PART 1 Preliminary matters
1.Citation and commencement
2.Interpretation
3.Service of documents
4.Duty to provide information to the Registrar
5.Fitness to practise criteria
PART 2 Initial consideration by the Registrar
6.Initial action in respect of allegations
7.Notices of referral and documents to be supplied to persons concerned
8.Applications for restoration
PART 3 Consideration by the Investigating Committee
9.Procedures of the Investigating Committee
10.Agreement of undertakings by the Investigating Committee
11.Notices
12.Reconsideration of allegations
PART 4 Consideration by the Committee: initial stages
13.Action upon referral of an allegation
14.Disclosure provisions
15.Inspection of documents
16.Notices of hearing other than interim order hearings
17.Interim Order Notices and court referrals
18.Hearing bundles
19.Request for a case management meeting
20.Case management meetings
21.Case management directions
PART 5 Matters arising both before and during hearings
22.Practice directions
23.Clinical and other specialist advice
24.Evidence
25.Absence of the person concerned
26.Agreement of undertakings and giving of advice and warnings
27.Joinder of allegations for a joint hearing
28.Consideration of allegations that relate to more than one category of impairment
29.Consideration of additional allegations
30.Additional evidence for review hearings
PART 6 Procedure at hearings
31.Procedure at principal hearings before the Committee in fitness to practise proceedings
32.Procedure at principal hearings before the Committee in disqualification proceedings
33.Procedure in relation to hearings of registration cases before the Committee
34.Procedure at review hearings
35.Procedure at restoration hearings
36.Procedure at interim order hearings
PART 7 General
37.Postponements and adjournments
38.Disposal of allegations without hearings
39.Attendance of the public at hearings
40.Representation
41.Amendment of the particulars of the allegation at principal hearings
42.Burden and standard of proof
43.Witness evidence
44.Vulnerable witnesses at hearings
45.Review of undertakings
46.Costs of the hearing
47.Notes and transcripts of hearings
The General Pharmaceutical Council makes these Rules in exercise of the powers conferred by articles 48(1)(b), 51(5), 52(1) and (2), 57(3), 61(1) to (3) and (6), 63(4), 64(8) and 66(1) of, and paragraph 5 of Schedule 1 to, the Pharmacy Order 2010(1).
In accordance with article 66(3) of that Order, the General Pharmaceutical Council has, in relation to the rules under Parts 6 and 7 of that Order, consulted such persons or organisations as it considered appropriate including the persons and organisations listed in paragraphs (a) to (h) of article 66(3) of that Order.
1. These Rules may be cited as the General Pharmaceutical Council (Fitness to Practise and Disqualification etc.) Rules 2010 and come into force on 27th September 2010.
2.—(1) In these Rules—
“the Act” means the Medicines Act 1968(2);
“the Order” means the Pharmacy Order 2010;
“allegation” means a criminal conduct allegation, a disqualification allegation, a fitness to practise allegation or a health allegation;
“the Appeals Committee Rules” means the General Pharmaceutical Council (Appeals Committee) Rules 2010(3);
“applicant concerned” means an applicant (or, where appropriate their representatives) for—
registration or renewal of registration whose application has been referred to the Committee for advice;
restoration of registration;
“the chair” means the chair of the Committee;
“the Committee” means the Fitness to Practise Committee established by virtue of article 4(6)(b) of the Order;
“criminal conduct allegation” means a complaint to, or concern of, the Council which gives rise or may give rise to criminal proceedings under any enactment;
“disqualification allegation” means a complaint to, or concern of, the Council which gives rise to, or may give rise to, an inquiry under Part 4 of the Act;
“fitness to practise allegation” means a complaint to, or concern of, the Council which is an allegation for the purposes of article 52(1), 53(1) or 54(1) of the Order, as appropriate;
“health allegation” means a complaint to, or a concern of, the Council which gives rise to, or may give rise to, an inquiry that a person’s fitness to practise is impaired by reason of article 51(1)(c) of the Order;
“informant” means a person who makes a complaint, or who raises a concern, to the Council relating to any person;
“interim order” means an interim order under article 56 of the Order;
“interim order hearing” means a hearing solely for the purposes of considering whether to make, confirm, vary, replace or revoke an interim order;
“legal adviser” means the person appointed to be a legal adviser under, or by virtue of rules under, article 63(1) of the Order in relation to the proceedings in question;
“parties” means the Council and the person concerned (or, where appropriate, their representatives) and “party”, except in the phrase “section 80 party”, is to be construed accordingly;
“person concerned” means, as the case may be, an applicant concerned, a registrant concerned or a section 80 party;
“prescribed fee” means a fee prescribed in rules under article 36(1) of the Order;
“the presenter” means the person instructed to represent the Council at a hearing (and includes employees of the Council);
“principal hearing” means—
in fitness to practise proceedings, a hearing of the Committee held in connection with making a determination under article 54(1) of the Order (as opposed to any further hearing to consider varying or revoking any direction given as a consequence of a finding of impairment); and
in disqualification proceedings, a hearing of the Committee held in connection with giving a direction under section 80 of the Act;
“registrant concerned” in the context of fitness to practise proceedings or proceedings under Part 4 of the Registration Rules, means the registrant who is the subject of the allegation or investigation to which those proceedings relate (or, where appropriate, their representatives);
“Registration Rules” means the General Pharmaceutical Council (Registration) Rules 2010(4);
“restoration hearing” means a hearing in fitness to practise proceedings to consider an application for restoration to the Register;
“review hearing” means a hearing for the purpose of—
reviewing directions issued by the Committee under article 54(2)(d) or (e) of the Order;
reviewing undertakings agreed by the Committee; or
revoking a direction by virtue of section 83(1) of the Act;
“secretary” means, except in relation to references to the secretary of the Investigating Committee, the secretary of the Committee;
“section 80 party” means an individual who, or a body corporate which, is subject to proceedings before the Committee in connection with the giving of a direction under section 80(1) or (4) of the Act (or, where appropriate, their representatives);
“threshold criteria” means the criteria published by the Council under article 52(2)(a) of the Order, as amended from time to time;
“witness” means a person who gives evidence, or whose evidence is received, at a hearing.
(2) For the purposes of these Rules—
(a)a meeting or hearing of the Committee, other than when it is deliberating in private, is considered to be “in private” if it is held in the presence of—
(i)the parties and any person present who is representing a party,
(ii)the person acting as secretary,
(iii)any witness giving evidence,
(iv)any legal, clinical or specialist adviser,
(v)any person responsible for the recording of the proceedings, or
(vi)any other person whose presence is deemed necessary by the chair,
but otherwise excluding everyone else; and
(b)a meeting of the Investigating Committee and the private deliberations of that Committee are considered to be “in private” if they are held in the presence of—
(i)the person acting as secretary to that Committee,
(ii)any legal, clinical or specialist adviser, or
(iii)any person responsible for the recording of the proceedings,
but otherwise excluding everyone else.
3.—(1) Subject to paragraph (2), any notice or document required to be served by the Council under these Rules must be in writing and may be served by sending it by a postal service or another delivery service (including, with the agreement of the person concerned, by electronic mail to an electronic mail address notified to the Registrar as an address for communications) or by leaving it at—
(a)in the case of a registrant, their address as entered in the Register;
(b)in relation to premises included in Part 3 of the Register, where the business carried on from those premises is carried on by—
(i)an individual, their home address entered in the Register,
(ii)a body corporate, its registered office address or principal office,
(iii)a partnership, its principal office; or
(c)in the case of an applicant who is not a registrant, the last known home address of the applicant.
(2) If a person to whom a notice is to be sent under these Rules so requests, notices or documents may be sent to or left at—
(a)where the person is represented by a solicitor, the solicitor’s practising or electronic mail address; or
(b)where the person is represented by a defence organisation or trade union, the business or electronic mail address of that defence organisation or trade union.
(3) Where any notice or document is sent on behalf of the Investigating Committee or of the Committee by a postal service, unless sent by a service which records the date of delivery, it must be sent by first class post and is to be treated as having been served on the day after the day on which it was posted.
(4) Where a notice or document has been sent by electronic mail or left at an address, it is to be treated as having been served on the day on which it was sent, or left at that address.
4.—(1) A registrant must notify the Registrar in writing of the events specified in paragraph (2) within the period of 7 days starting on the day on which the event occurs.
(2) Those events are if the registrant—
(a)is convicted of any criminal offence;
(b)accepts a police caution;
(c)has, in summary proceedings in Scotland in respect of an offence, been the subject of an order discharging the registrant absolutely (without proceeding to conviction);
(d)has accepted a conditional offer under section 302 of the Criminal Procedure (Scotland) Act 1995(5) (fixed penalty: conditional offer by procurator fiscal);
(e)has agreed to pay a penalty under section 115A of the Social Security Administration Act 1992(6) (penalty as an alternative to prosecution);
(f)is notified by a regulatory body in the United Kingdom responsible under any enactment for the regulation of a health or social care profession of a determination to the effect that their fitness to practise is impaired, or a determination by a regulatory body elsewhere to the same effect;
(g)becomes subject to an investigation into their fitness to practise by another regulatory body (apart from the Council);
(h)becomes the subject of any fraud investigation by a body responsible for investigating fraud in relation to the health service (for example, the NHS Counter Fraud and Security Management Service, the NHS Business Services Authority or the NHS Scotland Counter Fraud Services, which is part of the Common Services Agency); or
(i)is removed, contingently removed or suspended from, refused admission to or conditionally included in any list held by a health service body of performers or providers of pharmaceutical services on fitness to practise grounds.
5.—(1) The Committee must have regard to the criteria specified in paragraph (2) or, where appropriate, (3), or, where appropriate, paragraphs (2) and (3), when deciding, in the case of any registrant, whether or not the requirements as to fitness to practise are met in relation to that registrant.
(2) In relation to evidence about the conduct or behaviour of the registrant which might cast doubt on whether the requirements as to fitness to practise are met in relation to the registrant, the Committee must have regard to whether or not that conduct or behaviour—
(a)presents an actual or potential risk to patients or to the public;
(b)has brought, or might bring, the profession of pharmacy into disrepute;
(c)has breached one of the fundamental principles of the profession of pharmacy; or
(d)shows that the integrity of the registrant can no longer be relied upon.
(3) In relation to evidence about the registrant’s physical or mental health which might cast doubt on whether the requirements as to fitness to practise are met in relation to the registrant, the Committee must have regard to whether or not that evidence shows actual or potential—
(a)self-harm; or
(b)harm to patients or to the public.
6.—(1) The Registrar may only refer an allegation where—
(a)the person concerned is identifiable; and
(b)the allegation is capable of being referred.
(2) The Registrar must not refer the allegation where—
(a)in the case of a fitness to practise allegation, the allegation is of a type stated in the threshold criteria which should not be referred;
(b)more than five years have elapsed since the most recent events referred to in the allegation unless the Registrar considers that it is necessary for the protection of the public, or otherwise in the public interest, for the allegation to be referred; or
(c)the allegation is made by an informant who—
(i)is anonymous and the allegation is not capable of verification from an independent source; or
(ii)is identifiable but does not participate in the consideration of the allegation and the allegation is not capable of verification from an independent source.
(3) The Registrar’s consideration of an allegation under paragraphs (1) and (2) may include the carrying out of any investigations which, in the Registrar’s opinion, are appropriate to the consideration of it.
(4) Investigations referred to in paragraph (3) may include—
(a)requesting the Council’s employees to undertake further inquiries;
(b)requesting the informant to provide a written statement or statutory declaration;
(c)instructing solicitors and inquiry agents; or
(d)in relation to a health allegation, requiring the person concerned to agree to be medically examined by a registered medical practitioner nominated by the Council.
(5) The allegation must be referred to the Committee instead of to the Investigating Committee if the Registrar considers that—
(a)the Committee should consider making an interim order, and if the Registrar does so consider, the Registrar must notify the Committee accordingly; or
(b)the public interest is best served by urgent consideration of the case.
(6) The Registrar must also refer an allegation to the Committee instead of to the Investigating Committee if—
(a)it relates to a conviction for one or more criminal offences and the sentence imposed in respect of one offence or in respect of some or all of those offences, is a custodial or suspended custodial sentence;
(b)it relates to a determination by a regulatory body in the United Kingdom responsible under any enactment for the regulation of a health or social care profession that the registrant’s fitness to practise is impaired.
(7) The Registrar may refer an allegation to the Committee instead of to the Investigating Committee where—
(a)in so far as the allegation relates to an entry in the Register, the Registrar has reasonable grounds for believing that that entry may have been fraudulently procured or incorrectly made; and
(b)the Registrar considers that the allegation should be so referred.
(8) Where the Registrar refers an allegation to the Committee under paragraph (5), (6) or (7), the Registrar must inform the person concerned and the informant, if any, that the allegation has been so referred.
7.—(1) Once the Registrar has taken a decision to refer a fitness to practise allegation or a disqualification allegation to the Investigating Committee, the Registrar must—
(a)send to the person concerned a notice of referral to the Investigating Committee;
(b)provide that person with—
(i)copies of all documentation, including summaries of relevant information, to be placed by the Registrar before the Investigating Committee, and
(ii)a copy of the threshold criteria.
(2) The notice of referral to the Investigating Committee must in terms—
(a)particularise the allegation;
(b)set out any recommendations for disposal of the case made by the Registrar;
(c)specify a date for the meeting of the Investigating Committee which will consider the allegation, which must be no less than 28 days after the date of service of the notice of referral;
(d)inform the person concerned of the Investigating Committee’s powers—
(i)to dismiss the case,
(ii)in relation to a health allegation, to require the person concerned to undergo a medical examination,
(iii)to issue warnings,
(iv)to agree undertakings,
(v)to give advice to the person concerned or to other persons,
(vi)to refer the matter to the Committee, and
(vii)in respect of the initiation of criminal proceedings;
(e)invite the person concerned to indicate, no later than 21 days after the date of service of the notice, whether the particulars of the allegation set out in the notice are admitted or denied;
(f)invite the person concerned to provide written representations on the allegation, and on any recommendations for disposal of the case made by the Registrar;
(g)state that any written representations must be submitted to the Investigating Committee no later than 21 days after the date of service of the notice;
(h)inform the person concerned that any representations, or extracts of any representations, received may be shown to the informant, if any, for comment;
(i)inform the person concerned that the Investigating Committee may seek further information from any source for the purposes of carrying out its functions in investigating the allegation, including from the person concerned’s employer, if any.
(3) A person who is the subject of a criminal conduct allegation must not be notified where that allegation is referred to the Investigating Committee, unless that person is a registrant and the allegation is being referred together with a fitness to practise or a disqualification allegation.
8.—(1) Subject to the following provisions of this rule, any person applying for restoration to Part 1 or 2 of the Register under article 57 of the Order must apply using the relevant application form, which is to be in such form as the Council may from time to time determine.
(2) The application form must (amongst other matters)—
(a)require persons applying under paragraph (1) to—
(i)provide their full home address and contact details (including a telephone number and electronic mail address, where possible),
(ii)give reasons for saying that their fitness to practise is no longer impaired,
(iii)specify the part of the Register to which they are applying to be restored,
(iv)provide any necessary supporting documentation, as mentioned in paragraph (3), and
(v)sign and date the application; and
(b)include a demand that any relevant prescribed fee be paid.
(3) Persons applying for restoration to Part 1 or, as the case may be, Part 2 of the Register under article 57 of the Order must provide to the Registrar, together with their completed application form—
(a)at least two certificates attesting to their identity and good character, one of which must be given by a registrant in good standing with the Council;
(b)sufficient evidence to demonstrate their fitness to return to practice, which may include—
(i)evidence of activities designed to address or learn from the original allegation,
(ii)evidence of learning activities designed to keep up to date with skills and knowledge, and with developments in practice, and
(iii)evidence demonstrating insight into the gravity of the allegation which resulted in their removal from the register; and
(c)any necessary supporting documentation, information or evidence as mentioned in the completed application form, and such additional documents, information or evidence as the Registrar may reasonably require for the purposes of verifying the information in, or determining, the application.
(4) The Registrar must not accept a certificate of the type referred to in paragraph (3)(a) as a valid part of the application unless there is an indication on the face of the certificate that the person signing it—
(a)knows why the person was removed from Part 1 or, as the case may be, Part 2 of the Register; and
(b)has seen a copy of the reasons given for the person’s removal from the relevant part of the Register.
(5) The Registrar must refuse the application if the relevant prescribed fee is not paid.
9.—(1) The Investigating Committee is to meet in private.
(2) The Investigating Committee may not hear oral evidence.
(3) Before disposing of any allegation before it, the Investigating Committee—
(a)must—
(i)consider all documents and recommendations placed before it by the Registrar, and
(ii)have regard to its own published referral criteria;
(b)may—
(i)direct that further investigations should be undertaken,
(ii)obtain advice from a legal, clinical or other specialist adviser, and
(iii)adjourn its consideration of an allegation until such time as any further information has been obtained, any comments from the informant, if any, are received, or where the person concerned has undergone a medical examination, a report on the person concerned has been prepared.
(4) In fitness to practise or disqualification proceedings (whether or not a criminal conduct allegation is also being considered in relation to the person concerned), the Investigating Committee—
(a)must in all cases—
(i)consider any written representations received from the person concerned, and
(ii)have regard to any relevant practice directions issued by the chair; and
(b)may send any written representations received from the person concerned to the informant, if any, for comment.
(5) In relation to a health allegation, the Investigating Committee may—
(a)require the person concerned to agree to be medically examined by a registered medical practitioner nominated by the Council; and
(b)where it receives information that the person concerned has refused to co-operate fully with a medical examination, refer that matter to the Committee as a separate allegation.
(6) Where the Investigating Committee decides to refer an allegation to the Committee and is of the view that—
(a)case management directions should be issued; or
(b)an interim order should be made,
it must notify the Committee accordingly.
(7) The Investigating Committee must not refer any—
(a)fitness to practise allegation to the Committee unless it is satisfied that there is a real prospect that the Committee will make a finding that the registrant’s fitness to practise is impaired; or
(b)disqualification allegation to the Committee unless it is satisfied that there is a real prospect that the Committee will make a direction for disqualification.
10.—(1) Where the registrant concerned admits that their fitness to practise is impaired, the Investigating Committee may, if it thinks fit, dispose of fitness to practise proceedings by agreeing undertakings with the registrant concerned (that is, that the registrant concerned will comply with such undertakings as the Committee considers appropriate), instead of referring the allegation to the Committee.
(2) Where the Investigating Committee has disposed of a case in accordance with paragraph (1) and it subsequently receives information that those undertakings have not been complied with, it may—
(a)refer the original allegation to the Committee and treat the failure to comply with the undertakings as a separate allegation of misconduct and refer that allegation to the Committee; or
(b)determine not to refer the original allegation to the Committee but treat the failure to comply with the undertakings as a separate allegation of misconduct and refer that allegation to the Committee.
(3) Where the Investigating Committee has disposed of a case in accordance with paragraph (1) and it subsequently receives information that those undertakings may no longer be appropriate, it may—
(a)with the agreement of the registrant concerned, vary those undertakings; or
(b)determine that those undertakings no longer apply.
11.—(1) In the case of a fitness to practise allegation, the information to be provided by the Registrar under article 53(2)(b) or (3)(c) of the Order or under rule 6(8) must be in a notice which is to be sent to the registrant concerned and the informant, if any, no later than 10 days after the date on which the relevant decision was made or, as the case may be, the allegation was referred.
(2) In the case of a disqualification allegation, the secretary to the Investigating Committee must inform the section 80 party of the decision of the Investigating Committee to refer, or not to refer, the allegation, and must do so in a notice of decision which is to be sent to the party no later than 10 days after the date on which the relevant decision was made.
(3) The notice under paragraph (1) or (2) must include the reasons for the decision or the referral and be accompanied by any legal advice considered by the Investigating Committee or the Registrar.
(4) Where the Investigating Committee has decided not to refer an allegation to the Committee, the notice under paragraph (1) or (2) must inform the person concerned that the Investigating Committee may nevertheless reconsider the allegation in the circumstances set out in rule 12.
(5) Where the Investigating Committee has decided to dispose of the allegation by agreeing undertakings or issuing a warning, the notice under paragraph (1) or (2) must, subject to paragraph (6), be accompanied by a statement setting out the undertakings or the warning.
(6) The statement referred to in paragraph (5) must not be sent to the informant if it includes undertakings relating to the health of a person concerned.
(7) If the statement relates to undertakings, it must also state, in terms, that if the Investigating Committee subsequently receives information that those undertakings have not been complied with, it may—
(a)refer the original allegation to the Committee and treat the failure to comply with the undertakings as a separate allegation of misconduct and refer that allegation to the Committee; or
(b)determine not to refer the original allegation to the Committee but treat the failure to comply with the undertakings as a separate allegation of misconduct and refer that allegation to the Committee.
(8) Where the Investigating Committee or the Registrar has referred the matter to the Committee, the notice under paragraph (1) or (2)—
(a)must particularise the matters to be referred; and
(b)where the Investigating Committee or the Registrar is of the view that the Committee should consider making an interim order, state the reasons for its view.
12.—(1) Where—
(a)the Investigating Committee has considered a fitness to practise or a disqualification allegation and decided not to refer it to the Committee; and
(b)within five years from the date of service of the notice given under rule 11, the Council receives a new allegation about the person concerned,
the Investigating Committee may take the action specified in paragraph (2).
(2) The Investigating Committee may—
(a)when considering whether or not to refer the new allegation to the Committee, have regard to the original allegation; and
(b)may refer both the original allegation and the new allegation to the Committee.
(3) Where the Investigating Committee has disposed of a fitness to practise or disqualification allegation, and within five years of that decision receives new evidence or information which makes the reconsideration of that decision—
(a)necessary for the protection of the public;
(b)necessary for the prevention of injustice to the person concerned; or
(c)otherwise necessary in the public interest,
it may reconsider the allegation.
(4) The Investigating Committee may reconsider an allegation where it receives information that the Council has erred in its administrative handling of the case and it is satisfied that it is necessary in the public interest to do so.
(5) Where the Investigating Committee has decided to reconsider a fitness to practise or disqualification allegation, the secretary to the Investigating Committee must—
(a)inform the person concerned and the informant, if any, of the decision to reconsider the allegation;
(b)inform the person concerned and, where appropriate, the informant, if any, of any new evidence or information;
(c)provide the person concerned and, where appropriate, the informant, if any, with copies of any new evidence and summaries of any new information received;
(d)seek written representations from the person concerned and the informant, if any, on—
(i)the decision to reconsider the allegation, and
(ii)any new evidence or information received (unless, in the case of the informant, if any, this has not been sent to the informant).
(6) Following reconsideration of the original allegation, the original decision not to refer the allegation to the Committee may be rescinded in appropriate circumstances.
(7) Following reconsideration of the allegation, a new notice must be sent as provided for in rule 11.
13.—(1) After referral of an allegation by the Registrar or the Investigating Committee to the Committee—
(a)in the case of a health allegation, the chair may require the person concerned to agree to be medically examined by a registered medical practitioner nominated by the Council;
(b)the Registrar must take such steps as, in the Registrar’s opinion, are desirable or necessary to assist the Council in the preparation of the case for hearing; and
(c)the secretary must serve on both of the parties a listing questionnaire, which must be in the format determined by the secretary.
(2) In a case where the Registrar has referred an allegation to the Committee instead of to the Investigating Committee, the Council may request a case management meeting.
14.—(1) As soon as is reasonably practicable after the date on which the person concerned is served with the notice given under rule 11 (“the referral date”), the Council must serve on the person concerned—
(a)finalised particulars of the allegation, sufficiently particularised to enable them to understand the allegation;
(b)any statements of evidence, expert reports or other documents relied upon by the Council in support of its case, not previously served upon the person concerned;
(c)any evidence or documents that the Council has in its possession (other than documents for which privilege is claimed) which, whilst not relied upon by the Council, may assist the person concerned in the preparation of their defence;
(d)a list of witnesses whose evidence is (or whose oral evidence will be) relied upon by the Council in support of its case;
(e)a copy of the listing questionnaire duly completed by the Council; and
(f)any time estimate for the duration of the Council’s case.
(2) As soon as reasonably practicable after the date of service of the material set out in paragraph (1), the person concerned must serve on the secretary—
(a)an agreed time estimate for the duration of the hearing; and
(b)a copy of the listing questionnaire, duly completed by the person concerned.
(3) If the parties are unable to agree a time estimate for the duration of the hearing, they must request case management directions.
(4) As soon as reasonably practicable after the date of service of the material set out in paragraph (1) and in any event, not less than 28 days before the date of the hearing, the person concerned must serve on the Council—
(a)any statements of evidence (including witness statements), expert reports or other documents; and
(b)a list of witnesses whose evidence is (or whose oral evidence will be),
relied upon by the person concerned in support of their case.
(5) The parties must notify the secretary of any changes to the agreed time estimate for the hearing or to the information provided by the parties in the listing questionnaire as soon as possible after becoming aware that that estimate or information has changed.
15.—(1) At any time after the service of a document by a party under this Part, up until the commencement of the relevant hearing, the party being served with the document may serve notification on the other party in possession of the original version of the document that the party wishes to inspect and examine it.
(2) The party in possession of the original version of the document must provide facilities for its inspection and examination—
(a)within 10 days from the date on which the request was notified; or
(b)if the request is notified less than 10 days before the date on which the relevant hearing commences, as soon as is reasonably practicable to provide those facilities.
16.—(1) Where the Committee is to hold a hearing, other than an interim order hearing, the secretary must serve a Notice of Hearing on the parties no less than 28 days before the date fixed for the hearing.
(2) The Notice of Hearing must—
(a)state the date, time and venue of the hearing;
(b)in the case—
(i)of a principal hearing, contain the finalised particulars of the allegation,
(ii)where the Registrar is seeking the advice of the Committee under—
(aa)rule 10(8) of the Registration Rules, contain a statement of the Registrar’s grounds for believing that the applicant’s fitness to practise may be impaired for reasons other than adverse physical or mental health,
(bb)rule 10(10) of the Registration Rules, contain a statement of the Registrar’s grounds for believing that the applicant’s fitness to practise may be impaired because of adverse physical or mental health, and
(cc)rule 20(2)(a) of the Registration Rules for the purposes of making findings of fact, contain a statement from the Registrar of the matters on which findings of fact are sought;
(c)where the Committee is to review directions previously given (including in relation to applications for restoration and applications under section 83 of the Act), contain a copy of the directions under review and the Committee’s reasons for making the directions;
(d)inform the person concerned of their right to attend and to be represented or accompanied at the hearing in accordance with rule 40;
(e)inform the person concerned that the Committee may proceed with the hearing in their absence in accordance with rule 25;
(f)inform the person concerned of—
(i)the relevant provisions of rules 31 to 35 relating to the procedure at the hearing,
(ii)the provisions relating to evidence set out in rule 24, and
(iii)the provisions relating to witness evidence set out in rules 43 and 44;
(g)require the person concerned to inform the secretary, within 14 days beginning with the date on which the Notice of Hearing is served, whether they intend to—
(i)attend the hearing,
(ii)be represented at the hearing, and if so, by whom,
(iii)seek to call any witnesses at the hearing, and if so whom,
(iv)in the case of a principal hearing, make any admissions in respect of the allegation, or
(v)where a case has been referred to the Committee under rule 20(2)(a) of the Registration Rules for the purposes of making findings of fact, make any admissions;
(h)if the person concerned is a registrant, inform them of the powers of the Committee to make an interim order;
(i)in the case of a principal hearing, inform the person concerned of the sanctions that may be imposed;
(j)in the case of a review hearing in fitness to practise proceedings, inform the registrant concerned of the Committee’s powers to vary or revoke any sanctions that have been imposed; and
(k)in the case of a restoration hearing, inform the applicant concerned of the Committee’s powers to impose conditions if they are restored to the register.
17.—(1) Where the Committee is to hold an interim order hearing, the secretary must serve on the registrant concerned an Interim Order Notice.
(2) The Interim Order Notice must—
(a)state the date, time and venue of the hearing;
(b)inform the registrant of their right to attend and to be represented or accompanied at the hearing in accordance with rule 40;
(c)inform the registrant that the Committee may proceed with the hearing in their absence in accordance with rule 25;
(d)require the registrant to inform the secretary, by a specified date, whether the registrant intends to—
(i)attend the hearing,
(ii)oppose the making of an interim order, and
(iii)be represented at the hearing, and if so, by whom;
(e)invite the registrant, if they do not wish to attend the hearing, to submit written representations to the Committee before the date of the hearing;
(f)if there is no interim order in force in relation to the registrant, state the reasons why the Council is seeking an interim order; and
(g)where the hearing is to review an interim order, include the terms of the order under review.
(3) The Interim Order Notice must be served on the registrant on a date which provides the registrant with reasonable notice of the hearing in the particular circumstances of the case.
(4) Where it appears to the secretary that an application should be made to the relevant court under article 56(5) of the Order to extend, or further extend, the period of an interim order, the secretary must advise the Committee accordingly, and the Committee may advise the Council to make the application.
18.—(1) This rule does not apply in respect of interim order hearings.
(2) Before any hearing, no later than 16 days before the Monday of the week in which the hearing is to take place before the Committee, the parties must serve on each other copies of the bundles on which they intend to rely at the hearing.
(3) No later than 9 days before the Monday of the week in which the hearing is to take place, the parties must serve on the secretary, 10 paginated copies of—
(a)where the bundle for the hearing has been agreed between the parties, the agreed bundle; or
(b)where the bundle for the hearing has not been agreed between the parties—
(i)any part of the bundle that has been agreed, and
(ii)a statement from the party seeking to rely on any disputed material why the party seeks to include it in their bundle;
(c)a statement of each party’s case; and
(d)where the case necessitates consideration of a point of law, each party’s skeleton argument.
(4) No later than 9 days before the Monday of the week in which the hearing is to take place, the parties must serve on the secretary a list indicating—
(a)any witness whose evidence has been agreed and who therefore does not need to be called; and
(b)any witness who is to be called to give oral evidence before the Committee.
(5) Any document which has not been served on the secretary by the end of the period specified in paragraph (3) is, except in exceptional circumstances, not to be admitted into evidence at the hearing.
19.—(1) A party to proceedings before the Committee may at any time serve on the secretary and the other party a written request for a case management meeting (in addition to the occasions on which they must, by virtue of these Rules, make such a request).
(2) The request must—
(a)state the reasons why the party is seeking a case management meeting;
(b)state what directions are sought for the management of the case (and the party may enclose draft directions where appropriate);
(c)state whether the person making the request seeks the participation of the parties at the meeting (and if so, the preferred format for that meeting) or whether the issues can be dealt with by way of directions without oral representations from the parties.
(3) The secretary shall send a copy of the request, together with any other material considered relevant, to the chair.
(4) The chair must agree to the request for a case management meeting unless the chair determines that the meeting is unnecessary or the request is an abuse of process.
20.—(1) Where requested by the chair, the secretary must list the matter for a case management meeting(7).
(2) The secretary must give the parties such notice of the meeting as is reasonable in the particular circumstances of the case.
(3) Case management meetings may be conducted by video link, teleconference or such other method as is agreed by the parties or, where the parties fail to agree, decided by the chair.
(4) The chair is to act independently of the parties and may give directions to secure the just, expeditious and effective running of the proceedings before the Committee.
(5) Case management meetings are to be held in private.
21.—(1) Case management directions may be issued—
(a)at a case management meeting;
(b)upon the request of a party (in circumstances where there is no request or requirement to hold a case management meeting); or
(c)by the chair of their own volition.
(2) Such case management directions may be issued as are considered necessary for the just and expeditious management of the case, and may include, but are not limited to—
(a)providing that either or both parties must comply with the provisions of rule 14, 15 or 18 within such period as may be specified in the direction;
(b)requiring the parties to obtain, and to disclose within a specified period, evidence and expert reports;
(c)requiring each party to provide an estimate of the length of the hearing and any dates on which they or any witnesses would not be able to attend the hearing;
(d)where facts are not in dispute or the allegation is admitted, requiring the parties to produce a statement of agreed facts;
(e)requiring the parties to state whether or not the health of the person concerned will be raised as an issue in the proceedings, and if so, whether, in their view, medical reports should be obtained;
(f)requiring a party to call the author of any expert report at the hearing;
(g)where agreed between the parties, directing that the witness statement of a witness is to stand as the evidence-in-chief of that witness;
(h)directing that special measures be put in place at the hearing for a vulnerable witness, including measures aimed at protecting the witness’s identity;
(i)requiring chronologies and additional skeleton arguments to be produced by the parties;
(j)directing that a further case management meeting should be held; and
(k)obtaining rulings from the Committee for the purpose of resolving questions of law or admissibility of evidence.
(3) Any rulings as mentioned in paragraph (2)(k) are binding on the Committee hearing the allegation.
(4) The secretary must keep a record of any case management directions given and must send written confirmation of such directions to the parties promptly.
(5) The Committee may draw such inferences as it considers appropriate in respect of the failure by a party to comply with case management directions.
22. The chair may issue practice directions of general application to any proceedings of the Committee.
23. The Committee may, at any time in the course of proceedings before it (including at a hearing), seek advice from—
(a)a clinical adviser, appointed under article 64(1)(a) of the Order, on a health related issue; or
(b)another specialist adviser, appointed under article 64(2)(a) of the Order, on issues falling within their speciality or related to it.
24.—(1) All questions of admissibility of evidence and law before the Committee are to be decided by the Committee (after having obtained the advice of the legal adviser, where appropriate).
(2) Subject only to the requirements of relevance and fairness, the Committee may receive—
(a)subject to paragraph (3), any documentary evidence; and
(b)where a hearing is held, any oral evidence,
whether or not such evidence would be admissible in any subsequent civil proceedings if the decision of the Committee were appealed to the relevant court.
(3) Where a party wishes to adduce a witness statement, the Committee may only receive such evidence if the statement—
(a)contains an attestation, in a format acceptable to the Committee, that the statement is true; and
(b)is signed by the person making it.
(4) Where a person concerned has been convicted of a criminal offence in the British Islands (and has not successfully appealed against the conviction), a copy of the certificate of conviction certified by a competent officer of the court or for a conviction in Scotland, an extract conviction, is admissible as conclusive proof of that conviction and the findings of fact on which it was based.
(5) The only evidence which may be adduced by the person concerned in rebuttal of a conviction certified or extracted in accordance with paragraph (4) is evidence for the purpose of proving that the person concerned is not the person referred to in the certificate or extract.
(6) Where it is alleged that an applicant or registrant has been included in a barred list (within the meaning of the Safeguarding Vulnerable Groups Act 2006(8) or the Safeguarding Vulnerable Groups (Northern Ireland) Order 2007(9)) by the Independent Barring Board (“the Board”)—
(a)information provided by the Secretary of State under the Safeguarding Vulnerable Groups Act 2006 or the Safeguarding Vulnerable Groups (Northern Ireland) Order 2007 that attests to that inclusion is to be conclusive proof of that inclusion, unless the applicant or registrant concerned can prove that they are not the person referred to in the information provided; and
(b)a document from the Board, authenticated in whatever way the Council may approve, that provides a statement of the findings of fact that led to that inclusion is conclusive proof of those facts.
(7) Where it is alleged that an applicant or registrant is included in the children’s or the adults’ list (within the meaning of the Protection of Vulnerable Groups (Scotland) Act 2007(10))—
(a)information provided by the Scottish Ministers under the Protection of Vulnerable Groups (Scotland) Act 2007 that attests to that inclusion is conclusive proof of that inclusion, unless the applicant or registrant concerned can prove that they are not the person referred to in the information provided; and
(b)a document from the Scottish Ministers, authenticated in whatever way the Council may approve, that provides a statement of the findings of fact that led to that inclusion is conclusive proof of those facts.
(8) A formal notification of a determination about a person’s fitness to practise made by a body responsible under any enactment for the regulation of a health or social care profession (in the United Kingdom or elsewhere), and signed by an officer authorised by that body to sign such a notification, is to be sufficient evidence, unless the contrary is proved, of any facts found proved by that regulatory body.
(9) The Committee may only allow a party to adduce written evidence at a hearing which has not been served in accordance with these Rules (or these Rules as modified by case management directions) in such exceptional circumstances as it may determine.
(10) In determining whether a registrant’s fitness to practise is impaired by reason of physical or mental health, or when giving advice to the Registrar in relation to an applicant’s physical or mental health, the Committee may take into account, amongst other matters—
(a)a refusal by the person concerned to submit to medical examination;
(b)the current physical or mental condition of the person concerned;
(c)any continuing or episodic condition suffered by the person concerned; and
(d)any underlying condition suffered by the person concerned which, although in remission, is capable of causing impairment of fitness to practise if it recurs.
(11) Where the Committee finds that a registrant concerned has failed to comply with the standards, that failure—
(a)may be taken into account by the Committee in determining whether or not the registrant concerned’s fitness to practise is impaired; and
(b)is not, of itself, to be taken to establish that the registrant’s fitness to practise is impaired.
(12) In paragraph (11), “the standards” means the standards of conduct, ethics and performance (including the Council’s Code of Conduct, Ethics and Performance and the related guidance) published by the Council under article 48(2) of the Order.
25. Where the person concerned is neither present nor represented at any hearing and the Committee is satisfied that—
(a)service of the Notice of Hearing or the Interim Order Notice has been properly effected; or
(b)all reasonable efforts have been made to serve the person concerned with the Notice of Hearing or the Interim Order Notice,
the Committee may nevertheless proceed to consider and determine the matter or allegation.
26.—(1) The Committee may, if it thinks fit, dispose of fitness to practise proceedings by agreeing undertakings with the registrant concerned (that is, that the registrant will comply with such undertakings as the Committee considers appropriate) where they admit that their fitness to practise is impaired.
(2) The Committee may, if it thinks fit, dispose of disqualification proceedings by—
(a)agreeing undertakings with the section 80 party (that is, that the section 80 party will comply with such undertakings as the Committee considers appropriate); or
(b)giving advice or a warning,
instead of issuing a direction under section 80 of the Act.
27.—(1) Unless it is of the view that there is a risk of prejudice to the fairness of the proceedings, the Committee may consider and determine a fitness to practise or a disqualification allegation against two or more persons concerned at the same hearing where—
(a)the allegation against each person concerned arises out of the same circumstances; or
(b)in the view of the Committee, a joint hearing is necessary or desirable.
(2) Where a joint hearing is held—
(a)these Rules are to have effect in relation to the hearing with the necessary modifications directed by the chair; and
(b)each person concerned is to be able to exercise any of the rights granted to that person under these Rules whether or not any other person concerned wishes to exercise that right.
28.—(1) As regards any fitness to practise allegation before the Committee, if—
(a)the particulars of the allegation in the Notice of Hearing relate to more than one category of impairment of fitness to practise; and
(b)those particulars include a conviction or caution,
the chair must ensure (by adapting the procedure for the hearing, where necessary) that at the principal hearing, the Committee makes its findings of facts in relation to the allegations that do not relate to the conviction or caution before it hears and makes its findings of fact in relation to the conviction or caution.
(2) In the circumstances set out in paragraph (1), the chair must also ensure (by adapting the procedure for the hearing, where necessary), that the Committee only makes its decision as regards impairment of fitness to practise once it has made its finding of fact in relation to all the allegations set out in the Notice of Hearing.
29. Where, before a principal hearing, the Council becomes aware of an additional allegation against a person concerned—
(a)the Council may request case management directions; and
(b)the chair may, where they consider it just to do so, direct that the new allegation be considered at the same hearing as the allegation that has already been referred, and that these Rules are to apply as modified to take into account the particular circumstances of the case.
30. Where, before a review hearing, the Council becomes aware of new evidence which it wishes to bring to the attention of the Committee (for example, evidence of a failure to comply with conditions)—
(a)the Council may request case management directions; and
(b)the chair may direct that the new evidence be considered at the review hearing, and that these Rules are to apply as modified to take into account the particular circumstances of the case.
31.—(1) Unless the Committee determines otherwise, the order of proceedings at a principal hearing in fitness to practise proceedings is to be in accordance with paragraphs (2) to (18).
(2) The Committee must hear and consider any preliminary legal arguments.
(3) The chair must—
(a)where the registrant concerned is present, require the registrant to confirm their name, or
(b)otherwise, require the presenter to confirm the registrant concerned’s name.
(4) The person acting as secretary must read out the allegation and the alleged facts upon which it is based.
(5) The chair must inquire whether the registrant wishes to make any admissions.
(6) Where facts are admitted, the chair must announce that such facts have been found proved.
(7) Where facts remain in dispute, the presenter is to open the case for the Council and may adduce evidence and, subject to paragraph (19), call witnesses in support of it.
(8) The registrant may make submissions regarding whether sufficient evidence has been adduced to find the facts proved or to support a finding of impairment, and the Committee must consider and announce its decision as to whether any such submissions should be upheld.
(9) The registrant may open their case and may adduce evidence and, subject to paragraph (19), call witnesses in support of it.
(10) The Committee must consider and announce its findings of fact.
(11) The Committee must receive further evidence and hear any further submissions from the parties as to whether, on the basis of any facts found proved, the registrant’s fitness to practise is impaired.
(12) The Committee must consider and announce its finding on the question of whether the fitness to practise of the registrant is impaired, and give its reasons for that decision.
(13) The Committee may receive further evidence and hear any further submissions from the parties or from any other person who has a direct interest in the proceedings where the registrant’s fitness to practise is found to be impaired, as to the appropriate sanction, if any, to be imposed, including evidence as to any mitigating circumstances and any relevant matters in the previous history of the registrant concerned.
(14) The Committee must consider and announce its decision as to the appropriate course of action to be taken in respect of the registrant of those specified in article 54(2) of the Order and give its reasons for that decision.
(15) Where the Committee considers that it might make an order under article 60(2) or (4) of the Order in relation to the registrant’s registration (interim measures pending a direction taking effect), it must invite representations from the parties before considering and announcing whether it is to impose such an order, together with its reasons for that decision.
(16) The Committee must deal with any interim order in place in respect of the registrant.
(17) At any stage in the proceedings, before making a determination as to whether the registrant’s fitness to practise is impaired, the Committee may, having regard to the nature of the allegation under consideration, adjourn and direct that a clinical adviser or a specialist adviser be appointed to assist the Committee under article 64 of the Order.
(18) At any stage before making its decision as to a sanction, the Committee may adjourn for further information or reports to be obtained in order to assist it in exercising its functions.
(19) The chair may refuse to allow a witness to give oral evidence, or to give oral evidence on a particular matter—
(a)if not satisfied that the witness is in a position to provide relevant testimony; or
(b)if satisfied that all or part of the evidence that the witness is to provide, or is to provide on that matter, should have been disclosed to the party not calling the witness at an earlier stage in the proceedings.
(20) Notwithstanding the procedure set out in paragraphs (2) to (18), the Committee may allow the parties to make additional submissions at any time.
32.—(1) Unless the Committee determines otherwise, the order of proceedings at a principal hearing in disqualification proceedings is to be in accordance with paragraphs (2) to (17).
(2) The Committee must hear and consider any preliminary legal arguments.
(3) The chair must—
(a)where the section 80 party or a representative of the party is present, require the party or representative to confirm the party’s name, or
(b)otherwise, require the presenter to confirm the section 80 party’s name.
(4) The person acting as secretary must read out the allegation, and the alleged facts upon which it is based.
(5) The chair must inquire whether the section 80 party wishes to make any admissions.
(6) Where facts have been admitted, the chair must announce that such facts have been found proved.
(7) Where facts remain in dispute, the presenter is to open the case for the Council and may adduce evidence and, subject to paragraph (19), call witnesses in support of it.
(8) The section 80 party may make submissions regarding whether sufficient evidence has been adduced to find the facts proved and the Committee must consider and announce its decision as to whether any such submissions should be upheld.
(9) The section 80 party may open their case and may adduce evidence and, subject to paragraph (19), call witnesses in support of it.
(10) The Committee must consider and announce its findings of fact.
(11) In a case falling within section 80(1)(b) or (4)(b) of the Act, the Committee must consider and announce its finding on the question of whether, in its opinion, the offence or misconduct renders the section 80 party unfit to be a pharmacist or would so render the party if the party were a pharmacist and give its reasons for that decision.
(12) Paragraph (13) applies where—
(a)the decision under paragraph (11) is that the offence or misconduct renders the party unfit to be a pharmacist or would so render the party if the party were a pharmacist; or
(b)in a case falling within section 80(1)(c) of the Act, the failure in question is by a member of the board or any officer of, or person employed by, the body in question.
(13) Where this paragraph applies, the Committee must—
(a)receive evidence about the facts specified in section 81(2) of the Act; and
(b)consider whether, having regard to those facts, the board of the body corporate or, as the case may be, the representative, is to be regarded as responsible for the offence, misconduct or failure in question.
(14) The Committee may receive further evidence and hear any further submissions from the parties or from any other person who has a direct interest in the proceedings as to whether a direction under section 80(1) or (4) of the Act should be imposed, including evidence as to any mitigating circumstances and any relevant matters in the previous history of the section 80 party.
(15) The Committee must consider and announce its decision as to whether or not a direction under section 80(1) or (4) of the Act should be given and must give its reasons for that decision.
(16) Where the decision under paragraph (15) is that the direction should be given, the chair must agree to that decision.
(17) At any stage before making its decision as to disqualification, the Committee may adjourn for further information or reports to be obtained in order to assist it in exercising its functions.
(18) Where the Council becomes aware that a section 80 party has failed to comply with any undertakings agreed under rule 26(2)(a), the Committee must—
(a)resume its consideration of the matter (the procedure at the hearing being for the Committee to determine); and
(b)reconsider the sanction imposed, and may instead issue a direction under section 80(1) or, as the case may be, (4), of the Act.
(19) The chair may refuse to allow a witness to give oral evidence, or to give oral evidence on a particular matter—
(a)if not satisfied that the witness is in a position to provide relevant testimony; or
(b)if satisfied that all or part of the evidence that the witness is to provide, or is to provide on that matter, should have been disclosed to the party not calling the witness at an earlier stage in the proceedings.
(20) Notwithstanding the procedure set out in paragraphs (2) to (17), the Committee may allow the parties to make additional submissions at any time.
33.—(1) Unless the Committee determines otherwise, the order of proceedings where the Registrar is seeking the advice of the Committee—
(a)under rule 10(8) of the Registration Rules (which relates to whether the fitness to practise of an applicant for registration may be impaired for reasons other than adverse physical or mental health);
(b)under rule 10(10) of the Registration Rules (which relates to whether the fitness to practise of an applicant for registration may be impaired because of adverse physical or mental health);
(c)under rule 20(2)(a) of the Registration Rules (which relates to proceedings in respect of fraud or error or fitness to practise matters prior to registration); or
(d)under rule 9(1)(d) of the Appeals Committee Rules (which relates to where the Appeals Committee seeks the advice of the Committee),
is to be in accordance with paragraphs (2) to (10).
(2) The Committee must hear and consider any preliminary legal arguments.
(3) The chair must—
(a)where the applicant or registrant concerned is present, require the applicant or registrant concerned to confirm their name; or
(b)otherwise, require the presenter to confirm the applicant or registrant concerned’s name.
(4) The chair must inquire whether the applicant or registrant concerned wishes to make any admissions.
(5) Where facts have been admitted, the chair must announce that such facts have been found proved.
(6) Where facts remain in dispute, the presenter must open the case for the Council and may adduce evidence and, subject to paragraph (11), call witnesses in support of it.
(7) The applicant or registrant concerned may open their case, adduce evidence and, subject to paragraph (11), call witnesses in support of it.
(8) The presenter may adduce evidence in rebuttal of the position of the applicant or registrant concerned and in support of the position of the Council including, subject to paragraph (11), the calling of witnesses.
(9) The applicant or registrant concerned may make a closing statement.
(10) The Committee must announce its advice and, where appropriate, the reasons for its advice.
(11) The chair may refuse to allow a witness to give oral evidence, or to give oral evidence on a particular matter—
(a)if not satisfied that the witness is in a position to provide relevant testimony; or
(b)if satisfied that all or part of the evidence that the witness is to provide, or is to provide on that matter, should have been disclosed to the party not calling the witness at an earlier stage in the proceedings.
(12) Notwithstanding the procedure set out in paragraphs (2) to (10), the Committee may allow the parties to make additional submissions at any time.
34.—(1) Unless the Committee determines otherwise, the order of proceedings at a review hearing is to be in accordance with paragraphs (2) to (9).
(2) The Committee must hear and consider any preliminary legal arguments.
(3) The chair must—
(a)where the person concerned is present or represented, require the person concerned to confirm their name; or
(b)otherwise, require the presenter to confirm the person concerned’s name.
(4) The presenter —
(a)must inform the Committee of the background to the case, and the sanction previously imposed or undertaking entered into;
(b)must direct the attention of the Committee to any relevant evidence, including transcripts of previous hearings; and
(c)may adduce evidence and, subject to paragraph (10), call witnesses in relation to the person concerned’s fitness to practise or, as the case may be, their failure to comply with an undertaking or with any requirement imposed as a condition of registration.
(5) The person concerned may present their case, adduce evidence and, subject to paragraph (10), call witnesses in support of it.
(6) The Committee must receive further evidence and hear any further submissions from the parties—
(a)where the Committee has given a direction under article 54(2)(d) or (e) of the Order, as to what direction to give, if any, under article 54(3) of that Order;
(b)where the person concerned has given an undertaking, as to whether the person concerned has breached the undertaking;
(c)where the Committee has given a direction under section 80(1) or (4) of the Act, as to whether that direction should be revoked.
(7) The Committee must consider and announce its finding on the relevant question in paragraph (6) and give its reasons for that decision.
(8) The Committee must consider and announce its decision as to—
(a)the direction, if any, to be given under article 54(3) of the Order; or
(b)the revocation of the direction under section 80(1) or (4) of the Act,
and give its reasons for that decision.
(9) Where the Committee finds that an undertaking has not been complied with, it may—
(a)in fitness to practise proceedings, determine that the registrant’s fitness to practise is impaired on the basis of that failure to comply and make a determination under article 54(2) of the Order;
(b)in disqualification proceedings, treat the failure as misconduct and give a direction under section 80(1) or (4) of the Act.
(10) The chair may refuse to allow a witness to give oral evidence, or to give oral evidence on a particular matter—
(a)if not satisfied that the witness is in a position to provide relevant testimony; or
(b)if satisfied that all or part of the evidence that the witness is to provide, or is to provide on that matter, should have been disclosed to the party not calling the witness at an earlier stage in the proceedings.
(11) Notwithstanding the procedure set out in paragraphs (2) to (9), the Committee may allow the parties to make additional submissions at any time.
35.—(1) Unless the Committee determines otherwise, the order of proceedings at a restoration hearing is to be in accordance with paragraphs (2) to (9).
(2) The Committee must hear and consider any preliminary legal arguments.
(3) The chair must—
(a)where the applicant concerned is present, require the applicant concerned to confirm their name; or
(b)otherwise, require the presenter to confirm the applicant concerned’s name.
(4) The presenter—
(a)must address the Committee as to the background to the case and the circumstances in which the applicant’s name was removed from the register,
(b)must direct the attention of the Committee to any relevant evidence, including transcripts of previous hearings; and
(c)may adduce evidence and, subject to paragraph (11), call witnesses in relation to the applicant’s fitness to practise.
(5) The applicant may address the Committee, adduce evidence and, subject to paragraph (11), call witnesses in relation to any relevant matter, including their suitability for restoration to the register.
(6) The Committee may receive further evidence and hear any further submissions from the parties as to its decision whether to grant or refuse the application.
(7) The Committee must then consider and announce whether to grant or refuse the application and give its reasons for that decision.
(8) Before reaching a decision under paragraph (7), the Committee may adjourn and give such directions as it sees fit.
(9) Where the Committee adjourns under paragraph (8), it must—
(a)consider any assessment reports produced further to a direction under paragraph (8), together with any other relevant evidence and reports; and
(b)invite further representations and evidence from the parties,
before reaching a decision as to whether the applicant should be restored to the register.
(10) Where the Committee decides that a person should be restored to Part 1 or, as the case may be, Part 2 of the Register, the secretary must notify the Registrar accordingly.
(11) The chair may refuse to allow a witness to give oral evidence, or to give oral evidence on a particular matter—
(a)if not satisfied that the witness is in a position to provide relevant testimony; or
(b)if satisfied that all or part of the evidence that the witness is to provide, or is to provide on that matter, should have been disclosed to the party not calling the witness at an earlier stage in the proceedings.
(12) Notwithstanding the procedure set out in paragraphs (2) to (9), the Committee may allow the parties to make additional submissions at any time.
36.—(1) The order of proceedings at an interim order hearing is to be in accordance with paragraphs (2) to (8).
(2) The Committee must hear and consider any preliminary legal arguments.
(3) The chair must—
(a)where the registrant concerned is present, require the registrant concerned to confirm their name; or
(b)otherwise, require the presenter to confirm the registrant concerned’s name.
(4) The presenter must address the Committee regarding whether it is necessary to make or review an interim order in respect of the registrant concerned and, subject to paragraphs (9) to (11), may adduce evidence in this regard.
(5) The registrant may present their case and, subject to paragraphs (9) to (11), may adduce evidence in support of it.
(6) The parties and members of the Committee may put questions to any witness.
(7) Where the registrant gives oral evidence, the presenter and members of the Committee may put questions to the registrant.
(8) The Committee must announce its decision and give its reasons for that decision.
(9) The Committee may, subject to paragraphs (10) and (11), receive any evidence which appears to it to be fair and relevant to its consideration under article 56 of the Order.
(10) No person may give oral evidence at the hearing unless the Committee considers such evidence is desirable to enable it to discharge its functions.
(11) The Committee may, at any stage in the proceedings—
(a)with the consent of the registrant; or
(b)where it is satisfied that to do so would be desirable to enable it to discharge its functions,
allow a party to produce at the hearing any written evidence, notwithstanding that a copy has not been provided to the other party before the hearing or that its author is not being called as a witness.
(12) The Committee may vary the order of proceedings under paragraphs (2) to (8) where it is in the interests of justice to do so.
(13) Where—
(a)an interim order is being reviewed by the Committee; and
(b)the hearing is, or is likely to be, the last such hearing before the expiry of the interim order,
the Committee may, after making its determination, advise the Registrar that an application should be made to the relevant court for the interim order to be extended, or if it has been extended, further extended, under article 56(5) of the Order.
(14) Where the terms of the order to be made or continued, or the terms of the variation to the order, or its revocation, are agreed between the parties, the Committee may make an order in those terms without the need for a hearing.
37.—(1) The chair may, of their own motion or upon the application of a party, postpone any meeting or hearing of which notice has been given under these Rules before the hearing begins.
(2) The Committee may, of its own motion or upon the application of a party, adjourn the proceedings at any stage provided that—
(a)no injustice is caused to the parties; and
(b)the decision to adjourn is made after hearing representations from the parties (where present).
(3) In considering whether or not to grant a request for postponement or adjournment, the chair or the Committee must, amongst other matters, have regard to—
(a)the public interest in the expeditious disposal of the case;
(b)the potential inconvenience caused to a party or any witnesses to be called by that party;
(c)the conduct of the party seeking the postponement or adjournment; and
(d)fairness to the parties.
(4) Where a person concerned applies for a postponement or adjournment on grounds of ill- health—
(a)the person concerned must adduce appropriate medical certification in support of that application; and
(b)the chair or Committee may, if not satisfied by the medical certification produced, require the person concerned to submit to be examined by a registered medical practitioner approved by the Council.
(5) Where the proceedings have been postponed or adjourned, the secretary must, as soon as practicable, notify the parties of the date, time and venue of the postponed or resumed hearing.
38.—(1) Where—
(a)an allegation has been referred to the Committee by the Investigating Committee;
(b)a principal hearing has not yet taken place in the proceedings; and
(c)the presenter for either the principal hearing or an interim order hearing that relates to the allegation considers that, on the basis of the evidence available or other information in the possession of the Council, the hearing should not be held,
the presenter must inform the Investigating Committee of their opinion forthwith and of the reasons for their opinion.
(2) Upon receipt of the presenter’s opinion, the Investigating Committee must consider the matter and may give a direction that the referral to the Committee (either for a principal or an interim order hearing, or both) is rescinded.
(3) The Investigating Committee must not rescind a referral for a principal hearing without first giving the maker of the relevant allegation (if any) a reasonable opportunity to comment on the proposed rescission.
39.—(1) Except as provided for in this rule, hearings of the Committee must be held in public.
(2) Any hearing before the Committee relating to a health allegation, or an interim order hearing before the Committee, must be held in private, unless the Committee is satisfied—
(a)having given the parties (where present), and any third party from whom the Committee considers it appropriate to hear, an opportunity to make representations; and
(b)in the case of the hearing relating to a health allegation, having obtained the advice of the legal and clinical advisers,
that the public interest in holding the hearing in public outweighs the interest of the registrant concerned or the third party in maintaining their privacy.
(3) A hearing before the Committee other than a hearing referred to in paragraph (2) may be held wholly or partly in private if the Committee—
(a)has given the parties (where present), and any third party from whom the Committee considers it appropriate to hear, an opportunity to make representations; and
(b)is satisfied that the interest of the person concerned or the third party in maintaining their privacy outweighs the public interest in holding the hearing, or the part of the hearing, in public.
(4) The Committee may exclude from the whole or part of any hearing any person whose conduct, in its opinion, has disrupted or is likely to disrupt the proceedings.
40.—(1) The presenter is to be a person who is—
(a)a barrister, advocate or solicitor who falls within sub-paragraph (i) or (ii) of article 61(2)(c) of the Order;
(b)a solicitor in Scotland who does not fall within sub-paragraph (a); or
(c)an employee of the Council.
(2) The person concerned may be represented by a person who is—
(a)a barrister, advocate or solicitor who falls within sub-paragraph (i) or (ii) of article 61(2)(c) of the Order;
(b)a solicitor in Scotland who does not fall within sub-paragraph (a); or
(c)a representative from that party’s defence organisation or their trade union.
(3) Where the person concerned is not represented, they may be accompanied and advised by a supporter, but the supporter—
(a)must not be—
(i)a member of the Council or of one of its statutory committees,
(ii)an employee of the Council, or
(iii)a witness at the hearing; and
(b)may only address the Committee with the permission of the chair.
41.—(1) At a principal hearing, at any stage before making its findings of fact, the Committee may of its own motion or following an application of one of the parties, amend the particulars of the allegation set out in the Notice of Hearing, unless it is of the view that the required amendment would prejudice the fairness of the proceedings.
(2) Before making any amendment under paragraph (1), the Committee must consider—
(a)any representations from the parties (where present); and
(b)in the case of a hearing in relation to a health allegation, the advice of the legal and clinical advisers.
42.—(1) Where facts at a principal hearing are in dispute, the burden of proving the facts rests on the Council.
(2) At a restoration hearing, the Committee may only grant the application if the applicant has proved their entitlement to be registered.
(3) Where facts are in dispute, the Committee must consider whether they have been established in accordance with the civil standard of proof.
43.—(1) Witnesses are to be required to take an oath, or to affirm, before giving their oral evidence.
(2) The Council may not compel the person concerned to be a witness.
(3) A party may not call a person to be a witness unless that party has provided to the other party a written statement of evidence provided by the witness which meets the requirements of rule 24, at least 7 days before the date of the hearing, unless the chair determines otherwise.
(4) The Committee may, upon the application of the party calling the witness, direct that any details which may identify that witness must not be revealed in public.
(5) Where a witness’s first language is not English, the Committee may direct that their evidence be given through an interpreter.
(6) Witnesses other than the person concerned—
(a)must first be examined by the party calling them;
(b)may be cross-examined;
(c)may then be re-examined by the party calling them; and
(d)may then be questioned, with the leave of the chair, by the Committee or by a clinical, legal or specialist adviser.
(7) The parties may then question the witnesses on matters arising out of the Committee’s questions, with the party calling the witness being given the last opportunity to do so (as between the parties).
(8) Where the person concerned is a witness, they—
(a)must first be examined by the person representing them or, if there is no such person, must be questioned by the Committee through the chair;
(b)may then be cross-examined;
(c)may then be re-examined by the person representing them, if any; and
(d)may then be questioned, with the leave of the chair, by the Committee whether or not they are represented.
(9) Any further questioning of witnesses is to be at the discretion of the chair.
(10) Except for expert witnesses and the person concerned, witnesses are not to be allowed to attend the proceedings until after they have completed giving their evidence and been formally released by the chair.
44.—(1) In proceedings before the Committee, the following may, if the quality of their evidence is otherwise likely to be adversely affected, be treated as vulnerable witnesses—
(a)any witness under the age of 18;
(b)any witness with a mental disorder (within the meaning of the Mental Health Act 1983(11));
(c)any witness who is significantly impaired in relation to intelligence or social functioning;
(d)any witness with a physical disability who requires assistance to give evidence;
(e)any witness, where an allegation against a person concerned is of a sexual nature and the witness was the alleged victim; or
(f)any witness who complains of intimidation.
(2) Upon—
(a)hearing representations from the parties; and
(b)in relation to a health allegation, after seeking the advice of a legal adviser,
the Committee may adopt such measures as it considers necessary to enable it to receive evidence from a vulnerable witness.
(3) Measures adopted by the Committee may include, but are not to be limited to—
(a)use of video links;
(b)subject to paragraph (4), use of pre-recorded evidence as the evidence-in-chief of a witness, provided always that the witness is present at the hearing for cross-examination and questioning; and
(c)use of interpreters (including signers and translators).
(4) Where—
(a)there is an allegation against a person concerned of a sexual nature;
(b)a witness is the alleged victim; and
(c)the person concerned is not represented,
the person concerned is not to be allowed to cross-examine the witness directly in person.
(5) In the circumstances set out in paragraph (4), any questioning of the witness is to be undertaken by such person as the Committee considers appropriate.
45.—(1) Where undertakings have been agreed by the Committee under rule 26, the Registrar may carry out any investigations which may include (but are not limited to) requesting the provision of reports or directing an assessment to be carried out where, in the Registrar’s opinion these are appropriate to the consideration of—
(a)whether the registrant concerned or section 80 party has complied with any undertakings in place; or
(b)in the case of a registrant, the registrant concerned’s fitness to practise.
(2) Where, as a result of information received by the Council, it appears to the Registrar that any undertakings agreed under rule 26 should be varied or cease to apply, the Registrar must—
(a)invite the registrant concerned or section 80 party to agree such varied undertakings as appear to the Registrar to be appropriate; or
(b)direct that the undertakings are no longer to apply.
(3) Where the Registrar receives information that—
(a)the registrant concerned or section 80 party has failed to comply with an undertaking agreed under rule 26 or which, having been agreed under rule 26, has been varied following an invitation to comply with it under paragraph (2)(a); or
(b)in the case of a registrant, the registrant concerned’s health or performance has deteriorated or otherwise gives further concern regarding their fitness to practise,
the Registrar may refer the matter to the Committee for a review hearing.
46.—(1) Where a principal hearing, a review hearing or a restoration hearing is to be held, a party may serve on the other party, and on the secretary, a schedule of costs or expenses relating to or connected with that hearing no less than 24 hours before the date of the hearing.
(2) After announcing the Committee’s decision, the chair may invite representations as to whether costs or expenses should be assessed against either party.
(3) After hearing any representations from the parties, the Committee may, if it thinks fit and having regard to the party’s ability to pay, order that a party pay by a specified date all or part of the costs or expenses relating to the hearing incurred by the other party.
(4) Where the Committee orders a party to pay costs or expenses, the chair may—
(a)summarily assess the costs or expenses to be paid; or
(b)require the parties to agree either the figure for the costs or expenses to be awarded or for those costs or expenses to be assessed by a person appointed by the secretary.
(5) Where a person is appointed by the secretary in accordance with paragraph (4)(b), that person must also determine how the costs of the assessment are to be apportioned.
47.—(1) Subject to paragraph (3), the Committee must arrange for all hearings to be recorded in writing or electronic form.
(2) Any party to the proceedings must, on application to the Committee and on payment of any fee determined by the Council under article 65(1) of the Order, be furnished with a transcript of the record of any part of the hearing at which the party was entitled to be present.
(3) The private deliberations of the Committee must not be recorded.
1968 c.67. Relevant amendments are made by Schedule 4 to the Order.
Scheduled to S.I. 2010/1614.
Scheduled to S.I. 2010/1617.
1992 c.5; section 115A was inserted by the Social Security Administration (Fraud) Act 1997 (c.47), section 15.
By virtue of rule 18(3) of the General Pharmaceutical Council (Statutory Committees and their Advisers) Rules 2010 which are scheduled to S.I.2010/1616, a case management meeting must be conducted by the chair. By virtue of rule 21(4) of those Rules, if the chair is not legally qualified (as defined in rule 2 of those Rules), a legal adviser must also be present at a case management meeting.
1983 c.20. “Mental disorder” is defined in section 1(2) as any disorder or disability of the mind.