- Latest available (Revised)
- Original (As made)
This is the original version (as it was originally made). This item of legislation is currently only available in its original format.
(This note is not part of the Regulations)
Section 5 of the Defamation Act 2013 (“the Act”) (c.26) provides a defence for the operator of a website where a defamation action is brought in respect of a statement posted on that website if it was not the operator who posted the statement. The defence can be defeated if the claimant can show that it was not possible for them to identify the person posting the statement, the claimant gave the operator a notice of complaint in relation to that statement and the operator did not respond to the notice of complaint in accordance with these regulations.
Regulation 1 makes provision in paragraph (3) about the calculation of the time limits which apply to actions which must be taken by the website operator. Its effect is to exclude from the calculation of the 48 hour period any time which occurs on a weekend or public holiday.
Regulation 2 sets out the information which must be contained in a notice of complaint in order for it to be valid. These requirements are additional to the requirements set out in section 5(6)(a) to (c) of the Act.
Regulation 3 and the Schedule provide for the steps which a website operator must take on receiving a valid notice of complaint in order to benefit from the defence provided by section 5 of the Act.
Regulation 4 applies where a website operator receives a notice alleging that a statement on the operator’s website is defamatory but that notice does not comply with section 5(6) of the Act and these regulations. In such a case these provisions provide that, in order to benefit from the defence in section 5 of the Act, the website operator must notify the person making the complaint of the requirements of the Act and these regulations.
Regulation 5 gives the court discretion to treat any action which was taken outside the time required by regulation 4 and the Schedule to be treated as though it was taken within that time limit. The court may exercise this discretion if it considers it in the interests of justice to do so.
An impact assessment has not been produced for these regulations but an impact assessment was produced for the relevant part of the Defamation Bill and the relevant section is available alongside this instrument on www.legislation.gov.uk.
Latest Available (revised):The latest available updated version of the legislation incorporating changes made by subsequent legislation and applied by our editorial team. Changes we have not yet applied to the text, can be found in the ‘Changes to Legislation’ area.
Original (As Enacted or Made): The original version of the legislation as it stood when it was enacted or made. No changes have been applied to the text.
Explanatory Memorandum sets out a brief statement of the purpose of a Statutory Instrument and provides information about its policy objective and policy implications. They aim to make the Statutory Instrument accessible to readers who are not legally qualified and accompany any Statutory Instrument or Draft Statutory Instrument laid before Parliament from June 2004 onwards.
Access essential accompanying documents and information for this legislation item from this tab. Dependent on the legislation item being viewed this may include:
Impact Assessments generally accompany all UK Government interventions of a regulatory nature that affect the private sector, civil society organisations and public services. They apply regardless of whether the regulation originates from a domestic or international source and can accompany primary (Acts etc) and secondary legislation (SIs). An Impact Assessment allows those with an interest in the policy area to understand:
Use this menu to access essential accompanying documents and information for this legislation item. Dependent on the legislation item being viewed this may include:
Click 'View More' or select 'More Resources' tab for additional information including: