the standstill period.
(2) Where the contracting authority sends a regulation 86 notice to all the relevant economic operators by facsimile or electronic means, the standstill period ends at midnight at the end of the 10th day after the relevant sending date.
(3) Where the contracting authority sends a regulation 86 notice to all the relevant economic operators only by other means, the standstill period ends at whichever of the following occurs first:—
(a)midnight at the end of the 15th day after the relevant sending date;
(b)midnight at the end of 10th day after the date on which the last of the economic operators to receive such a notice receives it.
(4) In paragraphs (2) and (3), “the relevant sending date” means the date on which the regulation 86 notice is sent to the relevant economic operators, and if the notices are sent to different relevant economic operators on different dates, the relevant sending date is the date on which the last of the notices is sent.
(5) Where the contracting authority sends the regulation 86 notice to one or more of the relevant economic operators by facsimile or electronic means and to the others by other means, the standstill period ends at whichever of the following two times occurs latest:—
(a)midnight at the end of the 10th day after the date on which the last notice is sent by facsimile or electronic means;
(b)the time when whichever of the following occurs first:—
(i)midnight at the end of the 15th day after the date on which the last notice is sent by other means;
(ii)midnight at the end of the 10th day after the date on which the last of the economic operators to receive a notice sent by any such other means receives it.
(6) In this regulation—
“regulation 86 notice” means a notice given in accordance with regulation 86; and
“relevant economic operators” means economic operators to which regulation 86 requires a notice to be sent.
CHAPTER 6APPLICATIONS TO THE COURT
Interpretation of Chapter 6
88.—(1) In this Chapter—
“claim form” includes, in Northern Ireland, the originating process by which the proceedings are commenced;
“contract”, except in regulation 103, means a public contract or a framework agreement;
“declaration of ineffectiveness” means a declaration made under regulation 98(2)(a) or 103(3);
“economic operator” has the meanings given by paragraph (2);
“grounds for ineffectiveness” has the meaning given to it by regulation 99;
“proceedings” means court proceedings taken for the purposes of regulation 91; and
“standstill period”, and references to its end, have the same meaning as in regulation 87.
(2) In regulations 89 and 90, “economic operator” has its usual meaning (in accordance with regulation 2(1)), but in the other provisions of this Part “economic operator” has the narrower meaning of an economic operator (as defined by regulation 2(1)) to which a duty is owed in accordance with regulation 89 or 90
Duty owed to economic operators from EEA states
89.—(1) This regulation applies to the obligation on a contracting authority to comply with—
(a)the provisions of Part 2; and
(b)any enforceable EU obligation in the field of public procurement in respect of a contract or design contest falling within the scope of Part 2.
(2) That obligation is a duty owed to an economic operator from the United Kingdom or from another EEA state.
Duty owed to economic operators from certain other states
90.—(1) The duty owed in accordance with regulation 89 is a duty owed also to—
(a)an economic operator from a GPA state, but only where the GPA applies to the procurement concerned; and
(b)an economic operator which is not from an EEA state or a GPA state, but only if a relevant bilateral agreement applies.
(2) For the purposes of paragraph (1)(a), the GPA applies to a procurement if—
(a)the procurement may result in the award of a contract of any description; and
(b)at the relevant time—
(i)a GPA State has agreed with the EU that the GPA shall apply to a contract of that description, and
(ii)the economic operator is from that GPA state.
(3) For the purposes of paragraph (1)(b), a relevant bilateral agreement applies if—
(a)there is an international agreement, other than the GPA, by which the EU is bound; and
(b)in accordance with that agreement, the economic operator is, in respect of the procurement concerned, to be accorded remedies no less favourable than those accorded to economic operators from the EU in respect of matters falling within the scope of the duty owed in accordance with regulation 89.
(4) In this regulation—
“GPA state” means any country, other than an EEA state, which at the relevant time is a signatory to the GPA; and
“relevant time” means the date on which the contracting authority sent a call for competition in respect of the contract to the EU Publications Office or would have done so if it had been required by Part 2 to do so.
Enforcement of duties through the Court
91.—(1) A breach of the duty owed in accordance with regulation 89 or 90 is actionable by any economic operator which, in consequence, suffers, or risks suffering, loss or damage.
(2) Proceedings for that purpose must be started in the High Court, and regulations 92 to 104 apply to such proceedings.
General time limits for starting proceedings
92.—(1) This regulation limits the time within which proceedings may be started where the proceedings do not seek a declaration of ineffectiveness.
(2) Subject to paragraphs (3) to (5), such proceedings must be started within 30 days beginning with the date when the economic operator first knew or ought to have known that grounds for starting the proceedings had arisen.
(3) Paragraph (2) does not require proceedings to be started before the end of any of the following periods:—
(a)where the proceedings relate to a decision which is sent to the economic operator by facsimile or electronic means, 10 days beginning with—
(i)the day after the date on which the decision is sent, if the decision is accompanied by a summary of the reasons for the decision;
(ii)if the decision is not so accompanied, the day after the date on which the economic operator is informed of a summary of those reasons;
(b)where the proceedings relate to a decision which is sent to the economic operator by other means, whichever of the following periods ends first:—
(i)15 days beginning with the day after the date on which the decision is sent, if the decision is accompanied by a summary of the reasons for the decision;
(ii)10 days beginning with—
(aa)the day after the date on which the decision is received, if the decision is accompanied by a summary of the reasons for the decision; or
(bb)if the decision is not so accompanied, the day after the date on which the economic operator is informed of a summary of those reasons;
(c)where sub-paragraphs (a) and (b) do not apply but the decision is published, 10 days beginning with the day on which the decision is published.
(4) Subject to paragraph (5), the Court may extend the time limits imposed by this regulation (but not any of the limits imposed by regulation 93) where the Court considers that there is a good reason for doing so.
(5) The Court must not exercise its power under paragraph (4) so as to permit proceedings to be started more than 3 months after the date when the economic operator first knew or ought to have known that grounds for starting the proceedings had arisen.
(6) For the purposes of this regulation, proceedings are to be regarded as started when the claim form is issued.
Special time limits for seeking a declaration of ineffectiveness
93.—(1) This regulation limits the time within which proceedings may be started where the proceedings seek a declaration of ineffectiveness.
(2) Such proceedings must be started—
(a)where paragraph (3) or (5) applies, within 30 days beginning with the relevant date mentioned in that paragraph;
(b)in any event, within 6 months beginning with the day after the date on which the contract was entered into.
(3) This paragraph applies where a relevant contract award notice has been published in the Official Journal, in which case the relevant date is the day after the date on which the notice was published.
(4) For that purpose, a contract award notice is relevant if, and only if—
(a)the contract was awarded without prior publication of a contract notice; and
(b)the contract award notice includes justification of the decision of the contracting authority to award the contract without prior publication of a contract notice.
(5) This paragraph applies where the contracting authority has informed the economic operator of—
(a)the conclusion of the contract, and
(b)a summary of the relevant reasons,
in which case the relevant date is the day after the date on which the economic operator was informed of the conclusion or, if later, was informed of a summary of the relevant reasons.
(6) In paragraph (5), “the relevant reasons” means the reasons which the economic operator would have been entitled to receive in response to a request under regulation 55(2).
(7) For the purposes of this regulation, proceedings are to be regarded as started when the claim form is issued.
Starting proceedings
94.—(1) Where proceedings are started, the economic operator must serve the claim form on the contracting authority within 7 days after the date of issue.
(2) Paragraph (3) applies where proceedings are started—
(a)seeking a declaration of ineffectiveness; or
(b)alleging a breach of regulation 87, 95 or 96(1)(b) where the contract has not been fully performed.
(3) In those circumstances, the economic operator must, as soon as practicable, send a copy of the claim form to each person, other than the contracting authority, who is a party to the contract in question.
(4) The contracting authority must, as soon as practicable, comply with any request from the economic operator for any information that the economic operator may reasonably require for the purpose of complying with paragraph (3).
(5) In this regulation, “serve” means serve in accordance with rules of court, and for the purposes of this regulation a claim form is deemed to be served on the day on which it is deemed by rules of court to be served.
Contract-making suspended by challenge to award decision
95.—(1) Where—
(a)a claim form has been issued in respect of a contracting authority’s decision to award the contract,
(b)the contracting authority has become aware that the claim form has been issued and that it relates to that decision, and
(c)the contract has not been entered into,
the contracting authority is required to refrain from entering into the contract.
(2) The requirement continues until any of the following occurs—
(a)the Court brings the requirement to an end by interim order under regulation 96(1)(a);
(b)the proceedings at first instance are determined, discontinued or otherwise disposed of and no order has been made continuing the requirement (for example in connection with an appeal or the possibility of an appeal).
(3) This regulation does not affect the obligations imposed by regulation 87.
Interim orders
96.—(1) In proceedings, the Court may, where relevant, make an interim order—
(a)bringing to an end the requirement imposed by regulation 95(1);
(b)restoring or modifying that requirement;
(c)suspending the procedure leading to—
(i)the award of the contract, or
(ii)the determination of the design contest,
in relation to which the breach of the duty owed in accordance with regulation 89 or 90 is alleged;
(d)suspending the implementation of any decision or action taken by the contracting authority in the course of following such a procedure.
(2) When deciding whether to make an order under paragraph (1)(a)—
(a)the Court must consider whether, if regulation 95(1) were not applicable, it would be appropriate to make an interim order requiring the contracting authority to refrain from entering into the contract; and
(b)only if the Court considers that it would not be appropriate to make such an interim order may it make an order under paragraph (1)(a).
(3) If the Court considers that it would not be appropriate to make an interim order of the kind mentioned in paragraph (2)(a) in the absence of undertakings or conditions, it may require or impose such undertakings or conditions in relation to the requirement in regulation 95(1).
(4) The Court may not make an order under paragraph (1)(a) or (b) or (3) before the end of the standstill period.
(5) This regulation does not prejudice any other powers of the Court.
Remedies where the contract has not been entered into
97.—(1) Paragraph (2) applies where—
(a)the Court is satisfied that a decision or action taken by a contracting authority was in breach of the duty owed in accordance with regulation 89 or 90; and
(b)the contract has not yet been entered into.
(2) In those circumstances, the Court may do one or more of the following—
(a)order the setting aside of the decision or action concerned;
(b)order the contracting authority to amend any document;
(c)award damages to an economic operator which has suffered loss or damage as a consequence of the breach.
(3) This regulation does not prejudice any other powers of the Court.
Remedies where the contract has been entered into
98.—(1) Paragraph (2) applies if—
(a)the Court is satisfied that a decision or action taken by a contracting authority was in breach of the duty owed in accordance with regulation 89 or 90; and
(b)the contract has already been entered into.
(2) In those circumstances, the Court—
(a)must, if it is satisfied that any of the grounds for ineffectiveness applies, make a declaration of ineffectiveness in respect of the contract unless regulation 100 requires the Court not to do so;
(b)must, where required by regulation 102, impose penalties in accordance with that regulation;
(c)may award damages to an economic operator which has suffered loss or damage as a consequence of the breach, regardless of whether the Court also acts as described in sub-paragraphs (a) and (b);
(d)must not order any other remedies.
(3) Paragraph (2)(d) is subject to regulation 103(3) and (9) (additional relief in respect of specific contracts where a framework agreement is ineffective) and does not prejudice any power of the Court under regulation 101(3) or 102(12) (orders which supplement a declaration of ineffectiveness or a contract-shortening order).
Grounds for ineffectiveness
99.—(1) There are three grounds for ineffectiveness.
The first ground
(2) Subject to paragraph (3), the first ground applies where the contract has been awarded without prior publication of a contract notice in any case in which Part 2 required the prior publication of a contract notice.
(3) The first ground does not apply if all the following apply:—
(a)the contracting authority considered the award of the contract without prior publication of a contract notice to be permitted by Part 2;
(b)the contracting authority has had published in the Official Journal a voluntary transparency notice expressing its intention to enter into the contract; and
(c)the contract has not been entered into before the end of a period of at least 10 days beginning with the day after the date on which the voluntary transparency notice was published in the Official Journal.
(4) In paragraph (3), “voluntary transparency notice” means a notice which contains the following information—
(a)the name and contact details of the contracting authority;
(b)a description of the object of the contract;
(c)a justification of the decision of the contracting authority to award the contract without prior publication of a contract notice;
(d)the name and contact details of the economic operator to be awarded the contract; and
(e)where appropriate, any other information which the contracting authority considers it useful to include.
The second ground
(5) The second ground applies where all the following apply—
(a)the contract has been entered into in breach of any requirement imposed by—
(i)regulation 87 (the standstill period),
(ii)regulation 95 (contract-making suspended by challenge to award), or
(iii)regulation 96(1)(b) (interim order restoring or modifying a suspension originally imposed by regulation 95);
(b)there has also been a breach of the duty owed to the economic operator in accordance with regulation 89 or 90 in respect of obligations other than those imposed by regulation 87 (the standstill period) and this Chapter;
(c)the breach mentioned in sub-paragraph (a) has deprived the economic operator of the possibility of starting proceedings in respect of the breach mentioned in sub-paragraph (b), or pursuing them to a proper conclusion, before the contract was entered into; and
(d)the breach mentioned in sub-paragraph (b) has affected the chances of the economic operator obtaining the contract.
The third ground
(6) Subject to paragraph (7), the third ground applies where all the following apply—
(a)the contract is based on a framework agreement or was awarded under a dynamic purchasing system;
(b)the contract was awarded in breach of any requirement imposed by—
(i)regulation 33(11) (award of contracts based on framework agreements through re-opening of competition), or
(ii)regulation 34(21) to (24) (award of contracts under dynamic purchasing systems); and
(c)the estimated value of the contract is equal to or greater than the relevant threshold mentioned in regulation 5.
(7) The third ground does not apply if all the following apply—
(a)the contracting authority considered the award of the contract to be in accordance with the provisions mentioned in paragraph (6)(b)(i) or (ii);
(b)the contracting authority has, despite regulation 86(5)(c), voluntarily complied with the requirements set out in regulation 86(1) to (4); and
(c)the contract has not been entered into before the end of the standstill period.
General interest grounds for not making a declaration of ineffectiveness
100.—(1) Where the Court is satisfied that any of the grounds for ineffectiveness applies, the Court must not make a declaration of ineffectiveness if—
(a)the contracting authority or another party to the proceedings raises an issue under this regulation; and
(b)the Court is satisfied that overriding reasons relating to a general interest require that the effects of the contract should be maintained.
(2) For that purpose, economic interests in the effectiveness of the contract may be considered as overriding reasons only if in exceptional circumstances ineffectiveness would lead to disproportionate consequences.
(3) However, economic interests directly linked to the contract cannot constitute overriding reasons relating to a general interest.
(4) For that purpose, economic interests directly linked to the contract include—
(a)the costs resulting from the delay in the execution of the contract;
(b)the costs resulting from the commencement of a new procurement procedure;
(c)the costs resulting from change of the economic operator performing the contract; and
(d)the costs of legal obligations resulting from the ineffectiveness.
(5) For the purposes of paragraph (1)(b), overriding reasons may be taken to require that the effects of the contract should be maintained even if they do not require the Court to refrain from shortening the duration of the contract by an order under regulation 102(3)(a).
The consequences of ineffectiveness
101.—(1) Where a declaration of ineffectiveness is made, the contract is to be considered to be prospectively, but not retrospectively, ineffective as from the time when the declaration is made and, accordingly, those obligations under the contract which at that time have yet to be performed are not to be performed.
(2) Paragraph (1) does not prevent the exercise of any power under which the orders or decisions of the Court may be stayed, but at the end of any period during which a declaration of ineffectiveness is stayed, the contract is then to be considered to have been ineffective as from the time when the declaration had been made.
(3) When making a declaration of ineffectiveness, or at any time after doing so, the Court may make any order that it thinks appropriate for addressing—
(a)the implications of paragraph (1) or (2) for the particular circumstances of the case;
(b)any consequential matters arising from the ineffectiveness.
(4) Such an order may, for example, address issues of restitution and compensation as between those parties to the contract who are parties to the proceedings so as to achieve an outcome which the Court considers to be just in all the circumstances.
(5) Paragraph (6) applies where the parties to the contract have, at any time before the declaration of ineffectiveness is made, agreed by contract any provisions for the purpose of regulating their mutual rights and obligations in the event of such a declaration being made.
(6) In those circumstances, the Court must not exercise its power to make an order under paragraph (3) in any way which is inconsistent with those provisions, unless and to the extent that the Court considers that those provisions are incompatible with the requirement in paragraph (1) or (2).
Penalties in addition to, or instead of, ineffectiveness
102.—(1) Where the Court makes a declaration of ineffectiveness, it must also order that the contracting authority pay a civil financial penalty of the amount specified in the order.
(2) Paragraph (3) applies where—
(a)in proceedings for a declaration of ineffectiveness, the Court is satisfied that any of the grounds for ineffectiveness applies but does not make a declaration of ineffectiveness because regulation 100 requires it not to do so; or
(b)in any proceedings, the Court is satisfied that the contract has been entered into in breach of any requirement imposed by regulation 87, 95 or 96(1)(b), and does not make a declaration of ineffectiveness (whether because none was sought or because the Court is not satisfied that any of the grounds for ineffectiveness applies).
(3) In those circumstances, the Court must order at least one, and may order both, of the following penalties:—
(a)that the duration of the contract be shortened to the extent specified in the order;
(b)that the contracting authority pay a civil financial penalty of the amount specified in the order.
(4) When the Court is considering what order to make under paragraph (1) or (3), the overriding consideration is that the penalties must be effective, proportionate and dissuasive.
(5) In determining the appropriate order, the Court must take account of all the relevant factors, including—
(a)the seriousness of the relevant breach of the duty owed in accordance with regulation 89 or 90;
(b)the behaviour of the contracting authority;
(c)where the order is to be made under paragraph (3), the extent to which the contract remains in force.
(6) Where more than one economic operator starts proceedings in relation to the same contract, paragraph (4) applies to the totality of penalties imposed in respect of the contract.
Civil financial penalties
(7) Subject to paragraph (8), where a contracting authority is ordered by the High Court of England and Wales to pay a civil financial penalty under this regulation—
(a)the Court’s order must state that the penalty is payable to the Minister for the Cabinet Office;
(b)the Court must send a copy of the order to the Minister;
(c)the contracting authority must pay the penalty to the Minister; and
(d)the Minister must, on receipt of the penalty, pay it into the Consolidated Fund.
(8) Where the Minister for the Cabinet Office, or the Cabinet Office, is ordered to pay a civil financial penalty under this Chapter—
(a)paragraph (7) does not apply; and
(b)the Minister for the Cabinet Office must pay the penalty into the Consolidated Fund.
(9) Subject to paragraph (10), where a contracting authority is ordered by the High Court of Northern Ireland to pay a civil financial penalty under this regulation—
(a)the Court’s order must state that the penalty is payable to the Department of Finance and Personnel;
(b)the Court must send a copy of the order to the Department;
(c)the contracting authority must pay the penalty to the Department; and
(d)the Department must, when it receives the penalty, pay it into the Consolidated Fund of Northern Ireland.
(10) Where the Department of Finance and Personnel is ordered to pay a civil financial penalty under this Chapter—
(a)paragraph (9) does not apply; and
(b)the Department must pay the penalty into the Consolidated Fund of Northern Ireland.
(11) Where a contracting authority is a non-Crown body—
(a)any payment due under paragraph (7) may be enforced by the Minister for the Cabinet Office as a judgment debt due to the Minister; and
(b)any payment due under paragraph (9) may be enforced by the Department of Finance and Personnel as a judgment debt due to it.
Contract shortening
(12) When making an order under paragraph (3)(a), or at any time after doing so, the Court may make any order that it thinks appropriate for addressing the consequences of the shortening of the duration of the contract.
(13) Such an order may, for example, address issues of restitution and compensation as between those parties to the contract who are parties to the proceedings so as to achieve an outcome which the Court considers to be just in all the circumstances.
(14) Paragraph (15) applies where the parties to the contract have, at any time before the order under paragraph (3)(a) is made, agreed by contract any provisions for the purpose of regulating their mutual rights and obligations in the event of such an order being made.
(15) In those circumstances, the Court must not exercise its power to make an order under paragraph (12) in any way which is inconsistent with those provisions, unless and to the extent that the Court considers that those provisions are incompatible with the primary order that is being made, or has been made, under paragraph (3)(a).
(16) In paragraph (3)(a), “duration of the contract” refers only to its prospective duration as from the time when the Court makes the order.
Ineffectiveness etc. in relation to specific contracts based on a framework agreement
103.—(1) In this regulation, “specific contract” means a contract which—
(a)is based on the terms of a framework agreement; and
(b)was entered into before a declaration of ineffectiveness (if any) was made in respect of the framework agreement.
(2) A specific contract is not to be considered to be ineffective merely because a declaration of ineffectiveness has been made in respect of the framework agreement.
(3) Where a declaration of ineffectiveness has been made in respect of the framework agreement, the Court must, subject to paragraph (5), make a separate declaration of ineffectiveness in respect of each relevant specific contract.
(4) For that purpose, a specific contract is relevant only if a claim for a declaration of ineffectiveness in respect of that specific contract has been made—
(a)within the time limits mentioned in regulation 93 as applicable to the circumstances of the specific contract;
(b)regardless of whether the claim was made at the same time as any claim for a declaration of ineffectiveness in respect of the framework agreement.
(5) Regulation 100 (general interest grounds for not making a declaration of ineffectiveness) applies for the purposes of paragraph (3), insofar as the overriding reasons relate specifically to the circumstances of the specific contract.
(6) This regulation does not prejudice the making of a declaration of ineffectiveness in relation to a specific contract in accordance with other provisions of this Part on the basis of—
(a)the third ground of ineffectiveness set out in regulation 99(6) and (7); or
(b)the second ground of ineffectiveness set out in regulation 99(5), where—
(i)the relevant breach of the kind mentioned in regulation 99(5)(a) is entering into the specific contract in breach of regulation 95 or 96(1)(b), and
(ii)the relevant breach of the kind mentioned in regulation 99(5)(b) relates specifically to the award of the specific contract and the procedure relating to that award, rather than to the award of the framework agreement and the procedure relating to it.
(7) A declaration of ineffectiveness must not be made in respect of a specific contract otherwise than in accordance with paragraph (3) or on a basis mentioned in paragraph (6).
(8) Where a declaration of ineffectiveness is made in respect of a specific contract in accordance with paragraph (3)—
(a)regulation 101 (the consequences of ineffectiveness) applies;
(b)regulation 102(1) (requirement to impose a civil financial penalty) does not apply.
(9) Where the Court refrains, by virtue of paragraph (5), from making a declaration of ineffectiveness which would otherwise have been required by paragraph (3), the Court must, subject to paragraph (10), order that the duration of the contract be shortened to the extent specified in the order.
(10) The extent by which the duration of the contract is to be shortened under paragraph (9) is the maximum extent, if any, which the Court considers to be possible having regard to what is required by the overriding reasons mentioned in paragraph (5).
(11) In paragraphs (9) and (10), “duration of the contract” refers only to its prospective duration as from the time when the Court makes the order.
Injunctions against the Crown
104. In proceedings against the Crown, the Court has power to grant an injunction despite section 21 of the Crown Proceedings Act 1947(1).