35.—(1) Subject to the provisions of this regulation, the person or persons conducting misconduct proceedings in the case of an officer other than a senior officer may—
(a)impose any of the disciplinary action in paragraph (3)(a) or (b) or (7)(b) as appropriate; or
(b)where he or they find the conduct amounts to misconduct but not gross misconduct following a misconduct meeting or hearing, record a finding of misconduct but take no further action.
(2) Subject to the provisions of this regulation, at a meeting or hearing held under regulation 34 the appropriate authority may—
(a)impose any of the disciplinary action in paragraph (3)(a) or (b) or (7)(b) as appropriate; or
(b)where the finding set out in the report is that the conduct amounted to misconduct but not gross misconduct, record a finding of misconduct but take no further action.
(3) The disciplinary action is—
(a)at a misconduct meeting or a further meeting held under regulation 34(1)(a)—
(i)management advice;
(ii)written warning; or
(iii)final written warning;
(b)at a misconduct hearing or a further hearing held under regulation 34(1)(b)—
(i)management advice;
(ii)written warning;
(iii)final written warning;
(iv)dismissal with notice; or
(v)dismissal without notice.
(4) The disciplinary action referred to in paragraph (3) shall have effect from the date on which it is notified to the officer concerned and in the case of dismissal with notice, the person or persons imposing the disciplinary action shall decide the period of notice to be given, subject to a minimum period of 28 days.
(5) Where there is a finding that the conduct of the officer concerned amounts to misconduct but not gross misconduct, the officer may not be dismissed (whether with or without notice) unless a final written warning was in force on the date of the assessment of the conduct under regulation 12(1) or under paragraph 19B(2) or (3) of Schedule 3 to the 2002 Act.
(6) Where, on the date of the assessment of the conduct under regulation 12(1) or under paragraph 19B(2) or (3) of Schedule 3 to the 2002 Act, the officer concerned had a written warning in force, a written warning shall not be given.
(7) Where, on the date of the assessment of the conduct under regulation 12(1) or under paragraph 19B(2) or (3) of Schedule 3 to the 2002 Act, the officer concerned had a final written warning in force—
(a)neither a written warning nor a final written warning shall be given; but
(b)subject to paragraph (9), in exceptional circumstances, the final written warning may be extended.
(8) Where a final written warning is extended under paragraph (7)(b), that warning shall remain in force for a period of 18 months from the date on which it would otherwise expire.
(9) A final written warning may be extended on one occasion only.
(10) Where there is a finding of gross misconduct and the person or persons considering the question of disciplinary action decide that the officer concerned shall be dismissed, the dismissal shall be without notice.
(11) Where the question of disciplinary action is being considered, the person or persons considering it—
(a)shall have regard to the record of police service of the officer concerned as shown on his personal record;
(b)may receive evidence from any witness whose evidence would, in his or their opinion, assist him or them in determining the question; and
(c)shall give—
(i)the officer concerned, his police friend or, at a misconduct hearing, his relevant lawyer; and
(ii)in the case of an officer other than a senior officer, the appropriate authority or person appointed to represent the appropriate authority in accordance with regulation 7(4);
an opportunity to make oral or written representations before any such question is determined.