Fitness to practise criteria
5.—(1) The Committee must have regard to the criteria specified in paragraph (2) or, where appropriate, (3), or, where appropriate, paragraphs (2) and (3), when deciding, in the case of any registrant, whether or not the requirements as to fitness to practise are met in relation to that registrant.
(2) In relation to evidence about the conduct or behaviour of the registrant which might cast doubt on whether the requirements as to fitness to practise are met in relation to the registrant, the Committee must have regard to whether or not that conduct or behaviour—
(a)presents an actual or potential risk to patients or to the public;
(b)has brought, or might bring, the profession of pharmacy into disrepute;
(c)has breached one of the fundamental principles of the profession of pharmacy; or
(d)shows that the integrity of the registrant can no longer be relied upon.
(3) In relation to evidence about the registrant’s physical or mental health which might cast doubt on whether the requirements as to fitness to practise are met in relation to the registrant, the Committee must have regard to whether or not that evidence shows actual or potential—
(a)self-harm; or
(b)harm to patients or to the public.